Re: Borked e-mail threading [Was Re: HylaFax receives rubbish]

2004-08-26 Thread S.D.A.
On Thu, Aug 26, 2004 at 11:50:39AM -0400 or thereabouts, Chris Metzler wrote: > On Thu, 26 Aug 2004 11:26:50 -0400 > "S.D.A." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 10:01:00PM -0700 or thereabouts, Rodney D. Myers > > wrote: > > > >> Not according to Sylpheed. Both times he starte

Re: Borked e-mail threading [Was Re: HylaFax receives rubbish]

2004-08-26 Thread Wayne Topa
...." where > I won't see it any more. Now all you have to do John if get them to fix the To: & Cc: problem. From: John Summerfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 23:38:35 +0800 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Borked e-mail threading [W

Re: Borked e-mail threading [Was Re: HylaFax receives rubbish]

2004-08-26 Thread Chris Metzler
On Thu, 26 Aug 2004 11:26:50 -0400 "S.D.A." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 10:01:00PM -0700 or thereabouts, Rodney D. Myers > wrote: > >> Not according to Sylpheed. Both times he started new threads > > That's one of the reasons why I dropped Sylpheed early on! Except I us

Re: Borked e-mail threading [Was Re: HylaFax receives rubbish]

2004-08-26 Thread John Summerfield
S.D.A. wrote: On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 10:01:00PM -0700 or thereabouts, Rodney D. Myers wrote: Not according to Sylpheed. Both times he started new threads That's one of the reasons why I dropped Sylpheed early on! If one has an e-mail client that does real threading, which uses the message-

Borked e-mail threading [Was Re: HylaFax receives rubbish]

2004-08-26 Thread S.D.A.
On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 10:01:00PM -0700 or thereabouts, Rodney D. Myers wrote: > Not according to Sylpheed. Both times he started new threads That's one of the reasons why I dropped Sylpheed early on! If one has an e-mail client that does real threading, which uses the message-id, then those m