On 02-Nov-2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
> how would the sources-lines for woody be?
> i don't need source-code, so I suppose updates / non-us and non-free would
> be sufficiently. Just writing woody instead of potato doesn't seem to
> work...
>
>> ## security updates
>> deb http://security
Hi,
how would the sources-lines for woody be?
i don't need source-code, so I suppose updates / non-us and non-free would
be sufficiently. Just writing woody instead of potato doesn't seem to
work...
> ## security updates
> deb http://security.debian.org/debian-security/ potato/updates main
> cont
2 matches
Mail list logo
