On Aug 15 2000, Adam Scriven wrote:
> That's the question that I asked about originally! I was wondering
> if anyone's ever used apt-move, and if they can give me some
> pointers, and some things to look out for.
I use it every single day. I takes the packages out from the
apt cac
> "Adam" == Adam Scriven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Adam> That's the question that I asked about originally! I was
Adam> wondering if anyone's ever used apt-move, and if they can
Adam> give me some pointers, and some things to look out for.
There is also apt-proxy from woody...
On Tue, Aug 15, 2000 at 10:27:10PM -0400, Adam Scriven wrote:
> >Try also apt-move to move all the downloaded packages from
> >/var/cache/apt/archives/ to a local `mirror' directory tree. You then
> >then export that tree using a http or ftp server.
>
> That's the question that I asked about or
At 22:05 2000/08/15 -0400, you wrote:
> > > Shared APT, squid, etc are all more banddith efficient solutions.
> Adam Scriven said:
> > How would I implement shared apt? That sounds like what I'd like to do,
> > but I've never even heard of it.
Orion wrote:
> What I do is have /var/cache/apt/ar
> > > Shared APT, squid, etc are all more banddith efficient solutions.
> Adam Scriven said:
>
> > How would I implement shared apt? That sounds like what I'd like to do,
> > but I've never even heard of it.
Orion wrote:
> What I do is have /var/cache/apt/archives as an NFS share from one
>
Adam Scriven said:
> At 13:20 2000/08/15 -0600, you wrote:
> >This is so not true. If you installed all your machines, without using any
> >sort of shared local cache it would still produce less bandwidth than 1
> >week of a full local mirror. You realize it takes about 200meg/day to keep
> >up wit
At 13:20 2000/08/15 -0600, you wrote:
This is so not true. If you installed all your machines, without using any
sort of shared local cache it would still produce less bandwidth than 1
week of a full local mirror. You realize it takes about 200meg/day to keep
up with our archive?
Ok, fair enoug
On Wed, 16 Aug 2000, C. Falconer wrote:
> >I've been toying with the idea of setting up a complete local mirror for
> >all of my machines here. It wouldn't be public (at least not yet), but it
> >would cut down on my network traffic, and it would cut down on the
At 09:37 AM 8/15/00 -0400, you wrote:
I've been toying with the idea of setting up a complete local mirror for
all of my machines here. It wouldn't be public (at least not yet), but it
would cut down on my network traffic, and it would cut down on the debian
servers that are being
At 09:00 2000/08/15 -0600, you wrote:
So, with all this in mind, if you can be more specific about what you want
to mirror maybe we can be more specific on how to go about doing it.
Ok, sure.
I should have mentioned this before, but I'm only going to do stable x86,
since that's all I have arou
Adam Scriven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've been toying with the idea of setting up a complete local mirror for
> all of my machines here. It wouldn't be public (at least not yet), but it
> would cut down on my network traffic, and it would cut down on the debian
Hey all.
I've been toying with the idea of setting up a complete local mirror for
all of my machines here. It wouldn't be public (at least not yet), but it
would cut down on my network traffic, and it would cut down on the debian
servers that are being pummelled right now.
8-)
I
12 matches
Mail list logo
