RE: Currency of packages

2001-06-04 Thread Ian Perry
PM To: Noah L. Meyerhans Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: Currency of packages On Sun, Jun 03, 2001 at 10:20:52PM -0400, Noah L. Meyerhans uttered: > I don't agree. I think "stable" is an innapropriate name. The prime > example for this is slink, which incl

Re: Currency of packages

2001-06-04 Thread Steve Kowalik
On Sun, Jun 03, 2001 at 10:20:52PM -0400, Noah L. Meyerhans uttered: > I don't agree. I think "stable" is an innapropriate name. The prime > example for this is slink, which included GNOME 0.3.something. This was > released after GNOME 1.0 came out. Let me tell you, there was nothing > at all "

Re: Currency of packages

2001-06-03 Thread Noah L. Meyerhans
On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 08:51:07AM -0700, Nate Amsden wrote: > > I'd like to hear how Debian old-timers work with this. > > we deal with it. i run cyrus imap 1.5.x and many other "old" packages > from stable. they are in stable for a reason..they are stable :) I don't agree. I think "stable" is

Re: Currency of packages

2001-06-03 Thread John Galt
I'm thinking tinker && reboot... If tinker fails, you really don't want to kill your uptime... On Sat, 2 Jun 2001, Rob Mahurin wrote: >On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 09:32:53AM -0700, Jaye Inabnit ke6sls wrote: >> >> where stable rules. Maintenance then isn't 'tinker & reboot', > >Shouldn't this be 'ti

Re: Currency of packages

2001-06-02 Thread Steve Kowalik
On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 07:14:22AM -0400, Rob Mahurin uttered: > On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 09:32:53AM -0700, Jaye Inabnit ke6sls wrote: > > > > where stable rules. Maintenance then isn't 'tinker & reboot', > > Shouldn't this be 'tinker ; reboot' ? If you use an ampersand your > tinkering will be

Re: Currency of packages

2001-06-02 Thread Rob Mahurin
On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 09:32:53AM -0700, Jaye Inabnit ke6sls wrote: > > where stable rules. Maintenance then isn't 'tinker & reboot', Shouldn't this be 'tinker ; reboot' ? If you use an ampersand your tinkering will be backgrounded and get interrupted by the reboot process. Rob -- The goys

Re: Currency of packages

2001-06-01 Thread Jaye Inabnit ke6sls
Good point. Think about those folks who install an OS in an office suit. There may be a dozen or more computers that need to work worry free. That's where stable rules. Maintenance then isn't 'tinker & reboot', 'tinker & reboot', but a check of system logs and a warm feeling that it's alright

Re: Currency of packages

2001-06-01 Thread Nate Amsden
> jennyw wrote: > I'd like to hear how Debian old-timers work with this. we deal with it. i run cyrus imap 1.5.x and many other "old" packages from stable. they are in stable for a reason..they are stable :) its a small price to pay to have a rock solid system that i don't have to worry about up

Re: Currency of packages

2001-06-01 Thread Rob Mahurin
Hi Jenny W, Please set your mailer to wrap long lines at about 70 characters. On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 09:44:46AM -0700, jennyw wrote: > I started using Debian because folks suggested it was easy to > maintain (e.g. apt-get). I really like apt -- it certainly makes > installing and downloading th

Re: Currency of packages

2001-05-31 Thread Casper Gielen
On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 09:44:46AM -0700, jennyw wrote: > I started using Debian because folks suggested it was easy to maintain > (e.g. apt-get). I really like apt -- it certainly makes installing and > downloading things a lot easier than other distributions. However ... > I'm not (yet) a heavy

Currency of packages

2001-05-31 Thread jennyw
I started using Debian because folks suggested it was easy to maintain (e.g. apt-get). I really like apt -- it certainly makes installing and downloading things a lot easier than other distributions.  However ... I'm not (yet) a heavy Linux user, and I find that a lot of times I want softwar