Re: Is to possible to "pin" based on package origin AND package versioning with a single "Pin:" line (to stay within winehq stable)?

2025-02-19 Thread Sophoklis Goumas
On Wed, 19 Feb 2025 at 04:52, Tim Woodall wrote: > > > Now reread your op. No, I don't believe it's possible to combine a pin > of a package version and a pin of a release. > > Best I can suggest is pinning individual packages by veraion. > Thanks for confirming my suspicion. It works as I've di

Re: Is to possible to "pin" based on package origin AND package versioning with a single "Pin:" line (to stay within winehq stable)?

2025-02-18 Thread Tim Woodall
On Wed, 19 Feb 2025, Tim Woodall wrote: On Tue, 18 Feb 2025, Tim Woodall wrote: On Tue, 18 Feb 2025, Sophoklis Goumas wrote: Hello. I've started with this: $ cat /etc/apt/preferences.d/winehq-v9 Package: *:any Pin: release o="dl.winehq.org", v=9* Pin-Priority: 625 Now reread your op. No

Re: Is to possible to "pin" based on package origin AND package versioning with a single "Pin:" line (to stay within winehq stable)?

2025-02-18 Thread Tim Woodall
On Tue, 18 Feb 2025, Tim Woodall wrote: On Tue, 18 Feb 2025, Sophoklis Goumas wrote: Hello. I've started with this: $ cat /etc/apt/preferences.d/winehq-v9 Package: *:any Pin: release o="dl.winehq.org", v=9* Pin-Priority: 625 Done some tests. Package: * Pin: release o=dl.winehq.org,v=9* Pi

Re: Is to possible to "pin" based on package origin AND package versioning with a single "Pin:" line (to stay within winehq stable)?

2025-02-18 Thread Tim Woodall
On Tue, 18 Feb 2025, Sophoklis Goumas wrote: Hello. I've started with this: $ cat /etc/apt/preferences.d/winehq-v9 Package: *:any Pin: release o="dl.winehq.org", v=9* Pin-Priority: 625 I'm not sure about the quotes, the :all or the * on the version in your example. The easiest way to fix th

Is to possible to "pin" based on package origin AND package versioning with a single "Pin:" line (to stay within winehq stable)?

2025-02-18 Thread Sophoklis Goumas
Hello. I recently run into some troubles with the WineHQ 10.x packages (of their development release channel) that is available to bookworm concurrently with their stable (9.x) packages (my troubles are off-topic here but I they will be reported where appropriate). So after downgrading those pack

Re: I can confirm that Fortigate firewalls are definitely based on Linux

2023-06-22 Thread tomas
On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 09:33:57PM +0800, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming wrote: > On Thu, 22 Jun 2023 at 21:22, wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 09:17:17PM +0800, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming > > wrote: > > > Subject: I can confirm that Fortigate fir

Re: I can confirm that Fortigate firewalls are definitely based on Linux

2023-06-22 Thread Nils
On Donnerstag, 22. Juni 2023 15:33:57 CEST Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming wrote: > I think Fortinet wouldn't say. They are required to ;-) signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: I can confirm that Fortigate firewalls are definitely based on Linux

2023-06-22 Thread Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming
On Thu, 22 Jun 2023 at 21:22, wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 09:17:17PM +0800, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming > wrote: > > Subject: I can confirm that Fortigate firewalls are definitely based on > > Linux > > > > Good day from Singapore, > > [...] &g

Re: I can confirm that Fortigate firewalls are definitely based on Linux

2023-06-22 Thread tomas
On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 09:17:17PM +0800, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming wrote: > Subject: I can confirm that Fortigate firewalls are definitely based on Linux > > Good day from Singapore, [...] > Do you guys know which Linux distro Fortigate firewalls are based on? > I wou

I can confirm that Fortigate firewalls are definitely based on Linux

2023-06-22 Thread Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming
Subject: I can confirm that Fortigate firewalls are definitely based on Linux Good day from Singapore, These few days, I have discovered that the output of the Fortigate firewall CLI command "diag hardware sysinfo cpu" is exactly the same as the output of the command "cat /proc/cp

Re: Is there no other tool but Zim, the graphical text editor based on wiki technologies, in Debian, to create intertwined wiki pages locally?

2023-06-16 Thread Susmita/Rajib
From: Me Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2023 19:23:26 +0200 Message-id: <[šŸ”Ž] 568e7aa9-e061-194a-13f8-8e2379f69...@nodatagrabbing.com> In-reply-to: <[šŸ”Ž] caeg4czxryyivofecor24n8o8bkbrvvuc+hhu2mmrzwyjrlj...@mail.gmail.com> References: <[šŸ”Ž] caeg4czxryyivofecor24n8o8bkbrvvuc+hhu2mmrzwyjrlj...@mail.gmail.com> and

Re: Is there no other tool but Zim, the graphical text editor based on wiki technologies, in Debian, to create intertwined wiki pages locally?

2023-06-15 Thread l0f4r0
Hi, 15 juin 2023, 20:15 de m...@nodatagrabbing.com: > Although I have never used it myself (I am 100% a vim and by extension a > vimwiki person) > +1 for vimwiki. > I know someone who used (not sure if he still does) Basket Notes > (https://basket-notepads.github.io/) and loves it. > In that ca

Re: Is there no other tool but Zim, the graphical text editor based on wiki technologies, in Debian, to create intertwined wiki pages locally?

2023-06-15 Thread Me
On 2023-06-15 12:54, Susmita/Rajib wrote: My dear illustrious Leaders of the Debian-user List and Senior List Members, There is Wiki.js but a Debian package for wiki.js isn't available. Then there is libreoffice-wiki-publisher in Debian, the LibreOffice extension for working with MediaWiki arti

Re: Is there no other tool but Zim, the graphical text editor based on wiki technologies, in Debian, to create intertwined wiki pages locally?

2023-06-15 Thread Dan Ritter
Susmita/Rajib wrote: > From: Michel Verdier > Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2023 13:54:35 +0200 > Message-id: <[šŸ”Ž] 87edmdaql0@free.fr> > In-reply-to: <[šŸ”Ž] > caeg4czxryyivofecor24n8o8bkbrvvuc+hhu2mmrzwyjrlj...@mail.gmail.com> > References: <[šŸ”Ž] > caeg4czxryyivofecor24n8o8bkbrvvuc+hhu2mmrzwyjrlj...@mail.gm

Re: Is there no other tool but Zim, the graphical text editor based on wiki technologies, in Debian, to create intertwined wiki pages locally?

2023-06-15 Thread Susmita/Rajib
From: Michel Verdier Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2023 13:54:35 +0200 Message-id: <[šŸ”Ž] 87edmdaql0@free.fr> In-reply-to: <[šŸ”Ž] caeg4czxryyivofecor24n8o8bkbrvvuc+hhu2mmrzwyjrlj...@mail.gmail.com> References: <[šŸ”Ž] caeg4czxryyivofecor24n8o8bkbrvvuc+hhu2mmrzwyjrlj...@mail.gmail.com> [ ... ] > emacs ? Tha

Re: Is there no other tool but Zim, the graphical text editor based on wiki technologies, in Debian, to create intertwined wiki pages locally?

2023-06-15 Thread ķ™©ė³‘ķ¬
On Thu, 2023-06-15 at 13:54 +0200, Michel Verdier wrote: > On 2023-06-15, Susmita/Rajib wrote: > > > I require a WYSIWYG editor. Zim is one. But I also need another > > supporting editor to further polish up files. > > emacs ? > +1; emacs is good! Also i use emacs very heavy ^^^ Sincerely, -

Re: Is there no other tool but Zim, the graphical text editor based on wiki technologies, in Debian, to create intertwined wiki pages locally?

2023-06-15 Thread Michel Verdier
On 2023-06-15, Susmita/Rajib wrote: > I require a WYSIWYG editor. Zim is one. But I also need another > supporting editor to further polish up files. emacs ?

Is there no other tool but Zim, the graphical text editor based on wiki technologies, in Debian, to create intertwined wiki pages locally?

2023-06-15 Thread Susmita/Rajib
My dear illustrious Leaders of the Debian-user List and Senior List Members, There is Wiki.js but a Debian package for wiki.js isn't available. Then there is libreoffice-wiki-publisher in Debian, the LibreOffice extension for working with MediaWiki articles. But files created with zim don't appe

Re: exim4 smarthost selection based on sender

2022-11-27 Thread Gregory Seidman
I *think* I followed that syntax, but I'm not sure because I am not super familiar with exim4 config. If I'm reading that correctly: if the from header matches .*xxx.org then use smtp.xxx.net else if the subject matches SSS then use mail.SSS.net else use smtp.googlemail.com

Re: exim4 smarthost selection based on sender

2022-11-27 Thread Marc Auslander
On 11/27/2022 12:20 PM, Gregory Seidman wrote: I send email from several email addresses. I pay for an email service for both sending and receiving email, but I pull it down locally (via POP with fetchmail) and send messages from my Debian server with mutt. All of those email addresses wind up fo

Re: exim4 smarthost selection based on sender

2022-11-27 Thread Steve McIntyre
Gregory wrote: >I send email from several email addresses. I pay for an email service for >both sending and receiving email, but I pull it down locally (via POP with >fetchmail) and send messages from my Debian server with mutt. All of those >email addresses wind up forwarding to the address with t

exim4 smarthost selection based on sender

2022-11-27 Thread Gregory Seidman
I send email from several email addresses. I pay for an email service for both sending and receiving email, but I pull it down locally (via POP with fetchmail) and send messages from my Debian server with mutt. All of those email addresses wind up forwarding to the address with the paid service, bu

Re: Replace line in file based on pattern

2022-01-15 Thread Andrei POPESCU
On Du, 02 ian 22, 21:22:33, Paul M. Foster wrote: > > I'm not interested in hacking a bunch of servers. Just one. The whole > purpose here is to restore a system to more or less its original > configuration when a reinstall must occur. A reinstall must occur when there > is a severe hardware failu

Re: Replace line in file based on pattern

2022-01-04 Thread David Wright
On Mon 03 Jan 2022 at 08:38:32 (-0500), Paul M. Foster wrote: > On 1/2/22 11:03 PM, Greg Wooledge wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 02, 2022 at 09:59:08PM -0500, Paul M. Foster wrote: > > > Regarding "patch", let's consider a "stock" config file from a fresh > > > install > > > (call it NEW), and an existing

Re: Replace line in file based on pattern

2022-01-03 Thread Paul M. Foster
On 1/2/22 11:03 PM, Greg Wooledge wrote: On Sun, Jan 02, 2022 at 09:59:08PM -0500, Paul M. Foster wrote: Regarding "patch", let's consider a "stock" config file from a fresh install (call it NEW), and an existing config which is tweaked for my purposes (call it OLD). Assume I want the stock conf

Re: Replace line in file based on pattern

2022-01-02 Thread john doe
On 1/3/2022 2:56 AM, Paul M. Foster wrote: On 1/2/22 6:20 PM, The Wanderer wrote: On 2022-01-02 at 17:52, Paul M. Foster wrote: Folks: In a script, I'd like to search for a pattern in a file, and replace that line entirely with a new line, once (not globally). I've tried What do you mean by

Re: Replace line in file based on pattern

2022-01-02 Thread Greg Wooledge
On Sun, Jan 02, 2022 at 09:59:08PM -0500, Paul M. Foster wrote: > Regarding "patch", let's consider a "stock" config file from a fresh install > (call it NEW), and an existing config which is tweaked for my purposes (call > it OLD). Assume I want the stock config altered to conform to my > existing

Re: Replace line in file based on pattern

2022-01-02 Thread Paul M. Foster
On 1/2/22 6:40 PM, Greg Wooledge wrote: On Sun, Jan 02, 2022 at 06:20:15PM -0500, The Wanderer wrote: Of course, given the ORIGINAL question, the best tool is neither of these. It's something like ansible or puppet. Or if you insist on jury-rigging crap together with stone knives and bearskin

Re: Replace line in file based on pattern

2022-01-02 Thread Paul M. Foster
On 1/2/22 8:46 PM, Greg Wooledge wrote: I'm rearranging the order of the quoted sections. On Sun, Jan 02, 2022 at 08:14:47PM -0500, The Wanderer wrote: That's very interesting, although not all that accessible to the relative newcomer to the field. It does leave me sad about the apparent conclu

Re: Replace line in file based on pattern

2022-01-02 Thread Paul M. Foster
On 1/2/22 6:20 PM, The Wanderer wrote: On 2022-01-02 at 17:52, Paul M. Foster wrote: Folks: In a script, I'd like to search for a pattern in a file, and replace that line entirely with a new line, once (not globally). I've tried What do you mean by "globally"? "Globally" just means I want

Re: Replace line in file based on pattern

2022-01-02 Thread Paul M. Foster
On 1/2/22 6:18 PM, Andy Smith wrote: Hello, On Sun, Jan 02, 2022 at 05:52:36PM -0500, Paul M. Foster wrote: In a script, I'd like to search for a pattern in a file, and replace that line entirely with a new line, once (not globally). I've tried sed -i s/search/new_line/ but this only replaces

Re: Replace line in file based on pattern

2022-01-02 Thread Greg Wooledge
I'm rearranging the order of the quoted sections. On Sun, Jan 02, 2022 at 08:14:47PM -0500, The Wanderer wrote: > That's very interesting, although not all that accessible to the > relative newcomer to the field. It does leave me sad about the apparent > conclusion that there is no safe way to edi

Re: Replace line in file based on pattern

2022-01-02 Thread The Wanderer
y to do it; see also >> below. > > Why does everyone think sed is an appropriate tool for this? It's > some sort of malevolent meme, I swear. Probably, at least in part, because it's the tool that can potentially do it which people are already most familiar with based on havin

Re: Replace line in file based on pattern

2022-01-02 Thread Greg Wooledge
On Sun, Jan 02, 2022 at 06:20:15PM -0500, The Wanderer wrote: > If you mean that you want to only replace the first matching line in the > file, but leave any subsequent matching lines alone... I've never > actually had occasion to do that, but a bit of Googling (for 'sed first > match only') found

Re: Replace line in file based on pattern

2022-01-02 Thread The Wanderer
On 2022-01-02 at 17:52, Paul M. Foster wrote: > Folks: > > In a script, I'd like to search for a pattern in a file, and replace > that line entirely with a new line, once (not globally). I've tried What do you mean by "globally"? If you mean that you want to only replace the first matching line

Re: Replace line in file based on pattern

2022-01-02 Thread Andy Smith
Hello, On Sun, Jan 02, 2022 at 05:52:36PM -0500, Paul M. Foster wrote: > In a script, I'd like to search for a pattern in a file, and replace that > line entirely with a new line, once (not globally). I've tried > > sed -i s/search/new_line/ > > but this only replaces the string itself. I want t

Replace line in file based on pattern

2022-01-02 Thread Paul M. Foster
Folks: In a script, I'd like to search for a pattern in a file, and replace that line entirely with a new line, once (not globally). I've tried sed -i s/search/new_line/ but this only replaces the string itself. I want the script to find the line my search term is on, and replace the whole l

What is the percentage of market share for servers based on Debian Linux?

2019-09-27 Thread Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming
Good evening from Singapore, What is the percentage of market share for servers based on Debian Linux? Looking forward to hearing from you. Thank you very much. -BEGIN EMAIL SIGNATURE- The Gospel for all Targeted Individuals (TIs): [The New York Times] Microwave Weapons Are Prime

Re: router solutions based on Debian?

2016-11-30 Thread Dan Ritter
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 02:45:00PM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote: > > > On 30/11/16 13:28, Dan Ritter wrote: > > Ubiquiti has a major problem: they violate the GPL up down and sideways. > > > > http://libertybsd.net/ubiquiti/ > > > > If the device can be completely reflashed, is that an issue? T

Re: router solutions based on Debian?

2016-11-30 Thread tomas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 02:45:00PM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote: > > > On 30/11/16 13:28, Dan Ritter wrote: [...] > > Ubiquiti has a major problem: they violate the GPL up down and sideways. > > > > http://libertybsd.net/ubiquiti/ > > > > If the d

Re: router solutions based on Debian?

2016-11-30 Thread Daniel Pocock
On 30/11/16 13:28, Dan Ritter wrote: > On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 03:00:24PM -0800, J Mo wrote: >> >> When it comes to router-web-UI distros, the only thing I could recommend was >> was PFSense. Everything else was disappointing. > > I don't recommend that anyone, ever, use a web UI to try to > con

Re: router solutions based on Debian?

2016-11-30 Thread Dan Ritter
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 03:00:24PM -0800, J Mo wrote: > > When it comes to router-web-UI distros, the only thing I could recommend was > was PFSense. Everything else was disappointing. I don't recommend that anyone, ever, use a web UI to try to control a router. > That being said, a regular old

Re: router solutions based on Debian?

2016-11-29 Thread J Mo
Please excuse my late reply. I am network engineer (Cisco and Juniper big routers/switches) and I recently did a review of about eight router-type Linux/BSD distros, all run under KVM on a virtual test network. I also recently started contributing some code to LEDE (OpenWRT). I do router-y/sw

Re: router solutions based on Debian?

2016-11-24 Thread Dan Ritter
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 03:54:17PM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote: > > I've seen a lot of discussions about making DIY routers running a free > OS like Debian, FreeBSD or OpenBSD and I was tempted to go with > something like that running Shorewall, strongSwan, DHCP and DNS. Maybe > it will also do wi

Re: router solutions based on Debian?

2016-11-24 Thread Daniel Pocock
On 24/11/16 14:46, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > More focussed at being a NAS than a router, but I built my own > based on a J1900 Celeron (passively cooled, low power) SoC. I wrote > up details[1]. Lars Wirzenius did something similar (focussed on > being a router rather than NAS) and w

Re: router solutions based on Debian?

2016-11-24 Thread Jonathan Dowland
More focussed at being a NAS than a router, but I built my own based on a J1900 Celeron (passively cooled, low power) SoC. I wrote up details[1]. Lars Wirzenius did something similar (focussed on being a router rather than NAS) and wrote that up too[2]. The vendor I bought mine from offered a

Re: router solutions based on Debian?

2016-11-23 Thread Daniel Pocock
On 23/11/16 15:54, Daniel Pocock wrote: > > Can anybody share any comments or links about this topic? > > - quiet (fanless), low-power and low cost hardware suitable for Gigabit > routing and maybe use as a NAS too. It would also be useful to have > fibre support in the router and avoid using

Re: router solutions based on Debian?

2016-11-23 Thread Jan Bakuwel
Hi Daniel, > On 24/11/2016, at 04:26, Bernhard Schmidt wrote: > > Daniel Pocock wrote: > > Hi Daniel, > >> My ISP is upgrading my connection to gigabit on Friday and I suspect my >> current router may struggle with it. >> >> My existing router runs OpenWRT but I've found the firewall and IPs

Re: router solutions based on Debian?

2016-11-23 Thread maderios
On 11/23/2016 03:54 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote: I've seen a lot of discussions about making DIY routers running a free OS like Debian, FreeBSD or OpenBSD and I was tempted to go with something like that running Shorewall, strongSwan, DHCP and DNS. Maybe it will also do wifi or maybe the existing r

Re: router solutions based on Debian?

2016-11-23 Thread Stefan Monnier
> Can anybody share any comments or links about this topic? > - quiet (fanless), low-power and low cost hardware suitable for Gigabit > routing and maybe use as a NAS too. It would also be useful to have > fibre support in the router and avoid using a media convertor. I don't know what you consid

Re: router solutions based on Debian?

2016-11-23 Thread Bernhard Schmidt
Daniel Pocock wrote: Hi Daniel, > My ISP is upgrading my connection to gigabit on Friday and I suspect my > current router may struggle with it. > > My existing router runs OpenWRT but I've found the firewall and IPsec > setup is a little bit constrained in that environment and it is tempting >

Re: router solutions based on Debian?

2016-11-23 Thread Eero Volotinen
check out pfsense.org eero 23.11.2016 4.54 ip. "Daniel Pocock" kirjoitti: > > > My ISP is upgrading my connection to gigabit on Friday and I suspect my > current router may struggle with it. > > My existing router runs OpenWRT but I've found the firewall and IPsec > setup is a little bit constr

router solutions based on Debian?

2016-11-23 Thread Daniel Pocock
My ISP is upgrading my connection to gigabit on Friday and I suspect my current router may struggle with it. My existing router runs OpenWRT but I've found the firewall and IPsec setup is a little bit constrained in that environment and it is tempting to move to a router running a full OS. I've

Re: limit traffic based on IPs

2013-08-12 Thread shawn wilson
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 4:28 AM, binary dreamer wrote: > stuck big time with the syntax of an iptable. > i would like to permit the speed of 512/512kbps to ips 192.168.1.2-5 > i would like to permit the speed of 1024/1024kbps to ips 192.168.1.6-10 > i would like to permit the speed of 2048/2048kbp

Re: limit traffic based on IPs

2013-08-12 Thread David Goodenough
On Monday 12 Aug 2013, binary dreamer wrote: > stuck big time with the syntax of an iptable. > i would like to permit the speed of 512/512kbps to ips 192.168.1.2-5 > i would like to permit the speed of 1024/1024kbps to ips 192.168.1.6-10 > i would like to permit the speed of 2048/2048kbps to ips 19

Re: limit traffic based on IPs

2013-08-12 Thread Jochen Spieker
binary dreamer: > > stuck big time with the syntax of an iptable. > i would like to permit the speed of 512/512kbps to ips 192.168.1.2-5 > i would like to permit the speed of 1024/1024kbps to ips 192.168.1.6-10 > i would like to permit the speed of 2048/2048kbps to ips 192.168.1.11-12 > the rest o

limit traffic based on IPs

2013-08-12 Thread binary dreamer
stuck big time with the syntax of an iptable. i would like to permit the speed of 512/512kbps to ips 192.168.1.2-5 i would like to permit the speed of 1024/1024kbps to ips 192.168.1.6-10 i would like to permit the speed of 2048/2048kbps to ips 192.168.1.11-12 the rest of the ips will set to free tr

LibreOffice mail merge with conditional text based on database field content

2012-07-17 Thread Gary Dale
etter (either F or M) denoting gender. I want to replace that with either "female" or "male" in the actual document, based on whether the current record refers to a female or male. I have a conditional text function, where the function is: Results.RESULTS.GENDER == "F&qu

Re: pure debian testing or a distro based on debian testing

2012-01-13 Thread Osamu Aoki
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 10:53:35PM +0100, Andrej Kacian wrote: > On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 15:11:58 +0530 > Amrish Purohit wrote: > > >Hi Osamu, > >Thanks for your reply. I will definitely try installing testing over > >stable version. I make my system dual boot so I have a backup. Here is > >the way I

Re: pure debian testing or a distro based on debian testing

2012-01-13 Thread Andrej Kacian
On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 15:11:58 +0530 Amrish Purohit wrote: >Hi Osamu, >Thanks for your reply. I will definitely try installing testing over >stable version. I make my system dual boot so I have a backup. Here is >the way I install the debian, please correct me if I am wrong. >I install the core sys

Re: pure debian testing or a distro based on debian testing

2012-01-10 Thread Amrish Purohit
unstable. > > >> I think I should go with a distro based on debian testing. >> (considering mint on debian testing). what should I do? >> > Maybe ... if such thing exist. But do you know most of us install > stable system and upgrade it to怀testing/uns

Re: pure debian testing or a distro based on debian testing

2012-01-09 Thread Osamu Aoki
ekly > build, but my system get stuck when gui come up ,keyboard and mouse > is not working. Sometime installer does not work well for testing/unstable. > I think I should go with a distro based on debian testing. > (considering mint on debian testing). what should I do? Maybe

pure debian testing or a distro based on debian testing

2012-01-09 Thread Amrish Purohit
working. I think I should go with a distro based on debian testing. (considering mint on debian testing). what should I do? Should I go with pure debian testing or a distro on debian testing? Thanks Amrish -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of

Re: iceweasel based on firefox 6.0 for squeeze

2011-09-29 Thread CamaleĆ³n
On Thu, 29 Sep 2011 16:24:54 +1000, Scott Ferguson wrote: > On 28/09/11 21:25, ļæ½ wrote: (...) Ah, Scott, Scott... the web turns into a lonely place when you can't play "Angry Birds" online and you need an html5 based browser to launch those softy balls of feather to des

Re: iceweasel based on firefox 6.0 for squeeze

2011-09-28 Thread Scott Ferguson
ensions? We're a long way from HTML5 >>>> yet. >>>> >>>> NOTE: warning from webservers based on version numbers doesn't count. >>> >>> (...) >>> >>> >>> >>> Ah, Scott, Scott... the web turns into a lonely

Re: iceweasel based on firefox 6.0 for squeeze

2011-09-28 Thread CamaleĆ³n
On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 10:45:22 +1000, Scott Ferguson wrote: > On 28/09/11 00:49, ļæ½ wrote: (...) >>> What changes in the internet render the default Squeeze Iceweasel >>> unusable other than the latest extensions? We're a long way from HTML5 >>> yet. >>>

Re: OT: iceweasel based on firefox 6.0 for squeeze

2011-09-27 Thread Scott Ferguson
On 28/09/11 13:14, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > MC 900 Ft Jesus - TRUTH IS OUT OF STYLE (1989) > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PYtlpG0hb38 > > Cheers! > > Ralf > > 5! I meant 5 On a slightly more serious note - HTML *5* is not a standard, yet. I'll happily start coding for it when it is - unti

OT: iceweasel based on firefox 6.0 for squeeze - reloaded

2011-09-27 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Wed, 2011-09-28 at 05:14 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > just like lots of people believe in > > little green people in flying saucers > > Idiots, everybody knows that the aliens are grey and that they fly in > cigar formed spaceships. > > Which reminds me to two songs. > > Jim

Re: OT: iceweasel based on firefox 6.0 for squeeze

2011-09-27 Thread Scott Ferguson
On 28/09/11 13:14, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > >> just like lots of people believe in >> little green people in flying saucers > > Idiots, everybody knows that the aliens are grey and that they fly in > cigar formed spaceships. :-D They make the spaceships in cigars? I knew those toba

OT: iceweasel based on firefox 6.0 for squeeze

2011-09-27 Thread Ralf Mardorf
> just like lots of people believe in > little green people in flying saucers Idiots, everybody knows that the aliens are grey and that they fly in cigar formed spaceships. Which reminds me to two songs. Jimi Hendrix - UFO (AUTHENTIC STUDIO RECORDINGS VOL 3) http://www.youtube.c

Re: iceweasel based on firefox 6.0 for squeeze

2011-09-27 Thread Scott Ferguson
because there is a later version out. >>> >>> The environment changes relative to a frozen browser which reduce >>> the usefulness to me. >> >> ? >> >> What changes in the internet render the default Squeeze Iceweasel >> unusable other th

Re: iceweasel based on firefox 6.0 for squeeze

2011-09-27 Thread Steven Rosenberg
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Rob Hurle wrote: > Dear Peter, > > On 25 September 2011 10:04, Peter Tenenbaum > wrote: > > I would like to migrate to firefox 6.0, but I'd like to do it using the > > debian iceweasel distribution. Can anyone tell me how to go about > setting > > that up? > > T

Re: iceweasel based on firefox 6.0 for squeeze

2011-09-27 Thread Brian
On Tue 27 Sep 2011 at 11:42:17 +, CamaleĆ³n wrote: > So, do you still think that Iceweasel does not fit for point 1)? There might be a demand to get it in on that basis - but it would only be for the birds. :) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject

Re: iceweasel based on firefox 6.0 for squeeze

2011-09-27 Thread CamaleĆ³n
The environment changes relative to a frozen browser which reduce the >> usefulness to me. > > ? > > What changes in the internet render the default Squeeze Iceweasel > unusable other than the latest extensions? We're a long way from HTML5 > yet. > > NOTE: warn

Re: iceweasel based on firefox 6.0 for squeeze

2011-09-27 Thread CamaleĆ³n
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 18:43:08 +0100, Brian wrote: > On Mon 26 Sep 2011 at 14:23:12 +, CamaleĆ³n wrote: > >> On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 14:33:31 +0100, Brian wrote: >> >> > It is clear we have diametrically opposite views, so best leave it >> > there. >> >> How can be that? >> >> I mean, how can you

Re: iceweasel based on firefox 6.0 for squeeze

2011-09-26 Thread Brian
On Mon 26 Sep 2011 at 14:23:12 +, CamaleĆ³n wrote: > On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 14:33:31 +0100, Brian wrote: > > > It is clear we have diametrically opposite views, so best leave it > > there. > > How can be that? > > I mean, how can you consider ClamAV needs to be up-to-date (I mean the > progra

Re: iceweasel based on firefox 6.0 for squeeze

2011-09-26 Thread CamaleĆ³n
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 14:33:31 +0100, Brian wrote: > On Mon 26 Sep 2011 at 11:35:51 +, CamaleĆ³n wrote: > >> Hey, you can't auto-give you a point for something that I have not >> discussed ;-) > > You were being tardy in getting round to it so it needed something to > prod you into action. :)

Re: iceweasel based on firefox 6.0 for squeeze

2011-09-26 Thread Brian
On Mon 26 Sep 2011 at 11:35:51 +, CamaleĆ³n wrote: > Hey, you can't auto-give you a point for something that I have not > discussed ;-) You were being tardy in getting round to it so it needed something to prod you into action. :) > Regards to the 4th point that says "a package needs to be

Re: iceweasel based on firefox 6.0 for squeeze

2011-09-26 Thread CamaleĆ³n
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 00:16:04 +0100, Brian wrote: > On Sun 25 Sep 2011 at 20:02:22 +, CamaleĆ³n wrote: > >> I think that's not comparable with a browser functionality that is >> needed for almost 50% of today's most used sites... how many people >> uses sort every day and how many people uses I

Re: iceweasel based on firefox 6.0 for squeeze

2011-09-25 Thread Scott Ferguson
ss to me. ? What changes in the internet render the default Squeeze Iceweasel unusable other than the latest extensions? We're a long way from HTML5 yet. NOTE: warning from webservers based on version numbers doesn't count. > > Google Apps was mentioned earlier which used to work

Re: iceweasel based on firefox 6.0 for squeeze

2011-09-25 Thread Brian
On Sun 25 Sep 2011 at 20:02:22 +, CamaleĆ³n wrote: > I think that's not comparable with a browser functionality that is needed > for almost 50% of today's most used sites... how many people uses sort > every day and how many people uses Iceweasel every day? :-) I wasn't comparing sort's func

Re: iceweasel based on firefox 6.0 for squeeze

2011-09-25 Thread CamaleĆ³n
On Sun, 25 Sep 2011 20:06:11 +0100, Brian wrote: > On Sun 25 Sep 2011 at 17:35:46 +, CamaleĆ³n wrote: > >> On Sun, 25 Sep 2011 17:56:32 +0100, Brian wrote: >> >> > The squeeze version of Iceweasel doesn't lose its usefulness because >> > there is a later version out. >> >> Yes, they do. >>

Re: iceweasel based on firefox 6.0 for squeeze

2011-09-25 Thread Brian
On Sun 25 Sep 2011 at 17:35:46 +, CamaleĆ³n wrote: > On Sun, 25 Sep 2011 17:56:32 +0100, Brian wrote: > > > The squeeze version of Iceweasel doesn't lose its usefulness because > > there is a later version out. > > Yes, they do. > > Many sites out there require fancy things like html5. And

Re: iceweasel based on firefox 6.0 for squeeze

2011-09-25 Thread Allan Wind
On 2011-09-25 17:56:32, Brian wrote: > The squeeze version of Iceweasel doesn't lose its usefulness because > there is a later version out. The environment changes relative to a frozen browser which reduce the usefulness to me. Google Apps was mentioned earlier which used to work and now give y

Re: iceweasel based on firefox 6.0 for squeeze

2011-09-25 Thread Peter Tenenbaum
Ah, that webpage did the trick, thanks! -PT On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Peter Tenenbaum < peter.g.tenenb...@gmail.com> wrote: > I would like to migrate to firefox 6.0, but I'd like to do it using the > debian iceweasel distribution. Can anyone tell me how to go about setting > that up? > >

Re: iceweasel based on firefox 6.0 for squeeze

2011-09-25 Thread CamaleĆ³n
On Sun, 25 Sep 2011 17:56:32 +0100, Brian wrote: > On Sun 25 Sep 2011 at 15:44:26 +, CamaleĆ³n wrote: > >> Yes, I already read that announcement message and that's why I find it >> very appropriate, specially for points 1) and 4). > > The squeeze version of Iceweasel doesn't lose its usefulne

Re: iceweasel based on firefox 6.0 for squeeze

2011-09-25 Thread Brian
On Sun 25 Sep 2011 at 15:44:26 +, CamaleĆ³n wrote: > Yes, I already read that announcement message and that's why I find it > very appropriate, specially for points 1) and 4). The squeeze version of Iceweasel doesn't lose its usefulness because there is a later version out. The later version

Re: iceweasel based on firefox 6.0 for squeeze

2011-09-25 Thread lina
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 11:16 PM, Brian wrote: > On Sun 25 Sep 2011 at 22:56:21 +0800, lina wrote: > > > I added the > > > > deb http://mozilla.debian.net/ squeeze-backports iceweasel-release > > to /etc/apt/sources.list.d/: > > > > during updating, it showed me: > > > > W: GPG error: http://mozi

Re: iceweasel based on firefox 6.0 for squeeze

2011-09-25 Thread CamaleĆ³n
On Sun, 25 Sep 2011 16:13:26 +0100, Brian wrote: > On Sun 25 Sep 2011 at 13:45:42 +, CamaleĆ³n wrote: > >> I've always wondered why Mozilla products are not integrated into >> "squeeze-updates" (the old "volatile" repo), it seems to fit perfectly >> there :-? > > Not quite the perfect fit for

Re: iceweasel based on firefox 6.0 for squeeze

2011-09-25 Thread Brian
On Sun 25 Sep 2011 at 22:56:21 +0800, lina wrote: > I added the > > deb http://mozilla.debian.net/ squeeze-backports iceweasel-release > to /etc/apt/sources.list.d/: > > during updating, it showed me: > > W: GPG error: http://mozilla.debian.net squeeze-backports Release: The > following signatu

Re: iceweasel based on firefox 6.0 for squeeze

2011-09-25 Thread Brad Rogers
On Sun, 25 Sep 2011 22:56:21 +0800 lina wrote: Hello lina, > W: GPG error: http://mozilla.debian.net squeeze-backports Release: The > following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not > available: NO_PUBKEY 85A3D26506C4AE2A Add the key: There's a series of instructions on

Re: iceweasel based on firefox 6.0 for squeeze

2011-09-25 Thread Brian
On Sun 25 Sep 2011 at 13:45:42 +, CamaleĆ³n wrote: > I've always wondered why Mozilla products are not integrated into > "squeeze-updates" (the old "volatile" repo), it seems to fit perfectly > there :-? Not quite the perfect fit for inclusion as you might think: This suite will contain

Re: iceweasel based on firefox 6.0 for squeeze

2011-09-25 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 01:45:42PM +, CamaleĆ³n wrote: Hi, > I've always wondered why Mozilla products are not integrated into > "squeeze-updates" (the old "volatile" repo), it seems to fit perfectly > there :-? As far as I remember in the past new Firefox/Iceweasel releases did not always

Re: iceweasel based on firefox 6.0 for squeeze

2011-09-25 Thread lina
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 9:45 PM, CamaleĆ³n wrote: > On Sun, 25 Sep 2011 11:02:34 +1000, Rob Hurle wrote: > > > Dear Peter, > > > > On 25 September 2011 10:04, Peter Tenenbaum > > wrote: > >> I would like to migrate to firefox 6.0, but I'd like to do it using the > >> debian iceweasel distribution

Re: iceweasel based on firefox 6.0 for squeeze

2011-09-25 Thread CamaleĆ³n
On Sun, 25 Sep 2011 11:02:34 +1000, Rob Hurle wrote: > Dear Peter, > > On 25 September 2011 10:04, Peter Tenenbaum > wrote: >> I would like to migrate to firefox 6.0, but I'd like to do it using the >> debian iceweasel distribution.Ā  Can anyone tell me how to go about >> setting that up? > > Tr

Re: iceweasel based on firefox 6.0 for squeeze

2011-09-24 Thread Rob Hurle
Dear Peter, On 25 September 2011 10:04, Peter Tenenbaum wrote: > I would like to migrate to firefox 6.0, but I'd like to do it using the > debian iceweasel distribution.Ā  Can anyone tell me how to go about setting > that up? Try the following: http://mozilla.debian.net/ I used it and found it

iceweasel based on firefox 6.0 for squeeze

2011-09-24 Thread Peter Tenenbaum
I would like to migrate to firefox 6.0, but I'd like to do it using the debian iceweasel distribution. Can anyone tell me how to go about setting that up? Thanks in advance, -PT

Re: Which distribution should I use based on my cpu's arch?

2011-03-15 Thread Steve McIntyre
Hongsheng Zhao wrote: >Hi all > >I've two computers and the cpu's informations are as follows: > >Intel (R) Core (TM) i7 CPU 920 @ 2.67 GHz > >and > >Intel (R) Core (TM) 2 Quad CPU Q8300 @ 2.5 GHz > >I want to know Which arch-specific distributions should

Re: Which distribution should I use based on my cpu's arch?

2011-03-15 Thread wolf python london
On 15 March 2011 20:23, Hongsheng Zhao wrote: > Hi all > > I've two computers and the cpu's informations are as follows: > > Intel (R) Core (TM) i7 CPU 920 @ 2.67 GHz > > and > > Intel (R) Core (TM) 2 Quad CPU Q8300 @ 2.5 GHz > > I want to know Which arc

Which distribution should I use based on my cpu's arch?

2011-03-15 Thread Hongsheng Zhao
Hi all I've two computers and the cpu's informations are as follows: Intel (R) Core (TM) i7 CPU 920 @ 2.67 GHz and Intel (R) Core (TM) 2 Quad CPU Q8300 @ 2.5 GHz I want to know Which arch-specific distributions should I use based on my cpu's arch listed above, especially, i386,

  1   2   3   >