K S Sreeram wrote:
> I have read lartc (lartc.org), but all the techniques it talks about
> (cbq, htb etc) works only for outgoing traffic, not for incoming data.
> The linux ingress qdisc doesnt seem suitable for this problem.
That's a nice howto. Did you notice section 9.7 on IMQ?
--
see shy j
On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 11:14:42AM +0530, K S Sreeram wrote:
> I have a 'cvs update' going on for a rather large repository.
> Whenever there is any HTTP traffic(browser/wget/apt-get etc), the CVS
> traffic seems to come to a halt. So it looks like my ISP is giving
> higher priority to HTTP traffi
[debian sarge]
Hi
I am connected to the internet thru a 128kbps connection, with a single
box. There is no separate router.
I have a 'cvs update' going on for a rather large repository.
Whenever there is any HTTP traffic(browser/wget/apt-get etc), the CVS
traffic seems to come to a halt. So it l
On Fri, Sep 13, 2002 at 09:52:50AM +1000, Jason Clarke wrote:
> Below is pasted the errors I receive when trying to run the shaper..
>
> Can some one either point me in the right direction (eg, a howto or url), or
> even tell me flat out what I need to do.
>
> Jason
>
> Starting CBQ traffic sha
Below is pasted the errors I receive when trying to run the shaper..
Can some one either point me in the right direction (eg, a howto or url), or
even tell me flat out what I need to do.
Jason
Starting CBQ traffic shaping:
/lib/modules/2.4.18/kernel/net/sched/sch_cbq.o: unresolved symbol
qdisc_
On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 03:53:26PM -0500, Michael Jinks wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 08:50:05AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > Oki DZ wrote:
> > > You can go to Google, and look for "cbq.init".
> >
> > No need to google - it's in the shaper package.
>
> Really?
I used to maintain it. Trust
On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 08:50:05AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> >
> > You can go to Google, and look for "cbq.init".
>
> No need to google - it's in the shaper package.
Really? dpkg -L doesn't see it... (shaper version 2.2.12-0.6.2-5,
installed on woody).
I do find it here, FWIW:
https://sou
On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 09:40:37AM +0700, Oki DZ wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 11:35:45AM -0500, Michael Jinks wrote:
> > Can anyone recommend a site that covers traffic control from a more
> > down-to-earth perspective? Or is anyone running a server that limits
> > its own bandwidth, and will
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 11:35:45AM -0500, Michael Jinks wrote:
> Can anyone recommend a site that covers traffic control from a more
> down-to-earth perspective? Or is anyone running a server that limits
> its own bandwidth, and willing to share your configs for comparison?
You can go to Google,
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 11:52:21AM -0500, Jamin W.Collins wrote:
>
> Looks like section 15.9 in the HOWTO at http://lartc.org/ covers just what
> you want to do. Looks like they provide a quick example of how to do it.
That's just the thing. Thanks!
--
# Michael Jinks, IB # JFI/MRSEC/EFI Com
On Wed, 11 Sep 2002 11:35:45 -0500
Michael Jinks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't really have time to become an expert in traffic shaping. I've
> been given a limit for this machine from the networking guys, and I just
> want to slap on one rule that says, in effect, "don't send more than N
Hi all.
debian.uchicago.edu has angered the local network admins by being too
much of a bandwidth hog, and it's time to throttle it. I'm reading up
on tc(8) and friends, but this tool is a lot more powerful and flexible
than I need it to be, and so are all the examples I can find (for
example se
Hi, I am running into the same problem and would like to know if you
could provide a reference URL to some documentation on the various
uses of 'tc' (or iproute in general).
On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 07:33:29PM -0500, Guillaume wrote:
>
> Thank you all,
> iproute was what I was looking for so long.
Thank you all,
iproute was what I was looking for so long.
just with this I reduce a little my outgoing bandwidth, but
interactivity is greatly increased as well as my ping and DL bandwidth !
# tc qdisc add dev ppp0 root tbf rate 240kbit latency 30ms burst 1700
Raising the burst (=bucket) incre
On Wed, 13 Feb 2002, Guillaume wrote:
>
>Hello,
>
>My users are using all the outgoing bandwidth by downloading files thru
>FTP, port 20. This results in the eMail and Web being unusable, even if
>they really don't need much by themselves.
>
>I head BSD has th
Hello,
My users are using all the outgoing bandwidth by downloading files thru
FTP, port 20. This results in the eMail and Web being unusable, even if
they really don't need much by themselves.
I head BSD has this kind of bandwidth limiting possibilities.
What about Deb ?
I tried limitin
hi,
since potato's rsync seems not to support the --bwlimit flag, and i am
looking for a general solution anyway, let me ask you this:
do you know of a tool that let's you limit the bandwidth in and out of
a process? i envision something like nice (without renice though), so
that you'd call someth
FQ would be your
friends) you can simply use proftpd which has support for per-directory,
per-virtual server bandwidth limiting.
marek
pgpmeyIa9khaW.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Todd Suess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Does anyone know of an FTPD for debian that supports limiting
> upstream/downstream bandwidth on either a system wide or
> (preferred) user/group basis? I am currently using a cable modem
Is it possible to use another IP for ftp-server? If you have
ftp-se
Does anyone know of an FTPD for debian that supports limiting
upstream/downstream bandwidth on either a system wide or
(preferred) user/group basis? I am currently using a cable modem
with a very high downstream rate, but an upstream rate limited to
128k, so if I have several users logged in down
Does any one know how to limit bandwitdth on a single system, through a
modem? Say you are in this situation:
You are ftp'ing files on one VT, and you are on the web under X, but since
the ftp session was first, it hogs most of the bandwidth.
Is there a way to make it "split" evenly?
--
21 matches
Mail list logo
