Re: Binairies format

2001-05-25 Thread Casper Gielen
On Fri, May 25, 2001 at 03:57:36AM -0700, patrick q wrote: > > I will _guess_ that unstable is i486 as I don't think kernel 2.4 > supports i386 any longer. I wouldn't be surprised to be corrected > though. Ok, guess what I'm going to say. 2.4 supports 386 just fine, what gave you the impression

Re: Binairies format

2001-05-25 Thread patrick q
--- Gael Pegliasco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > Following my previous message about 'packages compilation', (thanks > andrea for > your reply), I'm now wondering how it is possible to know for which > architecture > a program has been compiled for ? The canonical answer would be to c

Binairies format

2001-05-25 Thread Gael Pegliasco
Hello, Following my previous message about 'packages compilation', (thanks andrea for your reply), I'm now wondering how it is possible to know for which architecture a program has been compiled for ? I mean, does someone know if there is a tool which detect if an executable is compiled for 386 o