On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 11:42:32AM +, Vittorio wrote:
> I'm struck by the fact that the media is so relevant as far as burning
> is involved.
Well, I can't say I've had any trouble at all with media; every type of
blank I've used has worked fine in all computers, and the audio one's
I've made
Rob Weir [debian-user] <09/09/02 00:26 +1000>:
> On Sat, Sep 07, 2002 at 04:11:12PM +, Vittorio wrote:
> > A part of them say "the lower the ripping and burning speed the
> > better" so for both speeds they recommend not to go faster than 4x.
> >
> > Others say that ripping speed is critical,
On Sat, Sep 07, 2002 at 04:11:12PM +, Vittorio wrote:
> A part of them say "the lower the ripping and burning speed the
> better" so for both speeds they recommend not to go faster than 4x.
>
> Others say that ripping speed is critical, so the 4x limit should
> apply to this phase only.
>
>
The people that you speak to at the office are probably used to using
the first generation of CD-DA extraction tools. The first tool that
comes to mind in Linux that is a representation of this is cdda2wav.
These tools tried to copy the data - mostly skipping errors - as is,
sometimes resulting i
On Saturday 07 September 2002 18:11, Vittorio wrote:
> Now speaking with (would-be or so-called) "experts" at office of
> "high quality audio CD burning" I'm becoming somewhat confused.
>
> A part of them say "the lower the ripping and burning speed the
> better" so for both speeds they recommend
Hi there
I'm not an expert :-( but I think, as far as cdparanoia is concerned,
the speed doesn't matter.
regards Christoph
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm using woody and xcdroast (or cdparanoia & cdrecord) to burn my audio CDs.
Now speaking with (would-be or so-called) "experts" at office of "high
quality audio CD burning" I'm becoming somewhat confused.
A part of them say "the lower the ripping and burning speed the
better" so for both spee
7 matches
Mail list logo
