On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 1:03 PM, Ralf Mardorf
wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-12-20 at 22:24 +, Tom H wrote:
>>
>> apt-cache policy
>
> Thank you, that's a useful command :).
You're welcome.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C
On Fri, 2013-12-20 at 22:24 +, Tom H wrote:
> apt-cache policy
Thank you, that's a useful command :).
--
Windows 8 Pro floppy disk 1
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2013-December/255074.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a su
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 10:24 PM, Tom H wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 2:49 AM, Ralf Mardorf
> wrote:
>>
>> with different settings backports always got a lower priority than
>> jessie/testing.
>>
>> Is it possible to give backports a higher priority than jessie/testing?
>>
>> Do I need to add
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 2:49 AM, Ralf Mardorf
wrote:
>
> with different settings backports always got a lower priority than
> jessie/testing.
>
> Is it possible to give backports a higher priority than jessie/testing?
>
> Do I need to add wheezy/updates and wheezy-updates to the preferences
> too,
On Fri, 2013-12-20 at 03:49 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Do I need to add wheezy/updates and wheezy-updates to the preferences
> too, or do they belong to wheezy?
I still don't know and will see when there are upgrades available, but
perhaps somebody can answer this question. Since for upgraded pa
Hi,
with different settings backports always got a lower priority than
jessie/testing.
Is it possible to give backports a higher priority than jessie/testing?
Do I need to add wheezy/updates and wheezy-updates to the preferences
too, or do they belong to wheezy?
Among others I tested wheezy-bac
6 matches
Mail list logo