On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 09:03:47PM +0200, Slavko wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Dňa Wed, 11 Sep 2013 23:00:03 +0400 recovery...@gmail.com napísal:
>
> > Unless you intend to do something very strange (i.e. amd64.deb which
> > contains i386 binaries), you'll probably better build package for i386
> > in a pure
On Wed, 11 Sep 2013 21:03:47 +0200
Slavko wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Dňa Wed, 11 Sep 2013 23:00:03 +0400 recovery...@gmail.com napísal:
>
> > Unless you intend to do something very strange (i.e. amd64.deb which
> > contains i386 binaries), you'll probably better build package for i386
> > in a pure i386
Hi.
On Mon, 09 Sep 2013 23:20:34 +0200
Lucio Crusca wrote:
> I'm trying to build opus package from source for both amd64 and i386, after
> having applied the patch by Pino Toscano I've found here:
>
> $ dpkg-buildpackage -ai386
>From my limited experience in this area, invoking dpkg-build
Hi,
Dňa Wed, 11 Sep 2013 23:00:03 +0400 recovery...@gmail.com napísal:
> Unless you intend to do something very strange (i.e. amd64.deb which
> contains i386 binaries), you'll probably better build package for i386
> in a pure i386 chroot (easily made by deboostrap).
Or in chroot created by the
On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 11:20:34PM +0200, Lucio Crusca wrote:
I'm trying to build opus package from source for both amd64 and i386, after
having applied the patch by Pino Toscano I've found here:
Look at the manpage for gcc (which I'm assuming you'll be using) and
you'll see switches for diffe
On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 06:30:41PM -0700, Gregory Nowak wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 11:20:34PM +0200, Lucio Crusca wrote:
> > I'm trying to build opus package from source for both amd64 and i386, after
> > having applied the patch by Pino Toscano I've found here:
>
> You might want to have a
Did you google for "debian cross compiling"?
Seemingly there are pre build toolchains available.
https://wiki.debian.org/BuildingCrossCompilers
https://www.google.de/search?q=debian+cross+platform+compiling&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a&channel=np&source=hp&gw
In data lunedì 9 settembre 2013 18:30:41, Gregory Nowak ha scritto:
> On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 11:20:34PM +0200, Lucio Crusca wrote:
> > I'm trying to build opus package from source for both amd64 and i386,
> > after
>
> > having applied the patch by Pino Toscano I've found here:
> You might want t
On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 11:20:34PM +0200, Lucio Crusca wrote:
> I'm trying to build opus package from source for both amd64 and i386, after
> having applied the patch by Pino Toscano I've found here:
You might want to have a look at apt-src or apt-build. I seem to
recall that apt-build can build
Hi,
I'm trying to build opus package from source for both amd64 and i386, after
having applied the patch by Pino Toscano I've found here:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=674467
What I've done so far is:
$ apt-get source opus
# apt-get build-dep opus
$ patch -Np1 < .../o
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 02:50:55PM +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
> Hi,
> I did "apt-get source ecj" which downloaded ecj sources. I get inside
> its directory and did "dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -d" because if
> failed to build. I deleted that directory, but when I try "apt-get
> source ecj"
On 5/28/07, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I did "apt-get source ecj" which downloaded ecj sources. I get inside
its directory and did "dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -d" because if
failed to build. I deleted that directory, but when I try "apt-get
source ecj" again it prints t
On 5/28/07, Klein Moebius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* Tshepang Lekhonkhobe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-05-28 14:50:55 +0200]:
> Need to get 0B/903B of source archives.
apt is trying to fetch from your local cache.
> Failed to fetch
means it's not in your local cache (maybe too full?)
It actu
* Tshepang Lekhonkhobe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-05-28 14:50:55 +0200]:
> Need to get 0B/903B of source archives.
apt is trying to fetch from your local cache.
> Failed to fetch
means it's not in your local cache (maybe too full?)
Try:
Apt-get clean
Then:
apt-get source umpty-scratch
Regar
Hi,
I did "apt-get source ecj" which downloaded ecj sources. I get inside
its directory and did "dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -d" because if
failed to build. I deleted that directory, but when I try "apt-get
source ecj" again it prints the following:
"""
Need to get 0B/903B of source archives.
Fa
On Thursday 05 February 2004 8:43 pm, Rob Weir wrote:
> If you build things from source, dpkg won't be aware of them, therefore
> apt will try to install them if something depends on them.
Hrm apt-get install checkinstall. It won't track dependencies but will make
a .deb, .rpm or slackTGZ from the
On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 01:43:08PM +1100, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 12:21:00AM +, cyril said
> > Hi
> >
> > as a Debian newbie (recent redhat convert) I could do with a bit of advice on
> > handling any source builds on my server. What kind of issues should I be
> > aware of
> >>If you build things from source, dpkg won't be aware of them, therefore
> >>apt will try to install them if something depends on them.
> >
> > From my (limited) experience with Gentoo I think it's possible to
> > install something from source and tell emerge about it, so it won't try
> > and i
Dave Thorn wrote:
On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 01:43:08PM +1100, Rob Weir wrote:
On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 12:21:00AM +, cyril said
as a Debian newbie (recent redhat convert) I could do with a bit of advice on
handling any source builds on my server. What kind of issues should I be
aware of if I c
On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 01:43:08PM +1100, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 12:21:00AM +, cyril said
> > as a Debian newbie (recent redhat convert) I could do with a bit of advice on
> > handling any source builds on my server. What kind of issues should I be
> > aware of if I choose
Thanks for the advice Rob
> Why? The Debian versions of apache and php include all known security
> fixes, and pretty much all available modules.
Well, I have had some problems with php 4.1.1 as supplied by Debian. There are
some issues with the way this version handles certain things that I ca
On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 12:21:00AM +, cyril said
> Hi
>
> as a Debian newbie (recent redhat convert) I could do with a bit of advice on
> handling any source builds on my server. What kind of issues should I be
> aware of if I choose to build some software from source on a stable Debian
> e
Hi
as a Debian newbie (recent redhat convert) I could do with a bit of advice on
handling any source builds on my server. What kind of issues should I be
aware of if I choose to build some software from source on a stable Debian
environment. For example I usually choose to build php / apache fr
I wrote:
I need wxWindows to be able to build a specific non-Debian
application. wxWindows is not supported on Woody, which is what I
run. Hence, I need to compile it.
Roberto Sanchez suggested:
> I've been thinking about it, and in your case it iw probably easier
> build it from upstream and i
I wrote:
I need wxWindows to be able to build a
specific non-Debian application. wxWindows is not supported on Woody,
which is what I run. Hence, I need to compile it.
Mark Roach replied:
That being the case, you could just grab the backport from this source
deb http://www.arrakis.es/~frigola/pys
On Mon, 2003-10-20 at 09:47, Dave Howorth wrote:
> Mark Roach wrote:
[...]
> >>The specific question is why these particular dependencies are arising.
> > The reason is that all of those wxwindows packages come from the same
> > source package. Why exactly did you decide that you needed to compile
Dave Howorth wrote:
The full story is in the previous messages, which I trimmed to save
bandwidth :) But briefly, I need wxWindows to be able to build a
specific non-Debian application. wxWindows is not supported on Woody,
which is what I run. Hence, I need to compile it. Not sure what you
m
Mark Roach wrote:
On Mon, 2003-10-20 at 07:06, Dave Howorth wrote:
dpkg-checkbuilddeps: Unmet build dependencies: libgtk1.2-dev, python
(>=2.3), python2.3-dev, libpng2-dev, libtiff3g-dev, xlibmesa-gl-dev |
libgl-dev, xlibmesa-glu-dev | libglu-dev, libesd0-dev
dpkg-buildpackage: Build dependencies
Mark Roach wrote:
The reason is that all of those wxwindows packages come from the same
source package. Why exactly did you decide that you needed to compile
the whole thing again?
-Mark
He is building a non-Debian app that requires wxWindows 2.4 and he
is on Woody, where only 2.2 is available i
Dave Howorth wrote:
On Friday 17 October 2003 16:13, I wrote:
| >>I need to install wxWindows 2.4 on a Woody system so I can build
| >>another application (TreeView X). Does anybody have any idea of the
| >>best way to do this, and what steps are involved?
I haven't built Debian-ised software f
On Mon, 2003-10-20 at 07:06, Dave Howorth wrote:
[...]
> dpkg-checkbuilddeps: Unmet build dependencies: libgtk1.2-dev, python
> (>=2.3), python2.3-dev, libpng2-dev, libtiff3g-dev, xlibmesa-gl-dev |
> libgl-dev, xlibmesa-glu-dev | libglu-dev, libesd0-dev
> dpkg-buildpackage: Build dependencies/con
On Friday 17 October 2003 16:13, I wrote:
| >>I need to install wxWindows 2.4 on a Woody system so I can build
| >>another application (TreeView X). Does anybody have any idea of the
| >>best way to do this, and what steps are involved?
I haven't built Debian-ised software from source before (exce
Sunil Thomas Thonikuzhiyil wrote:
> Hello
> I have downloaded
> somepackage..diff.gz
> somepackage.dsc
> somepackage.orig.tar.gz
> from incoming. Presently I have a potato installation
> How do I make a deb file from the above
> TIA
> sunil
cd /your/build/dir
Hello
I have downloaded
somepackage..diff.gz
somepackage.dsc
somepackage.orig.tar.gz
from incoming. Presently I have a potato installation
How do I make a deb file from the above
TIA
sunil
>
> I'm trying to build ssh-1.2.3-9.3 from a souce package on a Potato box.
one thing that may work...is if you compile ssh1.2.3 from
raw source, install the real debs ..then overwrite all the files
with your binaries from the source compile, and run dpkg-repack
on it .. shouldn't be too difficul
I'm trying to build ssh-1.2.3-9.3 from a souce package on a Potato
box. (Reasons for using source package are optimization, control over
./configure flags, etc). The box is to be used for server applications,
and does not have X or GNOME libraries, which the build process is looking
for. ./debian
kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:
>on Sun, Dec 31, 2000 at 04:12:42PM -0800, kmself@ix.netcom.com
>(kmself@ix.netcom.com) wrote:
>> I'm trying to build mutt from sources with the gzip patch.
>>
>> How do I pass the option "--enable-gzip" when running
>> "debian/rules binary"? Specifying this on the co
on Sun, Dec 31, 2000 at 04:12:42PM -0800, kmself@ix.netcom.com
(kmself@ix.netcom.com) wrote:
> I'm trying to build mutt from sources with the gzip patch.
>
> How do I pass the option "--enable-gzip" when running
> "debian/rules binary"? Specifying this on the command line doesn't seem
> to work
I'm trying to build mutt from sources with the gzip patch.
How do I pass the option "--enable-gzip" when running
"debian/rules binary"? Specifying this on the command line doesn't seem
to work. The Debian FAQ doesn't mention this, nor the dpkg-dev manpage.
--
Karsten M. Self http://kmself
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Mon, 20 Jul 1998, Keith wrote:
> I have tried about three time to build a debian package from the Pine 3.96L
> files that I downloaded from the debian server. I have all three files it
> runs through the whole thing, but all I get is a tech-notes package.
>
> dpkg-buildpackage
>
> It cranks through the building process than errors at the end.
Run it as a root. (There are other methods, but this is the simplest)
Alex Y.
--
_
_( )_
( (o___ +---+
| _ 7 |Alexander Y
I have tried about three time to build a debian package from the Pine 3.96L
files that I downloaded from the debian server. I have all three files it
runs through the whole thing, but all I get is a tech-notes package.
These are the files that I downloaded:
pine_3.96L-2.diff.gz
pine_3.96L-2.dsc
p
I'm trying to build lprng, but during the documentation, I get:
make[2]: Entering directory `/root/lprng-3.4.1/HOWTO'
sgml2html LPRng-HOWTO.sgml
DynaLoader object version 1.03 does not match $DynaLoader::VERSION 1.00 at
/usr/lib/perl5/DynaLoader.pm line 58.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /
43 matches
Mail list logo
