On 31/3/25 03:23, Marc Shapiro wrote:
I was looking into Brave the other day, but what stopped me was the lack
of anything to replace Video Download Helper. Am I missing something?
Is there a way to download YouTube videos in Brave, or do I stick with
Firefox?
Marc
To download youtube vide
On Tue, 1 Apr 2025 15:16:52 -0400
Eben King wrote:
Hello Eben,
>On 4/1/25 14:02, Brad Rogers wrote:
>>
>> The error message that now displays, is thus;
I wrote none of that.
You do Bret Busby, who is far more knowledgeable than I with regard to
this matter, a disservice.
Please take more care
On 4/1/25 14:02, Brad Rogers wrote:
The error message that now displays, is thus;
"
Ad blockers violate YouTube's Terms of Service
It looks like you may be using an ad blocker. Video playback is blocked
unless YouTube is allowlisted or the ad blocker is disabled.
Ads allow YouTube to be used
On Mon, 31 Mar 2025 21:14:18 -0700
Marc Shapiro wrote:
Hello Marc,
>Yes, but that version does not download from YouTube. I have yt-dlp,
Ah; I have no interest in yt.
--
Regards _ "Valid sig separator is {dash}{dash}{space}"
/ ) "The blindingly obvious is never immedia
ed in Brave.
https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/video-downloadhelper/lmjnegcaeklhafolokijcfjliaokphfk
Yes, but that version does not download from YouTube. I have yt-dlp, so
I can use Brave to find what I want, and then download with yt-dlp. It
would be nice to have something in the br
https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/video-downloadhelper/lmjnegcaeklhafolokijcfjliaokphfk
Yes, but that version does not download from YouTube. I have yt-dlp, so
I can use Brave to find what I want, and then download with yt-dlp. It
would be nice to have something in the browser, but yt-dlp works fine
fro
heard* of Manifest until that moment,
so I was starting from square zero.
(Short answer: Manifest is a sort of browser extension API. It defines
what capabilities an extension may use. Google is phasing out version 2
of the Manifest API in favor of version 3, which offers fewer features.)
Howev
?
>
You may want to try out KDE's Falkon Web Browser. It is fast. It comes with
ad blocking. Cosmetically it looks good in KDE.
>
> Marc
>
>
> On 3/6/25 1:25 PM, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 21:50:27 +0100, KISER JD wrote:
> >> The C
On Sun, 30 Mar 2025 12:23:04 -0700
Marc Shapiro wrote:
Hello Marc,
>I was looking into Brave the other day, but what stopped me was the
>lack of anything to replace Video Download Helper.
I've got VDH installed in Brave.
https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/video-downloadhelper/lmjnegcaekl
user opts-in to them). It is one thing to
provide a free, open source, community-maintained ad blocker, it is
another thing altogether to make it your business model to replace
someone else's ads with your own. I cannot fathom how this could be
considered ethical at all.
The browser
i currently use firefox and have mostly been ok with it.
would like to try something else.
currently running testing.
any that have any filtering capabilities? yt and a few
other sites are intolerable without a decent blocker.
songbird
On 7/3/25 01:57, Bret Busby wrote:
On 7/3/25 01:32, songbird wrote:
i currently use firefox and have mostly been ok with it.
would like to try something else.
currently running testing.
any that have any filtering capabilities? yt and a few
other sites are intolerable without a d
On 3/6/25 12:32, songbird wrote:
any that have any filtering capabilities? yt and a few
other sites are intolerable without a decent blocker.
If you're talking about ads, Noscript and Ghostery on FF take care of
them for me.
is anyone using opera
x27; in the URL and then it went back to the
javascript page.
I agree with you about not doing financial stuff on a phone, but I do
sometimes do web browsing on the phone. I prefer not to because the
screen size is too limiting. I did it that particular time because I had
recommended Duckduckgo a
ince privacy is a huge field I add specifically that at
least on Android it even does a decent job at anti-fingerprinting, as
far as that is still possible and for those who care. In this respect
too and again speaking of Android, I'm not aware of another browser that
comes close. Or even cares. Com
D MacDougall wrote:
> On 3/8/25 12:34, debian-u...@howorth.org.uk wrote:
> > That's just a blank page except for a picture of a duck, the word
> > DuckDuckGo and a search box. No explanation of anything at any
> > length?
>
>
> Very odd. On my phone I see exactly what you see plus several
Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 08, 2025 at 13:39:18 -0800, Charlie Gibbs wrote:
> > On Sat Mar 8 13:29:36 2025 debian-u...@howorth.org.uk wrote:
> > > D MacDougall wrote:
> > >> https://duckduckgo.com
> > >
> > > That's just a blank page except for a picture of a duck, the word
> > > D
On Sun, Mar 09, 2025 at 11:34:41 -0400, deb...@kcburns.com wrote:
> On 3/9/25 1:05 AM, Christopher David Howie wrote:
> > Many of my friends keep recommending Brave, but I cannot get past the
> > fact that their business model is to strip ads from sites and insert
> > their own ads instead (if the
user opts-in to them). It is one thing to
provide a free, open source, community-maintained ad blocker, it is
another thing altogether to make it your business model to replace
someone else's ads with your own. I cannot fathom how this could be
considered ethical at all.
The browser
On 08/03/2025 22:56, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Sat, Mar 08, 2025 at 13:39:18 -0800, Charlie Gibbs wrote:
On Sat Mar 8 13:29:36 2025 debian-u...@howorth.org.uk wrote:
D MacDougall wrote:
https://duckduckgo.com
That's just a blank page except for a picture of a duck, the word
DuckDuckGo and a
ads with your own. I cannot fathom how this could be
> considered ethical at all.
Honey browser extension for the win!
> The browser might provide a good user experience but their business
> model is *slimy as hell* and I cannot in good conscience support them in
> any way.
Jeff
On 3/8/25 12:34, debian-u...@howorth.org.uk wrote:
> That's just a blank page except for a picture of a duck, the word
> DuckDuckGo and a search box. No explanation of anything at any length?
Very odd. On my phone I see exactly what you see plus several other
things on the page. One other thin
rs never deal with HTML.
There are also server-side components that can remove unneeded
whitespace and unneeded end-of-lines, like mod_pagespeed. They are
used to improve the time to send and load a page in the browser.
(Sorry to hang this off John's message. I could not find Greg's message).
Jeff
de a free, open source, community-maintained ad blocker, it is
another thing altogether to make it your business model to replace
someone else's ads with your own. I cannot fathom how this could be
considered ethical at all.
The browser might provide a good user experience but their busin
On 3/7/25 11:49 AM, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
I believe all the major browsers are using Manifest v3 nowadays.
Most support Mv3 now, but AFAIK only Chrome has actually disabled Mv2
support. All of my Mv2 extensions continue to work on Firefox.
--
Chris Howie
http://www.chrishowie.com
http://en.
On 9/3/25 06:56, Greg Wooledge wrote:
P.S. looking at the HTML source with Ctrl-U, it's all one line. Seriously,
who does that?
hobbit:~$ xclip -o | wc
02960 44363
44 kilobytes of HTML/CSS/Javascript, all in one. stupid. line. Well,
they found a way to make me stop trying to re
On Sun, Mar 09, 2025 at 07:04:30 +0800, Bret Busby wrote:
> That long line of code, might not be completely stupid. It might have some
> hidden AI thing (that they figure no member of the public would find, due to
> the length of the line), that starts playing "Rubber Ducky, you're the one",
> in a
Greg writes:
> looking at the HTML source with Ctrl-U, it's all one line. Seriously,
> who does that?
"Website builders" and "content management systems". Modern Web
designers never deal with HTML.
--
John Hasler
j...@sugarbit.com
Elmwood, WI USA
On Sat, Mar 08, 2025 at 13:39:18 -0800, Charlie Gibbs wrote:
> On Sat Mar 8 13:29:36 2025 debian-u...@howorth.org.uk wrote:
> > D MacDougall wrote:
> >> https://duckduckgo.com
> >
> > That's just a blank page except for a picture of a duck, the word
> > DuckDuckGo and a search box. No explanation
proving to the
>>> point that I seldom have cause to use any other. Along the way I
>>> discovered that they also make a browser.
>> ...
>> The browser is free of charge. They have about 3 services that
>> you can subscribe to by the month or year such as a V
other. Along the way I
> > > discovered that they also make a browser.
> ...
> The browser is free of charge. They have about 3 services that you
> can subscribe to by the month or year such as a VPN but they are
> entirely separate from the browser. They have a websit
On 2025-03-08, D MacDougall wrote:
...
> I've been using DuckDuckGo as my primary search engine for
> years and have found that it's gradually been improving to the point that
> I seldom have cause to use any other. Along the way I discovered that
> they also make a brow
rimary search engine for
> years and have found that it's gradually been improving to the point that
> I seldom have cause to use any other. Along the way I discovered that
> they also make a browser. They make it for all the MS and Apple computers
> and for both Apple and Android
On Sat, 8 Mar 2025, poc...@homemail.com wrote:
> Pi-hole is your friend https://pi-hole.net/
Interesting, but for the moment I don't fancy pi-hole as my DNS server. Roger
On Sat, 8 Mar 2025, Chris Green wrote:
> > > ... some humongous hosts file to block ads
> >
> wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/StevenBlack/hosts/master/hosts
>
131425 ad servers. Fantastic! Thanks, Roger
https://itsfoss.com/brave-vs-vivaldi/
https://discuss.privacyguides.net/t/how-does-vivaldi-compare-to-brave-in-terms-of-privacy/17715
and several other sites.
... wanted maximum privacy in a browser,
didn't want integrated email & calendar,
so chose Brave Browser.
Ken
Roger Price wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Mar 2025, Greg wrote:
>
> > On 2025-03-07, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > I believe David Wright uses some humongous hosts file to block ads on
> > his computer rather than a brower add-on (if I'm remembering and
> > understanding
> > correctly).
>
> I do something si
On Fri, 7 Mar 2025, Greg wrote:
> On 2025-03-07, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> I believe David Wright uses some humongous hosts file to block ads on
> his computer rather than a brower add-on (if I'm remembering and understanding
> correctly).
I do something similar but it's limited. What's the best w
have found that it's gradually been improving to the point that
I seldom have cause to use any other. Along the way I discovered that
they also make a browser. They make it for all the MS and Apple computers
and for both Apple and Android phones. Since Android is the only one of
those that I use,
* On 2025 07 Mar 08:09 -0600, fxkl4...@protonmail.com wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Mar 2025, Nate Bargmann wrote:
>
> > My answer is to block as much as possible at my router. As I run
> > OpenWrt for my router, I have the Adblock package installed and running.
> > This way I get blocking applied for other
Hello,
from what I understand, the point is not if a web browser implements
Manifest V3, but how it does so.
Chrome disables certain features (blocking WebRequest) used by adblockers.
Chromium still allows to install Ublock Origin (normal version, not Lite
version) but warns that perhaps in
, it informed me
> that it was disabling uBlock Origin. Thus began my own search for
> some answers. I'd never even *heard* of Manifest until that moment,
> so I was starting from square zero.
>
> (Short answer: Manifest is a sort of browser extension API. It defines
&g
On 2025-03-07, Stefan Monnier wrote:
>> I do have uBlock Origin installed and working in the browsers as well.
>> Getting used to this and then using my phone on mobile data is a jarring
>> experience!
>
> I don't understand. Why don't you install uBlock Origin on your phone?
I use a "DNS privé"
On Thu, 6 Mar 2025, Nate Bargmann wrote:
> My answer is to block as much as possible at my router. As I run
> OpenWrt for my router, I have the Adblock package installed and running.
> This way I get blocking applied for other devices such as our phones and
> Chromium when it disables uBlock orig
* On 2025 06 Mar 21:57 -0600, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > I do have uBlock Origin installed and working in the browsers as well.
> > Getting used to this and then using my phone on mobile data is a jarring
> > experience!
>
> I don't understand. Why don't you install uBlock Origin on your phone?
O
Greg Wooledge wrote:
...
> One of the possible answers was to switch to "uBlock Origin Lite",
> which is less capable (it can't "phone home" to update its block lists
> because Manifest v3 doesn't permit that), but may still be good enough
> for most people.
>
> Another answer is to use Firefox. I
On 07/03/2025 04:25, Greg Wooledge wrote:
One of the possible answers was to switch to "uBlock Origin Lite",
which is less capable (it can't "phone home" to update its block lists
because Manifest v3 doesn't permit that), but may still be good enough
for most people.
I believed that main limita
> I do have uBlock Origin installed and working in the browsers as well.
> Getting used to this and then using my phone on mobile data is a jarring
> experience!
I don't understand. Why don't you install uBlock Origin on your phone?
Stefan "using uMatrix on his phone"
My answer is to block as much as possible at my router. As I run
OpenWrt for my router, I have the Adblock package installed and running.
This way I get blocking applied for other devices such as our phones and
Chromium when it disables uBlock origin.
There are other options I'm aware of but have
songbird writes:
> i currently use firefox and have mostly been ok with it.
>
> would like to try something else.
>
> currently running testing.
>
> any that have any filtering capabilities? yt and a few
> other sites are intolerable without a decent blocker.
>
>
> songbird
If you wer
m, so strictly worse
- A skin on Firefox, so may as well be Firefox
- Deeply entwined with cryptocurrency bros or AI grift, so unacceptable
- Not production ready
> any that have any filtering capabilities? yt and a few
> other sites are intolerable without a decent blocker.
I am not
for
some answers. I'd never even *heard* of Manifest until that moment,
so I was starting from square zero.
(Short answer: Manifest is a sort of browser extension API. It defines
what capabilities an extension may use. Google is phasing out version 2
of the Manifest API in favor of version 3
On Thu, Mar 6, 2025, at 18:32, songbird wrote:
> i currently use firefox and have mostly been ok with it.
>
> would like to try something else.
>
> currently running testing.
>
> any that have any filtering capabilities? yt and a few
> other sites are intolerable without a decent blocker.
>
Bret Busby wrote:
> On 7/3/25 01:32, songbird wrote:
> >i currently use firefox and have mostly been ok with it.
> >
> >would like to try something else.
> >
> >currently running testing.
> >
> >any that have any filtering capabilities? yt and a few
> > other sites are intolera
Vivaldi is my backup browser. It's based on Chromium.
Frank
On 7/3/25 01:32, songbird wrote:
i currently use firefox and have mostly been ok with it.
would like to try something else.
currently running testing.
any that have any filtering capabilities? yt and a few
other sites are intolerable without a decent blocker.
songbird
Try t
On Thu, 13 Feb 2025 15:52:38 -0800
David Hoff Jr wrote:
> I have a fresh install on Debian 12 with all updates. I am trying
> to use Links web browser to access the dailycaller.com web site but am
> being blocked. A message says to enable cookies which I have tried
> using "link
* David Hoff Jr [25-02/13=Th 15:52 -0800]:
> I have a fresh install on Debian 12 with all updates. I am trying
> to use Links web browser to access the dailycaller.com web site but am
> being blocked. A message says to enable cookies which I have tried using
> "link
I have a fresh install on Debian 12 with all updates. I am trying
to use Links web browser to access the dailycaller.com web site but am
being blocked. A message says to enable cookies which I have tried using
"links -enable-cookies dailycaller.com", but to no avail. Is there a
solution
;> I believed there are at least 4 ways (besides settings specific to
> >> particular applications)
> >> - *browser alternatives
> >> - BROWSER environment
> >> - mailcap for text/html
> >> - XDG configuration
> >>
> >> sensible-browser,
des settings specific to
>> particular applications)
>> - *browser alternatives
>> - BROWSER environment
>> - mailcap for text/html
>> - XDG configuration
>>
>> sensible-browser, "open", and xdg-open just use some of these options.
>
> There
On 13/02/2025 09:19, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 08:56:47 +0700, Max Nikulin wrote:
- *browser alternatives
- BROWSER environment
- mailcap for text/html
I have realized that I do not have an example of an application that
determines https: scheme handler from mailcap (it is
Max Nikulin wrote:
> On 13/02/2025 01:26, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > Now Debian has*two* completely separate
> > ways to specify a default application for a role.
>
> I believed there are at least 4 ways (besides settings specific to
> particular applications)
&
particular applications)
> - *browser alternatives
> - BROWSER environment
> - mailcap for text/html
> - XDG configuration
Yes, but mailcap and XDG aren't Debian specific. Alternatives and
the $BROWSER variable (which is what the sensible-browser shell script
uses) are Debia
On 13/02/2025 01:26, Greg Wooledge wrote:
Now Debian has*two* completely separate
ways to specify a default application for a role.
I believed there are at least 4 ways (besides settings specific to
particular applications)
- *browser alternatives
- BROWSER environment
- mailcap for text
On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 10:34:32 -0600, David Wright wrote:
> urlCommand "sensible-browser '%s'"
hobbit:~$ type -a sensible-browser
sensible-browser is /usr/bin/sensible-browser
sensible-browser is /bin/sensible-browser
hobbit:~$ ls -l /usr/bin/sensible-browser
-rwx
On 2025-02-12, Nicolas George wrote:
> Greg (HE12025-02-12):
>> What is going on? You suggested examining the source code.
>
> No, I suggested reading the documentation. Others have suggested other
> avenues that lead to understanding. These are good answers. The
> suggestions to uninstall and ran
Greg (HE12025-02-12):
> What is going on? You suggested examining the source code.
No, I suggested reading the documentation. Others have suggested other
avenues that lead to understanding. These are good answers. The
suggestions to uninstall and randomly fiddle with the order are
polluting the go
On 2025-02-12, Nicolas George wrote:
>
> The only way to achieve a reliable result is to understand what is going
> on. I am flabbergasted that so many people on this list do not start
What is going on? You suggested examining the source code. For the end
user, this might be arduous task at best.
thread is so long. However I am still
>> curious whether xfce-terminal respects /etc/xdg/mimeapps.list or
>> ~/.config/mimeapps.list. My expectation it should.
>
> The OP needs to delve into what's calling up the browser in each and
> every case, unfortunately. Some here have
Greg (HE12025-02-12):
> Simply reversing the installation order of the two browsers seems the
> most direct and easiest solution.
It might achieve the result. A solution…
What will the OP do if they install another browser to try something and
it becomes the default one? Uninstall them a
whether xfce-terminal respects /etc/xdg/mimeapps.list or
> ~/.config/mimeapps.list. My expectation it should.
The OP needs to delve into what's calling up the browser in each and
every case, unfortunately. Some here have fixated on order of
installation, and that might be a fix for /et
On 2025-02-12, Brad Rogers wrote:
>
> On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 15:36:46 - (UTC)
> Greg wrote:
>
> Hello Greg,
>
>>What exactly is he after? I was under the impression it was setting the
>>default browser to Vivaldi.
>
> Yes, but as has been explained, there ar
Chris Green wrote:
> Anssi Saari wrote:
> > Chris Green writes:
> >
> > > Installing epiphany just added it as a choice but left vivaldi as the
> > > configured browser, but still epiphany grabbed everything.
> >
> > Have you considered y
On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 15:36:46 - (UTC)
Greg wrote:
Hello Greg,
>What exactly is he after? I was under the impression it was setting the
>default browser to Vivaldi.
Yes, but as has been explained, there are multiple ways in which a
browser can be chosen. Some, most notably, circumv
On 12/02/2025 22:09, Greg wrote:
On 2025-02-12, Max Nikulin wrote:
Certainly, but before delving into source code I would try the standard
(XDG) way to configure media types and applications associations.
Unfortunately, as Greg Wooledge has already pointed out, there is no
universal standard.
y first, and then
> Vivaldi, instead of the other way around.
>
> Problem solved.
>
> That said, I believe the three-browser problem is not generally solvable.
>
> :-)
>
Very true! I'm not even sure the one browser problem has a solution!
--
Chris Green
·
ee of successfully achieving exactly
> what Chris is after.
Hello,
What exactly is he after? I was under the impression it was setting the
default browser to Vivaldi.
On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 15:09:38 - (UTC)
Greg wrote:
Hello Greg,
>Simply reversing the installation order of the two browsers seems the
>most direct and easiest solution.
Still with, of course, no guarantee of successfully achieving exactly
what Chris is after.
--
Regards _ "Valid si
On 2025-02-12, Max Nikulin wrote:
> On 12/02/2025 20:55, Nicolas George wrote:
>> Max Nikulin (HE12025-02-12):
>>> I would not be surprised if it is not explicitly documented.
>>
>> At worst, the source code is the documentation.
>
> Certainly, but before delving into source code I would try the
On 12/02/2025 20:55, Nicolas George wrote:
Max Nikulin (HE12025-02-12):
I would not be surprised if it is not explicitly documented.
At worst, the source code is the documentation.
Certainly, but before delving into source code I would try the standard
(XDG) way to configure media types and
ther way around.
Problem solved.
That said, I believe the three-browser problem is not generally solvable.
:-)
> Regards,
>
On 2025-02-12, Chris Green wrote:
>>
>> If you want a Linux way to solve the issue: first, read the
>> documentation of xfce-terminal to see how it decides which web browser
>> to run; then read the documentation of that mechanism to see how to
>> configure it.
&g
Max Nikulin (HE12025-02-12):
> I would not be surprised if it is not explicitly documented.
At worst, the source code is the documentation.
Regards,
--
Nicolas George
re I
> > want to be.
>
> That might be a way, but it would be less efficient than installing
> Windows or Macos instead of Linux.
>
> If you want a Linux way to solve the issue: first, read the
> documentation of xfce-terminal to see how it decides which web browser
> to r
> > > very much can install something for one user and not for another in a
> > > browser.
> >
> > How? If I install epiphany using alt then it sets itself as the
> > default browser in just about every location I know about and some
> > that I don't. The
then it goes on to give a few answer links that look
> promising.
I'd look at update-alternatives, but...
This one is system wide, and barring some systemd shenanigans, it
should be the only one. Note that there are two browser entries there:
www-browser and x-www-browser (from m
182/xfce4-terminal-change-default-browser
https://forum.puppylinux.com/viewtopic.php?t=6899
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=191547
I hope one of these helps.
On 12/02/2025 17:23, Nicolas George wrote:
If you want a Linux way to solve the issue: first, read the
documentation of xfce-terminal to see how it decides which web browser
to run;
I would not be surprised if it is not explicitly documented. Perhaps
XFCE has a configuration menu. Most GUI
one user and not for another in a
> > browser.
>
> How? If I install epiphany using alt then it sets itself as the
> default browser in just about every location I know about and some
> that I don't. These settings apply to all users on the system.
Installing a browser is v
debian-u...@howorth.org.uk wrote:
> Chris Green wrote:
> > debian-u...@howorth.org.uk wrote:
> > > Chris Green wrote:
> > > > songbird wrote:
> > > > > Chris Green wrote:
> > > > > ...
> > > > > > It would
a way, but it would be less efficient than installing
Windows or Macos instead of Linux.
If you want a Linux way to solve the issue: first, read the
documentation of xfce-terminal to see how it decides which web browser
to run; then read the documentation of that mechanism to see how to
configure it.
Regards,
--
Nicolas George
Anssi Saari wrote:
> Chris Green writes:
>
> > Installing epiphany just added it as a choice but left vivaldi as the
> > configured browser, but still epiphany grabbed everything.
>
> Have you considered you may get better information if you actually
> define this &q
Chris Green writes:
> Installing epiphany just added it as a choice but left vivaldi as the
> configured browser, but still epiphany grabbed everything.
Have you considered you may get better information if you actually
define this "everything"? For me it's the small handfu
hen, it seems that it is alternatives.
What does
update-alternatives --display x-www-browser
say?
Cheers
--
t
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Chris Green wrote:
> debian-u...@howorth.org.uk wrote:
> > Chris Green wrote:
> > > songbird wrote:
> > > > Chris Green wrote:
> > > > ...
> > > > > It would be much easier if I could simply tell epiphany (or
> > &
wrote:
> > > > > Chris Green wrote:
> > > > > ...
> > > > > > It would be much easier if I could simply tell epiphany (or
> > > > > > another browser) **not** to try and become the default for
> > > > > > everything, rather
On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 08:21:02PM +, Chris Green wrote:
> debian-u...@howorth.org.uk wrote:
> > Chris Green wrote:
> > > songbird wrote:
> > > > Chris Green wrote:
> > > > ...
> > > > > It would be much easier if I could simply te
debian-u...@howorth.org.uk wrote:
> Chris Green wrote:
> > songbird wrote:
> > > Chris Green wrote:
> > > ...
> > > > It would be much easier if I could simply tell epiphany (or
> > > > another browser) **not** to try and become the default fo
1 - 100 of 2514 matches
Mail list logo
