On Sun, 2004-12-05 at 20:14 -0800, jack kinnon wrote:
> --- Sam Watkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Dec 04, 2004 at 07:35:30PM -0800, jack
> > kinnon wrote:
> > > I can coming back to. I have not been able to
> > select a res of 1024x768 for
> > > the display.
> >
> > please post you
On Sat, Dec 04, 2004 at 07:35:30PM -0800, jack kinnon wrote:
> I can coming back to. I have not been able to select a res of 1024x768 for
> the display.
please post your /etc/X11/XF86Config or /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 file,
and tell us what sort of video card and how much video ram you have if you kn
jack kinnon wrote:
Hi folks,
This is an old problem that I can coming back to. I
have not been able to select a res of 1024x768 for the
display. If I select this res, the system will not
boot into graphics mode. This is not a lack of memory
problem for sure because I can use it under Win XP.
I am r
On Sat, 2004-12-04 at 19:35 -0800, jack kinnon wrote:
> Hi folks,
> This is an old problem that I can coming back to. I
> have not been able to select a res of 1024x768 for the
> display. If I select this res, the system will not
> boot into graphics mode. This is not a lack of memory
> problem for
Hi folks,
This is an old problem that I can coming back to. I
have not been able to select a res of 1024x768 for the
display. If I select this res, the system will not
boot into graphics mode. This is not a lack of memory
problem for sure because I can use it under Win XP.
I am running 'stable'. C
5 matches
Mail list logo