Re: Best Nics.

2003-10-10 Thread Ron Johnson
On Fri, 2003-10-10 at 06:08, David Palmer. wrote: > On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 03:40:29 +0100 > Pigeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 06:25:37PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: > > > On Thu, 2003-10-09 at 17:20, David Palmer. wrote: > > > > On Thu, 9 Oct 2003 08:19:17 -0400 > > > > Jo

Re: Best Nics.

2003-10-10 Thread Allan Wind
I am using a 3Com (Broadcom) 3C996B-T without issues on an Athlon and it was surpringly affordable for a 32/64 bit, 33/66/100/133 MHz card (http://www.3com.com/products/en_US/detail.jsp?tab=prodspec&sku=3C996B-T&pathtype=purchase). /Allan -- Allan Wind P.O. Box 2022 Woburn, MA 01888-0022 USA s

Re: Best Nics.

2003-10-10 Thread David Palmer.
On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 03:40:29 +0100 Pigeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 06:25:37PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: > > On Thu, 2003-10-09 at 17:20, David Palmer. wrote: > > > On Thu, 9 Oct 2003 08:19:17 -0400 > > > Johann Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > On Thursda

Re: Best Nics.

2003-10-09 Thread Pigeon
On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 06:25:37PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: > On Thu, 2003-10-09 at 17:20, David Palmer. wrote: > > On Thu, 9 Oct 2003 08:19:17 -0400 > > Johann Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On Thursday October 9 at 11:29am > > > Edward Murrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > >

Re: Best Nics.

2003-10-09 Thread Johann Koenig
On Friday October 10 at 06:20am "David Palmer." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 9 Oct 2003 08:19:17 -0400 > Johann Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Thursday October 9 at 11:29am > > Edward Murrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > If you need good 100mbps performance under loa

Re: Best Nics.

2003-10-09 Thread Ron Johnson
On Thu, 2003-10-09 at 17:20, David Palmer. wrote: > On Thu, 9 Oct 2003 08:19:17 -0400 > Johann Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Thursday October 9 at 11:29am > > Edward Murrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > If you need good 100mbps performance under load, you can't go wrong > >

Re: Best Nics.

2003-10-09 Thread David Palmer.
On Thu, 9 Oct 2003 08:19:17 -0400 Johann Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thursday October 9 at 11:29am > Edward Murrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > If you need good 100mbps performance under load, you can't go wrong > > with Intel. The 3Com 3c905Bs I use in my workstations also seem

Re: Best Nics.

2003-10-09 Thread Johann Koenig
On Thursday October 9 at 11:29am Edward Murrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If you need good 100mbps performance under load, you can't go wrong > with Intel. The 3Com 3c905Bs I use in my workstations also seem to > take anything I can throw at them (including trying to run Q3A > X11/OpenGL over

Re: Best Nics.

2003-10-08 Thread David Palmer.
Thank you Edward and Mike. Regards, David. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Best Nics.

2003-10-08 Thread Mike Mueller
On Wednesday 08 October 2003 18:29, Edward Murrell wrote: > On Thu, 2003-10-09 at 01:56, David Palmer. wrote: > > But as all of this is going to applied later in a commercial > > environment, I was wondering if anybody would be able to advise as to a > > decent make of commercial standard Nics. > >

Re: Best Nics.

2003-10-08 Thread Edward Murrell
On Thu, 2003-10-09 at 01:56, David Palmer. wrote: > But as all of this is going to applied later in a commercial > environment, I was wondering if anybody would be able to advise as to a > decent make of commercial standard Nics. First off, avoid anything with a realtek chipset. That should avoid

Best Nics.

2003-10-08 Thread David Palmer.
Hello, I intend to familiarize myself with firewall structuring in the near future, and I've got myself an old Fujitech 486 desktop unit that should do the job. Apparently Bastille is instructive in this avenue, so I thought I'd go in that direction. But as all of this is going to applied later i