Hi,I need the Debian 1.1.x files. I know that there exists an copy on ibiblio, but I have some problems to download the files. Is there someone who has a copy on CD (I read that iConnect has produced some Gold CDs)? It would be nice, if I could download the CD as ISO via ftp...Marc
Hi Steve,
Thanks for the info on root shell exploits! If anyone has any more
reasons I can use to persuade my ISP to upgrade from Debian 1.1 I'd be
greatful.
Marcus
Stephen Carpenter wrote:
"Root Shell Exploits" are bugs in programs that either run as root (like a
network serv
>Probably your admin will feel more necouraged if you show him some of the
> >root shell expoits that have been found since them (no, I won't tell you
> >any). Debian 1.1 is pretty old.
>
> Is there a list of 1.1 bugs someplace?
AFAIK no...The bug datbase is cleared out a
ts that have been found since them (no, I won't tell you
>any). Debian 1.1 is pretty old.
Is there a list of 1.1 bugs someplace? What are these "root shell
exploits" that Marcus refered to?
Thanks!
Marcus
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 1 Jun 1998, Steven A. Reisman wrote:
> > Yeeehaa! I tried the JDK 1.1.5v7 on Debian 1.1 and javac actually
> > executed out of the box, with no configuration! Maybe that sounds like no
> > big deal, but I count that as an enormous victory after fumbling around
> >
Yeeehaa! I tried the JDK 1.1.5v7 on Debian 1.1 and javac actually
executed out of the box, with no configuration! Maybe that sounds like no
big deal, but I count that as an enormous victory after fumbling around
with 1.1.5v5 for quite a while. I'll report back after more testing if
there&
Yeeehaa! I tried the JDK 1.1.5v7 on Debian 1.1 and javac actually
executed out of the box, with no configuration! Maybe that sounds like no
big deal, but I count that as an enormous victory after fumbling around
with 1.1.5v5 for quite a while. I'll report back after more testing if
there&
I have an old 386 with 4 Megs of ram and it is probably easiest to
install the old 1.1 distribution then upgrade it but I don't know of an
archive of it around. Can anyone help. ( the old 1.1 easily installs in
4 Megs of RAM)
Thanks,
Chris
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
> Hello
>
> I wanted to upgrade a system to Debian 1.2.2. I ran into problems with
> the tex packages, because texbin refuse to install
...
Add the line /usr/X11R6/lib to the file /etc/ld.so.conf,
and then run ldconfig.
Alexander Gieg
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
By
Hello
I wanted to upgrade a system to Debian 1.2.2. I ran into problems with
the tex packages, because texbin refuse to install
dpkg -i /mnt/debian/stable/binary/tex/texbin_3.1415-5.deb
(Reading database ... 25360 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to replace texbin 3.1415-5
On Fri, 10 Jan 1997, Le Tran wrote:
> I want to upgrade from 1.1 to 1.2 beginning with the base package.
> Would anyone show me how to do it? TIA.
>
Check out the upgrades directory. The script DoList uses base.list-1.2 to
upgrade the base packages. You should be able to extrapolate the
functiona
I want to upgrade from 1.1 to 1.2 beginning with the base package.
Would anyone show me how to do it? TIA.
Le
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
s
1) /dev/MAKEDEV no longer supports the option loop. I remembered something about
major 7 when I ran this on 1.1 and it seems to be working.
2) the install disks say Welcome to Debian 1.1
3) When I tried to configure modules from the install disks, it failed saying
the kernel was the wrong ve
It seems you NE2000 is not configured, because you are using module.
Add in you '/etc/modules' one line :
ne
to say kerneld to load module ne at boot time
and add in your /etc/conf.modules something like :
ne irq=10 io=0x300
to give parameters to module ne, because MODULE ne can't autoprobe
Hello folks...I've got a CD-ROM from IConnect, made ~ the first of July.
It seems to install just fine, but when it reboots, the network doesn't
start up. I've got a NE2000 card, and I think that I configured
everything okay...it works fine when I install from my old .93r6 cd, for
instance. Durin
I am trying to install Debian 1.1 on my system, I have a Adaptec 2840 SCSI card
and I tried to use several boot disks but none goes well (I get a problem
after recognize the disks). So, I have tried to use the kernel that I am using
with my linux, I have replaced the linux file of the boot disk
were on the drive (it was backed up) and
> cant use my new computer with debian, unless one of you know whats wrong.
>
> Perhaps I should wait until the system is completely installed, and then
> fdisk/mke2fs the big drive?
That's exactly it. This is a well known problem of the D
Well, i have been running a seagate external 8GB on a p100 with a aha2940
using a slackware distribution and kernel 1.3.85
My new computer came in, a p166, so I decided to repartition my drives,
now that I am using the best linux distribution in the world :)
The problem is, I am trying to mke2fs
On Tue, 22 Oct 1996, Vaibhav Goel wrote:
>
>
> Hello;
>
> I am interested in installing Debian on a 486 machine. This machine does
> not have a CDROM drive so I will have to download the whole package and
> install it from floppies/ftp. Here is my situation; I will be connecting
> the 486 on
On Tue, 22 Oct 1996, Vaibhav Goel wrote:
>
>
> Hello;
>
> I am interested in installing Debian on a 486 machine. This machine does
> not have a CDROM drive so I will have to download the whole package and
> install it from floppies/ftp. Here is my situation; I will be connecting
> the 486 on
Hello;
I am interested in installing Debian on a 486 machine. This machine does
not have a CDROM drive so I will have to download the whole package and
install it from floppies/ftp. Here is my situation; I will be connecting
the 486 on Ethernet to an NT box. I would like download all the pac
I install Tex and Latex with Debian-1.1.
I could to Tex but I could not do Latex. When doing Latex,
I got a message like:
This is Tex, Version 3.1415 (C version 6.1)
I can't find the default format file!
I saw a similar note on the net regarding the same problem.
Is it a bug and how to f
Hi all,
I have to run the 1.2.13 kernel for MATLAB. I have compiled a new
1.2.13 kernel and modules using all the a.out gcc and libs, no
problems. In /lib/modules I have separate directories for 1.2.13 and
2.0.0 with all the subdirectories with all the modules in them. But
when I try to load th
I was curious if it's possible to yank the Linux Kernel v2.0.20 off
sunsite.unc.edu and install it on a Debian v1.1 (Kernel v2.0) machine. I
require this because I use the eepro ethernet driver and the v0.08 that
is included with Debian 1.1 is broke. The new v0.09 eepro driv
James> I was curious if it's possible to yank the Linux Kernel v2.0.20 off
James> sunsite.unc.edu and install it on a Debian v1.1 (Kernel v2.0)
James> machine.
Yes, that should work. Just untar it somewhere, have /usr/src/linux point to
that directory, install the Debian's kernel-package,
I was curious if it's possible to yank the Linux Kernel v2.0.20 off
sunsite.unc.edu and install it on a Debian v1.1 (Kernel v2.0) machine. I
require this because I use the eepro ethernet driver and the v0.08 that
is included with Debian 1.1 is broke. The new v0.09 eepro driver is
suppos
Martin Stromberg wrote:
>[Klippa, klapp, kluppit]
>
>>
>> BTW, if you look in the archives, you should find _tons_ on this topic.
>> :-)
>>
>> Casper Boden-Cummins.
>>
>>
>
>So where are the recent archives you're talking about, or are you joking
>(the smiley)?
>
>And before you say "http://ww
Gerd Bavendiek wrote:
>I just installed Debian 1.1 on a system with a PS/2
>Mouse. Unfortunately I'm missing
>/lib/modules/2.0.0/misc/psaux.o. There is a descriptive file in
>/usr/lib/module-help/modules/psaux. Additionally I took
>kernel-image-2.0.0-0.deb and kernel-image-2.
Hi,
I just installed Debian 1.1 on a system with a PS/2
Mouse. Unfortunately I'm missing
/lib/modules/2.0.0/misc/psaux.o. There is a descriptive file in
/usr/lib/module-help/modules/psaux. Additionally I took
kernel-image-2.0.0-0.deb and kernel-image-2.0.6_2.0.6-0.deb. But there is
no psaux
On Tue, 3 Sep 1996, Jim Worthington wrote:
oh very sorry
it's Contents , not Contens
excuse my English
talking to u from Israel
___
Boris Beletsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] for pgp public key)
On Tue, 3 Sep 1996, Jim Worthington wrote:
|>Date: Tue, 03 Sep 1996 23:19:37 -0400
|>From: Jim Worthington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|>To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
|>Subject: I got fvwm-95 but can't get it to compile under Debian 1.1
|>
|>I got fvwm-95 but I can't
I got fvwm-95 but I can't get it to compile under Debian 1.1:
It's complaining about a missing file: xpm.h
and a missing library: Xpm
Is there a debian package for this xpm stuff?
Where do I Look?
Where do I install it? (if not Debian)
Has anybody got fvwm-95 to compile?
Sebastian Kuzminsky writes ("inconsistency/confusion in aout-svgalib of Debian
1.1"):
>I'm not sure this is the right place to send this bug report...
>
>There's an inconsistency in Debian 1.1. When the aout-svgalib
> package is installed, it puts
I'm not sure this is the right place to send this bug report...
There's an inconsistency in Debian 1.1. When the aout-svgalib
package is installed, it puts the libary files in
/usr/i486-linuxaout/lib, but ld.so is not configured to look there for
libraries, so the aout sv
> fsck.ext2: Attempt to read block from filesystem resulted in short read
From: "Susan G. Kleinmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Run fsck manually on the sick drive (fsck /dev/hda8).
I sent a private note to this user that he should print the disk partition
table (using "fdisk") and see what it says fo
Oz Dror <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> After a power failure. I cannot fsck one of my IDE partition
> when I type:
> fsck /dev/hda8
>
> I get:
> -- Parallelizing fsck version 1.02 (16-Jan-96)
> e2fsck 1.02, 16-Jan-96 for EXT2 FS 0.5b, 95/08/09
> fsck.ext2: Attempt to read block from filesystem resu
Hi Oz --
You said:
> After a power failure. I cannot fsck one of my IDE partition
> when I type:
> fsck /dev/hda8
>
> I get:
> -- Parallelizing fsck version 1.02 (16-Jan-96)
> e2fsck 1.02, 16-Jan-96 for EXT2 FS 0.5b, 95/08/09
> fsck.ext2: Attempt to read block from filesystem resulted in short re
Hi,
I have an IDE and SCSI-2 Drives.
After a power failure. I cannot fsck one of my IDE partition
when I type:
fsck /dev/hda8
I get:
-- Parallelizing fsck version 1.02 (16-Jan-96)
e2fsck 1.02, 16-Jan-96 for EXT2 FS 0.5b, 95/08/09
fsck.ext2: Attempt to read block from filesystem resulted in short
Updated Instructions!!!
Howto Upgrade a Running Slackware 3.0 System to Debian 1.1
--
I have the problem that our main server has to be up almost 24hrs a day but
yet I need to switch to Debian since Slackware is becomming badly outdated
On 29.07.96 17:27 Jim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Subject: Re: Is buzz-fixed (<- stable<- Debian-1.1.x <- Debian )
>...
> At 10:44 PM 7/26/96 +0200, you wrote:
>> In my opinion (hope I am wrong) the buzz-fixed/ tree under
>> ftp.debian.org:/debian/ a
ble<- Debian-1.1.x <- Debian ) FIXE
Author: debian-user@lists.debian.org at cclink
Date:27.07.96 06:39
> In my opinion (hope I am wrong) the buzz-fixed/ tree under
> ftp.debian.org:/debian/ and the other directories pointing to it through
> symlinks (including stable/)
to write this letter ;-)
What confused me was that ".message" under debian states that stable/
points to the latest Debian-1.1.x, while in fact stable/ points
to buzz-fixed/ (which turned out not to be fixed :).
Hope this helps.
Enjoy Debian GNU/Linux! :-)
Lazaro
P.S. It woul
Guglielmo Rabbiolo wrote:
>
> hi,
>
> I've recently decided to install debian 1.1 after having used
> Slackware for years and I've been able at least to compile
> and boot kernel 2.0.
>
> I followed the instructions and made the INSTALLATION BOOT
>
I am trying to install Debian Linux on a system with an NCR 53c810 SCSI
controller. The kernel on the default boot disk does not seem to have
support for this controller. I also tried using a different boot disk
that did have support for the controller, which worked fine up to the
step where I tr
**On 04 Jul, In article "Debian-1.1 problems: locale + dosemu + nfs-mount",
** RO (Rolf Obrecht) writes:
RO>Hi out there,
RO>I upgraded from 0.93 to 1.1 and found some problems:
RO>
RO>1.) Several programs which try to set the locale fail and give me error
RO&
Hi,
I have have compiled (kernel 2.0 ) on debian 1.1
(libc libc5_5.2.18-9).
In a program that I have written I am using a select
system call. The select waits indefinitely on input from a serial line and
a FIFO node.
for (;;){
FD_ZERO(&readfds);
if (fifo_fd != -1)
FD
On Wed, 19 Jun 1996, David Gaudine wrote:
> I tried using "dpkg --scanpackages". When that didn't work I tried
> every variation I could think of (Scanpackages, ScanPackages,
> scan-packages...)
> It looks like I'll have to wait for the update.
>
The script name is dpkg-scanpackages.
Dwarf
--
Kai Grossjohann writes:
>
> I suggest throwing away the Packages thingy completely and always
> telling dselect to update its info based on the actual contents of the
> directory. People have been hit too often by that problem, I think.
This could be combined with the "update" option in des
> On Wed, 19 Jun 96 09:28 PDT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bruce Perens)
> said:
Bruce> I ran a Packages file update yesterday but it apparently did
Bruce> not complete. I am running one now.
I suggest throwing away the Packages thingy completely and always
telling dselect to update its info
Hi,
I found a curious bug with jove 4.16, compiled and running on a Debian Lignux
1.1. If you insert 8 characters in an empty buffer right after startup,
move to the beginning of the line and insert blanks, all is ok. If you
add a ninth char, and insert blanks in the beginning, they get doubled on
Bruce Perens writes:
> I ran a Packages file update yesterday but it apparently did not complete.
> I am running one now.
That should be a pretty popular download. What worries me is whether
the market is going to be flooded with CDROMs with bad Packages files.
With Slackware that always seems
I ran a Packages file update yesterday but it apparently did not complete.
I am running one now.
Bruce
I tried loading the new Debian Linux 1.1 on my Micron VL system here at home.
It does the Loading ... and Uncompressing Linux OK. It then prints about a
screenfull of messages, ending with a message about my third hard drive,
followed within about a second of what looks like some kind of dump. T
On Mon, 17 Jun 1996, Rick Hawkins wrote:
> > 1.) There are distributions which only need to rawrite one singel disk.
> > versa five!
>
> beg pardon? debian requires two, root & boot. It also requires either
> the 3 disks, or a file (base1_1.tgz) be available in the top two levels
> of the
> From:Martin Konold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Debian 1.1 will include the Linux 2.0 kernel
> 1.) There are distributions which only need to rawrite one singel disk.
> versa five!
beg pardon? debian requires two, root & boot. It also requires either
Debian 1.1 is available as ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/Debian-1.1 .
I will wait 24 hours for the mirror sites to catch up with the last few
changes, and will then post the public announcement.
Thanks
Bruce
On Tue, 11 Jun 1996, Bruce Perens wrote:
> I see everyone wants to know. Yes, I will include the Linux 2.0 kernel in the
> latest boot disk set, which will be uploaded this evening. I also have a
> kernel-image package, although I am not the official kernel maintainer.
Could you (or Simon) also up
I see everyone wants to know. Yes, I will include the Linux 2.0 kernel in the
latest boot disk set, which will be uploaded this evening. I also have a
kernel-image package, although I am not the official kernel maintainer.
Thanks
Bruce
Hi,
Is Linux 2.0 going to be included in Debian 1.1 once it's
release?
Thanks.
--
Arthur D. Jerijian | "Who on earth can blame them? Ah, no wonder the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | men of Troy and Argives under arms have suffered
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | years of agony all fo
As Linux 2.0 already released, I think it should be included
in the debain 1.1 official release.
David> Where is the .deb file?
Oh, sorry, I must have taken emacs-19.31 from the developers system.
The public archive lags a little, mostly a day, sometimes a little longer.
Expect to see emacs-19.31 in unstable/binary/editors any time now.
--
Dirk Eddelb"uttel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> David M Cooke writes:
> David> Will the officially release Debian 1.1 include emacs-19.31?
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> emacs --version
> 19.31.1
Where is the .deb file? I checked unstable/binary/editors and found:
-r--r--r-- 1 daemon
David M Cooke writes:
David> Will the officially release Debian 1.1 include emacs-19.31?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> emacs --version
19.31.1
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> cat /etc/debian_version
1.1
Debian 1.1 is in official beta-test and can be install
Will the officially release Debian 1.1 include emacs-19.31?
It would be nice since I've converted our SGI and Convex machines
already and I'd like to run the same version on the soon to be
installed Debian wo
ns on the MIT ftp site, beta4_1 and
beta5.
> Presumably libc 5.3.12 contains the newer version, so when 5.3
> stabilizes and David upgrades, we'll have it. Until then, you might
Both libc 5.3.12 and 5.4.1 include pthreads 1.60beta4. I will release
libc 5.3.12 or 5.4.x (if it
David Engel writes:
[ chopped pthreads related release notes ]
>Would someone like to test the pthread library that is built? You'll
>need to get the libc5 source and recompile the entire package
>yourself. If libpthread proves to work, I'll include it in either the
>next libc5 package or
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Engel) writes:
> > The MIT pthread library 1.60 beta2 seems to work. It passed most of tests
> > in the MIT pthread package. The pthread libraries are not installed by
[...]
> Would someone like to test the pthread library that is built? You'll
> need to get the libc5
On Tue, 4 Jun 1996, David Engel wrote:
> > The MIT pthread library 1.60 beta2 seems to work. It passed most of tests
The latest pthread library is 1.60 beta4, released on 10/25/95.
Compiled seperately it works moderately well. It's a lot of fun to
play with. You can get more info at
http://www
omeone like to test the pthread library that is built? You'll
need to get the libc5 source and recompile the entire package
yourself. If libpthread proves to work, I'll include it in either the
next libc5 package or a separate libpthread package.
> Also, why does debian 1.1 use libc-5.2
Ian Jackson:
> How about having each pager program use update-alternatives to provide
> a possible variant of /usr/bin/pager, and then having man configured
> by default to use /usr/bin/pager ?
Another possibility would be to fix more so that it can scroll
backwards. This shouldn't take more than
I get the following warning message when running several applications.
I suspect some type of inconsistency with Perl. My two from-scratch
installations of debian 1.1 do not produce this warning message (only
my upgraded from 0.93R6). I would appreciate any help to correct this
problem as I
I would like to play with pthreads, and was wondering what I must
do to get phtreads support built into my libc. Do I have to
compile the latest version of libc myself, with pthreads
specified somewhere? Or is it in the latest version already?
Also, why does debian 1.1 use libc-5.2.18 when libc
On Mon, 3 Jun 1996, Guy Maor wrote:
> > Is there any reason the default PAGER on Debian should not be set to less
> > out of the box?
>
> less is not a base package, so might not be installed. more is one
> third the size of less, and it's very important to keep the base
> packages as small as p
How about having each pager program use update-alternatives to provide
a possible variant of /usr/bin/pager, and then having man configured
by default to use /usr/bin/pager ?
This would mean that man couldn't tell that less was being used and
give it all those funky arguments with the name of the
James> 3) emacs was upgraded to 19.30 (another major enhancement!). when I
James> upgraded to 19.29, I had the same problem, namely, emacs looks for
James> the file /usr/lib/emacs/19.28/lisp/jka-compr.elc. This problem is
James> easily fixed by creating the sym-link 'ln -s 19.30 19.28' i
James D. Freels wrote:
> Finally, I have a commercial license of NAG FORTRAN, which uses a.out
> binaries and linkable libraries. I can execute the compiler because I
> have a.out executing enabled in my newly-complied kernel. However, I
> get unresolved references in the link step. I suspect b
On Mon, 3 Jun 1996, Amos Shapira wrote:
> I never went all the way about this, but I allways had the suspicion that
> Slackware's "more" is actually "less" renamed. Could you check this?
> (maybe try "more -V"?)
>
I dug up my old Slackware 2.0.1 distribution on cdrom and discovered that
the /u
I have recently upgraded my debian machine from 0.93R6 to 1.1 beta.
I am happy to report that everything, except one important piece, is
up and running and better than before!
I had a few minor problems which have been reported earlier and were
easily fixed:
1) /etc/crontab contained an incorrec
> Is there any reason the default PAGER on Debian should not be set to less
> out of the box?
less is not a base package, so might not be installed. more is one
third the size of less, and it's very important to keep the base
packages as small as possible.
Guy
Sorry for the confusion. It turns out that more is not the same as less
on slackware but man automatically uses less without a variable set. I'm
pretty sure it is not using a temp file.
Is there any reason the default PAGER on Debian should not be set to less
out of the box?
Nathan
You can define $PAGER as something like
"cat >/tmp/$$;more /tmp/$$;rm /tmp/$$" to get the back-scrolling at
the cost of somewhat reduced speed. You won't see the first page until
the last has been formatted (which is why we don't do this by default).
Bruce
--
Pixar's Toy Story: Over 1/3 B
On Sun, 2 Jun 1996, Austin Donnelly wrote:
> Those systems maybe format the manpage to a temporary file, then
> use more to view that file. Debian's man put the formatted output
> through a pipe directly to the pager, for speed.
>
> Note that you can also do:
>
> $ export MANOPT='-Pless'
Guy Maor wrote
>> While using man to read a manpage I am not able to scroll backwards a page
>> by using "b" or "^B". Has anyone else experienced this? My current
>> version of man is 2.3.10-11. If I just use "more" to read a text file,
>> everything works fine.
>
>more can't go backwards on uns
On Mon, 3 Jun 1996, N. Salwen wrote:
> I tried this both man and more on my slackware system at home and they
> both go backwards. I don't have the PAGER variable set.
>
> I realize this is slackware but I am surprised at the difference.
As someone else pointed out, slackware man most likely wr
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
>
>On Sat, 1 Jun 1996, Guy Maor wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 1 Jun 1996, Richard Lovison wrote:
>>
>> > While using man to read a manpage I am not able to scroll backwards a page
>> > by using "b" or "^B".
>>
>> more can't go backwards on unseekable files, like p
On Sat, 1 Jun 1996, Richard Lovison wrote:
>
> While using man to read a manpage I am not able to scroll backwards a page
> by using "b" or "^B". Has anyone else experienced this? My current
> version of man is 2.3.10-11. If I just use "more" to read a text file,
> everything works fine.
>
If
On Sat, 1 Jun 1996, Guy Maor wrote:
> On Sat, 1 Jun 1996, Richard Lovison wrote:
>
> > While using man to read a manpage I am not able to scroll backwards a page
> > by using "b" or "^B".
>
> more can't go backwards on unseekable files, like pipes for example.
> (man pipes the data out to the
On Sat, 1 Jun 1996, Richard Lovison wrote:
> While using man to read a manpage I am not able to scroll backwards a page
> by using "b" or "^B". Has anyone else experienced this? My current
> version of man is 2.3.10-11. If I just use "more" to read a text file,
> everything works fine.
more ca
I think "more" won't scroll back when it is reading a pipe, only when
it is reading a file. Man drives it with a pipe.
Bruce
--
Clinton isn't perfect, but I like him a whole lot more than Dole.
Bruce Perens AB6YM [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.hams.com/
While using man to read a manpage I am not able to scroll backwards a page
by using "b" or "^B". Has anyone else experienced this? My current
version of man is 2.3.10-11. If I just use "more" to read a text file,
everything works fine.
Richard
Stephen Masterman wrote:
>
> I seem to remember reading some comments in the XFree86 docs about how it
> does not support Diamond cards. I think its some political thing, since
> Diamond won't release the code freely to make the driver or something..
> But this information may be obsolete now.
...
>System 2:
> motherboard: ASUS P55TP4N
> CPU: Intel Pentium 166MHz
>Graphics card: Diamond Stealth64 VIDEO 2001 (PCI, S3 765 (Trio64V+), 2 MB)
>Linux: Debian 1.1beta
...
>
> System 2 runs svgalib programs fine, no problems. System 1 with the
>video card from System 2 al
I have successfully installed (from scratch) the debian 1.1 beta on
two server machines (an i-386 and an i-486). Everything seems to be
working as planned and I have no complaints. I am getting ready to
*upgrade* my existing pentium machine (my main workstation) from
0.93R6 to 1.1 beta. I have
Just installed Debian 1.1beta. It was pretty smooth, except for X, and
i dont think the X problems are really Debians fault, but what the heck,
i'll ask for help here anyway.
I have two systems...
System 1:
motherboard: ASUS SP3G
CPU: AMD 486 dx4 100MHz
Graphics card: Orchi
We're going to build another kernel with an updated device driver. That
will probably fix this problem.
Thanks
Bruce
--
Clinton isn't perfect, but I like him a whole lot more than Dole.
Bruce Perens AB6YM [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.hams.com/
Hi.
I tried to install debian 1.1 with Boot1440.bin from may 28, but there was
a problem:
I have a Pentium with Adaptec AHA2940 SCSI-controller and a Samsung
PLS-31274S SCSI-harddisk.
Here is a part of the output of the boot process:
(...)
aic7xxx: Burstlen = 8DWD, Latency timer = 32PCLKS
Hi.
I tried to install debian 1.1 with Boot1440.bin from may 28, but there was
a problem:
I have a Pentium with Adaptec AHA2940 SCSI-controller and a Samsung
PLS-31274S SCSI-harddisk.
Here is a part of the output of the boot process:
(...)
aic7xxx: Burstlen = 8DWD, Latency timer = 32PCLKS
On Sun, 19 May 1996, Matthew D Moss wrote:
> I've downloaded and installed debian with the 1.1beta diskettes.
> What packages should I be using? Stable? Unstable?
> Thanks...
>
unstable.
--
Syrus Nemat-Nasser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>UCSD
I've downloaded and installed debian with the 1.1beta diskettes.
What packages should I be using? Stable? Unstable?
Thanks...
On one of the computer systems here, I am suddenly unable to use the Debian
installation disks.
Details:
I am using a boot floppy made from a file dated something like May 4.
It boots version 1.3.95.
The boot seems to go OK; i.e., the kernel loads without any obvious problems.
Then I insert the
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo
