Upgrading rex's libc, was Re: Bug in libc5.4.13

Tadeusz Bak writes: [SNIP] > The bug is fixed in libc5.4.17 (from "bo" directory). So I think that > libc in "rex" should be upgraded. Yes, why not upgrade rex's libc? Nothing would break, the packages are ready... If we want rex to be stable, that would be part of the normal bug fixing routi

Bug in libc5.4.13

That simple program compiled under Debian-1.2 (libc5.4.13) produces wrong results. #include main() { double a; printf("input: "); scanf("%lf", &a); printf("value = %f\n", a); } $ ./test01 input: 2e-3 value = 0.002000 $ ./test01 input: 2E-3 value = 2.00 The bug is fixed in libc5