Thus spake Deryk Barker ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> One further piece of info: I tested the new system out by booting
> Knoppix, which ran just fine.
>
> So I thought I could snag the XF86Config-4 from that - put it onto
> floppy (!) etc.
>
> Did all that and it still didn't work - but the Knoppix-de
Deryk Barker wrote:
One further piece of info: I tested the new system out by booting
Knoppix, which ran just fine.
So I thought I could snag the XF86Config-4 from that - put it onto
floppy (!) etc.
Did all that and it still didn't work - but the Knoppix-derived config
used the nv driver and Kno
One further piece of info: I tested the new system out by booting
Knoppix, which ran just fine.
So I thought I could snag the XF86Config-4 from that - put it onto
floppy (!) etc.
Did all that and it still didn't work - but the Knoppix-derived config
used the nv driver and Knoppix is based on unst
Thus spake Bob Proulx ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Deryk Barker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-12-19 14:27:15 -0800]:
> > Has anyone persuaded the confiuration of xserver-xfree86 version 4 to
> > produce a usable XF86Config-4?
>
> Yes. Many times.
>
> > I've tried saying both yes and no to the framebuffer
Deryk Barker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-12-19 14:27:15 -0800]:
> Has anyone persuaded the confiuration of xserver-xfree86 version 4 to
> produce a usable XF86Config-4?
Yes. Many times.
> I've tried saying both yes and no to the framebuffer questin, which
> was fingered in an earlier discussion of
Has anyone persuaded the confiuration of xserver-xfree86 version 4 to
produce a usable XF86Config-4?
I've tried saying both yes and no to the framebuffer questin, which
was fingered in an earlier discussion of this, but neither works, and
I'm stuck in the "no screens found" mess.
Is there somethi
6 matches
Mail list logo
