of hddtemp.
I use that with xfce and the sensor plugin you mentioned.
Thank you for the reply. :-)
David
You may want to try out the psensor program. Psensor makes graphs of CPU
temperature. It has a server module that allows for remote monitoring as
well.
Thank you for the reply. :-)
David
emperature.
> > echo drivetemp > /etc/modules-load.d/drivetemp.conf
> >
> > Now you can get rid of hddtemp.
> >
> > I use that with xfce and the sensor plugin you mentioned.
>
>
> Thank you for the reply. :-)
>
>
> David
>
On 10/27/24 13:19, Charles Curley wrote:
On Sun, 27 Oct 2024 09:36:32 -0700
David Christensen wrote:
To allow the Sensor plugin access to hard disk temperatures, I have
set the set-user-ID bit on hddtemp(8):
# chmod u+s /usr/sbin/hddtemp
hddtemp has been superseded by a kernel module, which
On Sun, 27 Oct 2024 09:36:32 -0700
David Christensen wrote:
> To allow the Sensor plugin access to hard disk temperatures, I have
> set the set-user-ID bit on hddtemp(8):
>
> # chmod u+s /usr/sbin/hddtemp
hddtemp has been superseded by a kernel module, which you can enable
like so:
# enable ge
On 10/26/24 22:11, Corey wrote:
where shall i check the CPU temperature in command line?
my dell laptop gets hot and hot when debian run for some time. do you think
it's due to cpu too busy?
Thanks.
My current daily driver is a Dell PowerEdge T30 Xeon E3-1225 v5:
2024-10-27 08:28:10
On Sun, Oct 27, 2024 at 4:48 AM Corey wrote:
> where shall i check the CPU temperature in command line?
> my dell laptop gets hot and hot when debian run for some time. do you
> think it's due to cpu too busy?
>
LM-Sensors displays chipset temps and fan speeds.
sudo apt i
Hello,
cat /sys/class/thermal/thermal_zone0/temp / 1000 = °C
Work's for me on raspberry pi and Thinkpad Laptop.
Best Regards
Am 27.10.24 um 06:11 schrieb Corey:
where shall i check the CPU temperature in command line?
my dell laptop gets hot and hot when debian run for some time. d
where shall i check the CPU temperature in command line?
my dell laptop gets hot and hot when debian run for some time. do you think
it's due to cpu too busy?
Thanks.
On Fri 25 Oct 2024 at 09:19:30 (-0400), eben@somewhere wrote:
> > Not using synaptic, I don't know why that path was chosen. But
> > you'd need world-execute all the way down from /root itself.
>
> Well the chmod thing is not acceptable.
Totally reasonable; any world-readable file in /root
would
On 10/24/24 22:20, David Wright wrote:
On Thu 24 Oct 2024 at 20:34:18 (-0400), e...@gmx.us wrote:
On 10/24/24 20:01, David Wright wrote:
Because of the ownership:
$ ls -l /var/cache/apt/archives/
total 4
-rw-r- 1 root root0 Apr 16 2022 lock
drwx-- 2 _apt root 4096
Eben, don't worry, got into same issue with some mails sent from debian.
These are then marked with the "*SPAM*" tag in the header, althpough
it is no spam. It as someting to do with DKIM. I already noticed debian of it,
but they say, they are not responsible and some other mailer is do
On 10/24/24 22:33, David Wright wrote:
> Anyway, it appears I can't reply to eben's posts in this thread but,
> if this gets through, I can reply to my own. (And to Daniel Roberts
> earlier.) What triggers their spam detector software, presumably
> "mailclean11", I have no idea.
I don't know why
Dunno, if it is correct:
I fell into the same issue. Just deleted the complete folder, then started
synaptic again and the folder was new created = issue gone.
Not sure, if this is enough. Maybe the reason is, debian is working on umask
settings and (as far as I read), there is normally no "def
On Thu 24 Oct 2024 at 21:20:28 (-0500), David Wright wrote:
[ … ]
> Apologies ditto.
That should have read:
Apologies, BTW, for losing the threading, but for some reason, my
email host rejected so many permutations of my post (nine, in fact)
that it became apparent the problem might lie in the
On Thu 24 Oct 2024 at 20:34:18 (-0400), e...@gmx.us wrote:
> On 10/24/24 20:01, David Wright wrote:
> > Because of the ownership:
> >
> >$ ls -l /var/cache/apt/archives/
> >total 4
> >-rw-r- 1 root root0 Apr 16 2022 lock
> >drwx-- 2 _apt root 4096 Oct 22 19:00 partial
>
On 10/24/24 20:01, David Wright wrote:
Because of the ownership:
$ ls -l /var/cache/apt/archives/
total 4
-rw-r- 1 root root0 Apr 16 2022 lock
drwx-- 2 _apt root 4096 Oct 22 19:00 partial
$
we can assume that _apt is the user that actually downloads packages
(into pa
Because of the ownership:
$ ls -l /var/cache/apt/archives/
total 4
-rw-r- 1 root root0 Apr 16 2022 lock
drwx-- 2 _apt root 4096 Oct 22 19:00 partial
$
we can assume that _apt is the user that actually downloads packages
(into partial/) before APT installs them. But your ass
Dunno if this helps.
My cpu is an Intel I7-2670QM.
The related files, you might need to check are:
/etc/laptop-mode/conf.d/cpufreq.conf
As far as I remember I chaned nothing here in the past.
Second one is:
/etc/modules
in here I set the
On Wed, 23 Oct 2024 16:20:45 -0400
e...@gmx.us wrote:
Hello e...@gmx.us,
>Is that in the package "linux-cpupower", or where do you get it?
No, it's what I called it. However, upon checking, I see that it's not
in stable. linux-cpupower, AFAIUI, will also do the job.
--
Regards _ "Val
On Wed, 23 Oct 2024 14:46:05 -0400
Eben King wrote:
Hello Eben,
>less heat inside the case, is it possible to cap it at a certain speed?
Yes. I use cpupower-gui for that sort of thing.
--
Regards _ "Valid sig separator is {dash}{dash}{space}"
/ ) "The blindingly obvious
On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 3:04 PM Michael Kjörling wrote:
>
> On 23 Oct 2024 14:46 -0400, from e...@gmx.us (Eben King):
> > I have a variable-speed CPU. Normally the OS manages it. If I want to make
> > less heat inside the case, is it possible to cap it at a certain speed
what I'm going to try, running the CPU slow so it (hopefully) cools down enough.
--
Most rock journalism is people who can't write interviewing people who
can't talk for people who can't read.
-- Frank Zappa (from MM, Jr)
On 10/23/24 16:46, Hans wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 23. Oktober 2024, 20:46:05 CEST schrieb Eben King:
>> I have a variable-speed CPU. Normally the OS manages it. If I want to make
>> less heat inside the case, is it possible to cap it at a certain speed?
>
> Try the command
c 3 -u 800MHz
>
> For the record, that should be #!/bin/bash instead of #:/bin/bash
> (or you could use #!/bin/sh in this case, since you're not actually
> using any bash extensions).
Yes, of course, just a little typo.
Tried a second ago, if it still works.
cpufreq-info | grep &qu
Am Mittwoch, 23. Oktober 2024, 20:46:05 CEST schrieb Eben King:
> I have a variable-speed CPU. Normally the OS manages it. If I want to make
> less heat inside the case, is it possible to cap it at a certain speed?
Try the command "cpufreq-set" like the example:
cpufreq-set -c
On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 22:46:09 +0200, Hans wrote:
> #:/bin/bash
>
> cpufreq-set -c 0 -u 800MHz
> cpufreq-set -c 1 -u 800MHz
> cpufreq-set -c 2 -u 800MHz
> cpufreq-set -c 3 -u 800MHz
For the record, that should be #!/bin/bash instead of #:/bin/bash
(or you could use #!/bin/sh in this case, since
Eben King wrote:
> I have a variable-speed CPU. Normally the OS manages it. If I want to make
> less heat inside the case, is it possible to cap it at a certain speed?
If you're trying to control the heat--i.e., the power dissipation--your BIOS
may have a CPU setting for the PL1, Po
On 10/23/24 14:52, Brad Rogers wrote:
On Wed, 23 Oct 2024 14:46:05 -0400
Eben King wrote:
Hello Eben,
less heat inside the case, is it possible to cap it at a certain speed?
Yes. I use cpupower-gui for that sort of thing.
Is that in the package "linux-cpupower", or where do you get it?
On 23 Oct 2024 14:46 -0400, from e...@gmx.us (Eben King):
> I have a variable-speed CPU. Normally the OS manages it. If I want to make
> less heat inside the case, is it possible to cap it at a certain speed?
CPU speed is controlled by the CPU frequency governor.
Set /sys/devices/syst
I have a variable-speed CPU. Normally the OS manages it. If I want to make
less heat inside the case, is it possible to cap it at a certain speed?
--
Did they get you to trade your heroes for ghosts? Hot ashes for trees?
Hot air for a cool breeze? Cold comfort for change?
Did you exchange a
On 26/09/24 at 14:53, Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote:
A new microcode for your CPU should be inside of
/usr/lib/firmware/amd-ucode/microcode_amd_fam15h.bin
since it says 'family: 0x15' in your output.
There is a little program on https://github.com/AMDESE/amd_ucode_info to
look into the
;Family=0x15 Model=0x10 Stepping=0x01: Patch=0x06001119 Length=2592 bytes
>
> So yes, your CPU microcode is up-to-date.
Perhaps it would be nice to ship a similar tool (or just a textual table as
documentation) in the amd64-microcode package. I agree that it is not too
easy to verify your
On 26/09/24 at 10:29, Michel Verdier wrote:
On 2024-09-25, Franco Martelli wrote:
The file that contains the microcode for my CPU is dated April 2022:
$ LANG=C ls -l /lib/firmware/amd-ucode/microcode_amd_fam15h.bin
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 7876 Apr 15 2022
/lib/firmware/amd-ucode
Hi Franco,
Franco Martelli wrote on 25/09/2024 17:07:
On 25/09/24 at 14:58, Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote:
What is the output of
sudo dmesg | grep -E '(microcode|model)'
?
This should show information about your CPU model and if its microcode is
actually updated.
Regards,
Jörg.
On 2024-09-25, Franco Martelli wrote:
> The file that contains the microcode for my CPU is dated April 2022:
>
> $ LANG=C ls -l /lib/firmware/amd-ucode/microcode_amd_fam15h.bin
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 7876 Apr 15 2022
> /lib/firmware/amd-ucode/microcode_amd_fam15h.bin
S
Franco Martelli wrote:
> On 25/09/24 at 18:16, Dan Ritter wrote:
> > > Is the CPU updated to the latest microcode?
> > Yes.
> >
> > Resources I needed to find that out for you:
> > https://www.cpu-world.com/cgi-bin/CPUID.pl?CPUID=22328
>
> Thank yo
On 25/09/24 at 18:16, Dan Ritter wrote:
Is the CPU updated to the latest microcode?
Yes.
Resources I needed to find that out for you:
https://www.cpu-world.com/cgi-bin/CPUID.pl?CPUID=22328
Thank you for the time you spent for me
and
https://github.com/platomav/CPUMicrocodes/blob/master
Franco Martelli wrote:
> On 25/09/24 at 14:58, Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote:
> > What is the output of
> >
> > sudo dmesg | grep -E '(microcode|model)'
> >
> > ?
> > This should show information about your CPU model and if its microcode
&g
On 25/09/24 at 14:58, Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote:
What is the output of
sudo dmesg | grep -E '(microcode|model)'
?
This should show information about your CPU model and if its microcode
is actually updated.
Regards,
Jörg.
It returns:
~# dmesg | grep -E '(microcode|model)
hether is the latest microcode installed I followed the
instructions at the "Debugging" section:
https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/developer/articles/technical/software-security-guidance/best-practices/microcode-update-guidance.html#inpage-nav-1-2
but I've a AMD CPU not an I
What is the output of
sudo dmesg | grep -E '(microcode|model)'
?
This should show information about your CPU model and if its microcode is
actually updated.
Regards,
Jörg.
On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 6:38 PM Franco Martelli wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> In the latest Debian's minor update (12.7) it was updated the
> "amd64-microcode" package, during the update process a message that it
> said: "The cpu microcode will be updated a
Hi everyone,
In the latest Debian's minor update (12.7) it was updated the
"amd64-microcode" package, during the update process a message that it
said: "The cpu microcode will be updated at the next reboot" was showed.
The issue is that I'm running an homemad
, dmesg continuously reports:
(...)
[Mon Jan 29 12:13:00 2024] cli64[1666090]: segfault at 0 ip
0040dd3b
sp 7ffc2bfba630 error 4 in cli64[40+18a000] likely on CPU 41
(core
17, socket 0)
(...)
What's cli64? A package search comes up empty for me.
https://packages.debian.org/s
]: segfault at 0 ip 0040dd3b
sp 7ffc2bfba630 error 4 in cli64[40+18a000] likely on CPU 41 (core
17, socket 0)
(...)
What's cli64? A package search comes up empty for me.
https://packages.debian.org/search?searchon=contents&keywords=cli64&mode=exactfilename&suite=
90]: segfault at 0 ip 0040dd3b
> sp 7ffc2bfba630 error 4 in cli64[400000+18a000] likely on CPU 41 (core
> 17, socket 0)
> (...)
What's cli64? A package search comes up empty for me.
https://packages.debian.org/search?searchon=contents&keywords=cli64&mode=exactfilename&sui
error 4 in cli64[40+18a000] likely on CPU 41 (core 17,
socket 0)
Well, what is cli64? I don't think it came with debian, so you'd have to
start by looking at what that program is doing.
(If you're not sure, I'm going to guess it's the areca raid management
softw
Hi all,
I have 2 bare metal Debian 12.4 servers with fairly new Intel CPUs and
plenty of memory.
On both, dmesg continuously reports:
(...)
[Mon Jan 29 12:13:00 2024] cli64[1666090]: segfault at 0 ip
0040dd3b sp 7ffc2bfba630 error 4 in cli64[40+18a000]
likely on CPU 41
everything and possibly updating the BIOS ?
>
> > If, at the same time as replacing the motherboard, i also replace the CPU
> > with a CPU of the same model and manufacturer, do I need to do anything
> > apart from reconnecting everything and possibly updating the BIOS ?
oot / MOK keys.
>
> If, at the same time as replacing the motherboard, i also replace the CPU
> with a CPU of the same model and manufacturer, do I need to do anything
> apart from reconnecting everything and possibly updating the BIOS ?
CPU won't need anything special.
--
|_|
eplacing the motherboard, i also replace the CPU
> with a CPU of the same model and manufacturer, do I need to do anything
> apart from reconnecting everything and possibly updating the BIOS ?
The new motherboard's NIC should have a unique MAC address. If the MAC address
was
used in any porti
If I replace a motherboard in a desktop PC with a motherboard of the same
model and manufacturer, do I need to do anything apart from reconnecting
everything and possibly updating the BIOS ?
If, at the same time as replacing the motherboard, i also replace the CPU
with a CPU of the same model
On 02 May 2023 00:19, NetValue Operations Centre wrote:
Good thinking, trying that.
I worked through some of the cpu features, and when removing the line:
the test VM on 5.10.0-22-amd64 booted successfully.
https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/x86/protection-keys.txt
"M
Good thinking, trying that.
I worked through some of the cpu features, and when removing the line:
the test VM on 5.10.0-22-amd64 booted successfully.
https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/x86/protection-keys.txt
"Memory Protection Keys provides a mechanism for enforcing page-
at the moment.
>
I now found out, that the 5.10.0-22 kernel boots fine, if I set the CPU
model manually to "EPYC-Rome" in my VM configuration (I use "virt-manager")
In that case, "virsh dumpxml" tells me about the VM's CPU:
EPYC-Rome
I've tried downgrading libc (and related packages) to 2.31-13+deb11u5,
but no success - still getting segmentation faults. Booting back to the
5.10.0-21 kernel seems the only solution at the moment.
Regards,
--
Alan Jackson
Yes, seeing similar issue here, Deb 11 guest on AMD-based libvirt
hypervisor, with vCPU configured as "EPYC-Rome".
The point at which segfaults occur seems slightly non-deterministic,
rebooting the server into the same kernel crashes at different points.
Sometimes the console dumps to initramf
On 2023-04-30 14:56 +0200, Andreas Haumer wrote:
> I have several virtualized systems around here.
>
> Yesterday I upgraded some of our Bullseye VMs to 11.7 and found,
> that now all systems running on a host with an AMD Ryzen 5950X CPU now
> crash with segfaults at various comma
at now all systems running on a host with an AMD Ryzen 5950X CPU now
> crash with segfaults at various commands.
>
> I have other VMs running on a server with an AMD EPYC CPU.
> Those VMs work fine with Debian 11.7
>
> But the VMs on the AMD Ryzen 5950X host now all crash.
>
Hi!
I have several virtualized systems around here.
Yesterday I upgraded some of our Bullseye VMs to 11.7 and found,
that now all systems running on a host with an AMD Ryzen 5950X CPU now
crash with segfaults at various commands.
I have other VMs running on a server with an AMD EPYC CPU.
Those
nice didn't do it. "nice -n 19" didn't make any change.
"nice" does not limit the CPU usage. It just changes the scheduling
priorities between processes.
--
Vincent Lefèvre - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)
On 11/04/2023 07:12, songbird wrote:
the bios did let me turn down the temperature so we'll see
how that works next time i need to do an upload.
I am curious if it affects
/sys/class/thermal/thermal_zone*
I have never tried to do anything with this interface. I decided to look
into sysfs
songbird wrote:
> songbird wrote:
> ...
>> i've been trying to find anything that will let me set this
>> but no luck yet in my searches.
>
> ...
>
> of course the moment i send the message it comes to me that
> perhaps the BIOS will let me do this, but i don't want to reboot
> at the moment
On 4/8/23 07:17, songbird wrote:
i have a program that has changed it's behavior to suddenly
become a CPU hog (while doing something simple like uploading
files for my website). probably a bug, but it got me to
wondering how i could limit the CPU temperature to a range
well below the ma
On 4/8/23 20:11, Mark Allums wrote:
On 4/8/2023 8:01 PM, David Christensen wrote:
On 4/8/23 07:17, songbird wrote:
i have a program that has changed it's behavior to suddenly
become a CPU hog (while doing something simple like uploading
files for my website). probably a bug, but it g
heduler should already schedule
optimally, be it preemptive SJF or whatever, anyway so only
possibility to reduce CPU temperature that way is to schedule
less anyway - also backwards, since computing is like the
"king" here it means if heat is a problem, it's not on our
side of it really.
--
underground experts united
https://dataswamp.org/~incal
On 08/04/2023 15:17, songbird wrote:
i have a program that has changed it's behavior to suddenly
become a CPU hog (while doing something simple like uploading
files for my website). probably a bug, but it got me to
wondering how i could limit the CPU temperature to a range
well belo
On 4/8/2023 8:01 PM, David Christensen wrote:
On 4/8/23 07:17, songbird wrote:
i have a program that has changed it's behavior to suddenly
become a CPU hog (while doing something simple like uploading
files for my website). probably a bug, but it got me to
wondering how i could limi
On 4/8/23 07:17, songbird wrote:
i have a program that has changed it's behavior to suddenly
become a CPU hog (while doing something simple like uploading
files for my website). probably a bug, but it got me to
wondering how i could limit the CPU temperature to a range
well below the ma
On 09/04/2023 02:17, songbird wrote:
i have an intel processor and it has the MAX which does
prevent it from going higher (100C), but i'd like to keep it
at 70C or lower.
I recommend thermald, which I use to limit my fanless 65 W i7-7700 CPU
to 80°C, passively cooled with heat pipes conn
On 9/4/23 00:56, Stefan Monnier wrote:
I recommend to go fanless whenever possible.
Computers should be silent.
I have a fanless ARM router that even in high summer has no thermal
problems (I am in Australia and I have no aircon). It does have a
massive case bonded to the CPU
I also
but no luck yet in my searches.
I installed 'thermald' to stop my CPUs hitting the max junction
temperature and hard resetting after a few minutes. I was quite
surprised that the standard kernel doesn't actually have thermal
protection which throttles CPU clocks and requires an external
userspace program to do this.
--
Tixy
Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
...
> Maybe don't use FTP but use rsync - that way you can come back to it
> after a while and start again at the point you left off?
i have no control over what is listening at the other
end other than i sign on.
i can limit the FTP software to fewer connections and
Jeffrey Walton wrote:
>> What would happen, if we started a political movement based
>> on nationalism and Unix?
>>
>> What would be the first thing we would do when we get
>> installed as government?
>
> Annex the Netherlands, and take control of ASML.
> Annex Taiwan, and take control of TSMC.
I
On Sat, Apr 8, 2023 at 1:29 PM Emanuel Berg wrote:
>
> >> I recommend to go fanless whenever possible.
> >> Computers should be silent.
> >
> > Yeah, optimally ...
>
> What would happen, if we started a political movement based on
> nationalism and Unix?
>
> What would be the first thing we would
>> I recommend to go fanless whenever possible.
>> Computers should be silent.
>
> Yeah, optimally ...
What would happen, if we started a political movement based on
nationalism and Unix?
What would be the first thing we would do when we get
installed as government?
Maybe close the border or som
Stefan Monnier wrote:
> I recommend to go fanless whenever possible.
> Computers should be silent.
Yeah, optimally ...
--
underground experts united
https://dataswamp.org/~incal
provided with the CPU has been adequate and quiet enough
> that i never have felt i had to buy the heatsink after
> all. i may do that in the future if this fan goes out.
I recommend to go fanless whenever possible.
Computers should be silent.
Stefan
On Sat, Apr 08, 2023 at 11:43:53AM -0400, songbird wrote:
> tv.debian wrote:
> ...
> > Also modern cpu do not suffer from high temperatures as much as the cpu
> > of yore, they use up all the thermal headroom they have, then throttle
> > the frequency/power to stay at t
t...@myposts.ovh wrote:
...
> By using a fanner?
well-trained chipmunk?
songbird
Jeremy Nicoll wrote:
> On Sat, 8 Apr 2023, at 15:26, songbird wrote:
>> songbird wrote:
>> ...
>>> i've been trying to find anything that will let me set this
>>> but no luck yet in my searches.
>
> Surely you don't need to set a temperature lim
On Sat, 8 Apr 2023, at 16:39, songbird wrote:
> only with this change to the FTP software has it become
> an annoyance that made me go look for a way to deal with
> it.
>
> filing a bug against the FTP software is also something
> i should do, but i've not gotten that far yet. ;)
Meantime, w
tv.debian wrote:
...
> Also modern cpu do not suffer from high temperatures as much as the cpu
> of yore, they use up all the thermal headroom they have, then throttle
> the frequency/power to stay at that level. Of course the rest of the
> system has to deal with the residual hea
ht a bigger heatsink so that the entire
thing could run without the fan, but the small fan
provided with the CPU has been adequate and quiet enough
that i never have felt i had to buy the heatsink after
all. i may do that in the future if this fan goes out.
one of my main design goals with this
davidson wrote:
...
> I would do
>
> $ man -k limit
>
> and see what looked interesting. prlimit(1) looks like it has a lot of
> switches.
ok, thanks will look at that too. :)
songbird
On Sat, 8 Apr 2023 Jeremy Nicoll wrote:
On Sat, 8 Apr 2023, at 15:26, songbird wrote:
songbird wrote:
...
i've been trying to find anything that will let me set this
but no luck yet in my searches.
Surely you don't need to set a temperature limit? If you
do, the cpu will stil
songbird wrote:
> i have a program that has changed it's behavior to suddenly
> become a CPU hog (while doing something simple like
> uploading files for my website). probably a bug, but it got
> me to wondering how i could limit the CPU temperature to
> a range well below th
On Sat, 8 Apr 2023, at 15:26, songbird wrote:
> songbird wrote:
> ...
>> i've been trying to find anything that will let me set this
>> but no luck yet in my searches.
Surely you don't need to set a temperature limit? If you
do, the cpu will still run (far too mu
reboot
at the moment to check that. will check later.
songbird
Hello, yes most motherboard bios will let you do that, also you may be
able to play with frequency boost and other advanced features that
greatly impact cpu temperature. Utilities like cpupower (cpupower-gui)
can allow yo
songbird wrote:
...
> i've been trying to find anything that will let me set this
> but no luck yet in my searches.
...
of course the moment i send the message it comes to me that
perhaps the BIOS will let me do this, but i don't want to reboot
at the moment to check that. will check later
On 2023-04-08 22:17, songbird wrote:
i have a program that has changed it's behavior to suddenly
become a CPU hog (while doing something simple like uploading
files for my website). probably a bug, but it got me to
wondering how i could limit the CPU temperature to a range
well belo
i have a program that has changed it's behavior to suddenly
become a CPU hog (while doing something simple like uploading
files for my website). probably a bug, but it got me to
wondering how i could limit the CPU temperature to a range
well below the maximum that kicks in by the CPU i
On 18/02/2023 08:15, Tixy wrote:
On Sat, 2023-02-18 at 07:09 +, piorunz wrote:
On 18/02/2023 06:17, Tom wrote:
It also has 2 drives one is chip and the other spins.
What?
I'm guessing that's one SSD and one spinning magnetic media hard drive.
Yes, I guessed that *after* I send the
On Sat, 2023-02-18 at 07:09 +, piorunz wrote:
> On 18/02/2023 06:17, Tom wrote:
>
>
> > It also has 2 drives one is chip and the other spins.
>
> What?
>
I'm guessing that's one SSD and one spinning magnetic media hard drive.
--
Tixy
On Sat, Feb 18, 2023 at 1:57 AM Tom wrote:
>
> IsIntel® Core™ i5-10600K Processor
>
> Is this processor supported? Which release be best.
The Core i5-10600K is a 10th gen/IceLake processor. It is supported by
the linux kernel.
There are no microcode updates (yet?) on my Core i5-1035G1 10th gen:
On 18/02/2023 06:17, Tom wrote:
Is*Intel® Core™ i5-10600K Processor*
Is this processor supported? Which release be best.
Hi Tom,
This processor from 2020 is very well supported by recent Linux kernels.
You can use Debian Stable as Felix suggested.
It also has 2 drives one is chip and t
Tom composed on 2023-02-18 01:17 (UTC-0500):
> IsIntel® Core™ i5-10600K Processor
> Is this processor supported? Which release be best.
> It also has 2 drives one is chip and the other spins.
Your CPU was introduced a bit over a year before Debian 11/Bullseye, so Bullseye
as the curre
IsIntel® Core™ i5-10600K Processor
Is this processor supported? Which release be best.
It also has 2 drives one is chip and the other spins.
Tom Clark
Sent from Mail for Windows
On 1/10/23 13:12, Dan Ritter wrote:
Georgi Naplatanov wrote:
Hi all!
I've just read Debian's Wiki page about CPU Microcode and there are
mentioned Intel's and AMD's processors for AMD64 architecture.
What is the situation with processors from other architectures
(arm64
Georgi Naplatanov wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I've just read Debian's Wiki page about CPU Microcode and there are
> mentioned Intel's and AMD's processors for AMD64 architecture.
>
> What is the situation with processors from other architectures
> (arm64/A
1 - 100 of 2097 matches
Mail list logo
