Re: Caching Apt Files

Carlos Sousa wrote: On Mon, 9 Aug 2004 22:17:36 -0500 Jacob S. wrote: I've been using apt-proxy, and see apt-cacher mentioned some as well. (I'm using apt-proxy 1.3.6 from Testing, not 1.9.5 from Unstable.) ... So, anyone with experience using apt-cacher, or better yet, both apt-cacher and apt-p

Re: Caching Apt Files

On Mon, 9 Aug 2004 22:17:36 -0500 Jacob S. wrote: > I've been using apt-proxy, and see apt-cacher mentioned some as well. > (I'm using apt-proxy 1.3.6 from Testing, not 1.9.5 from Unstable.) > ... > So, anyone with experience using apt-cacher, or better yet, both > apt-cacher and apt-proxy? I would

Re: Caching Apt Files

So, anyone with experience using apt-cacher, or better yet, both apt-cacher and apt-proxy? I would appreciate hearing other people's thoughts and experiences. I have been using apt-cacher for quite some time now and find it quite good.sorry no experience with apt-proxy p v mathew -- To UNSUBSCR

Caching Apt Files

I've been using apt-proxy, and see apt-cacher mentioned some as well. (I'm using apt-proxy 1.3.6 from Testing, not 1.9.5 from Unstable.) Apt-proxy looks like it's mainly a hack of some shell scripts to use wget, rsync and friends to retrieve packages and cache them. Apt-cacher looks like a .cgi ha