Avi Greenbury wrote:
> Ali Milis wrote:
>> Ubuntu is great only if you have spare time.
> Or if the defaults are acceptable to you.
ROFL, for years I tried to fantasize that Ubuntu is
defaults are acceptable.
> Personally, I find that Debian on laptops requires more time to set
> up than Ubuntu d
On Sun, 2010-01-10 at 20:43 +0700, Ali Milis wrote:
> > I wouldnt bother, try Ubuntu.
>
> Ubuntu is great only if you have spare time.
> I am on the way back to Debian too.
> Unfortunately, stable means also ancient :(
>
> --
> Raja Ali M.I. Ilias, Bengkalis
> Counted GNU/Linux Engineer # 405138
Ali Milis wrote:
> > I wouldnt bother, try Ubuntu.
>
> Ubuntu is great only if you have spare time.
Or if the defaults are acceptable to you. Unless it's something other
than configuration that you're getting at?
Personally, I find that Debian on laptops requires more time to set
up than Ubuntu
> I wouldnt bother, try Ubuntu.
Ubuntu is great only if you have spare time.
I am on the way back to Debian too.
Unfortunately, stable means also ancient :(
--
Raja Ali M.I. Ilias, Bengkalis
Counted GNU/Linux Engineer # 405138 - http://counter.li.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-r
On Sat January 9 2010, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> You might want to try wicd as well. I just installed lenny/stable on a
> friends network and network-manager (a.k.a. nework mangler) simply
> wouldn't connect to my AP. wicd worked right away.
I second that.. I had problems with my laptop & wireless,
On Sun, 2010-01-10 at 00:55 +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Fri,08.Jan.10, 00:02:50, Vasco Costa wrote:
> >
> > Lenny supports all my hardware except my Atheros wireless card (ath9k).
> > Backports came to rescue with linux-image-2.6.30-bpo.2-686.
>
> You might want to try wicd as well. I just
On Fri,08.Jan.10, 00:02:50, Vasco Costa wrote:
>
> Lenny supports all my hardware except my Atheros wireless card (ath9k).
> Backports came to rescue with linux-image-2.6.30-bpo.2-686.
You might want to try wicd as well. I just installed lenny/stable on a
friends network and network-manager (a.k
Brent Clark writes:
> I think if you run Testing, its no different if you run / use FreeBSD
> ports. You just need to know, and guess if its safe to do a dist-upgrade
> or upgrade only certain packages, but 99% of the time, I just
> dist-upgrade, and as said .. no problems here. Even Ubuntu, Ive
On Thu, 2010-01-07 at 16:29 -0700, bosco wrote:
> On 2010-01-07 14:40:02 -0700, Paul Cartwright said:
>
> > On Thu January 7 2010, bosco wrote:
> >> You might take a look at Sidux, it is a distro compiled out of
> >> unstable. I used it for a while. It is well supported and has a good
> >> group
On 2010-01-07 14:40:02 -0700, Paul Cartwright said:
On Thu January 7 2010, bosco wrote:
You might take a look at Sidux, it is a distro compiled out of
unstable. I used it for a while. It is well supported and has a good
group at the Sidux forum.
but no email list.. I installed sidux on my la
On Thu January 7 2010, bosco wrote:
> You might take a look at Sidux, it is a distro compiled out of
> unstable. I used it for a while. It is well supported and has a good
> group at the Sidux forum.
but no email list.. I installed sidux on my laptop, getting rid of Ubuntu..
still have lenny on my
You might take a look at Sidux, it is a distro compiled out of
unstable. I used it for a while. It is well supported and has a good
group at the Sidux forum.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debi
On Thu, 2010-01-07 at 09:33 +0100, didier gaumet wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Jan 2010 20:28:08 +,
> Vasco Costa wrote :
>
> [...]
> > By the way, in case I want to go back to a rolling release scheme, how
> > does Debian testing/unstable behave in this regard for an experienced
> > power user? I know
On Wed, 6 Jan 2010 20:28:08 +,
Vasco Costa wrote :
[...]
> By the way, in case I want to go back to a rolling release scheme, how
> does Debian testing/unstable behave in this regard for an experienced
> power user? I know all the nuts and bolts of Archlinux, including
> using the testing rep
>On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 10:32 PM, Matthew Moore
>wrote:
>On Wednesday January 6 2010 1:52:11 pm Brent Clark wrote:
> On 06/01/2010 22:28, Vasco Costa wrote:
> > I'm planning to stay forever this time. :)
> >
> > To be really honest I've never really quit Debian since I kept using
> > stable in ser
On Wednesday January 6 2010 1:52:11 pm Brent Clark wrote:
> On 06/01/2010 22:28, Vasco Costa wrote:
> > I'm planning to stay forever this time. :)
> >
> > To be really honest I've never really quit Debian since I kept using
> > stable in servers. I've only switched from Debian testing/unstable to
>
Vasco Costa:
>
> I'm planning to stay forever this time. :)
I never switched during the whole time I have used Linux and never
regretted when I touched another distribution. :)
> By the way, in case I want to go back to a rolling release scheme, how
> does Debian testing/unstable behave in this r
On 06/01/2010 22:28, Vasco Costa wrote:
I'm planning to stay forever this time. :)
To be really honest I've never really quit Debian since I kept using
stable in servers. I've only switched from Debian testing/unstable to
Gentoo and then Archlinux. Now that I also value a stable desktop I'm
stic
I'm planning to stay forever this time. :)
To be really honest I've never really quit Debian since I kept using
stable in servers. I've only switched from Debian testing/unstable to
Gentoo and then Archlinux. Now that I also value a stable desktop I'm
sticking with Lenny on my laptop.
By the way,
Alright, I'm back to Debian after having used it extensively in the late
90's and early 2000's. By that time I was a regular "RPM hell" sufferer,
thus APT was the main feature which made me switch to Debian.
Initially I was comfortable sticking with stable releases, however the
will to stay bleedi
20 matches
Mail list logo
