Re: Debian 2.2 or woody

2000-09-10 Thread Mike Werner
Julio Merino wrote: > Hi, > > I'm going to install a new debian system at home (as I commented in > some other messages)... but I'm now wondering if installing the 2.2 or > woody version... > > Since I discovered apt :-) in slink, I've been always using the > unstable distribution. I would use 2.

Re: Debian 2.2 or woody

2000-09-10 Thread Preben Randhol
Julio Merino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 10/09/2000 (14:37) : > Since I discovered apt :-) in slink, I've been always using the > unstable distribution. I would use 2.2, but in that version there are > not the "latest" versions of some programs, for example, emacs, gnome, > etc. And the problem of

Re: Debian 2.2 or woody

2000-09-10 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Sun, Sep 10, 2000 at 12:41:43PM +0200, Julio Merino wrote: > Hi, > > I'm going to install a new debian system at home (as I commented in > some other messages)... but I'm now wondering if installing the 2.2 or > woody version... I can't give you a definitive answer since I've only been using D

Re: Debian 2.2 or woody

2000-09-10 Thread Philipp Schulte
On Sun, Sep 10, 2000 at 12:41:43PM +0200, Julio Merino wrote: > Since I discovered apt :-) in slink, I've been always using the > unstable distribution. I would use 2.2, but in that version there are > not the "latest" versions of some programs, for example, emacs, gnome, > etc. And the problem o

Debian 2.2 or woody

2000-09-10 Thread Julio Merino
Hi, I'm going to install a new debian system at home (as I commented in some other messages)... but I'm now wondering if installing the 2.2 or woody version... Since I discovered apt :-) in slink, I've been always using the unstable distribution. I would use 2.2, but in that version there are not