Re: Debian 1.3 again

1997-04-13 Thread Heiko Schlittermann
On Apr 12, Jean Pierre LeJacq wrote : Not a complete answer but ... : : I wouldn't recommend using /dev/modem link. This makes it : more difficult to gurantee the uucp locking protocol. Use : the actual device name instead. No, if all your call out programms use /dev/modem, it's ok. And then it

Re: Debian 1.3 again

1997-04-13 Thread Vadim Vygonets
On Sat, 12 Apr 1997 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > mknod /dev/mcdx0 b 20 0 > mknod /dev/mcdx1 b 20 1 type ./MAKEDEV mcd or something... > Then I linked the modem to ttyS1...or is it vice versa?? > > ln -s ttyS1 modem > > Is this correct...??? It should be ``ln -s cua1 modem'' (AFAIK). Vadik.

Re: Debian 1.3 again

1997-04-13 Thread Jean Pierre LeJacq
Not a complete answer but ... I wouldn't recommend using /dev/modem link. This makes it more difficult to gurantee the uucp locking protocol. Use the actual device name instead. -- Jean Pierre On Sat, 12 Apr 1997 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi again, > > It seems that the following devices

Debian 1.3 again

1997-04-12 Thread jacek
Hi again, It seems that the following devices are missing after the installation from the base disks: /dev/mcd /dev/mcdx /dev/modem I managed to create /dev/mcdx0 and /dev/mcdx1 by typing mknod /dev/mcdx0 b 20 0 mknod /dev/mcdx1 b 20 1 Is this correct...?? But I don't know how to create /dev/m