Re: Creating kernel packages with make-kpkg

2000-10-19 Thread Klaus Reimer
Hallo, > I was told, just recently in debian-devel, that only the kernel needs > to be patched (and only the top-level Makefile). Apparently, the > patch applies cleanly to 2.2.17, not sure about 2.4.x Looks like that's right. The kernel modules are now installed in /lib/modules/2.2.17-adder

Re: Creating kernel packages with make-kpkg

2000-10-19 Thread Brian May
> "Klaus" == Klaus Reimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Klaus> Yes, that's exactly what I wanted to know. I have read in Klaus> that Flavour-patch-file that klogd needs to patched to. Is Klaus> the klogd in Debian 2.2 already patched? I was told, just recently in debian-devel, that

Re: Creating kernel packages with make-kpkg

2000-10-19 Thread Klaus Reimer
Hallo, > You shouldn't be using the --flavour option unless you > have patched the kernel using the patch supplied in > /usr/doc/kernel-package/Flavours.gz Ah, haven't known that. Thanks. > Klaus> the modules? And are these module packages compatible with > Klaus> all kernel 2.2.17

Re: Creating kernel packages with make-kpkg

2000-10-19 Thread Brian May
> "Klaus" == Klaus Reimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Klaus> make-kpkg --bzImage --flavour adder --revsion 2.2.17-1 Klaus> buildpackage [...] Klaus> Second problem: The kernel-image does install its modules Klaus> in /lib/modules/2.2.17. But if I compile the additional

Creating kernel packages with make-kpkg

2000-10-19 Thread Klaus Reimer
Hi, I have created some kernel packages with make-kpkg and now I want to build the alsa- and pcmcia-modules for these kernels. For example I have two different kernel packages: kernel-image-2.2.17-mamba - This is a standard kernel with no additional patches kernel-image-2.2.17-adder