Re: Caching-only nameserver - which bind

Paul Wright wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm about to configure a caching only nameserver for my dialup box, and I > noticed that there are two variants of the bind package available, bind > and bind9. I know that the bind package is version 8.x > > Which version should I use? > > Is there an advantage o

Re: Caching-only nameserver - which bind

On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 12:40:39AM -0400, Paul Wright wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm about to configure a caching only nameserver for my dialup box, and I > noticed that there are two variants of the bind package available, bind > and bind9. I know that the bind package is version 8.x > > Which vers

Caching-only nameserver - which bind

Hi all, I'm about to configure a caching only nameserver for my dialup box, and I noticed that there are two variants of the bind package available, bind and bind9. I know that the bind package is version 8.x Which version should I use? Is there an advantage or disadvantage to the newer versi