Re: (SOLVED) Re: Backported Kernel - install question

2013-12-14 Thread Kailash Kalyani
On Saturday 14 December 2013 02:22 PM, Reco wrote: Hi. On Sat, 14 Dec 2013 12:06:15 +0530 Kailash Kalyani wrote: Apt-get gave me the following error: The following packages have unmet dependencies: linux-image-3.11-0.bpo.2-686-pae : Breaks: initramfs-tools (< 0.110~) but 0.109.1 is to b

Re: (SOLVED) Re: Backported Kernel - install question

2013-12-14 Thread Reco
Hi. On Sat, 14 Dec 2013 12:06:15 +0530 Kailash Kalyani wrote: > Apt-get gave me the following error: > > The following packages have unmet dependencies: > linux-image-3.11-0.bpo.2-686-pae : Breaks: initramfs-tools (< 0.110~) > but 0.109.1 is to be installed > E: Unable to correct problems,

Re: (SOLVED) Re: Backported Kernel - install question

2013-12-14 Thread Kailash Kalyani
On Saturday 14 December 2013 12:06 PM, Kailash Kalyani wrote: On Friday 13 December 2013 02:32 AM, Reco wrote: Hi. On Thu, 12 Dec 2013 21:33:45 +0100 Ralf Mardorf wrote: On Thu, 2013-12-12 at 21:32 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote: I experienced that synaptic for *buntu Saucy is broken, perhaps i

(SOLVED) Re: Backported Kernel - install question

2013-12-13 Thread Kailash Kalyani
On Friday 13 December 2013 02:32 AM, Reco wrote: Hi. On Thu, 12 Dec 2013 21:33:45 +0100 Ralf Mardorf wrote: On Thu, 2013-12-12 at 21:32 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote: I experienced that synaptic for *buntu Saucy is broken, perhaps it's for Debian broken too. Sometimes nothing is inconsistent, b

Re: Backported Kernel - install question

2013-12-12 Thread Reco
Hi. On Thu, 12 Dec 2013 21:33:45 +0100 Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Thu, 2013-12-12 at 21:32 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > > > I experienced that synaptic for *buntu Saucy is broken, perhaps it's for > > Debian broken too. Sometimes nothing is inconsistent, but Synaptic > > claims that a dependenc

Re: Backported Kernel - install question

2013-12-12 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Thu, 2013-12-12 at 21:32 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Thu, 2013-12-12 at 23:03 +0400, Reco wrote: > > Hi. > > > > On Fri, 13 Dec 2013 00:17:02 +0530 > > Kailash Kalyani wrote: > > > > > My understanding is that it should be possible to install backports > > > without breaking a stable in

Re: Backported Kernel - install question

2013-12-12 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Thu, 2013-12-12 at 23:03 +0400, Reco wrote: > Hi. > > On Fri, 13 Dec 2013 00:17:02 +0530 > Kailash Kalyani wrote: > > > My understanding is that it should be possible to install backports > > without breaking a stable install. What am I missing? > > Sure, it is possible. You're just using

Re: Backported Kernel - install question

2013-12-12 Thread Reco
Hi. On Fri, 13 Dec 2013 00:17:02 +0530 Kailash Kalyani wrote: > My understanding is that it should be possible to install backports > without breaking a stable install. What am I missing? Sure, it is possible. You're just using wrong tool for the task. Try: apt-get install -t wheezy-backpor