Re: DESTROY (perl experts please) (fwd)

2000-12-02 Thread pigfoot Chen
¡°¡mWayne Topa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>¡n¡G > Subject: Re: DESTROY (perl experts please) (fwd) > Date: Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 12:07:06PM +1100 > In reply to:Damien > Quoting Damien([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > hrm. afaik, unstable refers to the helixcode distribution - thu

Re: DESTROY (perl experts please) (fwd)

2000-12-01 Thread Wayne Topa
Subject: Re: DESTROY (perl experts please) (fwd) Date: Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 12:07:06PM +1100 In reply to:Damien Quoting Damien([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > > > > > deb http://spidermonkey.helixcode.com/distributions/debian unstable main > >

Re: DESTROY (perl experts please) (fwd)

2000-11-30 Thread Damien
> > > > deb http://spidermonkey.helixcode.com/distributions/debian unstable main >Thats Woody, not Potato > Potato is stable _not_ unstable hrm. afaik, unstable refers to the helixcode distribution - thus unstable helixcode will

Re: DESTROY (perl experts please) (fwd)

2000-11-30 Thread Wayne Topa
Subject: DESTROY (perl experts please) (fwd) Date: Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 05:05:25PM -0500 In reply to:Debian Ghost Quoting Debian Ghost([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Subject: RE: DESTROY (perl experts please) > > I don't seem to get the same reply back when I apt-cache

DESTROY (perl experts please) (fwd)

2000-11-29 Thread Debian Ghost
Subject: RE: DESTROY (perl experts please) I don't seem to get the same reply back when I apt-cache search for the packages. Are my sources.list wrong for potato? Man, I just don't get that list of perl stuff when I apt-cache search grep for perl. Maybe my sources are not what they should be: de