Henri Salo wrote:
On Sat, Apr 04, 2009 at 11:07:10PM -0500, Tim McDonough wrote:
"distributed database", "database replication"
Thank you to all. Now that I am looking down the right path I have
plenty of material to read.
Tim
This is very good book of the subject.
http://www.cs.ualberta.
On 2009-04-05 17:04, Henri Salo wrote:
On Sat, Apr 04, 2009 at 11:07:10PM -0500, Tim McDonough wrote:
"distributed database", "database replication"
Thank you to all. Now that I am looking down the right path I have
plenty of material to read.
Tim
This is very good book of the subject.
ht
On Sat, Apr 04, 2009 at 11:07:10PM -0500, Tim McDonough wrote:
>>> "distributed database", "database replication"
>
> Thank you to all. Now that I am looking down the right path I have
> plenty of material to read.
>
> Tim
This is very good book of the subject.
http://www.cs.ualberta.ca/~databa
>
>
>
> Original Message
>From: glynast...@yahoo.co.uk
>To: debian-user@lists.debian.org,
>koffiejunkielistlur...@koffiejunkie.za.net
>Subject: Re: Big Database Server General Question
>Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 16:13:19 + (GMT)
>
>>
>>--- On S
--- On Sun, 5/4/09, kj wrote:
> > Of course, this requires competent designers
> Absolutely. Sadly, I spend a great deal of my time trying
> to work miracles with the db to compensate for developers
> who don't know what they're doing and doesn't
> want to learn.
I feel ya there. Same here
Ron Johnson wrote:
Absolutely. Sadly, I spend a great deal of my time trying to work
miracles with the db to compensate for developers who don't know what
they're doing and doesn't want to learn.
Argh. Don't *even* get me started on that topic!!!
On the other hand, if it wasn't for cluele
On 2009-04-05 06:12, kj wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
Proper system design obviates the need for the complexity of a
distributed system. In an era of Quad Xeons and 32GB RAM. replication
should only be needed for HA.
True, but for systems like the OP mentioned (google, wikipedia, etc),
which use
Ron Johnson wrote:
Proper system design obviates the need for the complexity of a
distributed system. In an era of Quad Xeons and 32GB RAM. replication
should only be needed for HA.
True, but for systems like the OP mentioned (google, wikipedia, etc),
which use the database more for storage th
"distributed database", "database replication"
Thank you to all. Now that I am looking down the right path I have
plenty of material to read.
Tim
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Tim McDonough wrote:
> I'm asking this question to find out what keywords to search for, not
> really looking for a specific answer here. When there is a huge database
> involved with a lot of users and lots of data it isn't done all with one
> computer and a fast connection.
"distributed databas
On 2009-04-04 18:38, John Hasler wrote:
Tim McDonough wrote:
I'm asking this question to find out what keywords to search for, not
really looking for a specific answer here. When there is a huge database
involved with a lot of users and lots of data it isn't done all with one
computer and a fas
On 2009-04-04 18:11, ow...@netptc.net wrote:
[snip]
If you're just interested in how things work, a rather unique
approach is that used by Terradata (now sold a couple of times),
based on a Cal Tech PhD thesis by Phil Neches.
Dedicated database machines with circuits hardwired for relational
>
>
>
> Original Message
>From: ron.l.john...@cox.net
>To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
>Subject: Re: Big Database Server General Question
>Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2009 17:13:49 -0500
>
>>On 2009-04-04 15:34, Tim McDonough wrote:
>>> I'm asking th
On 2009-04-04 15:34, Tim McDonough wrote:
I'm asking this question to find out what keywords to search for, not
really looking for a specific answer here.
When there is a huge database involved with a lot of users and lots of
data it isn't done all with one computer and a fast connection.
Su
Could you be refering to distributed systems?
On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 2:34 PM, Tim McDonough wrote:
> I'm asking this question to find out what keywords to search for, not
> really looking for a specific answer here.
>
> When there is a huge database involved with a lot of users and lots of data
I'm asking this question to find out what keywords to search for, not
really looking for a specific answer here.
When there is a huge database involved with a lot of users and lots of
data it isn't done all with one computer and a fast connection. I'm
generally interested in how requests direc
16 matches
Mail list logo
