On Wed, 16 Mar 2011 20:32:11 +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Ma, 15 mar 11, 09:54:00, D G Teed wrote:
>>
>> What I'm seeing now puzzles me. I'm considering the same situation,
>> except for squeeze.
>>
>> The packages site says .97 is available in lenny-volatile. But .97 is
>> not showing up
On Ma, 15 mar 11, 09:54:00, D G Teed wrote:
>
> What I'm seeing now puzzles me. I'm considering the same situation, except
> for squeeze.
>
> The packages site says .97 is available in lenny-volatile.
> But .97 is not showing up in squeeze-updates, which is supposed to replace
> volatile.
...
>
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Camaleón wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Feb 2011 11:20:44 -0600, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
>
> > On Thursday 17 February 2011 11:05:42 Camaleón wrote:
>
> >> > From what I understand, the clamav binaries are only updated in
> >> > stable (even in stable/volatile or stabl
On Thu, 17 Feb 2011 11:20:44 -0600, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> On Thursday 17 February 2011 11:05:42 Camaleón wrote:
>> > From what I understand, the clamav binaries are only updated in
>> > stable (even in stable/volatile or stable-updates) when a new version
>> > is needed in order to use
On Thursday 17 February 2011 11:05:42 Camaleón wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Feb 2011 10:38:24 -0600, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> > On Thursday 17 February 2011 09:41:43 Camaleón wrote:
> >> Since a week (or so) ago, my ClamAV log is urging me to upgrade to the
> >> lastest stable version available -as a
On Thu, 17 Feb 2011 10:38:24 -0600, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> On Thursday 17 February 2011 09:41:43 Camaleón wrote:
>> Since a week (or so) ago, my ClamAV log is urging me to upgrade to the
>> lastest stable version available -as always- but I see no update in
>> volatile repo... is that exp
On Thu, 17 Feb 2011 11:27:55 -0500, mark wrote:
>> Since a week (or so) ago, my ClamAV log is urging me to upgrade to the
>> lastest stable version available -as always- but I see no update in
>> volatile repo... is that expected to be done? :-?
>>
>> (running lenny here)
>>
>
> If having the lat
On Thursday 17 February 2011 09:41:43 Camaleón wrote:
> Since a week (or so) ago, my ClamAV log is urging me to upgrade to the
> lastest stable version available -as always- but I see no update in
> volatile repo... is that expected to be done? :-?
From what I understand, the clamav binaries are o
> Hello,
>
> Since a week (or so) ago, my ClamAV log is urging me to upgrade to the
> lastest stable version available -as always- but I see no update in
> volatile repo... is that expected to be done? :-?
>
> (running lenny here)
>
> Greetings,
Hi,
If having the latest and greatest ClamAV is imp
Hello,
Since a week (or so) ago, my ClamAV log is urging me to upgrade to the
lastest stable version available -as always- but I see no update in
volatile repo... is that expected to be done? :-?
(running lenny here)
Greetings,
--
Camaleón
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@l
10 matches
Mail list logo