David Baron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|> > I note that any attempt to place CONFIG_DEVFS=y (or CONFIG_DEVFS_FS
|> > as implied
|> > in the Makefile by the devfs sources!!) produces an undefined symbol
error. I
|> > did, however, notice some errors dealing with devfs elsewhere. In any
event,
>>1. I am not using udev. Apparently not using devfs either because I compiled
>>that into the kernel with no change. Since I am based on an older knoppix
>>install, what exactly am I using? Devpts is what? How do I get modules
active
>>and alsa working?
>I note that any attempt to place CONFI
>1. I am not using udev. Apparently not using devfs either because I compiled
>that into the kernel with no change. Since I am based on an older knoppix
>install, what exactly am I using? Devpts is what? How do I get modules active
>and alsa working?
I note that any attempt to place CONFIG_DEVF
On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 10:34:05AM -0500, Piszcz, Justin wrote:
> Why use initrd at all (as long as you are not using a RAID ROOT
> volume)
Yeah I'd avoid usind initrd. The only problem there is since you based
your config on the existing one for the debian kernel, you may need to
go through and d
14, 2005 9:58 AM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org,
Subject: Built 2.6.14!
Yes, I succeded for the first time in building a kernel. Since the Sid
version
came up with "Kernel modules not enabled" and loads of undefined
symbols, no
alsa, etc., I based the build on the working 2.6
Yes, I succeded for the first time in building a kernel. Since the Sid version
came up with "Kernel modules not enabled" and loads of undefined symbols, no
alsa, etc., I based the build on the working 2.6.11 config. Answered a bunch
of questions for new items, taking mostly the defaults except f
6 matches
Mail list logo
