On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 03:56:04AM -0500, Hal Vaughan wrote:
> I'm adding a new system to my LAN. The DNS is running DNSMasq and is on
> Etch. The new system is running Lenny. I edited the /etc/network/
> interfaces file to include the following (other than loopback, the only
> interface in t
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 8:56 AM, Hal Vaughan wrote:
> I'm adding a new system to my LAN. The DNS is running DNSMasq and is on
> Etch. The new system is running Lenny. I edited the
> /etc/network/interfaces file to include the following (other than loopback,
> the only interface in the file):
>
>
I'm adding a new system to my LAN. The DNS is running DNSMasq and is
on Etch. The new system is running Lenny. I edited the /etc/network/
interfaces file to include the following (other than loopback, the
only interface in the file):
auto eth0
iface eth0 inet static
address 172.16.7.111
n
On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 11:50:18PM -0500, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> look at dnsmasq. I don't use the dhcp part, but it works just fine
> out-of-the-box for dns. The box that connects to my (dialup) modem runs
> dnsmasq and has all my hosts in /etc/hosts. The other boxes on my
> network know the
Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 02:34:58PM +1000, Lachlan wrote:
>
>> my idea to fix this is to have an old laptop (old as in i upgraded 3
>> months ago, running lenny but hasn't been updated since august) that
>> i'm thinking could be used as the network dhcp instead of my mode
2008/11/4 Douglas A. Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 02:34:58PM +1000, Lachlan wrote:
>
>> my idea to fix this is to have an old laptop (old as in i upgraded 3
>> months ago, running lenny but hasn't been updated since august) that
>> i'm thinking could be used as the network d
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 02:34:58PM +1000, Lachlan wrote:
> my idea to fix this is to have an old laptop (old as in i upgraded 3
> months ago, running lenny but hasn't been updated since august) that
> i'm thinking could be used as the network dhcp instead of my modem
> (which i'm thinking is half
i been have tremendous trouble getting my network to see hostnames and
and other pc's. it will see everything randomly one day and then be
missing the next.
my idea to fix this is to have an old laptop (old as in i upgraded 3
months ago, running lenny but hasn't been updated since august) that
i'm
On Tue, 2003-02-18 at 08:30, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 08:37:06AM -0600, Jeffrey L. Taylor wrote:
> > They work okay together using Dynamic DNS (not things like dyndns.org,
> > same name, different process). You can use TSIG (IIRC) to securely
> > authenticate updates.
>
> I t
Am Dienstag, 18. Februar 2003 15:30 schrieb Paul Johnson:
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 08:37:06AM -0600, Jeffrey L. Taylor wrote:
> > They work okay together using Dynamic DNS (not things like dyndns.org,
> > same name, different process). You can use TSIG (IIRC) to securely
> > authenticate updates.
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 08:37:06AM -0600, Jeffrey L. Taylor wrote:
> They work okay together using Dynamic DNS (not things like dyndns.org,
> same name, different process). You can use TSIG (IIRC) to securely
> authenticate updates.
I tried before a couple times, and never could get it to work.
> Quoting Tom Allison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> How do these two play nice together?
>>
>> Do you still need the perl script to do it or have they configured a
>> way to talk directly (DHCP3, BIND9)?
>>
>> I know at one point that there was a perl script that did a nice job
>> going between the two.
Quoting Tom Allison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> How do these two play nice together?
>
> Do you still need the perl script to do it or have they configured a way
> to talk directly (DHCP3, BIND9)?
>
> I know at one point that there was a perl script that did a nice job
> going between the two. But
How do these two play nice together?
Do you still need the perl script to do it or have they configured a way
to talk directly (DHCP3, BIND9)?
I know at one point that there was a perl script that did a nice job
going between the two. But I thought that with the newer versions of
bind and dhc
I've got a problem in my named.conf file and I'm not sure why:
Jun 22 08:53:59 pretorian named[31230]: denied update from
[127.0.0.1].1059 for "1.168.192.in-addr.arpa" IN
I have the line: allow-updates {localhost;}; in the config file.
But the changes are taking correctly.
New computers to the
I can't really speak to the DNS part of this issue, but at the very
least you can keep the IP address of each machine static using DHCP...
Install DHCP, and then edit the /etc/dhcpd.conf file. Give global
parameters (subnet info, nameserver addresses, etc) -- it's all in
the dhcpd.conf man pa
Hi there,
I've currently got my debian box plugged into the wall, which serves as
the router for an apple airport wireless hub through NAT. the airport
then goes to connect through my laptop. right now, the airport acts as
a tranparent bridge (i.e. performs NO NAT), and also acts as a DHCP
serve
ng edge development work.
I've been using dhcp-beta without problems, but I haven't been upgrading it.
Would handing out fixed ip-addresses with DHCP solve your problem? Then
you wouldn't need to keep editing the DNS files. I rebuild the DNS
files automatically from /etc/hosts o
> Is there any such? It would be nice not having to update the DNS server by
> hand all the time. And using DHCP to assign IP:s automatically could solve
> this if there was a tool for updating the DNS server.
>
There have been some published patches to the ISC DHCP server (the one which
is in th
> I'm not quite sure what you mean. For me, dhcpcd does assign a DNS server
> via the /etc/dhcp/resolv.conf which it generates. However, it does not
By a quick look at your script it looks like you're fixing your own
/etc/hosts file. I'm talking about updating the dns server (BIND) for two
c-net
I'm not quite sure what you mean. For me, dhcpcd does assign a DNS server
via the /etc/dhcp/resolv.conf which it generates. However, it does not
update several other things I would like it to and it does change some
things I would like it to leave alone. In order to update these things, I
use the
On Tue, 1 Dec 1998, Ben Jorgensen wrote:
> Is there any such? It would be nice not having to update the DNS server by
> hand all the time. And using DHCP to assign IP:s automatically could solve
> this if there was a tool for updating the DNS server.
>
This is still in the protocol definition st
Is there any such? It would be nice not having to update the DNS server by
hand all the time. And using DHCP to assign IP:s automatically could solve
this if there was a tool for updating the DNS server.
//ben
--
http://surf.to/anTiX
23 matches
Mail list logo
