>Le 26/09/2010 21:02, Celejar wrote:
>> On Sat, 25 Sep 2010 23:29:28 +0200
>> Aniruddha wrote:
>>
>> Here's my opinion:
>>
>> ...
>>
>> * I think encryption is not well suited for a desktop system, unless
>> you have some special need for it (e.g. laptop). It creates extra
>> overhead, meaning it
On Sat, 25 Sep 2010 23:29:28 +0200
Aniruddha wrote:
> Here's my opinion:
...
> * I think encryption is not well suited for a desktop system, unless
> you have some special need for it (e.g. laptop). It creates extra
> overhead, meaning it is a lot slower then a normal file system + it
> makes d
On Sat, 25 Sep 2010 22:05:50 +0100
Charles Turner wrote:
> I have two 80GB disks, which will hold my "system" files.
> I have two 500GB disks which will be my home drive.
>
> I plan to mirror both sets of disks using RAID1.
>
> My mirrored 80GB disks will contain the following, the format of my
Here's my opinion:
* I wouldn't use raid for a desktop system but a backup program such
as rsnapshot. You can mirror each disk this way, the main advantage is
that when you throw something away by accident it is still there in
your backup while with raid you would have lost it. Raid (and lvm)
ca
I'm a new GNU/Linux user. I've recently received a desktop with lots
of disk space and I've been thinking about how to use it effectively.
It will contain lots of multimedia files, and later I want to set up
mail & web servers on it, primarily for edification rather than
production, so these are my
5 matches
Mail list logo
