Hi,
On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 05:39:30PM +0200, rudu wrote:
> I wrote an e-mail to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with the
> subject "unsubscribe" and sent it, expecting to receive a confirmation
> e-mail ... which never comes ...
> I also tried https://www.debian.org/Ma
Hello,
I'm just trying to suspend my subscription to Debian-user for a few weeks.
So, I wrote an e-mail to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with the
subject "unsubscribe" and sent it, expecting to receive a confirmation
e-mail ... which never comes ...
I also tried https:/
Noted.
On 2020-08-16 20:01, Henning Follmann wrote:
On Sun, Aug 16, 2020 at 05:44:51PM +0800, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En
Ming wrote:
Subject: I discovered a bug in the no-ip dynamic dns free hostname
auto
renewal/confirmation script written by loblab
[...]
Then I downloaded the no-ip ddns
Does ddclient support automatic confirmation of noip.com free hostnames?
On 2020-08-16 21:55, Charles Curley wrote:
On Sun, 16 Aug 2020 17:44:51 +0800
Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming wrote:
Subject: I discovered a bug in the no-ip dynamic dns free hostname
auto renewal/confirmation script
On Sun, 16 Aug 2020 17:44:51 +0800
Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming wrote:
> Subject: I discovered a bug in the no-ip dynamic dns free hostname
> auto renewal/confirmation script written by loblab
You may be better off using the debian package ddclient. It supports
no-ip.com.
--
Does a
On Sun, Aug 16, 2020 at 05:44:51PM +0800, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming wrote:
> Subject: I discovered a bug in the no-ip dynamic dns free hostname auto
> renewal/confirmation script written by loblab
>
[...]
> Then I downloaded the no-ip ddns free hostname auto renewal/confirmat
Subject: I discovered a bug in the no-ip dynamic dns free hostname auto
renewal/confirmation script written by loblab
Good day from Singapore,
Programming code troubleshooting person: Mr. Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En
Ming (Targeted Individual)
Country: Singapore
Date: 15 to 16 August 2020
On 30/11/16 11:59, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Tuesday 29 November 2016 20:36:29 iqwue Wabv wrote:
>> Richard,
>>
>> I didn't know that kernels > 4.1 are available as jessie-backports. Thanks.
>> Regards, Karol
>
> Only 4.7. The others appear not to be available any more.
Yes - there only ever appear
On Wednesday 30 November 2016 00:50:04 Mirko Parthey wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 10:59:35PM +, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > > I didn't know that kernels > 4.1 are available as jessie-backports.
> > > Thanks. Regards, Karol
> >
> > Only 4.7. The others appear not to be available any more.
>
> Old
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 10:59:35PM +, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > I didn't know that kernels > 4.1 are available as jessie-backports. Thanks.
> > Regards, Karol
>
> Only 4.7. The others appear not to be available any more.
Older backports are available at http://snapshot.debian.org/.
Mirko
On Tuesday 29 November 2016 20:36:29 iqwue Wabv wrote:
> Richard,
>
> I didn't know that kernels > 4.1 are available as jessie-backports. Thanks.
> Regards, Karol
Only 4.7. The others appear not to be available any more.
Lisi
Richard,
I didn't know that kernels > 4.1 are available as jessie-backports. Thanks.
Regards, Karol
Greg Wooledge [2016-11-28 12:43:44-05] wrote:
> $ apt-cache search linux-image-4.6
> $ apt-cache show linux-image-4.6.0-0.bpo.1-amd64
> Dunno what to tell you. Maybe it's because I have the package
> installed? I don't know why that would affect apt-cache search/show.
You have kernel 4.6 instal
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 05:26:58PM +, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> lisi@Eros:~$ aptitude search linux-image
> i linux-image-3.16.0-4-amd64 - Linux 3.16 for 64-bit PCs
> p linux-image-3.16.0-4-amd64-dbg - Debugging symbols for Linux
> 3.16.0-4-amd64
> p linux-image-4.7.
On Monday 28 November 2016 16:58:49 Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 04:57:12PM +, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > On Monday 28 November 2016 13:09:06 Richard Hector wrote:
> > > FWIW, newer kernels are available in jessie-backports; you don't need
> > > to upgrade the whole thing just for
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 04:57:12PM +, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Monday 28 November 2016 13:09:06 Richard Hector wrote:
> > FWIW, newer kernels are available in jessie-backports; you don't need to
> > upgrade the whole thing just for that.
>
> As of now, only 4.7, which has been getting a bad writ
On Monday 28 November 2016 13:09:06 Richard Hector wrote:
> On 27/11/16 04:53, iqwue Wabv wrote:
> > 1) jessie wifi doesn't work because lack of drivers for Intel® Dual Band
> > Wireless-AC 8260
> >
> > which is only available in >4.1 linux kernel. So I have to upgrade my
> > installation from jess
On 27/11/16 04:53, iqwue Wabv wrote:
> 1) jessie wifi doesn't work because lack of drivers for Intel® Dual Band
> Wireless-AC 8260
>
> which is only available in >4.1 linux kernel. So I have to upgrade my
> installation from jessie to testing
>
FWIW, newer kernels are available in jessie-backpor
Good to know, thanks.
Hello,
I would like to confirm the successfully running Debian testing
'stretch' on Lenovo Thinkpad Carbon X1 4th generation:
TYPE 20FC-0038PB production 16/07
1) jessie wifi doesn't work because lack of drivers for Intel® Dual Band
Wireless-AC 8260
which is only available in >4.1 linux ke
Effective C++ Programming Workshop -Singapore -OCT 11-15th 2010
The C++ Language Basics
A quick contrast on features of C++ & C
A simple C++ program
A C++ build Phase
Exploring GNU Tool chains for debugging skills
Cascading of I/O operators
Type compatibility
Scope resolution operator
Point
Good day.
I ask for easy to fulfil advice on how to make a confirmation on partition
format before formatting itself using mkfs.ext3.
I would like to be asked something like, Please type, I want to destroy the
partition.
I can make a bash script that will eventually run a renamed mkfs.ext3 but
On Fri, 7 Nov 2008, Sam Kuper wrote:
2008/11/7 Robert Holtzman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Fri, 7 Nov 2008, Sam Kuper wrote:
Dear all,
I selected option three (report abuse).
Sucker!
Listen, moron, some sites (Facebook, Reverbnation, etc) let users import
their address books from Hotmail, et
er
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Confirmation Message from I Am Three
On Fri, 7 Nov 2008, Sam Kuper wrote:
Dear all,
I selected option three (report abuse).
Sucker!
--
Bob Holtzman
A day without fusion is like, a day without sunshine If it smells it's
chemistry, if it c
Message-
From: Robert Holtzman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 07, 2008 12:34 PM
To: Sam Kuper
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Confirmation Message from I Am Three
On Fri, 7 Nov 2008, Sam Kuper wrote:
> Dear all,
> I selected option three (report
t; user
> > has abused the facility. Reverbnation is quite right to provide an abuse
> > link. It's actually much like the confirmation email the debian-user list
> > sends to people who sign up: to avoid a person subscribing someone who
> > doesn't wish to be subscribe
e
> link. It's actually much like the confirmation email the debian-user list
> sends to people who sign up: to avoid a person subscribing someone who
> doesn't wish to be subscribed.
No it's not, because the default is "you are subscribed". Only spammers
do this.
On Fri,07.Nov.08, 15:01:00, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> On Friday 07 November 2008, Andrei Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> about 'Re: Confirmation Message from I Am Three':
> >On Fri,07.Nov.08, 17:09:33, Sam Kuper wrote:
> >> I selected option three (
an abuse
link. It's actually much like the confirmation email the debian-user list
sends to people who sign up: to avoid a person subscribing someone who
doesn't wish to be subscribed.
So, frankly, given that at least one person on debian-user (me) doesn't want
to be emailed concer
On Fri, 7 Nov 2008, Sam Kuper wrote:
Dear all,
I selected option three (report abuse).
Sucker!
--
Bob Holtzman
A day without fusion is like, a day without sunshine
If it smells it's chemistry, if it crawls it's biology, if it doesn't
work it's physics
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PRO
On Friday 07 November 2008, Andrei Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
about 'Re: Confirmation Message from I Am Three':
>On Fri,07.Nov.08, 17:09:33, Sam Kuper wrote:
>> I selected option three (report abuse).
That seems appros.
>1. Please don't reply to spam - it
On Fri,07.Nov.08, 17:09:33, Sam Kuper wrote:
> Dear all,
> I selected option three (report abuse).
1. Please don't reply to spam - it makes it impossible to remove it from
the archives
2. Don't quote spam messages (partially or entirely) - it confuses the
spam filters
Regards,
Andrei
--
If you
Dear all,
I selected option three (report abuse).
Regards,
Sam
2008/11/7 I Am Three <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
>
> debian-user@lists.debian.org,
>
>
> I Am Three is now using our secure emailing software (FanReach, from
> ReverbNation.com) to keep fans up to date about their music, shows, and
> ne
debian-user@lists.debian.org,
I Am Three is now using our secure emailing software (FanReach, from
ReverbNation.com) to keep fans up to date about their music, shows, and
news. I Am Three has indicated that you opted-in to be on their existing
email list. As part of our rigid anti-spam proto
Hal Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I had a system drive go bad and it'll be just as easy to install Etch on
> it rather than rebuild it (currently it's Sarge). I have read the
> issues in UPGRADING from Sarge to Etch. I just want some clarification
Hey Hal. Sorry to hear it. Is this _RA
I had a system drive go bad and it'll be just as easy to install Etch on
it rather than rebuild it (currently it's Sarge). I have read the
issues in UPGRADING from Sarge to Etch. I just want some clarification
so I don't do something messy. If I wipe Sarge and install Etch, and I
still have
On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 11:57 +0200, Eeltje wrote:
> Did you get the nvidia module working again? It would be nice if you told
> whether you were successful or not...
> --
> Eeltje de Vries
>
>
I am sorry not to reply early. I was busy for some personal business.
Yes, this problem is solved now
On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 02:25:39PM +0100, Jaime Ventura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
heard to say:
> Thank you all for you replies.
> This was the answer I was look for since I prefer to use the command
> line, although running aptitude from an unprivileged user(mentioned by
> Johannes) was also a
a pressed file? That way all my new systems would have that option set.
Thanks
Jaime
Daniel Burrows wrote:
On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 11:49:57AM +0100, Jaime Ventura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
heard to say:
Hello,
Is there any way to force aptitude to ask for confirmation when
install o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jaime Ventura wrote:
> Hello,
>Is there any way to force aptitude to ask for confirmation when
> install or remove package.
Maybe even better just run aptitude as ordinary user (from CLI).
Whenever you want to commit something it will
On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 11:49:57AM +0100, Jaime Ventura wrote:
> Hello,
>Is there any way to force aptitude to ask for confirmation when
> install or remove package.
Run it interactively (just type aptitude with no arguments). Then when
you hit 'g' for go, it will tell y
On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 11:49:57AM +0100, Jaime Ventura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
heard to say:
> Hello,
>Is there any way to force aptitude to ask for confirmation when
> install or remove package.
I'm guessing you're running installs from the command line? You
w
Hello,
Is there any way to force aptitude to ask for confirmation when
install or remove package.
Thanks
Jaime
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you for subscribing. You have now unsubscribed and no more messages will
be sent.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you for subscribing. You have now unsubscribed and no more messages will
be sent.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello.
Your mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] requires your confirmation.
To confirm that your mail is legitimate, simply click on this URL:
https://www.gradwell.com/u/?c=586c8b9673b729387c476726
Once you have confirmed this mail then you will never have
to confirm any more mails to [EMAIL PROTECTED
mail messages ("junk mail" or "spam").
This includes, but is not limited to, bulk-mailing of commercial advertising,
information announcements, and political tracts. Such material may only be
sent to those who have specifically requested it.
Confirmation in Error?
On th
Julie Cialini.com Confirmation:
I want to personally Thank You for your e-mail. Please make sure you bookmark my site
at www.JulieCialini.com for future visits. Thanks Again...Love Julie Cialini
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl
Hello
My name is Chang and I am a mo rtgage broker that
was assigned to your case.
I just review your application and glad to inform you that
we can approve you.
Please click on this link and enter some more info
so I cancomplete your application. We should be
able to finish thisup pretty qui
You have now unsubscribed and no more messages will be sent.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You have now unsubscribed and no more messages will be sent.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You have now unsubscribed and no more messages will be sent.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You have now unsubscribed and no more messages will be sent.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You have now unsubscribed and no more messages will be sent.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You have now unsubscribed and no more messages will be sent.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Protected message is attached.
Service: http://www.key2learning.com.au
Mail To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*** Mail Scanner: No Virus found
*** LISTS.DEBIAN Anti Virus
*** http://www.lists.debian.org
Norton AntiVirus Deleted1.txt
Description: plain/text
Protected message is attached.
Service: http://www.key2learning.com.au
Mail To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*** Mail Scanner: No Virus found
*** LISTS.DEBIAN Anti Virus
*** http://www.lists.debian.org
Norton AntiVirus Deleted1.txt
Description: plain/text
Read the attachment for details.
+++ A service of SEAFM.COM.AU
+++ http://www.seafm.com.au
+++ Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*** Anti-Virus: No Virus!
*** LISTS.DEBIAN Anti Virus
*** http://www.lists.debian.org
Norton AntiVirus Deleted1.txt
Description: plain/text
Protected message is attached.
Service: http://www.oztips.com
Mail To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Norton AntiVirus Deleted1.txt
Description: plain/text
Your password was changed successfully.
Service: http://www.giftlog.com
Mail To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*** Mail- Attachment: No suspicious Virus signatures
*** LISTS.DEBIAN Anti Virus
*** http://www.lists.debian.org
Norton AntiVirus Deleted1.txt
Description: plain/text
Thank you for subscribing. You have now unsubscribed and no more messages will be sent.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you for subscribing. You have now unsubscribed and no more messages will be sent.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you for subscribing. You have now unsubscribed and no more messages will be sent.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 09:42:33AM -0500, Adam Aube wrote:
> If a user will open a random zip file they received in their email and run
> its contents, they will certainly enter their root password when prompted
> to do so.
Again, it's a correctable
s. keeling wrote:
Incoming from Scarletdown:
How's about something like this?
Dear Linux user,
Please find the NEW LINUX Virus program called HONOR. Since this
Scenario 1:
"Hey Boss; the mailserver's hosed again."
"How did that happen?"
"Someone checked their mail."
Scenario 2:
"Hey Boss; th
On Thursday 29 January 2004 12:47 am, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 08:50:38PM -0500, Adam Aube wrote:
> > Migrating them to a new OS won't help - only education will.
>
> No, but it'll likely go a long way in limiting damage if they're not
> root.
It may limit the damage - but it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 08:50:38PM -0500, Adam Aube wrote:
> Migrating them to a new OS won't help - only education will.
No, but it'll likely go a long way in limiting damage if they're not root.
- --
.''`. Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 11:04:52AM +1030, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> And the more that Linux systems succumb to the usability vs security
> (eg by having passwordless root logins or everyone running about as
> admin) then we'll become the targets for t
On Thu, 29 Jan 2004 09:29:41 +1100
"Ian Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does anyone know what this is ?
>
> Or is it just elaborate spam ?
>
> Or am I now on yet ANOTHER spam list ?
>
Hello Ian,
Don't worry too much about the noise.
A lot of people don't realise you're a Debian newbie, so
Paul Johnson wrote:
On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 04:34:35PM -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
When the signal to noise ratio starts to approach 1:1
it's time to take steps.
YOU already have the power.
http://ursine.ca/~baloo/clamd-exiscan.txt
1:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~} dpkg -l clamav\*
Desired=Unknown/Install/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 02:20:39AM +0100, Brian Schmidt wrote:
> From what I understand then the mailing list checks the sender address,
> to see if it is subscribed to the mailinglist.
The debian lists are open, not closed.
> A thing I would love t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 07:48:55PM -0500, Rajesh Menon wrote:
> i don;t know much about setting up mailing-lists, but can;t it be setup
> to allow mails ONLY from REGISTERED users?
Who is registered? A large portion of the readership isn't subscribe
On 2004-01-29, s. keeling penned:
>
> Why is debian-* the place to go to complain about Windows viruses?!?
> I choose Linux & Debian to avoid Windows and all its cracks and
> deficiencies. Others (perhaps including you?) use Linux/Debian in a
> pointless attempt to support/protect an unusable Wind
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 04:34:35PM -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
> When the signal to noise ratio starts to approach 1:1
> it's time to take steps.
YOU already have the power.
http://ursine.ca/~baloo/clamd-exiscan.txt
- --
.''`. Paul Johnson <[EMAI
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 10:51:52AM +1100, Ian Perry wrote:
> Firstly... my apologies to the list.
>
> Well, thank you for your abrupt reply and for being so damn rude.
>
> If you can't be civil, then please in future don't bother responding.
Apply c
do wish to receive the above information, please reply to this
email within hours making certain that the message body or
subject line contains this confirmation key:
857808f10f5c7679597bc24115bd5af4
If you don't want to receive the information -- simply delete this mail.--- Begin Message
Incoming from Scarletdown:
>
> How's about something like this?
>
> Dear Linux user,
>
> Please find the NEW LINUX Virus program called HONOR. Since this
Scenario 1:
"Hey Boss; the mailserver's hosed again."
"How did that happen?"
"Someone checked their mail."
Scenario 2:
"Hey Boss; the mai
On Wednesday 28 January 2004 07:44 pm, s. keeling wrote:
> Does Windows get cracked more often because there's more Windows? No,
> it's because Windows is more crackable
I also think the "Windows is hacked more because it's more popular"
argument is bogus. The point I like to use is this: IIS fl
Rajesh Menon wrote:
and as you notice, the sender names are not "rajesh menon", or "brian
schmidt", or anyone on the list, but just a random name.
No, but as you notice, the mail address being used is [EMAIL PROTECTED],
even if I put up another name as a front for that address, the address
will
Brian Schmidt wrote:
Rajesh Menon wrote:
i don;t know much about setting up mailing-lists, but can;t it be
setup to allow mails ONLY from REGISTERED users?
From what I understand then the mailing list checks the sender address,
to see if it is subscribed to the mailinglist. Unfortunately it's
who is not registered with a mailing list like
lists.debian.org should not have their email forwarded to everyone on
the list. if that were the case, what's the point of getting the
confirmation mail, and replying back with the confirmation?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wi
Rajesh Menon wrote:
i don;t know much about setting up mailing-lists, but can;t it be setup
to allow mails ONLY from REGISTERED users?
From what I understand then the mailing list checks the sender address,
to see if it is subscribed to the mailinglist. Unfortunately it's easy
for me to simply c
s. keeling wrote:
Incoming from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
..the more Linux systems, or the more open source systems, out there
the more likely that people will be interested in actually cracking
Others have already debunked that theory. Does Windows get cracked
more often because there's more Windows?
i don;t know much about setting up mailing-lists, but can;t it be setup
to allow mails ONLY from REGISTERED users?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
27;t protect windows with
windows. You have to use something decent.
-Original Message-
From: s. keeling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 29 January 2004 11:20 AM
To: Debian User
Subject: Re: FW: registration confirmation...
Incoming from Ian Perry:
> Firstly... my apologies
Incoming from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> ..the more Linux systems, or the more open source systems, out there
> the more likely that people will be interested in actually cracking
Others have already debunked that theory. Does Windows get cracked
more often because there's more Windows? No, it's be
s. keeling wrote:
Why is debian-* the place to go to complain about Windows viruses?!?
I choose Linux & Debian to avoid Windows and all its cracks and
deficiencies.
I dunno. I'd hazard a guess the fact that the list mantainers idiotic
position of open acceptance every freakin' time we have a
Hi There,
> Why is debian-* the place to go to complain about Windows viruses?!?
I don't think I know (and I don't want to hazard a guess).
> I choose Linux & Debian to avoid Windows and all its cracks and
> deficiencies. Others (perhaps including you?) use Linux/Debian in a
> pointless attemp
Incoming from Ian Perry:
> Firstly... my apologies to the list.
>
> Well, thank you for your abrupt reply and for being so damn rude.
>
> If you can't be civil, then please in future don't bother responding.
>
> A simple "Yes, its just spam would have sufficed" thank you.
I'll agree, I was abru
: s. keeling [mailto:]
Sent: Thursday, 29 January 2004 9:56 AM
To: Debian Users
Subject: Re: FW: registration confirmation...
Incoming from Ian Perry:
>
> Does anyone know what this is ?
>
> Or is it just elaborate spam ?
>
> Or am I now on yet ANOTHER spam list ?
FOR C
Incoming from Ian Perry:
>
> Does anyone know what this is ?
>
> Or is it just elaborate spam ?
>
> Or am I now on yet ANOTHER spam list ?
FOR CRYING OUT LOUD, THINK! The From: says lists.debian.org. You're
subscribed to some list at lists.debian.org, somebody sent crap to the
list, and lists
Does anyone know what this is ?
Or is it just elaborate spam ?
Or am I now on yet ANOTHER spam list ?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 28 January 2004 5:51 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: registration confirmation
Thanks for
Thanks for your registration.
( We say Sorry again, the first mail was delivered to an unknown mail address.
This was a bug in our mailing system! )
The amount of 239.- USD was deducted by your account.
Welcome,
you can now visit more than 1200 very very hot web pages!
Your registration, pages a
Thanks for your registration.
( We say Sorry again, the first mail was delivered to an unknown mail address.
This was a bug in our mailing system! )
The amount of 239.- USD was deducted by your account.
Welcome,
you can now visit more than 1200 very very hot web pages!
Your registration, pages a
Thank you for subscribing. You have now unsubscribed and no more messages will be sent.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you for subscribing. You have now unsubscribed and no more messages will be sent.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dear [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Thank you for verifying your email address with Spam Arrest!
Your email has been forwarded to Support's inbox. All of your
future emails to Support will also be delivered directly into
their inbox.
You can protect your own email account using Spam Arrest.
Please v
Dear [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Thank you for verifying your email address with Spam Arrest!
Your email has been forwarded to Support's inbox. All of your
future emails to Support will also be delivered directly into
their inbox.
You can protect your own email account using Spam Arrest.
Please v
Dear [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Thank you for verifying your email address with Spam Arrest!
Your email has been forwarded to Support's inbox. All of your
future emails to Support will also be delivered directly into
their inbox.
You can protect your own email account using Spam Arrest.
Please v
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 04:43:18AM +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Aug 2003 14:00:55 -0500 (CDT),
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > In effort to control spam email we have implemented an email
> > verification system.
>
> ..url to credentials? This _is_
1 - 100 of 121 matches
Mail list logo
