of hddtemp.
I use that with xfce and the sensor plugin you mentioned.
Thank you for the reply. :-)
David
You may want to try out the psensor program. Psensor makes graphs of CPU
temperature. It has a server module that allows for remote monitoring as
well.
Thank you for the reply. :-)
David
emperature.
> > echo drivetemp > /etc/modules-load.d/drivetemp.conf
> >
> > Now you can get rid of hddtemp.
> >
> > I use that with xfce and the sensor plugin you mentioned.
>
>
> Thank you for the reply. :-)
>
>
> David
>
On 10/27/24 13:19, Charles Curley wrote:
On Sun, 27 Oct 2024 09:36:32 -0700
David Christensen wrote:
To allow the Sensor plugin access to hard disk temperatures, I have
set the set-user-ID bit on hddtemp(8):
# chmod u+s /usr/sbin/hddtemp
hddtemp has been superseded by a kernel module, which
On Sun, 27 Oct 2024 09:36:32 -0700
David Christensen wrote:
> To allow the Sensor plugin access to hard disk temperatures, I have
> set the set-user-ID bit on hddtemp(8):
>
> # chmod u+s /usr/sbin/hddtemp
hddtemp has been superseded by a kernel module, which you can enable
like so:
# enable ge
On 10/26/24 22:11, Corey wrote:
where shall i check the CPU temperature in command line?
my dell laptop gets hot and hot when debian run for some time. do you think
it's due to cpu too busy?
Thanks.
My current daily driver is a Dell PowerEdge T30 Xeon E3-1225 v5:
2024-10-27 08:28:10
On Sun, Oct 27, 2024 at 4:48 AM Corey wrote:
> where shall i check the CPU temperature in command line?
> my dell laptop gets hot and hot when debian run for some time. do you
> think it's due to cpu too busy?
>
LM-Sensors displays chipset temps and fan speeds.
sudo apt i
Hello,
cat /sys/class/thermal/thermal_zone0/temp / 1000 = °C
Work's for me on raspberry pi and Thinkpad Laptop.
Best Regards
Am 27.10.24 um 06:11 schrieb Corey:
where shall i check the CPU temperature in command line?
my dell laptop gets hot and hot when debian run for some time. d
where shall i check the CPU temperature in command line?
my dell laptop gets hot and hot when debian run for some time. do you think
it's due to cpu too busy?
Thanks.
On 2023-04-08 11:31:44 -0400, songbird wrote:
> Jeremy Nicoll wrote:
> > Wouldn't it be better to limit the amount of cputime that
> > the hogging application is using?
> >
> > Google suggests that "nice" or "cpulimit" might do that.
>
> nice didn't do it. "nice -n 19" didn't make any change.
On 11/04/2023 07:12, songbird wrote:
the bios did let me turn down the temperature so we'll see
how that works next time i need to do an upload.
I am curious if it affects
/sys/class/thermal/thermal_zone*
I have never tried to do anything with this interface. I decided to look
into sysfs
songbird wrote:
> songbird wrote:
> ...
>> i've been trying to find anything that will let me set this
>> but no luck yet in my searches.
>
> ...
>
> of course the moment i send the message it comes to me that
> perhaps the BIOS will let me do this, but i don't want to reboot
> at the moment
On 4/8/23 07:17, songbird wrote:
i have a program that has changed it's behavior to suddenly
become a CPU hog (while doing something simple like uploading
files for my website). probably a bug, but it got me to
wondering how i could limit the CPU temperature to a range
well below the ma
ot me to
wondering how i could limit the CPU temperature to a range
well below the maximum that kicks in by the CPU itself.
i have an intel processor and it has the MAX which does
prevent it from going higher (100C), but i'd like to keep it
at 70C or lower.
i've been trying to fin
heduler should already schedule
optimally, be it preemptive SJF or whatever, anyway so only
possibility to reduce CPU temperature that way is to schedule
less anyway - also backwards, since computing is like the
"king" here it means if heat is a problem, it's not on our
side of it really.
--
underground experts united
https://dataswamp.org/~incal
On 08/04/2023 15:17, songbird wrote:
i have a program that has changed it's behavior to suddenly
become a CPU hog (while doing something simple like uploading
files for my website). probably a bug, but it got me to
wondering how i could limit the CPU temperature to a range
well belo
t the CPU temperature to a range
well below the maximum that kicks in by the CPU itself.
i have an intel processor and it has the MAX which does
prevent it from going higher (100C), but i'd like to keep it
at 70C or lower.
i've been trying to find anything that will let me set this
On 4/8/23 07:17, songbird wrote:
i have a program that has changed it's behavior to suddenly
become a CPU hog (while doing something simple like uploading
files for my website). probably a bug, but it got me to
wondering how i could limit the CPU temperature to a range
well below the ma
ected to a heat sink on
the side of a Streacom FC8 Alpha case. I use the xfce4-sensors-plugin to
monitor CPU package temperatures and thermald seems to do the job. My
config:
$ cat /etc/thermald/thermal-conf.xml
Passive control of CPU temperature
*
have a mini ARM server that does have a fan but the O/S (Armbian)
omitted to give it any fan controller so I wrote my own fan control service.
Based on CPU temperature I am able to switch the fan off or on and set
various operating speeds.
The great disappointment is that all through this recent
On Sat, 2023-04-08 at 10:17 -0400, songbird wrote:
>
> i have an intel processor and it has the MAX which does
> prevent it from going higher (100C), but i'd like to keep it
> at 70C or lower.
>
> i've been trying to find anything that will let me set this
> but no luck yet in my searches.
I
Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
...
> Maybe don't use FTP but use rsync - that way you can come back to it
> after a while and start again at the point you left off?
i have no control over what is listening at the other
end other than i sign on.
i can limit the FTP software to fewer connections and
Jeffrey Walton wrote:
>> What would happen, if we started a political movement based
>> on nationalism and Unix?
>>
>> What would be the first thing we would do when we get
>> installed as government?
>
> Annex the Netherlands, and take control of ASML.
> Annex Taiwan, and take control of TSMC.
I
On Sat, Apr 8, 2023 at 1:29 PM Emanuel Berg wrote:
>
> >> I recommend to go fanless whenever possible.
> >> Computers should be silent.
> >
> > Yeah, optimally ...
>
> What would happen, if we started a political movement based on
> nationalism and Unix?
>
> What would be the first thing we would
>> I recommend to go fanless whenever possible.
>> Computers should be silent.
>
> Yeah, optimally ...
What would happen, if we started a political movement based on
nationalism and Unix?
What would be the first thing we would do when we get
installed as government?
Maybe close the border or som
Stefan Monnier wrote:
> I recommend to go fanless whenever possible.
> Computers should be silent.
Yeah, optimally ...
--
underground experts united
https://dataswamp.org/~incal
> i have a very tiny fan and heatsink that is right on
> the processor. the rest of the system is fanless (no
> fan for the PSU - no fancy GPU needed for what i do).
> i almost bought a bigger heatsink so that the entire
> thing could run without the fan, but the small fan
> provided with the CP
On Sat, Apr 08, 2023 at 11:43:53AM -0400, songbird wrote:
> tv.debian wrote:
> ...
> > Also modern cpu do not suffer from high temperatures as much as the cpu
> > of yore, they use up all the thermal headroom they have, then throttle
> > the frequency/power to stay at that level. Of course the re
t...@myposts.ovh wrote:
...
> By using a fanner?
well-trained chipmunk?
songbird
Jeremy Nicoll wrote:
> On Sat, 8 Apr 2023, at 15:26, songbird wrote:
>> songbird wrote:
>> ...
>>> i've been trying to find anything that will let me set this
>>> but no luck yet in my searches.
>
> Surely you don't need to set a temperature limit? If you
> do, the cpu will still run (far too mu
On Sat, 8 Apr 2023, at 16:39, songbird wrote:
> only with this change to the FTP software has it become
> an annoyance that made me go look for a way to deal with
> it.
>
> filing a bug against the FTP software is also something
> i should do, but i've not gotten that far yet. ;)
Meantime, w
tv.debian wrote:
...
> Also modern cpu do not suffer from high temperatures as much as the cpu
> of yore, they use up all the thermal headroom they have, then throttle
> the frequency/power to stay at that level. Of course the rest of the
> system has to deal with the residual heat as well if it
Emanuel Berg wrote:
...
> But install fans and see if you still get high temperatures if
> you didn't (?) ...
i have a very tiny fan and heatsink that is right on
the processor. the rest of the system is fanless (no
fan for the PSU - no fancy GPU needed for what i do).
i almost bought a bigger
davidson wrote:
...
> I would do
>
> $ man -k limit
>
> and see what looked interesting. prlimit(1) looks like it has a lot of
> switches.
ok, thanks will look at that too. :)
songbird
On Sat, 8 Apr 2023 Jeremy Nicoll wrote:
On Sat, 8 Apr 2023, at 15:26, songbird wrote:
songbird wrote:
...
i've been trying to find anything that will let me set this
but no luck yet in my searches.
Surely you don't need to set a temperature limit? If you
do, the cpu will still run (far too
songbird wrote:
> i have a program that has changed it's behavior to suddenly
> become a CPU hog (while doing something simple like
> uploading files for my website). probably a bug, but it got
> me to wondering how i could limit the CPU temperature to
> a range well below th
On Sat, 8 Apr 2023, at 15:26, songbird wrote:
> songbird wrote:
> ...
>> i've been trying to find anything that will let me set this
>> but no luck yet in my searches.
Surely you don't need to set a temperature limit? If you
do, the cpu will still run (far too much, but less than now)
up to tha
reboot
at the moment to check that. will check later.
songbird
Hello, yes most motherboard bios will let you do that, also you may be
able to play with frequency boost and other advanced features that
greatly impact cpu temperature. Utilities like cpupower (cpupower-gui)
can allow yo
songbird wrote:
...
> i've been trying to find anything that will let me set this
> but no luck yet in my searches.
...
of course the moment i send the message it comes to me that
perhaps the BIOS will let me do this, but i don't want to reboot
at the moment to check that. will check later
On 2023-04-08 22:17, songbird wrote:
i have a program that has changed it's behavior to suddenly
become a CPU hog (while doing something simple like uploading
files for my website). probably a bug, but it got me to
wondering how i could limit the CPU temperature to a range
well belo
i have a program that has changed it's behavior to suddenly
become a CPU hog (while doing something simple like uploading
files for my website). probably a bug, but it got me to
wondering how i could limit the CPU temperature to a range
well below the maximum that kicks in by the CPU i
On 7/27/10 2:26 AM, Joe wrote:
On 27/07/10 06:56, Long Wind wrote:
(sorry, this question isn't debian specific)
I have a P3/550, SECC2
I get its manual from Intel
It says max T junction is 80 C
The motherboard BIOS reports CPU temperature
but is the reported value equal to T junction?
from Intel
>>> It says max T junction is 80 C
>>> The motherboard BIOS reports CPU temperature but is the reported value
>>> equal to T junction?
>>
>> Mmm... I have heard that some motherboard manufacturers read "T case"
>> value instead &qu
Thanks to all those who reply!
According to the motherboard manual:
CPU temperature is monitored ... thru the CPU's internal thermal diode.
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 10:32 PM, Camaleón wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 01:56:29 -0400, Long Wind wrote:
>
>> (sorry, this question isn&
On 27/07/10 06:56, Long Wind wrote:
(sorry, this question isn't debian specific)
I have a P3/550, SECC2
I get its manual from Intel
It says max T junction is 80 C
The motherboard BIOS reports CPU temperature
but is the reported value equal to T junction?
That doesn't sound right.
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 01:56:29 -0400, Long Wind wrote:
> (sorry, this question isn't debian specific) I have a P3/550, SECC2
> I get its manual from Intel
> It says max T junction is 80 C
> The motherboard BIOS reports CPU temperature but is the reported value
> equal to T junc
(sorry, this question isn't debian specific)
I have a P3/550, SECC2
I get its manual from Intel
It says max T junction is 80 C
The motherboard BIOS reports CPU temperature
but is the reported value equal to T junction?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
w
On Sun, 18 Apr 2010 09:28:38 -0400, Long Wind wrote:
> To Camaleón
>
> I had run sensors-detect and loaded some modules.
And the output of that command was...?
> If I hadn't, the
> sensors command wouldn't even say CPU fan speed is 0.
Yes, but that means there is something wrong with your cur
To Camaleón
I had run sensors-detect and loaded some modules.
If I hadn't, the sensors command wouldn't even say CPU fan speed is 0.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lis
On Sun, 18 Apr 2010 07:24:08 -0400, Long Wind wrote:
> Thank Aioanei and Camaleón!
>
> Even bios in my Slot 1 machine which use P3 or C1 can show fan speed or
> cpu temp The bad thing about HP is their bios doesn't show CPU and fan
> info though asus bios show!
Do not panic. Some modern motherb
Thank Aioanei and Camaleón!
Even bios in my Slot 1 machine which use P3 or C1 can show fan speed or cpu temp
The bad thing about HP is their bios doesn't show CPU and fan info
though asus bios show!
I read doc from lm-sensor
They say their reading isn't reliable
(they ask me to compare their readi
On Sun, 18 Apr 2010 06:33:38 -0400, Long Wind wrote:
> The sensors command shows 0 rpm all the time! Thank Eduard anyway!
Read "carefully" what Eduard said :-)
You have to run "sensors-detect" as root that will ask you some questions
and provide more info about the suitable modules you need to
Of course, if the hardware isn't capable of detecting temperature (eg
hardware sensors), you're pretty much out of luck.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.
The sensors command shows 0 rpm all the time!
Thank Eduard anyway!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/w2i2107b77c1004180333j4237e8aq8a8f1509dff81...@mail
#include
* Long Wind [Sun, Apr 18 2010, 01:24:09AM]:
> I have etch and HP VL420
> It runs P4 1.6G
> but BIOS can't show CPU temperature and fan speed
> so I download a bios from motherboard maker ASUS
> but can't update bios
> then I install lm-sensor in etch
> b
I have etch and HP VL420
It runs P4 1.6G
but BIOS can't show CPU temperature and fan speed
so I download a bios from motherboard maker ASUS
but can't update bios
then I install lm-sensor in etch
but reading data seems incorrect
Can you help???
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian
El 21/05/2008, a las 21:56, Hugo Vanwoerkom escribió:
Florian Kulzer wrote:
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 13:45:19 +0200, Santi Saez wrote:
Dear Srs,
I need to get the CPU temperature in a Supermicro X6DH8-XG2
motherboard, this is the link for key features:
http://www.supermicro.com/products
On Wed, 21 May 2008 19:17:03 +0200
Florian Kulzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 09:22:44 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 08:02:42 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > > Did you go to the mentioned web site to look to see whether the
> > > PC87427
Florian Kulzer wrote:
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 13:45:19 +0200, Santi Saez wrote:
Dear Srs,
I need to get the CPU temperature in a Supermicro X6DH8-XG2 motherboard,
this is the link for key features:
http://www.supermicro.com/products/motherboard/Xeon800/E7520/X6DH8-
XG2.cfm
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 13:45:19 +0200, Santi Saez wrote:
>
> Dear Srs,
>
> I need to get the CPU temperature in a Supermicro X6DH8-XG2 motherboard,
> this is the link for key features:
>
> http://www.supermicro.com/products/motherboard/Xeon800/E7520/X6DH8-
> XG2.cfm
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 09:22:44 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 08:02:42 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
[...]
> > Did you go to the mentioned web site to look to see whether the
> > PC87427 is supported by lm-sensors 2.10.1-3?
>
> *I* did. But then, I'm not the OP.
Why are you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/21/08 11:02, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> Ron Johnson wrote:
>>
>> On 05/21/08 09:01, Brian Schrock wrote:
[snip]
>>> Did you go to the mentioned web site to look to see whether the
>>> PC87427 is supported by lm-sensors 2.10.1-3?
>>
>> *I* did. But
Ron Johnson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/21/08 09:01, Brian Schrock wrote:
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 9:02 AM, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
On 05/21/08 06:45, Santi Saez wrote:
Dear Srs,
I need to get the CPU temp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/21/08 09:01, Brian Schrock wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 9:02 AM, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>
> On 05/21/08 06:45, Santi Saez wrote:
>
>> Dear Srs,
>
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 9:02 AM, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 05/21/08 06:45, Santi Saez wrote:
> >
> > Dear Srs,
> >
> > I need to get the CPU temperature in a Supermicro X6DH8-XG2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/21/08 06:45, Santi Saez wrote:
>
> Dear Srs,
>
> I need to get the CPU temperature in a Supermicro X6DH8-XG2 motherboard,
> this is the link for key features:
>
> http://www.supermicro.com/products/motherboard/Xeon80
Dear Srs,
I need to get the CPU temperature in a Supermicro X6DH8-XG2
motherboard, this is the link for key features:
http://www.supermicro.com/products/motherboard/Xeon800/E7520/X6DH8-
XG2.cfm
According with the page specs, X6DH8-XG2 seems to have some thermal
monitoring chip/hardware
On Tue, 04 Sep 2007 12:29:08 +0200, Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote:
On Tue, 04 Sep 2007 12:29:08 +0200, Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote:
> Felix Karpfen wrote:
>> Since upgrading from Sarge to Etch, my CPU temperature appears to be
>> running 5-10 deg.C higher
>>
>> Am I headin
Felix Karpfen wrote:
> Since upgrading from Sarge to Etch, my CPU temperature appears to be
> running 5-10 deg.C higher; immediately after booting it is a healthy 30
> deg.C and it creeps up to 45-50 deg.C within an hour. On the idle (?)
> computer there are some 120 processes run
On Sat, 01 Sep 2007 21:13:42 -0400, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
On Sat, 01 Sep 2007 21:13:42 -0400, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 09:17:44PM +, Felix Karpfen wrote:
>> Since upgrading from Sarge to Etch, my CPU temperature appears to be
>> running 5-
On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 09:17:44PM +, Felix Karpfen wrote:
> Since upgrading from Sarge to Etch, my CPU temperature appears to be
> running 5-10 deg.C higher; immediately after booting it is a healthy 30
> deg.C and it creeps up to 45-50 deg.C within an hour. On the idle (?)
> co
Since upgrading from Sarge to Etch, my CPU temperature appears to be
running 5-10 deg.C higher; immediately after booting it is a healthy 30
deg.C and it creeps up to 45-50 deg.C within an hour. On the idle (?)
computer there are some 120 processes running and the system load is about
40%.
Am I
Douglas Tutty wrote on Monday, January 08, 2007 8:02 AM -0600:
> On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 11:52:57PM -0600, Seth Goodman wrote:
> > Douglas Tutty wrote on Sunday, January 07, 2007 4:20 PM -0600:
> >
> > > Most electronics are designed for an ambient (to them, not the
> > > case) temperature of 25 C
On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 11:52:57PM -0600, Seth Goodman wrote:
> Douglas Tutty wrote on Sunday, January 07, 2007 4:20 PM -0600:
>
> > Most electronics are designed for an ambient (to them, not the case)
> > temperature of 25 C max.
>
> It would be nice if we could assume that when designing hardwa
John Hasler wrote:
Kevin Mark writes:
After geening a snippet of an article on slashdot last year, it said
that solar cells are now 48% efficient.
Some extremely expensive experimental solar cells are up to 48% efficient.
...it would seem that the cost of investing in solar cells to power
co
Douglas Tutty wrote on Sunday, January 07, 2007 4:20 PM -0600:
> Most electronics are designed for an ambient (to them, not the
> case) temperature of 25 C max.
It would be nice if we could assume that when designing hardware, but it
isn't realistic. Even for a benign laboratory environment, we
On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 10:53:26AM +1300, Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 06, 2007 at 04:03:37PM -0800, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> >
> > yet another reason to shave the cats *outside* instead of in the
> > house...
>
> Shave? LOL What breed are they? Or is "cats" a euphemism?
hmmm... ok
On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 08:04:08AM -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> The problem where I live is the ambient temperature. It is now 8AM and
> the temperature is 21C 70F. That is the case temp also and the mobo temp
> is 34C. The CPU temp is 40C.
>
> But houses here are either built out of corrugat
On Sat, Jan 06, 2007 at 04:03:37PM -0800, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
>
> yet another reason to shave the cats *outside* instead of in the
> house...
Shave? LOL What breed are they? Or is "cats" a euphemism?
--
Chris.
==
" ... the official version cannot be abandoned because the implicatio
Kevin Mark writes:
> After geening a snippet of an article on slashdot last year, it said
> that solar cells are now 48% efficient.
Some extremely expensive experimental solar cells are up to 48% efficient.
> ...it would seem that the cost of investing in solar cells to power
> cooling units woul
On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 08:04:08AM -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> But houses here are either built out of corrugated steel, in which case
> you never put a computer in it, or concrete block + concrete roof, like
> ours. Because it never rains from Oct.-May the sun will heat the
> structure so b
Douglas Tutty wrote:
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 02:06:19PM -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
Douglas Tutty wrote:
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 12:34:55PM +0700, surachai locharoen wrote:
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 07:42:03AM +0700, Surachai Locharoen wrote:
I use debian etch on compact presario v4000. I ad
On Sat, Jan 06, 2007 at 04:19:40PM -0600, Mike McCarty wrote:
> Seth Goodman wrote:
> >Mike McCarty wrote on Saturday, January 06, 2007 7:48 AM -0600:
> >
> >
> >>The two most common causes of PS failure are spikes on the AC and
> >>failing fans or otherwise obstructed air flow.
> >
> >
> >Transien
Seth Goodman wrote:
Mike McCarty wrote on Saturday, January 06, 2007 7:48 AM -0600:
The two most common causes of PS failure are spikes on the AC and
failing fans or otherwise obstructed air flow.
Transients in the AC line causing damage to power supplies is a
design issue for the supply.
On Saturday 06 January 2007 18:53, Seth Goodman wrote:
> Mike McCarty wrote on Saturday, January 06, 2007 7:48 AM -0600:
> > The two most common causes of PS failure are spikes on the AC and
> > failing fans or otherwise obstructed air flow.
>
> Transients in the AC line causing damage to power sup
Surachai Locharoen wrote on Saturday, January 06, 2007 12:42 AM -0600:
> polling_interval was set to 2, I changed this to 30 and observed that
> sometimes the CPU temp spiked at 102, 105, 107 but for no more than 1
> second then immediately dropped back to sub-100. No instability, so
> could be a
Mike McCarty wrote on Saturday, January 06, 2007 7:48 AM -0600:
> The two most common causes of PS failure are spikes on the AC and
> failing fans or otherwise obstructed air flow.
Transients in the AC line causing damage to power supplies is a
design issue for the supply. We have known for year
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 10:26:42PM -0600, Cybe R. Wizard wrote:
> Marc Shapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > I can claim firsthand experience with exactly that. Box overheated.
> > Fried capacitors. Required new motherboard and CPU. Fortunately I
> > was able to get a similar MB, only slight
can insert rule to reduce frequency when hight cpu temperature.
This is not a solution. You need to correct the problem. Eventually,
you are going to kill your machine unless you correct the heat
dissipation problem.
This presumes that your sensors are not lying to you.
Mike
--
p="p=%c%s%c
Marc Shapiro wrote:
I had been hearing whining on and off from my PS for at least a few
weeks. If I had paid attention to it I could have picked up a PS
locally for about $35 and avoided the hassle, cost and downtime. I now
You could have picked up a fan for $12. I always use my ears when
Surachai Locharoen wrote:
[snip]
The fan (there is one) responds autonomously -- probably BIOS
controlled? So does the above really matter.
What is invoking the BIOS?
Doing something like kernel compile I would see the CPU temp hovering
between 80-100. Passive would kick in every now an
Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
I've had a couple desktop psu's fail. symptoms have been intermittent
hard-locks, out-of-spec voltages, difficulty when rebooting (such as
power leds come on, but no POST) etc. Nothing definitive, but the
problems have gone away with a new power supply. My understand
, however. I don't think I have seen it hit 40C
> yet and I keep it running 24/7. It is an AMD Mobile AMD Athlon(tm) XP-M
> Processor 2800+.
>
> --
> Marc Shapiro
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The heat increase because cpu run in full speed. So I enable cpufreq
scaling and install cpufreqd deamon
The cpufreqd control cpu frequency by rule in configuration file. So I
can insert rule to reduce frequency when hight cpu temperature.
Kan
Cybe R. Wizard wrote:
Marc Shapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
I can claim firsthand experience with exactly that. Box overheated.
Fried capacitors. Required new motherboard and CPU. Fortunately I
was able to get a similar MB, only slight upgrade, so I was able to
use my old memory and d
เมื่อ ศ. 2007-01-05 เวลา 21:56 -0800, Andrew Sackville-West เขียนว่า:
> On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 10:26:42PM -0600, Cybe R. Wizard wrote:
> > Marc Shapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > > I can claim firsthand experience with exactly that. Box overheated.
> > > Fried capacitors. Required new mot
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 10:26:42PM -0600, Cybe R. Wizard wrote:
> Marc Shapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > I can claim firsthand experience with exactly that. Box overheated.
> > Fried capacitors. Required new motherboard and CPU. Fortunately I
> > was able to get a similar MB, only slight
Marc Shapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I can claim firsthand experience with exactly that. Box overheated.
> Fried capacitors. Required new motherboard and CPU. Fortunately I
> was able to get a similar MB, only slight upgrade, so I was able to
> use my old memory and didn't have to replac
เมื่อ ศ. 2007-01-05 เวลา 18:40 -0800, Marc Shapiro เขียนว่า:
> Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote:
> > On Friday 05 January 2007 09:57, Marko Randjelovic wrote:
> >> surachai locharoen wrote:
> >>> it has sound "woe woe weo"
> >>>
> >>> --
> >> Than fan of your CPU is not working well. Just to make sure, i
Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote:
On Friday 05 January 2007 09:57, Marko Randjelovic wrote:
surachai locharoen wrote:
it has sound "woe woe weo"
--
Than fan of your CPU is not working well. Just to make sure, if you
don't have windows, try Knoppix or some other CD bootable distro. If it
is the same,
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 02:06:19PM -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> Douglas Tutty wrote:
> >On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 12:34:55PM +0700, surachai locharoen wrote:
> >
> >>>On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 07:42:03AM +0700, Surachai Locharoen wrote:
> I use debian etch on compact presario v4000. I add tempe
เมื่อ ศ. 2007-01-05 เวลา 14:06 -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom เขียนว่า:
> Douglas Tutty wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 12:34:55PM +0700, surachai locharoen wrote:
> >
> >>> On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 07:42:03AM +0700, Surachai Locharoen wrote:
> I use debian etch on compact presario v4000. I add
1 - 100 of 118 matches
Mail list logo
