On Sun, Nov 02, 2008 at 11:49:41 -0300, Victor Munoz wrote:
[...]
> This has been solved too. Don't know what caused this, but this was
> the output of lsattr on /usr/share/doc/libcairo-perl:
>
> /usr/share/doc/libcairo-perl# !ls
> lsattr *
> --- changelog.Debian.gz
> -a-Ac-Z
On Sun, Nov 02, 2008 at 11:12:04AM -0300, Victor Munoz wrote:
>
> Preparing to replace libcairo-perl 1.043-1 (using
> .../libcairo-perl_1.060-1_i386.deb) ...
> Unpacking replacement libcairo-perl ...
> dpkg: error processing
> /var/cache/apt/archives/libcairo-perl_1.060-1_i386.deb (--unpack):
> u
On Sat, Nov 01, 2008 at 07:45:20PM +0100, Florian Kulzer wrote:
> > [...]
> > Errors were encountered while processing:
> > mono-gac
> > mono-runtime
> > libmono2.0-cil
> > libgconf2.0-cil
> > libmono-addins0.2-cil
> > libmono-system-web2.0-cil
> > libmono1.0-cil
> > libgnome2.0-cil
> > libmono-add
On Sat, Nov 01, 2008 at 07:45:20PM +0100, Florian Kulzer wrote:
>
> I would try to comment out the entire dh_installdefoma stanza in
> /var/lib/dpkg/info/ttf-liberation.prerm and then run
>
> dpkg --purge ttf-liberation
>
> again.
>
Amazing... this did the trick. I wouldn't have had the slig
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 09:23:07 -0300, Victor Munoz wrote:
[...]
> However, aptitude still complains about other things:
>
> Removing ttf-liberation ...
> W: /usr/share/fonts/truetype/ttf-liberation/LiberationSans-Bold.ttf:
> not registered.
> W:
> /usr/share/fonts/truetype/ttf-liberation/Liber
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 11:13:25AM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2008-10-31 03:24 +0100, Victor Munoz wrote:
>
> > Hello. I've got a very complex situation here with perl. I'm running
> > sid, and last weekend's update left my system partially broken.
>
> It seems you had not upgraded for a lon
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 10:20:32AM +0100, Florian Kulzer wrote:
>
> I think your problem is similar to this one:
>
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2008/08/msg01904.html
>
> You can try to follow the same procedure. I can walk you through it
> step-by-step if necessary; in that case, start
On 2008-10-31 03:24 +0100, Victor Munoz wrote:
> Hello. I've got a very complex situation here with perl. I'm running
> sid, and last weekend's update left my system partially broken.
It seems you had not upgraded for a long time (half a year at least).
> Basically, perl was left in a "partially
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 23:24:33 -0300, Victor Munoz wrote:
> Hello. I've got a very complex situation here with perl. I'm running
> sid, and last weekend's update left my system partially broken.
> Basically, perl was left in a "partially installed" status. This means
> that perl itself and severa
Hello. I've got a very complex situation here with perl. I'm running
sid, and last weekend's update left my system partially broken.
Basically, perl was left in a "partially installed" status. This means
that perl itself and several other packages cannot be upgraded because
the system can't find so
That's it exactly Nicos! (Well almost.) I added the line to my
httpd.conf rather than conf.d/perl.conf. Works like a charm. Thanks!
Chris
On Mon, 19 Jul 2004, Nicos Gollan wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 22:50:33 -0400 (EDT)
> Chris Gorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I'm wondering if anyon
On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 22:50:33 -0400 (EDT)
Chris Gorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm wondering if anyone is running libapache-mod-perl2 from sarge.
> I'm getting some odd errors which look to be related to an error in
> the perl environment. I'm trying to use ModPerl::Registry, formerly
> Apac
Hello,
I'm wondering if anyone is running libapache-mod-perl2 from sarge. I'm
getting some odd errors which look to be related to an error in the perl
environment. I'm trying to use ModPerl::Registry, formerly
Apache::Registry with apache2. Per the instructions at perl.apache.org,
I've made a
Hi all,
I managed to seriously screw up my debian/PPC box while doing a
dist-upgrade. I have a few questions, which hopefully someone else has
had some experience with, or maybe could point me in the direction of
an answer...
1. The command dpkg --configure --pending, for example, as well as m
> ii perl5.6.1-7 Larry Wall's Practical
> ii perl-5.005 6.3 Transitional package.
> ii perl-5.005-base 6.3 Transitional package.
> ii perl-5.005-doc 6.3 Transitional package.
> ii perl-5.005-suid
On Sat, 2002-04-20 at 03:05, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 09:42:13PM +0200, Tim van den Elsen wrote:
> > A few days ago i wanted to update the newest packages. I always use
> > 'dselect'. When dselect tried to update and install a certain package
> > (it had something do to with pe
On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 09:42:13PM +0200, Tim van den Elsen wrote:
> A few days ago i wanted to update the newest packages. I always use
> 'dselect'. When dselect tried to update and install a certain package
> (it had something do to with perl, can't remember exact name) it gave an
> error. It was
Hi,
I am kinda new to Debian. I have some experience with other distro's
like Gentoo and Red Hat. Debian seemed like the perfect distro for me :)
But unfortunatly i ran into a strange error which can't even be solved
by people in #debian at openprojects.net
A few days ago i wanted to update the n
Hi,
When I upgraded from potato to woody it seems that I have done
something wrong in that my perl installation now appears to be
broken. When I try to install a module from cpan I get this
error message:
cpan> install Net::FTP
Running make f
Once upon a time, I heard Oki DZ say
> I have a system with broken perl installation, the output of
> apt-get -s install perl is attached below.
^^^
That's the culprit, perl package is to be consider obsolete. use
apt-get install perl-5.005 instead.
> It's
I don't know about apt but about potato and frozen: potato == frozen
(frozen is simply a symlink to potato).
Ron Rademaker
On Fri, 14 Apr 2000, Oki DZ wrote:
> I have a system with broken perl installation, the output of
> apt-get -s install perl is attached below.
> It's ki
I have a system with broken perl installation, the output of
apt-get -s install perl is attached below.
It's kinda scary, isn't it...?
The installed perl (according to dpkg) is perl-5.005, why did I get
"perl-5.004" to be installed?
BTW, I installed the machine using pot
22 matches
Mail list logo
