also sprach Carlos Sousa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.02.09.1517 +0100]:
> > \s+
>
> I take it you mean that each line is composed of two words, separated by
> one or more spaces, and terminated with a newline. Both words will, of
> course, contain no spaces.
righty.
> > while read user filename; d
On Sat, 1 Feb 2003 17:37:56 +0100 martin f krafft wrote:
> Right. But I gave up on it when I fough 30 minutes this morning on
> reading in a file formatted like this:
>
> \s+
I take it you mean that each line is composed of two words, separated by
one or more spaces, and terminated with a newline
On Sat, 1 Feb 2003, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
>
> There are not things you should package. It's a one-off that you,
> as a capable sysadmin ;), should be able to write in less time as
> it took for you to compose this message.
and i'd make the script check the Master release directory
and
* martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030201 17:51]:
> Right. But I gave up on it when I fough 30 minutes this morning on
> reading in a file formatted like this:
>
> \s+
>
> with a while loop:
>
> while read user filename; do
> echo "$user : $filename"
> done < thefile
>
> this is supposed
also sprach Rohan Nicholls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.02.01.1703 +0100]:
> I am not sure why you have lost faith in shell scripting, besides the
> language being horribly ugly, and useless for complicated development
> (which it is not meant, nor designed for, so fair enough:)), but perl is
> notori
> Well, not if I am lazy... I have a shell script like that, but I want
> a perl version. I don't believe in shell anymore, and I have too
> little time to learn Perl...
>
I am not sure why you have lost faith in shell scripting, besides the
language being horribly ugly, and useless for complic
also sprach Miquel van Smoorenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.02.01.1528 +0100]:
> There are not things you should package. It's a one-off that you,
> as a capable sysadmin ;), should be able to write in less time as
> it took for you to compose this message.
Well, not if I am lazy... I have a shel
also sprach Colin Ellis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.02.01.1528 +0100]:
> Maybe a mixture of cvs and .login could do this?
I was thinking about that, but that's overkill. Aside, it requires
users to checkin, and it requires me to configure the CVS tree
properly wrt permissions...
PS: I'd appreciate
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I am in search for a tool that does the following.
>
>- According to a list of users, the tool goes and finds a particular
> file relative to the user's home directory. Let's say this file is
> called foo.rc. If the user
Maybe a mixture of cvs and .login could do this?
-Original Message-
From: martin f krafft [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 01 February 2003 13:58
To: debian users
Subject: Configuration centralizing tool sought
Hi all,
I am in search for a tool that does the following.
- According to
also sprach martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.02.01.1457 +0100]:
> Or if someone more capable on perl than I (i.e. > 0) could whip that
> out of his/her pocket for my perusal. I'll package it and give credit
> in return.
if there is someone, please speak to me before as i have a couple of
Hi all,
I am in search for a tool that does the following.
- According to a list of users, the tool goes and finds a particular
file relative to the user's home directory. Let's say this file is
called foo.rc. If the user list consists of {bob, jane, bill}, then
the tool would go and find
12 matches
Mail list logo
