On Mon 27 Feb 2012 at 12:44:34 -0500, Tom H wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Brian wrote:
> >
> > Sorry, I'm a bit thrown by 'diversity'; I'll assume you mean 'severity'.
> > There is already one mail expressing that view and I try not to go in
> > for 'me toos'.
>
> I must've mistyped
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Brian wrote:
> On Mon 27 Feb 2012 at 11:29:59 -0500, Tom H wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Brian wrote:
>> >
>> > Quite possibly. But that's the nature of Testing, isn't it? Preventing
>> > packages in a good state (like CUPS) from migrating there d
On Mon 27 Feb 2012 at 11:29:59 -0500, Tom H wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Brian wrote:
> >
> > Quite possibly. But that's the nature of Testing, isn't it? Preventing
> > packages in a good state (like CUPS) from migrating there defeats its
> > purpose.
>
> Why don't you add a commen
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Brian wrote:
> On Sun 26 Feb 2012 at 18:20:25 -0600, Nate Bargmann wrote:
>
>> I suspect that if this update hits Testing that many more users will
>> be impacted. I know that I will have to put CUPS on my laptop in Hold
>> status just so I have a machine to prin
On Sun 26 Feb 2012 at 18:20:25 -0600, Nate Bargmann wrote:
> I suspect that if this update hits Testing that many more users will
> be impacted. I know that I will have to put CUPS on my laptop in Hold
> status just so I have a machine to print from should it migrate to
> Testing in its current s
* On 2012 26 Feb 16:55 -0600, Brian wrote:
> http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#tags
>
>important
> a bug which has a major effect on the usability of a package,
> without rendering it completely unusable to everyone
>
> The bit after the comma is the relevant bit.
>
> Now you
On Sun 26 Feb 2012 at 15:55:27 -0600, Nate Bargmann wrote:
> * On 2012 26 Feb 14:12 -0600, Brian wrote:
> > Bug #660420 at most rates a severity level of 'Important'. Designating
> > it as 'Grave' to prevent it getting into testing is not the purpose of
> > the BTS.
>
> Strangely, I thought it wa
* On 2012 26 Feb 14:12 -0600, Brian wrote:
> Bug #660420 at most rates a severity level of 'Important'. Designating
> it as 'Grave' to prevent it getting into testing is not the purpose of
> the BTS.
Strangely, I thought it was intended to be used in such a manner as to
keep severely broken packag
On Sun 26 Feb 2012 at 07:28:51 -0600, Nate Bargmann wrote:
> * On 2012 26 Feb 06:43 -0600, Camaleón wrote:
>
> > Try with the last good version of the package in Sid and if it works,
> > just open a bug report.
>
> Two bugs are open in this topic, 660348 (mine) and 660420 (Mike's).
> Both of u
* On 2012 26 Feb 06:43 -0600, Camaleón wrote:
> Try with the last good version of the package in Sid and if it works,
> just open a bug report.
Two bugs are open in this topic, 660348 (mine) and 660420 (Mike's).
Both of us have tried the latest update (1.5.2-5) and Mike sees help
with the Gener
On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 18:02:27 -0600, Nate Bargmann wrote:
> I just noticed that my Sid box is printing blank sheets from CUPS to my
> Brother HL-5240 printer. It is connected to the network using an Axis
> 540+ print server which provides an LPD interface. I can print a text
> document using a2ps
I just noticed that my Sid box is printing blank sheets from CUPS to my
Brother HL-5240 printer. It is connected to the network using an Axis
540+ print server which provides an LPD interface. I can print a text
document using a2ps but anything from Iceweasel or LibreOffice results
in a blank she
12 matches
Mail list logo
