Ahh, well if you get stuck then i recommend you check out
http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/Linux/docs/HOWTO/other-formats/html_single/DNS-HOWTO.html
--
Cheers,
rinmak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED
Like I said, I'm new and working a new job. Named is running on Red Hat
(either pc1 w/7.3 or pc2 w/9.x, I'm not sure). Regardless, I think you
gave me enough to start with come monday, well at least I have a
direction to head, anyway.
thanks -mac
Ryan Mackay wrote:
Sometime near Sat, Jan 1
Sometime near Sat, Jan 17, 2004 at 09:23:12AM -0600, Mac McCaskie wrote:
> Hey Folks,
>
> What do I need to do to get a new site to show up in DNS? This is the
> scenario: I've just connected a pc via satalite to the net, now I want
> it to show up as a sub-part (is that the right term?) on our
At 2004-01-17T15:23:12Z, Mac McCaskie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What do I need to do to get a new site to show up in DNS? This is the
> scenario: I've just connected a pc via satalite to the net, now I want it
> to show up as a sub-part (is that the right term?) on our domain.
Do you want th
Hey Folks,
What do I need to do to get a new site to show up in DNS? This is the
scenario: I've just connected a pc via satalite to the net, now I want
it to show up as a sub-part (is that the right term?) on our domain.
ie our domain is "foo.net"
and we want it to show up as "104.foo.net"
we
Angel wrote:
> Hello!!
>
> I need to make up a dominium, but with only a server. I will like to
> use some DNS server not on my site, ¿can somebody help me? Of course I
> have static IP. And if I have to put DNS server on my machine, what can
> I use to make it?
>
> Thank you for a
Hello!!
I need to make up a dominium, but with only a server. I will like to
use some DNS server not on my site, ¿can somebody help me? Of course I
have static IP. And if I have to put DNS server on my machine, what can
I use to make it?
Thank you for all!!!
Ang
Art Lemasters ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Does anyone here know how to do this with the most recent sendmail
> in potato (8.9.3) to receive mail for both domain.com and machine.domain.com,
> etc.?
Make sure all the domains for which you wish to receive mail are defined
in the 'w' (or is it
On Thu, Nov 04, 1999 at 01:09:32PM -0500, William T Wilson wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Nov 1999, Bob Nielsen wrote:
>
> > > Yes, you can point A records from two domains to the same IP address.
> >
> > You can also use a CNAME record. I'm not sure when one approach would
> > be preferred over the other.
On Thu, 4 Nov 1999, Bob Nielsen wrote:
> > Yes, you can point A records from two domains to the same IP address.
>
> You can also use a CNAME record. I'm not sure when one approach would
> be preferred over the other.
The answer is simple: Use A records for everything and forget about
CNAMEs. :
On Thu, 4 Nov 1999, Bob Nielsen wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 04, 1999 at 12:01:29AM -0500, William T Wilson wrote:
> >
> > Yes, you can point A records from two domains to the same IP address.
>
> You can also use a CNAME record. I'm not sure when one approach would
> be preferred over the other.
Yo
Bob Nielsen wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 04, 1999 at 12:01:29AM -0500, William T Wilson wrote:
> >
> > Yes, you can point A records from two domains to the same IP address.
>
> You can also use a CNAME record. I'm not sure when one approach would
> be preferred over the other.
This is true however the r
On Thu, Nov 04, 1999 at 12:01:29AM -0500, William T Wilson wrote:
>
> Yes, you can point A records from two domains to the same IP address.
You can also use a CNAME record. I'm not sure when one approach would
be preferred over the other.
You can also use virtual hosting to have the same machin
On Wed, 3 Nov 1999, Art Lemasters wrote:
> How can I set up two completely different FQDNs (two totally
> different hostnames) on one box (e.g., my.domain.net &
> alsomy.otherdomain.net) so that this machine accepts traffic
> on my.domain.net while appearing to be alsomy.otherdomain.net
> t
yeah that would work fine, point 1 domain at 1 ip, or point a million
domains at 1 ip ..its all the same ..now if your doing it for web
hosting, e.g.
http://www.aphroland.org and http://yahoo.aphroland.org and
http://comedy.aphroland.org are all the same ip (208.222.179.35)
however they are all
On Wed, 3 Nov 1999, Art Lemasters wrote:
> How can I set up two completely different FQDNs (two totally
> different hostnames) on one box (e.g., my.domain.net &
Point both DNS entries at your IP address. You can only have your IP map
to one of them in reverse DNS, though. If you absolutely
How can I set up two completely different FQDNs (two totally
different hostnames) on one box (e.g., my.domain.net &
alsomy.otherdomain.net) so that this machine accepts traffic
on my.domain.net while appearing to be alsomy.otherdomain.net
to anyone who accesses it via the webserver or mailserv
Another one.
If a name server is open to the public (in terms of zone transfers).
Is it possible to do something like...
nslookup
server nameserver.in.question
ls -t any *.com
?
I know you can pick a specific domain and get the db information for it, but
is there anyway to query
a DNS server t
Hi guys,
I know this isn't strictly debian related but i'm sure someone can help me
quickly.
If i've got BIND 8.1.2 running (debian 2.0) i've noticed that all zone
transfers to anywhere are blocked.
With the "xfernets" command I know I can allow certain hosts to do zone
tranfers, but all over th
You can do what you suggest.
When you register a domain name (xyz.org), you
just tell the InterNic (or whomever) the primary
and secondary name servers (provided by your
ISP, usually) for names in that domain. The
name servers answer the specific host address
for each such host (you have to tell
Hello,
Is it possible to create a new domain on a subnet that is already
registered? Here is my situation. Let's have subnet 111.111.111.255
which has domainname `university.edu'. Now I want to take one address
from the subnet, let's say 111.111.111.254, and register it as a
new domain (outside f
Not so. What's frowned upon are CNAMEs that point to other CNAMEs.
Shaleh wrote:
> I was under the impression that the use of CNAME was not smiled on. Is
> this the case? If so, what is the preferred way to handle CNAMEs?
--
Jens B. Jorgensen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Unsubscribe? mail -s uns
On Tue, Jul 28, 1998 at 05:20:27PM -0400, Shaleh wrote:
> I was under the impression that the use of CNAME was not smiled on. Is
> this the case? If so, what is the preferred way to handle CNAMEs?
I just talked to our sysadmin at work -- he says CNAMEs are ok 'cept
when you're talking about mail
I was under the impression that the use of CNAME was not smiled on. Is
this the case? If so, what is the preferred way to handle CNAMEs?
--
Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
Run bindconfig
On Mon, 26 Jan 1998, eugene mendoza wrote:
>
> Hello ,
> I have a problem getting dns to start on the linux
> server.
> When i try to run named it says '/etc/named.conf'
> cannot be opened.
> I could not find such a file anywhere in the system.
> Any help in this matter will be
Hello ,
I have a problem getting dns to start on the linux
server.
When i try to run named it says '/etc/named.conf'
cannot be opened.
I could not find such a file anywhere in the system.
Any help in this matter will be deeply appreciated.
Much Obliged,
Regards,
Eugene
__
Rick Jones wrote:
>I should have been more specific, sorry. I wanted to know if this
>secondary that is behind the firewall, IP masq'd, can be used as far as
>internic is concerned, or if they will reject it because of the IP
>masqing?
No, Internic will not allow two name servers with the same IP
A. M. Varon wrote:
>
> On Fri, 9 May 1997, Rick Jones wrote:
>
> > I think I know the answer to this already, BUT is it possible to run a
> > secondary DNS through an IP masq firewall?
> >
> > Just wondering since I'm about to network my home systems via an IP masq
> > firewall and would rather u
I should have been more specific, sorry. I wanted to know if this
secondary that is behind the firewall, IP masq'd, can be used as far as
internic is concerned, or if they will reject it because of the IP
masqing?
Does any body know? I have solved my need for a secondary but am still
curious ab
I set up a DNS on my FreeBSD box which is behind my Debian box
and it worked fine. At the time I didn't think to ask the question I
just added the secondary line to my named.boot for my ISP and
restarted named.
> >Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >To: Debian User List
> >cc: "Jens B. Jorge
On Fri, 9 May 1997, Rick Jones wrote:
> I think I know the answer to this already, BUT is it possible to run a
> secondary DNS through an IP masq firewall?
>
> Just wondering since I'm about to network my home systems via an IP masq
> firewall and would rather use one of my other systems as second
Rick Jones wrote:
>
> I think I know the answer to this already, BUT is it possible to run a
> secondary DNS through an IP masq firewall?
>
> Just wondering since I'm about to network my home systems via an IP masq
> firewall and would rather use one of my other systems as secondary.
>
> I haven
I think I know the answer to this already, BUT is it possible to run a
secondary DNS through an IP masq firewall?
Just wondering since I'm about to network my home systems via an IP masq
firewall and would rather use one of my other systems as secondary.
I haven't researched IP masq firewalling y
33 matches
Mail list logo
