On Tue 16 Aug 2016 at 22:45:29 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
[...Snip... The history is in previous mails].
> After a lot more wrong turnings and much agonising, thinking instead of
> panicking (at last!) and retrying:
>
> root@Eros:/home/lisi/Sane-Files# scanimage -L
> device `genesys:libusb:001:00
On Tuesday 16 August 2016 17:27:10 Brian wrote:
> On Tue 16 Aug 2016 at 15:39:00 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > On Tuesday 16 August 2016 13:49:48 Brian wrote:
> > > Mea culpa. Please see the apt-get manual: build-dep (no "s").
> >
> > Thanks, both. :-)
> >
> > Everything now built, though there was
On Tuesday 16 August 2016 17:27:10 Brian wrote:
> Five .debs are built; only libsane, libsane-common and sane-utils need
> to be installed with 'dpkg -i'.
Ah! I don't know about senior moments. I need a rest, some sleep and a new
brain.
Lisi
On Tue 16 Aug 2016 at 15:39:00 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Tuesday 16 August 2016 13:49:48 Brian wrote:
> >
> > Mea culpa. Please see the apt-get manual: build-dep (no "s").
>
> Thanks, both. :-)
>
> Everything now built, though there was an error at the end:
>
> Now running lintian...
> warn
On Tuesday 16 August 2016 13:49:48 Brian wrote:
> On Tue 16 Aug 2016 at 12:57:50 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > On Monday 15 August 2016 14:25:58 Brian wrote:
> > > A good guide to backporting is at
> > >
> > >
> > > https://raphaelhertzog.com/2010/12/15/howto-to-rebuild-debian-packages/
> > >
> >
On Tue 16 Aug 2016 at 12:57:50 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Monday 15 August 2016 14:25:58 Brian wrote:
> >
> > A good guide to backporting is at
> >
> > https://raphaelhertzog.com/2010/12/15/howto-to-rebuild-debian-packages/
> >
> > A deb-src line in sources.list for unstable is needed to do
>
Le 16/08/2016 à 13:57, Lisi Reisz a écrit :
> I have got stuck. Only slightly further on than I had already got stuck.
> (apt-get said it wasn't downloading what I had already downloaded!)
>
> root@Eros:/home/lisi/Sane-Files# apt-get build-deps libsane-common/testing
> E: Invalid operation bui
On Monday 15 August 2016 14:25:58 Brian wrote:
> On Mon 15 Aug 2016 at 14:23:36 +0200, didier gaumet wrote:
> > Le 15/08/2016 à 12:42, Lisi Reisz a écrit :
> > > Thanks, didier. That is nice to know.
> > >
> > > So it should be in the up-to-date tar ball, if I were to succeed in
> > > sorting that
On Mon 15 Aug 2016 at 19:05:55 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Monday 15 August 2016 14:25:58 Brian wrote:
> > A good guide to backporting is at
> >
> > https://raphaelhertzog.com/2010/12/15/howto-to-rebuild-debian-packages/
> >
> > A deb-src line in sources.list for unstable is needed to do
> >
>
On Monday 15 August 2016 14:25:58 Brian wrote:
> A good guide to backporting is at
>
> https://raphaelhertzog.com/2010/12/15/howto-to-rebuild-debian-packages/
>
> A deb-src line in sources.list for unstable is needed to do
>
> apt-get source libsane-common/unstable
>
> Then
>
> apt-get build-
On Mon 15 Aug 2016 at 15:47:00 +0200, didier gaumet wrote:
> Le 15/08/2016 à 15:25, Brian a écrit :
> [...]
> > I reckon the second approach will not work because the libraries need
> > an adjustment too.
>
> I plead guilty: Lisi just confirmed your point of view, In computer
> science, crime (of
Le 15/08/2016 à 15:25, Brian a écrit :
[...]
> I reckon the second approach will not work because the libraries need
> an adjustment too.
I plead guilty: Lisi just confirmed your point of view, In computer
science, crime (of lazyness) does not (always) pay ;-)
thanks for your input, Brian, I did
On Mon 15 Aug 2016 at 14:23:36 +0200, didier gaumet wrote:
> Le 15/08/2016 à 12:42, Lisi Reisz a écrit :
>
> > Thanks, didier. That is nice to know.
> >
> > So it should be in the up-to-date tar ball, if I were to succeed in sorting
> > that out. But are you suggesting that I would do better
On Monday 15 August 2016 13:23:36 didier gaumet wrote:
> Le 15/08/2016 à 12:42, Lisi Reisz a écrit :
> > Thanks, didier. That is nice to know.
> >
> > So it should be in the up-to-date tar ball, if I were to succeed in
> > sorting that out. But are you suggesting that I would do better to
> > bac
Le 15/08/2016 à 12:42, Lisi Reisz a écrit :
> Thanks, didier. That is nice to know.
>
> So it should be in the up-to-date tar ball, if I were to succeed in sorting
> that out. But are you suggesting that I would do better to backport from
> Stretch? I had decided that the tar ball would be s
On Monday 15 August 2016 08:52:15 didier gaumet wrote:
> Le 15/08/2016 à 00:13, Lisi Reisz a écrit :
> > Although Canon LiDE 220
>
> [...]
>
> > lisi@Eros:~$ lsusb | grep Canon
> > Bus 001 Device 003: ID 04a9:190f Canon, Inc.
> > lisi@Eros:~$ grep 190f /etc/sane.d/genesys.conf
> >
> > Having little
Le 15/08/2016 à 00:13, Lisi Reisz a écrit :
> Although Canon LiDE 220
[...]
> lisi@Eros:~$ lsusb | grep Canon
> Bus 001 Device 003: ID 04a9:190f Canon, Inc.
> lisi@Eros:~$ grep 190f /etc/sane.d/genesys.conf
>
> Having little faith, I cat-ed /etc/sane.d/genesys.conf, and the 220 driver
> was
> i
On 08/14/2016 06:13 PM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
Although Canon LiDE 220 is supposed to be covered completely, and although I
have had very good success with earlier models, I was having major problems
with this one, echoed by many on the internet. I tried all the usual tests,
culminating in:
lisi@Eros
Although Canon LiDE 220 is supposed to be covered completely, and although I
have had very good success with earlier models, I was having major problems
with this one, echoed by many on the internet. I tried all the usual tests,
culminating in:
lisi@Eros:~$ scandisk -L
No scanners were identif
19 matches
Mail list logo
