On Sat, Nov 01, 2003 at 11:14:46PM -0600, Kent West wrote:
> Arnt Karlsen wrote:
>
> >On Sat, 01 Nov 2003 12:06:21 -0800 (PST),
> >"Mark Healey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> >
> >
> >>On Sat, 1 Nov 2003 17:53:27 +, Pigeon wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>Go ahe
Arnt Karlsen wrote:
On Sat, 01 Nov 2003 12:06:21 -0800 (PST),
"Mark Healey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Sat, 1 Nov 2003 17:53:27 +, Pigeon wrote:
Go ahead and install Debian, without worrying about getting the NIC
working yet. Use the machine that yo
On Sat, 01 Nov 2003 12:06:21 -0800 (PST),
"Mark Healey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sat, 1 Nov 2003 17:53:27 +, Pigeon wrote:
> >Go ahead and install Debian, without worrying about getting the NIC
> >working yet. Use the machine that you're posting from to
On Sat, 1 Nov 2003 10:35:05 -0700, Monique Y. Herman wrote:
>On Sat, 01 Nov 2003 at 13:54 GMT, Mark Healey penned:
>>>
>>>That simply means that you're running the linux kernel, version
>>>2.4.18-bf2.4, and your machine name is utonium (is this related to the
>>>powerpuff girls?).
>>
>> Yes.
>
>Co
On Sat, 1 Nov 2003 17:53:27 +, Pigeon wrote:
>Go ahead and install Debian, without worrying about getting the NIC
>working yet. Use the machine that you're posting from to go to
>http://packages.debian.org/testing/devel/kernel-source-2.4.22.html
>and download the .deb of kernel-source-2.4.22. T
On Sat, Nov 01, 2003 at 05:54:12AM -0800, Mark Healey wrote:
> I should mention that I had to download this from Broadcom. I have a
> CD with a source RPM and a .tar.gz. On an earlier attempt I tried to
> compile it from source but after I expanded the .tar.gz I couldn't
> extract resulting .tar.
On Sat, 01 Nov 2003 at 13:54 GMT, Mark Healey penned:
>>
>>That simply means that you're running the linux kernel, version
>>2.4.18-bf2.4, and your machine name is utonium (is this related to the
>>powerpuff girls?).
>
> Yes.
Cool! My machines tend to be super mario bros. characters.
>>Where is
On Sat, 01 Nov 2003 at 05:49 GMT, Kent West penned:
> Monique Y. Herman wrote:
>>
>>I've never used apt-cache, but a quick look at the man page suggests
>>that perhaps you hadn't yet generated the cache, so searching on it
>>probably wasn't very helpful. Looks like the original poster assumed
>>th
On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 22:27:29 -0700, Monique Y. Herman wrote:
>On Sat, 01 Nov 2003 at 03:26 GMT, Mark Healey penned:
>> On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 18:08:05 -0900, Ken Irving wrote:
>>
>>>On Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at 06:17:52PM -0800, Mark Healey wrote:
On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 18:03:59 -0700, Monique Y. Herman
On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 22:23:07 -0700, Monique Y. Herman wrote:
>On Sat, 01 Nov 2003 at 02:17 GMT, Mark Healey penned:
>> On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 18:03:59 -0700, Monique Y. Herman wrote:
>>>More pertinently, what part of the general advice given to you several
>>>posts ago frustrated the bejeezus out of y
On Friday 31 October 2003 02:11, Mark Healey wrote:
> When installing there was no networing setup.
[...]
> How do I get this to work?
>
> Asus A7V8X mobo with
> Broadcom 4400 onboard lan
[...]
Mark: I just read this thread. I had a similar problem (with a different
NIC) a couple of month
Monique Y. Herman wrote:
On Sat, 01 Nov 2003 at 02:17 GMT, Mark Healey penned:
The post then said to run "apt-cache search kernel-image-2.4 | more"
and then select the apprpriate kernel.
There was no output when I ran that.
I've never used apt-cache, but a quick look at the man page sugges
On Sat, 01 Nov 2003 at 03:26 GMT, Mark Healey penned:
> On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 18:08:05 -0900, Ken Irving wrote:
>
>>On Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at 06:17:52PM -0800, Mark Healey wrote:
>>> On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 18:03:59 -0700, Monique Y. Herman wrote: ...
>>>
>>> >It all comes down to specific hardware config
On Sat, 01 Nov 2003 at 02:17 GMT, Mark Healey penned:
> On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 18:03:59 -0700, Monique Y. Herman wrote:
>
>>Which books have you tried?
>
> I didn't even go past the reverse of the title page. The most recent
> copyright date was july 2000.
Fair enough. A lot of the core material
Mark Healey wrote:
Ok, this is getting frustrating.
I understand. It was very frustrating for me in the beginning also.
Is it possible to get debian running without learning a bunch of
arcane hacker lore?
Simple answer? "No." Debian is not about ease of installation (as much
as many peopl
On Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at 07:26:39PM -0800, Mark Healey wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 18:08:05 -0900, Ken Irving wrote:
>
> >On Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at 06:17:52PM -0800, Mark Healey wrote:
> >> On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 18:03:59 -0700, Monique Y. Herman wrote:
> >> ...
> >>
> >> >It all comes down to specific
On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 18:08:05 -0900, Ken Irving wrote:
>On Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at 06:17:52PM -0800, Mark Healey wrote:
>> On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 18:03:59 -0700, Monique Y. Herman wrote:
>> ...
>>
>> >It all comes down to specific hardware configuration. Every system has
>> >some hardware that it won't
On Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at 06:17:52PM -0800, Mark Healey wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 18:03:59 -0700, Monique Y. Herman wrote:
> ...
>
> >It all comes down to specific hardware configuration. Every system has
> >some hardware that it won't be prepared to use right out of the box.
>
> The Broadcom 4
On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 18:03:59 -0700, Monique Y. Herman wrote:
>> I am interrested in learning how it works but it has to be working for
>> that to happen. The fact is that the installation routine and
>> documentation just plain suck. It doesn't help that the books
>> available are ancient.
>
>No
On Sat, 01 Nov 2003 at 00:46 GMT, Mark Healey penned:
> On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 15:59:31 -0700, Monique Y. Herman wrote:
>
>>I understand that you're getting frustrated with the install process,
>>but really, the install is something you'll do once for this system.
>>If the installation process is suc
On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 15:59:31 -0700, Monique Y. Herman wrote:
>On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 at 22:40 GMT, Mark Healey penned:
>>>
>>>Run "uname -a". If your CD is a woody ("stable") CD, and it probably
>>>is, you're probably running a 2.2 kernel. If so, run "apt-cache search
>>>kernel-image-2.4 | more" to s
On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 at 22:40 GMT, Mark Healey penned:
>>
>>Run "uname -a". If your CD is a woody ("stable") CD, and it probably
>>is, you're probably running a 2.2 kernel. If so, run "apt-cache search
>>kernel-image-2.4 | more" to see if you have any 2.4 kernels available
>>on your CD. If you do, p
On Thu, 30 Oct 2003 23:11:45 -0600, Kent West wrote:
>Mark Healey wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 30 Oct 2003 20:57:07 -0600, Kent West wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>Mark Healey wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
When installing there was no networing setup.
The first install attempt I assumed that support was in the kernel
Mark Healey wrote:
On Thu, 30 Oct 2003 20:57:07 -0600, Kent West wrote:
Mark Healey wrote:
When installing there was no networing setup.
The first install attempt I assumed that support was in the kernel
since it wasn't on the list of non-supported nics in the installation
manual. That
On Thu, 30 Oct 2003 20:57:07 -0600, Kent West wrote:
>Mark Healey wrote:
>
>>When installing there was no networing setup.
>>
>>The first install attempt I assumed that support was in the kernel
>>since it wasn't on the list of non-supported nics in the installation
>>manual. That didn't work.
>>
On Thu, 30 Oct 2003 21:53:53 -0500, Jerome R. Acks wrote:
>On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 05:11:35PM -0800, Mark Healey wrote:
>> When installing there was no networing setup.
>>
>> The first install attempt I assumed that support was in the kernel
>> since it wasn't on the list of non-supported nics in
Mark Healey wrote:
When installing there was no networing setup.
The first install attempt I assumed that support was in the kernel
since it wasn't on the list of non-supported nics in the installation
manual. That didn't work.
On the second attempt I tried the add modules option and it wasn't
l
On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 05:11:35PM -0800, Mark Healey wrote:
> When installing there was no networing setup.
>
> The first install attempt I assumed that support was in the kernel
> since it wasn't on the list of non-supported nics in the installation
> manual. That didn't work.
>
> On the seco
When installing there was no networing setup.
The first install attempt I assumed that support was in the kernel
since it wasn't on the list of non-supported nics in the installation
manual. That didn't work.
On the second attempt I tried the add modules option and it wasn't
listed.
I tried g
29 matches
Mail list logo