On 7/17/22 2:07 AM, Nicolas George wrote:
Gary L. Roach (12022-07-16):
Some time ago I installed backuppc and then decided to not use it. Even
though I purged the program and made sure that I deleted all directories, I
still get a backuppc password request when starting any of my programs
Gary L. Roach (12022-07-16):
> Some time ago I installed backuppc and then decided to not use it. Even
> though I purged the program and made sure that I deleted all directories, I
> still get a backuppc password request when starting any of my programs.
> Anyone had this problem and i
lps:
>>
>
> Were I to install backuppc, 21 other packages would arrive with it
> (including Recommends). Did you purge all those too?
Another route I might try if I'd been purging some and "rm -r" others
is to maybe reinstall then "apt get autoremove backuppc". T
On Sat 16 Jul 2022 at 19:13:25 (-0700), Gary L. Roach wrote:
> On 7/16/22 5:51 PM, David wrote:
> > On Sun, 17 Jul 2022 at 10:24, Gary L. Roach wrote:
> >
> > > Some time ago I installed backuppc and then decided to not use it. Even
> > > though I purged the pro
Kernel Version: 5.10.0-13-amd64
OS Type: 64-bit
Processors: 4 × AMD FX(tm)-4350 Quad-Core Processor
Memory: 15.6 GiB of RAM
Graphics Processor: AMD CAICOS
Gary R
On 7/16/22 5:51 PM, David wrote:
On Sun, 17 Jul 2022 at 10:24, Gary L. Roach wrote:
Some time ago I installed backuppc and then
On Sun, 17 Jul 2022 at 10:24, Gary L. Roach wrote:
> Some time ago I installed backuppc and then decided to not use it. Even
> though I purged the program and made sure that I deleted all
> directories, I still get a backuppc password request when starting any
> of my programs. Any
Hi all,
Some time ago I installed backuppc and then decided to not use it. Even
though I purged the program and made sure that I deleted all
directories, I still get a backuppc password request when starting any
of my programs. Anyone had this problem and if so, do you know how to
get rid of
Hi all,
Has anyone gotten backuppc version 4 to work on Debian Buster. I tried
to install version 4 and got a missing dependency. The version of
libgci-pm-perl has changed from version 4.40-1 in buster to version
4.51-1 in Bullseye. Can I safely upgrade to version 4.51-1 without
breaking my
https://www.mycause.com.au/page/183259/a-smile-will-change-a-day-love-that-changed-my-world
From: Gary Roach
Sent: Sunday, 12 August 2018 3:50 AM
To: Debian User
Subject: Apache Backuppc problem
Hi all.
Debian Stretch OS
I have installed the BackupPC /Apache2
On 8/11/18 1:50 PM, Gary Roach wrote:
Hi all.
Debian Stretch OS
I have installed the BackupPC /Apache2 package before and had no trouble
accessing the BackupPC GUI at localhost/backuppc. This time (using apt install
backuppc) I keep getting a window asking if I wish to save a bin file. The
Hi all.
Debian Stretch OS
I have installed the BackupPC /Apache2 package before and had no trouble
accessing the BackupPC GUI at localhost/backuppc. This time (using apt
install backuppc) I keep getting a window asking if I wish to save a bin
file. The server downloads a file like W6gLcuk0
It has been about 7 years since I've been on the list.
I decided to implement a comprehensive backup solution and chose backuppc. I
also built a new mini-ITX PC for this use--Intel Core i3, 8 Gb RAM, 750 GB
HDD, wired networking---and Debian Jesse for the software. To be fair, befo
Hi
I have an elderly machine which has been successfully running backuppc,
mainly with linux clients but including use of smb to backup Windows
hosts. I recently upgraded from squeeze to wheezy and found that
backuppc no longer worked correctly with smbclient: the backup
terminates with no
I have a Wheezy system setup with backuppc to back up 3 computers -
all ext3/4 systems. I have been trying to restore to a cold iron system.
Every time I try to create a restore.tar file the process stops at 331KB
when the file should be about 21GB. The file contains the directories
and no
I have a Wheezy system setup with backuppc to back up 3 computers -
all ext3/4 systems. I have been trying to restore to a cold iron system.
Every time I try to create a restore.tar file the process stops at 331KB
when the file should be about 21GB. The file contains the directories
and no
too worried because I have a complete backup
system. Of course I am having trouble with the restore. The data's all
there on the backup disk but BackupPC only restored the directories and
none of the data. I am trying to create a tar file and manually transfer
the data across but am having
On Wed, 2012-11-14 at 17:53 -0800, David Christensen wrote:
> On 11/14/12 12:48, Gary Roach wrote:
> > I got home from vacation, fired up the systems and one of the hard
> > drives was trashed. Two days of recovery attempts didn't work so I
> > reformatted and reinstalled the Debian Squeeze system.
On 11/14/12 12:48, Gary Roach wrote:
I got home from vacation, fired up the systems and one of the hard
drives was trashed. Two days of recovery attempts didn't work so I
reformatted and reinstalled the Debian Squeeze system.
What do you mean by "trashed"?
Have you run any hardware diagnostic
Hi all
I sent a copy of this to the backuppc mailing list but response is a bit slow.
So if someone has some experience with backuppc and can help, it will be
sincerely appreciated.
I got home from vacation, fired up the systems and one of the hard drives was
trashed. Two days of recovery
2012/6/27 Keith McKenzie :
> The system isn't backed up normally, as you would have installation
> media to restore it; you would just backup configuration. Having said
> that, if you do want to back it up, use a live media, not the running
> system.
>
> (Usually it is only your data that is irrep
The system isn't backed up normally, as you would have installation
media to restore it; you would just backup configuration. Having said
that, if you do want to back it up, use a live media, not the running
system.
(Usually it is only your data that is irreplaceable.)
HTH
--
Sent from FOSS (F
# aptitude show backuppc | grep Version
Version: 3.1.0-9.1
# uname -a
Linux backuppc 2.6.32-5-686 #1 SMP Sun May 6 04:01:19 UTC 2012 i686 GNU/Linux
using default backup setting for localhost, it failed full backup with
below error messages:
Contents of file /var/lib/backuppc/pc/localhost
On Mi, 07 mar 12, 13:30:12, Sylvain wrote:
> 2012/3/7 Camaleón :
> > Anyway, I would have expected some kind of warning at the logs coming
> > from backuppc indicating a problem for accessing to the configured mount
> > point which was not available at that time and thus fail
On Wed, 07 Mar 2012 13:30:12 +0100, Sylvain wrote:
> 2012/3/7 Camaleón :
>> Anyway, I would have expected some kind of warning at the logs coming
>> from backuppc indicating a problem for accessing to the configured
>> mount point which was not available at that time and thus
2012/3/7 Camaleón :
> Anyway, I would have expected some kind of warning at the logs coming
> from backuppc indicating a problem for accessing to the configured mount
> point which was not available at that time and thus failing.
Me too, and I didn't understand why I wasn't
o my mind.
"Problems" and "straightforward" do not usually go in the same phrase, by
their own nature :-)
>> So backuppc daemon is starting but fails because it cannot access to
>> the configured external USB hard disk? You can check the service status
>>
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 2:46 AM, Sylvain wrote:
> 2012/3/6 Tom H :
>>
>> AFAICT, a bug should be filed against backuppc to change its init
>> script to have "$remote_fs" (or "$all"!) in "Required-Start" or
>> "autofs" in "
2012/3/6 Tom H :
> AFAICT, a bug should be filed against backuppc to change its init
> script to have "$remote_fs" (or "$all"!) in "Required-Start" or
> "autofs" in "Should-Start".
autofs doesn't seem to be included in $remote_fs
On Tue, 06 Mar 2012 12:35:21 +0100, Sylvain wrote:
> I installed backuppc the other day, configured it and it works fine
> except for one thing: it doesn't start at boot. I looked in the backuppc
> logs and in the syslog and saw nothing suspicious. If I start it
> manually
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 6:35 AM, Sylvain wrote:
>
> I installed backuppc the other day, configured it and it works fine
> except for one thing: it doesn't start at boot. I looked in the
> backuppc logs and in the syslog and saw nothing suspicious. If I start
> it manually with
On 06/03/12 11:35, Sylvain wrote:
Hey there,
I installed backuppc the other day, configured it and it works fine
except for one thing: it doesn't start at boot. I looked in the
backuppc logs and in the syslog and saw nothing suspicious. If I start
it manually with /etc/init.d/backuppc star
Hey there,
I installed backuppc the other day, configured it and it works fine
except for one thing: it doesn't start at boot. I looked in the
backuppc logs and in the syslog and saw nothing suspicious. If I start
it manually with /etc/init.d/backuppc start, it works just fine. There
are
Brian writes:
> On Wed 23 Nov 2011 at 05:15:40 -0600, Harry Putnam wrote:
>
>> dpkg: unrecoverable fatal error, aborting:
>>syntax error: unknown user 'backuppc' in statoverride file
>>
>> Can the `stateoverride' file mentioned be edited? If
Rob Owens writes:
> You could try:
>
> aptitude reinstall backuppc
>
> and see if that gets you anywhere.
Thanks, I did mention in OP that I could neither install nor remove.
Surely there is someway to get rid of the pesky stuff.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to d
On Wed 23 Nov 2011 at 05:15:40 -0600, Harry Putnam wrote:
> dpkg: unrecoverable fatal error, aborting:
>syntax error: unknown user 'backuppc' in statoverride file
>
> Can the `stateoverride' file mentioned be edited? If so, where is it?
>
> Searches of /
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 04:59:27AM -0600, Harry Putnam wrote:
> I decided to try out backuppc and set it up for a trial... decided it
> way more complicated and overdone for my needs and uninstalled it.
>
> Only it didn't really get uninstalled. I don't remember now all the
>From atitude full-upgrade
[...]
dpkg: unrecoverable fatal error, aborting:
syntax error: unknown user 'backuppc' in statoverride file
Can the `stateoverride' file mentioned be edited? If so, where is it?
Searches of /etc/ and /var/ come up dry.
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
I decided to try out backuppc and set it up for a trial... decided it
way more complicated and overdone for my needs and uninstalled it.
Only it didn't really get uninstalled. I don't remember now all the
steps I took but do recall it involved reinstalling it at some point
to try
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011, Harry Putnam wrote:
> On debian many of the things that would be done by user during an
> install from sources are done for you. I ended up with the main files
> at /var/lib/backuppc. which contains a whole pile of some kind of data
> files. I see them in place
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 11:38 PM, Harry Putnam wrote:
>
> So if I put /var/lib/backuppc (and everything under it) on an nfs share
> that resides on a solaris machine with zfs... it should work alright?
Yes, perhaps with a bit of performance loss compared to local storage.
--
Les
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 10:55 PM, Harry Putnam wrote:
>
> I haven't finished the docs yet, maybe it tell what this stuff
> is... but for purposes of this post I wondered if it would be wisest
> to let the directories and files under /var/lib/backuppc also reside
> on the nfs s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Apr 21, 2007 at 01:37:59AM -0700, mxc wrote:
>
> Hi there,
>
> I installed backuppc to do backups of our servers. For the first three weeks
> everything went fine and then suddenly the backups stopped working.
> Initially
Hi there,
I installed backuppc to do backups of our servers. For the first three weeks
everything went fine and then suddenly the backups stopped working.
Initially backuppc reported that the ping response time was greater than
20msec and there it stopped the backup of the server. I changed the
I am currently running BackupPC 2.1.1-2sarge2 on Debian Sarge (oldstable).
I want to upgrade the backup server to Etch (stable) which has BackupPC
2.1.2-6. Are there any known gotchas in upgrading from from 2.1.1 to
2.1.2 ???
I also see that BackupPC has released 2.1.3 and also 3.0.0
Hi Guys, I have installed Backuppc in debiansarge from apt-get Installation was fine and now i need to configure the backup to copy to a remote machine. I have instaled backupPC in sorce machine and now i am planning to copy the source machine data to destination data using rsyncd
ed_keys and not authorized_keys2.
Thankyou once again.
Kind Rgeards
Siju
> Justin.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Siju George [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2005 9:11 AM
> To: Debian User
> Subject: backupPC on sarge
>
> Hi all,
>
> I am try
Looks as if you need to copy your public key into the authorized_keys2
file on the remote machine for user root.
Justin.
-Original Message-
From: Siju George [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2005 9:11 AM
To: Debian User
Subject: backupPC on sarge
Hi all,
I am
Hi all,
I am trying to backup the etc folder on a remote machine using
backuppc and I get the following error. Could someone please tell me
what could be wrong?
Thankyou so much.
Kind Regards
Siju
--
Running: /usr/bin/ssh -q -x -l root linsrv /usr/bin/rsync --server
--sender
On Wed, 2005-07-20 at 09:00, Adam Dobrin wrote:
> I'm having trouble using backuppc from a separate subnet. I have a VPN
> connection from an offiste location to my network; and while the remote
> machine *can* ping into the internal network, and perl's gethostbyname
>
Steve Lamb wrote:>
I just did a search for "debian sata dvd burner".
Here's the link:
You're right. Apparently I didn't do enough testing, or the problem was
temporary,
and now seems to be limited to the sourceforge lists or at least backuppc-user,
and
Marty wrote:
> Steve Lamb wrote:
>>> No, it's just some recent change that google made.
>> So you claim. And your proof is... what?
> See my answer above.
What you gave was not proof. It was supposition based on your
observations on a *dynamic system*. IE, the same term used today is
l previously getting google hits for both backuppc-users and
debian-users, and many other technical list archives without the extra
qualifying
terms that require one to know in advance where the answer to their question
lies.
I think that if recent lawsuits are behind google's changes, then
Marty wrote:
> I wonder how SPI would respond to that statement.
Would be interesting, wouldn't it. I mean you are talking about a
collective of individuals who have decided that some software should be
funded. Just because they say it is "in the public interest" doesn't mean the
public want
Steve Lamb wrote:
Marty wrote:
Steve Lamb wrote:
The public has no interest.
But google shareholders do? I hope that's not what you mean.
Nope. Simply pointing out that "the public" is an entity which in and of
itself has no interests. "The public" is a collection of individuals
Marty wrote:
> Steve Lamb wrote:
>> The public has no interest.
> But google shareholders do? I hope that's not what you mean.
Nope. Simply pointing out that "the public" is an entity which in and of
itself has no interests. "The public" is a collection of individuals, each of
whom hav
On Tue, 2005-07-19 at 15:26, Marty wrote:
> Maybe the most optimistic explanation would be just that google is
> knucking under to the rampant copyright or lawsuit madness that's
> plaguing the USA, but that still leaves a problem for technical
> list users.
I've moved some of my busier list subs
Steve Lamb wrote:
Marty wrote:
I don't see what legitimate purpose it might serve, and I wonder if the
posters' wishes or search engine users' interests, or even public
interests, enter into consideration? I suppose not.
The public has no interest.
But google shareholders do? I hope th
Stephen Patterson wrote:
On Thu, 16 Sep 2004 13:40:11 +0200, Sturla Holm Hansen wrote:
Anyone tried backuppc ( http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/ )
If so, here's my files:
Fatal error (bad version): Host key verification failed.
Sounds like ssh is being bitchy wrt to the identity key for each
On Thu, 16 Sep 2004 13:40:11 +0200, Sturla Holm Hansen wrote:
> Anyone tried backuppc ( http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/ )
> If so, here's my files:
> Fatal error (bad version): Host key verification failed.
Sounds like ssh is being bitchy wrt to the identity key for each
host. Can
Anyone tried backuppc ( http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/ )
If so, here's my files:
/etc/backuppc/hosts:
hostdhcpusermoreUsers # <--- do not edit this line
localhost 0 backuppc
even0 even
/etc/backuppc/even.pl
$Conf{XferMethod} = '
60 matches
Mail list logo
