On Tue, 14 Aug 2012 09:55:01 -0600, Glenn English wrote:
> On Aug 14, 2012, at 9:03 AM, Camaleón wrote:
(...)
>> Debian does not ship AA by default and even if so, no profile is
>> enabled so I would discard a problem coming from here (unless, of
>> course, you did something that trigered the AA
On Aug 14, 2012, at 9:03 AM, Camaleón wrote:
> I may have consufed bind9 with postfix or another server application, but
> true is that I remember a usual service that came chrooted as a Debian
> default that I had to un-chroot to make it to work with less headaches.
Yeah. Postfix is chrooted
On Mon, 13 Aug 2012 15:11:58 -0600, Glenn English wrote:
> On Aug 13, 2012, at 10:27 AM, Camaleón wrote:
>> The only thing I can think that can be causing these erros is that by
>> default, and IIRC, Bind9 comes chrooted in Debian
>
> I may be wrong, but I don't think the Debian Bind9 install on
On Aug 13, 2012, at 10:27 AM, Camaleón wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Aug 2012 14:19:31 -0600, Glenn English wrote:
>
>> I started having lots of errors like "refresh: could not set file
>> modification time of '/etc/bind/X': permisison denied" in syslog
>> from bind9. I found some talking about this a
On Sun, 12 Aug 2012 14:19:31 -0600, Glenn English wrote:
> Lenny, updated until the end.
>
> I started having lots of errors like "refresh: could not set file
> modification time of '/etc/bind/X': permisison denied" in syslog
> from bind9. I found some talking about this at a Ubuntu site, and
Lenny, updated until the end.
I started having lots of errors like "refresh: could not set file modification
time of '/etc/bind/X': permisison denied" in syslog from bind9. I found
some talking about this at a Ubuntu site, and a little more in README.Debian.
And there's a apparmor.d/usr.sbi
6 matches
Mail list logo
