On 08/04/13 20:59, Rob Owens wrote:
On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 09:30:52AM -0700, Gary Roach wrote:
As for as OCR vs retyping vs scan and preses - still up in the air
at this point. I suspect that all three methods might be used.
There are commercial companies that will do bulk scanning and OCR.
On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 09:30:52AM -0700, Gary Roach wrote:
> As for as OCR vs retyping vs scan and preses - still up in the air
> at this point. I suspect that all three methods might be used.
>
There are commercial companies that will do bulk scanning and OCR. I
used one in the past and I found
On 4/8/13 7:30 PM, Gary Roach wrote:
> Ok, the organization is the Unitarian Universalist Church of Long Beach
> CA. We have been around since 1913. I recently got stuck with the job of
> Church Historian and am concerned about the closet full of records going
> back to day one.
[snip]
Is there a
On 04/07/2013 05:56 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
On 4/8/13, Gary Roach wrote:
Hi all,
I have a records archiving problem and don't know where to start. There
are 100 years of records that include hand written material, type
written hard copy, photos and a lot of email. I would like to have a
sys
On Sun, Apr 07, 2013 at 01:57:51PM -0700, Gary Roach wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a records archiving problem and don't know where to start.
> There are 100 years of records that include hand written material,
> type written hard copy, photos and a lot of email. I would like to
> have a system base
On 4/8/13, Gary Roach wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a records archiving problem and don't know where to start. There
> are 100 years of records that include hand written material, type
> written hard copy, photos and a lot of email. I would like to have a
> system based around mysql (if possible) th
Hi all,
I have a records archiving problem and don't know where to start. There
are 100 years of records that include hand written material, type
written hard copy, photos and a lot of email. I would like to have a
system based around mysql (if possible) that would allow flexible data
mining.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/25/07 13:44, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
> Ron Johnson wrote:
[snip]
>> But isn't that putting all your eggs in one basket? (Unless I'm
>> mis-reading you.)
>
> 3 disks in three different locations (according to Douglas'
> requirements). You'd h
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 05/25/07 09:04, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
>> Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> [snip]
>>> True. However, for a small data set (under 1 GB) the need for three
>>> copies means three hard drives. Using a hard drive and rewriting ove
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/25/07 09:04, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
> Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
[snip]
>> True. However, for a small data set (under 1 GB) the need for three
>> copies means three hard drives. Using a hard drive and rewriting over
>> it means that you loo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 10:41:18AM +0200, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
>> Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
>>> No. I figure a CD is good for at least a year. Every year, I
>>> pull the two netinst cds from the bank, take an SHA h
On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 10:41:18AM +0200, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
> Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> > No. I figure a CD is good for at least a year. Every year, I
> > pull the two netinst cds from the bank, take an SHA hash and compare it
> > with the written notes, then run something like cdck o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 10:49:51PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
>> On 05/23/07 20:17, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 07:05:23PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
>>>
> It would be very nice if there was a u
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/24/07 18:58, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 06:08:21PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> >
>>> There is something to be said for casting something in plain text in
>>> bronze and gold plating it.
>> Buffered lignin-free paper.
>
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 06:08:21PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
>
> > There is something to be said for casting something in plain text in
> > bronze and gold plating it.
>
> Buffered lignin-free paper.
>
Burns.
Bronze melts.
Pottery breaks.
Acid rain eats granite.
I guess the bottom line is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/24/07 16:18, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 12:03:15PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> >
>>> Never heard of ODF, or is it specific to *Office programmes?
>>> Personally, I save my latex as latex. The origional contents are
>>
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 12:03:15PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
>
> > Never heard of ODF, or is it specific to *Office programmes?
> > Personally, I save my latex as latex. The origional contents are
> > plainly visible.
>
> Never heard of ODF It's the OpenOffice.org 2.0 document format,
> ak
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/24/07 08:47, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 10:49:51PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
>> On 05/23/07 20:17, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 07:05:23PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
>>>
> It would be very ni
On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 10:49:51PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 05/23/07 20:17, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> > On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 07:05:23PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> >
> >>> It would be very nice if there was a universal cross-platform rw +
> >>> encrypt filesystem for archives. Somethin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/23/07 20:17, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 07:05:23PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
>
>>> It would be very nice if there was a universal cross-platform rw +
>>> encrypt filesystem for archives. Something that you could be conf
20 matches
Mail list logo
