Re (5): Configuration for a Linux router with a client having a public address

2010-10-24 Thread peasthope
* From: Bob Proulx * Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 23:45:50 -0600 > Since those are old diagrams they don't show where carnot fits into > things. * From: "Jesús M. Navarro" * Date: Sun, 5 Sep 2010 23:47:48 +0200 > There's neither "carnot" nor "Allied Telesis 3612TR" in your prov

Re (5): Configuration for a Linux router with a client having a public address

2010-10-24 Thread peasthope
* From: Bob Proulx * Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 23:45:50 -0600 > Since those are old diagrams they don't show where carnot fits into > things. * From: "Jesús M. Navarro" * Date: Sun, 5 Sep 2010 23:47:48 +0200 > There's neither "carnot" nor "Allied Telesis 3612TR" in your prov

Re (4): Configuration for a Linux router with a client having a public address

2010-10-04 Thread peasthope
* From: Bob Proulx * Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 23:45:50 -0600 > Since those are old diagrams they don't show where carnot fits into > things. * From: "Jesús M. Navarro" * Date: Sun, 5 Sep 2010 23:47:48 +0200 > There's neither "carnot" nor "Allied Telesis 3612TR" in your prov

Re (3): Configuration for a Linux router with a client having a public address

2010-09-04 Thread peasthope
From: Bob Proulx Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 23:45:50 -0600 > ... carnot is already on the public internet > with 142.103.107.138? OK, we've discussed two distinct configurations and that wasn't clear. Friday I reinstated the old configuration and checked just now that carnot is still running

Re: Re (2): Configuration for a Linux router with a client having a public address

2010-09-03 Thread Bob Proulx
peasth...@shaw.ca wrote: > http://142.103.107.138/ So now I am really confused. carnot is already on the public internet with 142.103.107.138? I thought that you had it on a private network and were trying to tunnel it onto the public internet. I am really confused now. Sorry. > My network is

Re (2): Configuration for a Linux router with a client having a public address

2010-09-03 Thread peasthope
From: Bob Proulx Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 20:55:04 -0600 > Excellent diagram! Thank you very much for sharing it. Welcome. Until I have a definite plan, the old configuration with carnot on the AT 3612TR is restored. All of these should work as long as the old disk drives hold up. http:

Re: Configuration for a Linux router with a client having a public address

2010-09-02 Thread Bob Proulx
peasth...@shaw.ca wrote: > Bob Proulx wrote: > > So dalton has address 172.24.2.1 in the RFC1918 private address space. > > Dalton has external address 142.103.107.137 and several internal addresses > including 172.24.2.1. > > Here is an old sketch. Dalton is on the left. We're not concerned w

Re: Configuration for a Linux router with a client having a public address

2010-09-02 Thread peasthope
From: Bob Proulx Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 14:00:20 -0600 > So dalton has address 172.24.2.1 in the RFC1918 private address space. Dalton has external address 142.103.107.137 and several internal addresses including 172.24.2.1. Here is an old sketch. Dalton is on the left. We're not concerne

Re: Configuration for a Linux router with a client having a public address

2010-09-02 Thread Bob Proulx
peasth...@shaw.ca wrote: > Given linux router dalton, eth 3, connected to a local machine > carnot, eth0, with a cross-over cable, I need some help to set > the configurations properly. > > #dalton:/etc/network/interfaces >... > iface eth3 inet static > address 172.24.2.1 > up

Configuration for a Linux router with a client having a public address

2010-09-02 Thread peasthope
Given linux router dalton, eth 3, connected to a local machine carnot, eth0, with a cross-over cable, I need some help to set the configurations properly. #dalton:/etc/network/interfaces ... iface eth3 inet static address 172.24.2.1 up route add -host 142.103.107.138