On 13/03/2015, David Wright wrote:
> Quoting Bret Busby (bret.bu...@gmail.com):
>> On 13/03/2015, David Wright wrote:
>> > Quoting Gajadur Dwijesh (dwije...@gmail.com):
>> >> Hi.
>> >> I got the same problem..
>> >> I followed this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DLlOd-a2wG0
>> >> and it wo
Quoting Bret Busby (bret.bu...@gmail.com):
> On 13/03/2015, David Wright wrote:
> > Quoting Gajadur Dwijesh (dwije...@gmail.com):
> >> Hi.
> >> I got the same problem..
> >> I followed this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DLlOd-a2wG0
> >> and it worked..i could dual boot windows 8.1 with Deb
On 13/03/2015, David Wright wrote:
> Quoting Gajadur Dwijesh (dwije...@gmail.com):
>> Hi.
>> I got the same problem..
>> I followed this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DLlOd-a2wG0
>> and it worked..i could dual boot windows 8.1 with Debian on UEFI mode
>
> Interesting. I played this through
Quoting Gajadur Dwijesh (dwije...@gmail.com):
> Hi.
> I got the same problem..
> I followed this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DLlOd-a2wG0
> and it worked..i could dual boot windows 8.1 with Debian on UEFI mode
Interesting. I played this through and at 506 seconds, I saw my first
EFI scr
Quoting Bret Busby (bret.bu...@gmail.com):
> I note that, after visiting the web page at
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unified_Extensible_Firmware_Interface
> to which I have been referred, in another message posted in this
> thread, I found
> "while Insyde Software offers InsydeH2O, its own impl
Curt a écrit :
> On 2015-03-11, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
>>> or, otherwise, interface with
>>> the UEFI/GPT system, so that the bootloader, GRUB 2, can find the MS
>>> Win8 installation within the UEFI system?
>> Probably not. At least not the Windows boot manager, which expects to be
>> loaded from
On Fri 13 Mar 2015 at 03:10:58 +0800, Bret Busby wrote:
> Does Debian Linux 7 support UEFI "Secure boot"?
The relevant threads are somewhat fragmented but a search with "Plan of
action for Secure Boot support" gives you all you want and more.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lis
On 12/03/2015, Bret Busby wrote:
> Okay.
>
> In thinking about this further, I remembered that, due to the
> malicious nature of MS Win8, it is installed with the nasty
> UEFI->Secure Boot mode, which maliciously disables the installation of
> any additional operating systems.
>
> And, I remember
On 13/03/2015, David Wright wrote:
> Quoting Bret Busby (bret.bu...@gmail.com):
>> The Setup Utility displays, in the Title Bar, "InsydeH20 Setup
>> Utility Rev. 3.7".
>>
>> The solution, at this stage, appears to be to use the Setup, to
>> change between UEFI and Legacy BIOS boot modes, thence
Hi.
I got the same problem..
I followed this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DLlOd-a2wG0
and it worked..i could dual boot windows 8.1 with Debian on UEFI mode
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 9:21 PM, David Wright
wrote:
> Quoting Bret Busby (bret.bu...@gmail.com):
> > The Setup Utility displays,
Quoting Bret Busby (bret.bu...@gmail.com):
> The Setup Utility displays, in the Title Bar, "InsydeH20 Setup
> Utility Rev. 3.7".
>
> The solution, at this stage, appears to be to use the Setup, to
> change between UEFI and Legacy BIOS boot modes, thence to select which
> operating system, I want
On 2015-03-12, Bret Busby wrote:
>
> I can "dual boot", within the Legacy BIOS system; I can select either
> Debian Linux 7, or, Ubuntu Linux 14.04, into which, to boot, from the
> Legacy BIOS GRUB menu.
Well, I meant boot the Windows 8. I should've said triple boot.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On 12/03/2015, Curt wrote:
> On 2015-03-11, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
>>
>>> or, otherwise, interface with
>>> the UEFI/GPT system, so that the bootloader, GRUB 2, can find the MS
>>> Win8 installation within the UEFI system?
>>
>> Probably not. At least not the Windows boot manager, which expects t
On 2015-03-11, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
>
>> or, otherwise, interface with
>> the UEFI/GPT system, so that the bootloader, GRUB 2, can find the MS
>> Win8 installation within the UEFI system?
>
> Probably not. At least not the Windows boot manager, which expects to be
> loaded from UEFI.
>
So he ca
On 11/03/2015, David Wright wrote:
> Quoting Bret Busby (bret.bu...@gmail.com):
>
>> I have now found that, against my wishes, the Linux installations were
>> done as "legacy BIOS" installations, instead of UEFI/GPT
>> installations, so I now have a system that (after repairing the nasty
>> PC-BSD
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 03:00:56PM +0800, Bret Busby wrote:
> Okay.
>
> In thinking about this further, I remembered that, due to the
> malicious nature of MS Win8, it is installed with the nasty
> UEFI->Secure Boot mode, which maliciously disables the installation of
> any additional operating sy
On Thursday, March 12, 2015 at 12:40:06 PM UTC+5:30, Bret Busby wrote:
> Okay.
>
> In thinking about this further, I remembered that, due to the
> malicious nature of MS Win8, it is installed with the nasty
> UEFI->Secure Boot mode, which maliciously disables the installation of
> any additional o
On Wednesday 11 March 2015 15:46:55 David Wright wrote:
> Quoting Bret Busby (bret.bu...@gmail.com):
> > I have now found that, against my wishes, the Linux installations were
> > done as "legacy BIOS" installations, instead of UEFI/GPT
> > installations, so I now have a system that (after repairin
Okay.
In thinking about this further, I remembered that, due to the
malicious nature of MS Win8, it is installed with the nasty
UEFI->Secure Boot mode, which maliciously disables the installation of
any additional operating systems.
And, I remember that the only way to amend that, to enable addit
On Wednesday 11 March 2015 23:53:37 David Wright wrote:
> A Debian version gets a codename long before it gets a number, even
> before it exists (like buster), and that name never changes. It only
> gets a number when it's released; in fact, it gets several: wheezy has
> nine so far.
Thanks, David
On Wednesday 11 March 2015 20:59:30 Bret Busby wrote:
> No, whilst for some of us find the numbers more meaningful and easier
> to understand, than version names, the discussion in the other thread,
> was, from my understanding, redefining the state names, rather than
> the version names.
>
> So, y
Quoting Bret Busby (bret.bu...@gmail.com):
> On 12/03/2015, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > On Wednesday 11 March 2015 16:34:15 David Wright wrote:
> >> Quoting Lisi Reisz (lisi.re...@gmail.com):
> >> > Debian *7*, David. Wheezy. It was released some time ago!!
> >>
> >> Touché. That just goes to show ho
Bret Busby a écrit :
>
> So, now, what happens when one operating system is installed via
> UEFI/GPT, and two are installed as BIOS/MBR, in terms of wanting to be
> able to select any one of the three operating systems, to boot?
Nothing special. Depending on its settings and priorities, the firmw
Bret Busby a écrit :
>
> Does Debian Linux 7 amd64, install as a UEFI/GPT operating system, or,
> is it strictly a "legacy BIOS"/FAT/MBR system
1) Don't associate UEFI/GPT or BIOS/FAT/MBR.
UEFI and BIOS/CSM/legacy are boot schemes.
GPT and MBR are partition schemes.
FAT is a just a filesystem typ
On 03/11/2015 04:59 PM, Bret Busby wrote:
On 12/03/2015, Lisi Reisz wrote:
On Wednesday 11 March 2015 16:34:15 David Wright wrote:
Quoting Lisi Reisz (lisi.re...@gmail.com):
On Wednesday 11 March 2015 15:46:55 David Wright wrote:
Quoting Bret Busby (bret.bu...@gmail.com):
I have now found t
On 12/03/2015, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Wednesday 11 March 2015 16:34:15 David Wright wrote:
>> Quoting Lisi Reisz (lisi.re...@gmail.com):
>> > On Wednesday 11 March 2015 15:46:55 David Wright wrote:
>> > > Quoting Bret Busby (bret.bu...@gmail.com):
>> > > > I have now found that, against my wishes,
On 12/03/2015, Bret Busby wrote:
> On 11/03/2015, David Wright wrote:
>> Quoting Bret Busby (bret.bu...@gmail.com):
>>
>>> I have now found that, against my wishes, the Linux installations were
>>> done as "legacy BIOS" installations, instead of UEFI/GPT
>>> installations, so I now have a system
On Wednesday 11 March 2015 16:34:15 David Wright wrote:
> Quoting Lisi Reisz (lisi.re...@gmail.com):
> > On Wednesday 11 March 2015 15:46:55 David Wright wrote:
> > > Quoting Bret Busby (bret.bu...@gmail.com):
> > > > I have now found that, against my wishes, the Linux installations
> > > > were do
Quoting Lisi Reisz (lisi.re...@gmail.com):
> On Wednesday 11 March 2015 15:46:55 David Wright wrote:
> > Quoting Bret Busby (bret.bu...@gmail.com):
> > > I have now found that, against my wishes, the Linux installations were
> > > done as "legacy BIOS" installations, instead of UEFI/GPT
> > > insta
Quoting Bret Busby (bret.bu...@gmail.com):
> I have now found that, against my wishes, the Linux installations were
> done as "legacy BIOS" installations, instead of UEFI/GPT
> installations, so I now have a system that (after repairing the nasty
> PC-BSD installation damage) kind of works, but, t
Hello.
As has previously been posted, I have a UEFI system, which came with
MS Win8 installed.
I then installed Debian 7 on the system, and Ubuntu 14.04 LTS, and,
after the Debian 7 installation, the MS Win8 installation, was no
longer accessible.
However, I have found that the MS Win8 installat
31 matches
Mail list logo
