Re: autofs for /home: exclude admin users

2024-04-01 Thread Felix Natter
hallo Darac, Darac Marjal writes: > On 01/04/2024 07:55, Felix Natter wrote: > > hello debian-users, > > I configured autofs for /home: > > * -fstype=nfs,rw,soft,bg,intr SERVER:/share/& > > Just to point out that this is "/share", not "/home".

Re: autofs for /home: exclude admin users

2024-04-01 Thread Darac Marjal
On 01/04/2024 07:55, Felix Natter wrote: hello debian-users, I configured autofs for /home: * -fstype=nfs,rw,soft,bg,intr SERVER:/share/& Just to point out that this is "/share", not "/home". You might have set user's home directories to be /share/, but you'

autofs for /home: exclude admin users

2024-03-31 Thread Felix Natter
hello debian-users, I configured autofs for /home: * -fstype=nfs,rw,soft,bg,intr SERVER:/share/& But now the login as "admin" does not work any more, since it tries to mount SERVER:/share/admin -> Is it possible to exclude a user from automounting? The workaround [1] I us

Re: autofs config [SOLVED]

2017-01-10 Thread Reco
Hi. On Tue, 10 Jan 2017 19:32:54 -0500 Harry Putnam wrote: > Reco writes: > > [...] > > >> ls /prj/d0 or ls /prj/dv both fail. However another share on that > >> same setup on the solaris host `gv' and 2x comes up as expected. > > > > You lost me here. If 'd0' and 'dv' are share name

Re: autofs config

2017-01-10 Thread Harry Putnam
e shares (Solaris host 2x) they are share names. [...] >> So ls /prj/gv after a pause shows /prj/gv/merb/ > > Therefore 'gv' is a host name and 'merb' is a share on that host. > Assuming you're using stock auto.net. > Debug autofs output confirms this

Re: autofs config

2017-01-10 Thread Reco
ls /prj/gv after a pause shows /prj/gv/merb/ Therefore 'gv' is a host name and 'merb' is a share on that host. Assuming you're using stock auto.net. Debug autofs output confirms this: update_offset_entry: parse(sun): updated multi-mount offset /merb -> -fstype=nfs4,soft,intr,nodev,nosuid,async gv:/merb Reco

Re: autofs config

2017-01-10 Thread Harry Putnam
. At least these are defaults starting with > Solaris 10. > > The thing that's broken here is autofs, not NFS implementation. I finally got around to trying the auto.net file you mentioned in your first reply in this thread. I still cannot read it and understand what it does but I

Re: autofs config

2017-01-10 Thread Reco
other things you mentioned. > > The `-hosts' line in auto.master has been commented out from the start. > > Must be shipped with autofs that way, as I did not do it. > > So then apparently it is not #828217 at the bottom of this. Or at > least not because of `net

Re: autofs config

2017-01-10 Thread Harry Putnam
m the start. Must be shipped with autofs that way, as I did not do it. So then apparently it is not #828217 at the bottom of this. Or at least not because of `net -hosts' being in play.

Re: autofs config

2017-01-10 Thread Reco
^^^ > addr=192.168.1.42 0 0 Ok, that simplifies things somewhat. So it's tcp-over-ipv4 type of NFS4 without any security worth mentioning. > > 3) Stop autofs, start it like this: > > > > /usr/sbin/automount -fd > > > > Mount a filesystem. Watch

Re: autofs config

2017-01-09 Thread Harry Putnam
Reco writes: [...] > Won't it be fun otherwise? > > The good thing is - autofs is working as intended. > The bad thing is - mount is failing. , | NOTE: I've rearranged your post to put the next question and answer at | the bottom of this reply ` [...] mis

Re: autofs config

2017-01-09 Thread Reco
Hi. On Mon, 09 Jan 2017 08:14:51 -0500 Harry Putnam wrote: > Reco wrote: > > Note that it be simplified to: > > > > * --fstype=nfs4,rw,soft,intr191.168.1.42:/projects/& > > I created /etc/auto.nfs and tried that forumulation. Restarted > autofs

Re: autofs config

2017-01-09 Thread Harry Putnam
Reco writes: [...] > And it gone haywire from here. Hehe... thats a good description... > Autofs has a concept of master map ( auto.master(5) ) which can contain > lines referring to either direct or indirect maps ( autofs(5) ). > > /etc/auto.master.d is intended for exten

Re: autofs config

2017-01-08 Thread Sven Hartge
Reco wrote: > [1] http://blog.tomecek.net/post/automount-with-systemd/ Note: this only works with static mounts. If you want to use any kind of automatic mapping you can't do this with systemd. Grüße, S° -- Sigmentation fault. Core dumped.

Re: autofs config

2017-01-08 Thread Reco
Hi. On Sun, 08 Jan 2017 13:37:32 -0500 Harry Putnam wrote: > I've edited /etc/auto.master by adding this line: > > /projects-nfs /etc/auto.master.d/prj-nfs.autofs --timeout=180 And it gone haywire from here. Autofs has a concept of master map ( auto.master(

autofs config

2017-01-08 Thread Harry Putnam
, | NOTE: A similar post was accidently posted to gentoo list but was | intended to be posted here ` Setup: Running Debian jessie-stable I've never used autofs and am trying to get it setup. Following the debian wiki and an Ubuntu howto. Also this site: http://www.linuxtech

autofs does not show all iso content.

2015-12-18 Thread Mimiko
Hello. I've setup autofs in Debian 7 to automount iso's when it is accessed via samba. At start it was working fine. I've setup --timeout=5. But as number of iso's grew, autofs started just to create the folders for the corresponding iso's while no content was i

Re: zfs, autofs dependencies

2015-04-04 Thread David Wright
Quoting Mimiko (vbv...@gmail.com): > On 03.04.2015 23:21, David Wright wrote: > >I'm as yet unconvinced. I can't see in your original posting where > >you've told ZFS how to manage mounting your volumes. > > > In my original post I've wrote: > > zfs create -V 4T zfspool/backup > zfs create -V 1T

Re: zfs, autofs dependencies

2015-04-04 Thread Mimiko
On 03.04.2015 23:21, David Wright wrote: Those scripts have logging lines. Have you read their output? Yes, there are logging, But there is no any suspection lines in that log files. Only error is given when it's trying to mount devices so there are: /backup/network - error mounting /backup/o

Re: zfs, autofs dependencies

2015-04-04 Thread Mimiko
On 03.04.2015 23:21, David Wright wrote: I'm as yet unconvinced. I can't see in your original posting where you've told ZFS how to manage mounting your volumes. In my original post I've wrote: zfs create -V 4T zfspool/backup zfs create -V 1T zfspool/network zfs create -V 1T zfspool/op mount

Re: zfs, autofs dependencies

2015-04-03 Thread David Wright
Quoting Mimiko (vbv...@gmail.com): > On 01.04.2015 17:55, Reco wrote: > > No, the problem is related to the Debian indeed. As ZFS is used as an > > LVM here, so you might as well replace those fancy/dev/zvol/* with > > something conventional, and the problem will still remain. I'm as yet unconvinc

Re: zfs, autofs dependencies

2015-04-03 Thread Mimiko
On 01.04.2015 17:55, Reco wrote: > No, the problem is related to the Debian indeed. As ZFS is used as an > LVM here, so you might as well replace those fancy/dev/zvol/* with > something conventional, and the problem will still remain. > > Consider the following /etc/fstab. > > /dev/sda1 /backup

Re: zfs, autofs dependencies

2015-04-01 Thread Reco
Hi. On Wed, 1 Apr 2015 10:33:29 -0400 Dan Ritter wrote: > On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 02:15:32PM +0300, Mimiko wrote: > > The question is, is there are method better to overcome this > > problem? How to specify mount order? How to enable zfs import early? > I suspect you will need to talk to the

Re: zfs, autofs dependencies

2015-04-01 Thread Dan Ritter
nt() can mount other disks. > > The question is, is there are method better to overcome this > problem? How to specify mount order? How to enable zfs import early? > > Second problem arises for autofs. I've setup it, so in /backup are > some iso files. But when autofs st

zfs, autofs dependencies

2015-04-01 Thread Mimiko
d it. First time do_mount() mounts only /backup, second time do_mount() can mount other disks. The question is, is there are method better to overcome this problem? How to specify mount order? How to enable zfs import early? Second problem arises for autofs. I've setup it, so in /backup a

Re: Anyone having troubles with autofs and NTFS formatted drives on Jessie/sid ?

2014-11-16 Thread Thierry Rascle
Hi, Thank you very much for your help. Replacing ikki-fstype=ntfs,gid=46,dmask=002,fmask=113 :/dev/ikki with ikki-fstype=fuse,gid=46,dmask=002,fmask=113 :ntfs-3g#/dev/ikki solved the problem. ntfs-3g was already installed on my system. Regards. Thierry On Sun, 16 Nov 2

Re: Anyone having troubles with autofs and NTFS formatted drives on Jessie/sid ?

2014-11-16 Thread Reco
Hi. On Sun, 16 Nov 2014 12:42:31 +0100 Thierry Rascle wrote: > The automounting used to work for all of the entries, but now does not > for the three entries with "-fstype=ntfs". Install ntfs-3g, replace -fstype=ntfs,gid=46,dmask=002,fmask=113 :/dev/ikki jacala with -fstype=fuse,gid=46,

Anyone having troubles with autofs and NTFS formatted drives on Jessie/sid ?

2014-11-16 Thread Thierry Rascle
Hi list, I'm using sid, with wmii as my only window manager and desktop environment. I'm using autofs for automounting my external devices: - CD/DVD drives, - USB sticks formatted as FAT or NTFS, - external hard disk drives formatted has EXT4 or NTFS. or NTFS), CD-ROM drives, ext

Squeeze/Wheezy: autofs-ldap -> syntax error in map near [ /nethome/files/disc01 ]

2013-09-26 Thread Denny Fuchs
hi, I'm trying to get autofs with LDAP working. We have two file servers (old/new) and several LDAP entries, like described in: /usr/share/doc/autofs-ldap/examples/ldap-automount-rfc2307-bis-auto.direct: === # extended LDIF # # LDAPv3 # base with scope su

Re: autofs to mount nfs exports

2013-02-06 Thread Bob Proulx
Soul Makossa wrote: > I'm trying to get the following to work on Debian Squeeze 6.6 Although I have previously used the autofs automounter quite a bit now time has passed and my memory has grown vague. But seeing no one else with an answer I will respond hoping to be helpful. > /etc/

Exporting an autofs-mounted filesystem via NFS

2012-12-19 Thread Alessandro Ghedini
Hi, I've been trying to export an autofs-mounted filesystem via NFS, but I can't get it to work. Basically when I try to mount such export on the client, mount.nfs gets stuck and never completes. Autofs seems to work correctly. because after starting the daemon on the server and say, d

Re: Autofs and NFS, user mapping

2012-08-03 Thread Bob Proulx
Tom H wrote: > Bob Proulx wrote: > > A pet peeve of mine is "share". Windows has "shares". Unix has > > "filesystems". NFS is itself a Network File System. So saying > > Network File System Share feels like saying a Personal PIN > > Number. It would make me happier if people just referred to > > th

Re: Autofs and NFS, user mapping

2012-08-03 Thread Tom H
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 11:20 PM, Bob Proulx wrote: > T o n g wrote: >> Bob Proulx wrote: >>> T o n g wrote: >>>> >>>> My Autofs auto-mounted NFS share looks like this: > > A pet peeve of mine is "share". Windows has "shares"

Re: Autofs and NFS, user mapping

2012-08-03 Thread Tom H
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 12:38 AM, T o n g wrote: > On Tue, 31 Jul 2012 10:44:14 -0400, Tom H wrote: >> >> 1) Does the mount work if you export with nfsv3 specified? > > Hmm... that might be the way. How can I do that? > > I remember that I have to specify nfsv3 on the client/nfsmount side to > get

Re: Autofs and NFS, user mapping

2012-08-01 Thread T o n g
On Tue, 31 Jul 2012 10:44:14 -0400, Tom H wrote: > 1) Does the mount work if you export with nfsv3 specified? Hmm... that might be the way. How can I do that? I remember that I have to specify nfsv3 on the client/nfsmount side to get the straight-mount work for my uid and gid. Thanks -- Ton

Re: Autofs and NFS, user mapping

2012-07-31 Thread Bob Proulx
T o n g wrote: > Bob Proulx wrote: > > T o n g wrote: > >> My Autofs auto-mounted NFS share looks like this: A pet peeve of mine is "share". Windows has "shares". Unix has "filesystems". NFS is itself a Network File System. So saying Network Fi

Re: Autofs and NFS, user mapping

2012-07-31 Thread Tom H
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 2:37 PM, T o n g wrote: > > My Autofs auto-mounted NFS share looks like this: > > drwxr-xr-x 9 4294967294 4294967294 45056 2011-04-12 09:47 tmp/ > > I.e., the user id and group id are all mapped wrong. > > I have identical user ids and group

Re: Autofs and NFS, user mapping

2012-07-30 Thread T o n g
On Sun, 29 Jul 2012 18:06:31 -0600, Bob Proulx wrote: > T o n g wrote: >> My Autofs auto-mounted NFS share looks like this: >> >> drwxr-xr-x 9 4294967294 4294967294 45056 2011-04-12 09:47 tmp/ >> >> I.e., the user id and group id are all mapped wrong. >

Re: Autofs and NFS, user mapping

2012-07-29 Thread Bob Proulx
T o n g wrote: > My Autofs auto-mounted NFS share looks like this: > > drwxr-xr-x 9 4294967294 4294967294 45056 2011-04-12 09:47 tmp/ > > I.e., the user id and group id are all mapped wrong. > > I have identical user ids and groups between my NFS sharing stations, so &

Autofs and NFS, user mapping

2012-07-29 Thread T o n g
Hi, My Autofs auto-mounted NFS share looks like this: drwxr-xr-x 9 4294967294 4294967294 45056 2011-04-12 09:47 tmp/ I.e., the user id and group id are all mapped wrong. I have identical user ids and groups between my NFS sharing stations, so previously, prior to using Autofs I just use

sshfs via autofs permissions problem

2012-05-07 Thread Bastien Rocheron
sshfs via autofs. Right now it seems to be working but actually I must have done something wrong because if I login with www-data on server2 and go to the user media directory which is owned by www-data I get a permission denied when I try to write. This is my /etc/auto.master: /home/server2/user_

Re: How to report a bug related to multiple packages (insserv, autofs, backuppc)

2012-03-08 Thread Andrei POPESCU
On Mi, 07 mar 12, 13:30:12, Sylvain wrote: > 2012/3/7 Camaleón : > > Anyway, I would have expected some kind of warning at the logs coming > > from backuppc indicating a problem for accessing to the configured mount > > point which was not available at that time and thus failing. > > Me too, and I

Re: How to report a bug related to multiple packages (insserv, autofs, backuppc)

2012-03-07 Thread Camaleón
On Wed, 07 Mar 2012 13:30:12 +0100, Sylvain wrote: > 2012/3/7 Camaleón : >> Anyway, I would have expected some kind of warning at the logs coming >> from backuppc indicating a problem for accessing to the configured >> mount point which was not available at that time and thus failing. > > Me too,

Re: How to report a bug related to multiple packages (insserv, autofs, backuppc)

2012-03-07 Thread Sylvain
2012/3/7 Camaleón : > Anyway, I would have expected some kind of warning at the logs coming > from backuppc indicating a problem for accessing to the configured mount > point which was not available at that time and thus failing. Me too, and I didn't understand why I wasn't getting anything in the

Re: How to report a bug related to multiple packages (insserv, autofs, backuppc)

2012-03-07 Thread Camaleón
; with "service backuppc status". > > Yes, the /removable/sbackup/backuppc directory is empty since autofs has > not started yet and thus has not created the directory yet. Okay, then the service is started but fails. >> Mmm, I would open a bug against the package it sel

Re: How to report a bug related to multiple packages (insserv, autofs, backuppc)

2012-03-07 Thread Tom H
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 2:46 AM, Sylvain wrote: > 2012/3/6 Tom H : >> >> AFAICT, a bug should be filed against backuppc to change its init >> script to have "$remote_fs" (or "$all"!) in "Required-Start" or >> "autofs" in "

Re: How to report a bug related to multiple packages (insserv, autofs, backuppc)

2012-03-06 Thread Sylvain
2012/3/6 Tom H : > AFAICT, a bug should be filed against backuppc to change its init > script to have "$remote_fs" (or "$all"!) in "Required-Start" or > "autofs" in "Should-Start". autofs doesn't seem to be included in $remote_fs

Re: How to report a bug related to multiple packages (insserv, autofs, backuppc)

2012-03-06 Thread Camaleón
a service is not started by default cannot be considered a bug or error "per se". > Note that my /var/lib/backuppc directory points to > /removable/sbackup/backuppc which is my external USB HDD mounted by > autofs, which is in /etc/rc*.d/S21autofs (backuppc is > /etc/rc*.d/S

Re: How to report a bug related to multiple packages (insserv, autofs, backuppc)

2012-03-06 Thread Tom H
/etc/init.d/backuppc start, it works just fine. There > are also startup scripts in /etc/rc*.d/. My backuppc version is > 3.2.1-2 (I'm running a testing install). > > Note that my /var/lib/backuppc directory points to > /removable/sbackup/backuppc which is my external USB HDD mou

Re: How to report a bug related to multiple packages (insserv, autofs, backuppc)

2012-03-06 Thread Keith McKenzie
t, it works just fine. There are also startup scripts in /etc/rc*.d/. My backuppc version is 3.2.1-2 (I'm running a testing install). Note that my /var/lib/backuppc directory points to /removable/sbackup/backuppc which is my external USB HDD mounted by autofs, which is in /etc/rc*.d/S21autofs

How to report a bug related to multiple packages (insserv, autofs, backuppc)

2012-03-06 Thread Sylvain
also startup scripts in /etc/rc*.d/. My backuppc version is 3.2.1-2 (I'm running a testing install). Note that my /var/lib/backuppc directory points to /removable/sbackup/backuppc which is my external USB HDD mounted by autofs, which is in /etc/rc*.d/S21autofs (backuppc is /etc/rc*.d/S21backup

Re: autofs interest ?

2011-09-27 Thread Bob Proulx
Stephane Durieux wrote: > A simple question: > from a server point of view does autofs costs less (cpu, io, memory) > than "traditionnal" nfs ? AutoFS is simply a automated mount service for NFS. AutoFS doesn't replace NFS. The autofs simply gets nfs going by mounting r

autofs interest ?

2011-09-27 Thread Stephane Durieux
Hello, A simple question: from a server point of view does autofs costs less (cpu, io, memory) than "traditionnal" nfs ? From a client point of view I think the fact to unmount directories frees ressources? But does a moint point consumes so much (memory ?) And concerning t

shutdown problem in combination with autofs/NFS

2011-08-10 Thread rog7993
e dead and can be used for debugging. But from an open ssh session I can restart autofs and then the shutdown goes further. First I tried to remove /usr/local/bin from the PATH variable in /etc/profiles. But this doesn't not help, because a lot of init scripts define theire own PATH variabl

Re: Problems with autofs

2011-04-15 Thread Javier Vasquez
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Aniruddha wrote: > On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 11:07 PM, Klistvud wrote: >> Dne, 12. 04. 2011 20:52:08 je Aniruddha napisal(a): > >>> I  tried with and without quotes, with the label and formatting the >>> drive as ext3.  I restarte

Re: Problems with autofs

2011-04-15 Thread Aniruddha
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 11:07 PM, Klistvud wrote: > Dne, 12. 04. 2011 20:52:08 je Aniruddha napisal(a): >> I  tried with and without quotes, with the label and formatting the >> drive as ext3.  I restarted autofs. None of these worked. When I cd to >>  /var/autofs/removable

Re: Problems with autofs

2011-04-12 Thread Klistvud
ate vfat... I tried with and without quotes, with the label and formatting the drive as ext3. I restarted autofs. None of these worked. When I cd to /var/autofs/removable it's empty. It's supposed to be empty. After you cd to it, try issuing: ls usb Or, even better, use the --ghost op

Re: Problems with autofs

2011-04-12 Thread Aniruddha
the label and formatting the drive as ext3. I restarted autofs. None of these worked. When I cd to /var/autofs/removable it's empty. My current settings: # cat /etc/auto.master /var/autofs/removable /etc/auto.removable --timeout=2,sync,nodev,nosuid # cat /etc/auto.removable usb

Re: Problems with autofs

2011-04-12 Thread Klistvud
Dne, 12. 04. 2011 17:39:35 je Aniruddha napisal(a): I try to automagically mount an usb drive following the autofs instructions in the wiki ( http://wiki.debian.org/AutoFs ). For some reason it just doesn't work. I can't find any relevant error message in messages or syslog. Any i

Problems with autofs

2011-04-12 Thread Aniruddha
I try to automagically mount an usb drive following the autofs instructions in the wiki ( http://wiki.debian.org/AutoFs ). For some reason it just doesn't work. I can't find any relevant error message in messages or syslog. Any ideas where I can begin to troubleshoot? Thanks! #

Re: Autofs not respecting uid in auto.removable

2011-03-05 Thread Camaleón
On Sat, 05 Mar 2011 19:28:39 +0530, L V Gandhi wrote: > On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 5:21 PM, Camaleón wrote: >> > Any solutions to mount with ownership of user? >> >> As per "man 5 autofs": >> >> (...) >> >> If you use the automounter for a f

Re: Autofs not respecting uid in auto.removable

2011-03-05 Thread L V Gandhi
gt; UUID=84C0-F18B > > (...) > > > Any solutions to mount with ownership of user? > > As per "man 5 autofs": > > (...) > > If you use the automounter for a filesystem without access permissions > (like vfat), users usually can't write on such a f

Re: Autofs not respecting uid in auto.removable

2011-03-05 Thread Camaleón
fat,rw,uid=1000,umask=022,posix,shortname=winnt > UUID=84C0-F18B (...) > Any solutions to mount with ownership of user? As per "man 5 autofs": (...) If you use the automounter for a filesystem without access permissions (like vfat), users usually can't write on such a files

Autofs not respecting uid in auto.removable

2011-03-04 Thread L V Gandhi
,umask=022,posix,shortname=winnt UUID=84C0-F18B I tried both /dev/ehd and UUID methods. /var/autofs/removable/ehd is mounted as root.root. I tried chown as sudo. There also I failed. lvgandhi@lvgvaio:~$ sudo chown lvgandhi /var/autofs/removable/ehd chown: changing ownership of `/var/autofs/removable

Re: Monitoring AutoFS in SNMP

2010-12-09 Thread Brian
--- On Tue, 3/23/10, Brian wrote: > From: Brian > Subject: Monitoring AutoFS in SNMP > To: "Debian User" > Date: Tuesday, March 23, 2010, 10:00 AM > I am trying to find a MIB to monitor > AutoFS but everything I find is tied to the current pid > AutoFS i

RE: Monitoring AutoFS in SNMP

2010-03-24 Thread Brian
> If it spawns a new process each time it mounts a new > partition, would it > not have a parent process that would at least be constant > on the server? > If that's the case, maybe you should just monitor the > parent process. > Otherwise, it would make sense to monitor a partition > instead of

RE: Monitoring AutoFS in SNMP

2010-03-23 Thread James Wu
> We are using autofs to mount cdrom and dvd iso images. There > are nearly 100 of them. Too many to really monitor > individually so we wanted to just monitor autofs. It looks > to me like each auto.* file in /etc spawns it's own process > and pid. And the pid c

RE: Monitoring AutoFS in SNMP

2010-03-23 Thread Brian
> > I am trying to find a MIB to monitor AutoFS but > everything I > > find is tied to the current pid AutoFS is running > under which > > of course changes each time it is restarted making it > useless > > as a monitoring metric. > > I'm not famil

Re: Monitoring AutoFS in SNMP

2010-03-23 Thread Brian
> > I am trying to find a MIB to monitor AutoFS but > everything I find > > is tied to the current pid AutoFS is running under > which of > > course changes each time it is restarted making it > useless as a > > monitoring metric. > > ???  Isn't that a

RE: Monitoring AutoFS in SNMP

2010-03-23 Thread James Wu
> I am trying to find a MIB to monitor AutoFS but everything I > find is tied to the current pid AutoFS is running under which > of course changes each time it is restarted making it useless > as a monitoring metric. I'm not familiar with autofs but if you do a

Re: Monitoring AutoFS in SNMP

2010-03-23 Thread Ron Johnson
On 2010-03-23 09:00, Brian wrote: I am trying to find a MIB to monitor AutoFS but everything I find is tied to the current pid AutoFS is running under which of > course changes each time it is restarted making it useless as a > monitoring metric. ??? Isn't that a *good* thing?

Monitoring AutoFS in SNMP

2010-03-23 Thread Brian
I am trying to find a MIB to monitor AutoFS but everything I find is tied to the current pid AutoFS is running under which of course changes each time it is restarted making it useless as a monitoring metric. Has anyone setup SNMP to monitor AutoFS or a similar type of daemon on a Debain

Re: autofs stopped working on testing

2010-01-10 Thread Mike Castle
Solved! On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 9:38 AM, Mike Castle wrote: > Oh ... I just remembered... / on the ldap server was full, and I ended > up nuking a lot of stuff on that partition.  I wonder if I got overly > zealous and deleted something important.  I hope not. Not sure if I deleted too much, or

autofs stopped working on testing

2010-01-10 Thread Mike Castle
Has anyone else noticed that autofs has stopped working on testing? I'm really just digging into the debugging process, so may not have read all of the necessary docs quite yet. I've had autofs working for /home and a /share hierarchy for quite some time now, and haven't had to

Re: usb automount disabled by installing/removing autofs

2009-04-25 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 12.04.09 01:34, Stephen Guzik wrote: > Automounting used to work fine with gnome in squeeze. Then I > installed and removed autofs and now it seems to be disabled. Does > anyone know how to recover the original behaviour? automount mounts filesystems automatically when someone&#x

usb automount disabled by installing/removing autofs

2009-04-12 Thread Stephen Guzik
Hi, Automounting used to work fine with gnome in squeeze. Then I installed and removed autofs and now it seems to be disabled. Does anyone know how to recover the original behaviour? Thanks, Stephen

naive question: autofs with negative niceness

2008-05-01 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Hello List, on my (little) cluster, I used autofs to mount the `/home' directory on the worker nodes: is it possible (and recommended) to give a negative niceness to automount ? what is the Debian to do so ? Thanks in advance, Jerome -- Jerome BENOIT jgmbenoit_at_mailsnare_dot_net

Re: question concerning autofs, usbfs and vfat

2008-02-05 Thread Bob McGowan
Robert Cates wrote: Hi, and thanks for your help! I have not made any changes to the default configuration for autofs. The truth is, I'm not even sure I need it installed. I thought it sounded like a nice feature, but I haven't done anything with it yet. This machine is a

RE: question concerning autofs, usbfs and vfat

2008-02-05 Thread Robert Cates
Hi, and thanks for your help! I have not made any changes to the default configuration for autofs. The truth is, I'm not even sure I need it installed. I thought it sounded like a nice feature, but I haven't done anything with it yet. This machine is a server, so therefore no KDE or

Re: question concerning autofs, usbfs and vfat

2008-02-04 Thread Bob McGowan
Robert Cates wrote: Hi all, to get right straight to my question – i was wanting to know which is the proper file system to choose for a (normal) USB 2.0 data/flash stick – autofs, usbfs or maybe vfat? The stick is of course usable under Windows as well as linux (from kernel 2.4.x). I

question concerning autofs, usbfs and vfat

2008-02-04 Thread Robert Cates
Hi all, to get right straight to my question - i was wanting to know which is the proper file system to choose for a (normal) USB 2.0 data/flash stick - autofs, usbfs or maybe vfat? The stick is of course usable under Windows as well as linux (from kernel 2.4.x). I believe I need to set

Re: Autofs configuration

2008-01-29 Thread Bob McGowan
Bruno Cochofel wrote: Hi, I have this config of autofs: # auto.master /var/autofs/removable /etc/auto.removable --timeout=2 /var/autofs/nfs /etc/auto.misc --timeout=60 # auto.removable # devices cdrom -fstype=iso9660,ro,sync,nodev,nosuid

Autofs configuration

2008-01-27 Thread Bruno Cochofel
Hi, I have this config of autofs: # auto.master /var/autofs/removable /etc/auto.removable --timeout=2 /var/autofs/nfs /etc/auto.misc --timeout=60 # auto.removable # devices cdrom -fstype=iso9660,ro,sync,nodev,nosuid :/dev/cdrom floppy -fstype=auto

Re: autofs+ldap (without /etc/auto.master)

2007-05-11 Thread Jan Christoph Nordholz
Hi Martin, the initscript is unable to find your auto.master map. Unless you've modified the initscript, it expects an object of class automountMap with ou=auto.master _below_ LDAPBASE. Have a look at ] /usr/share/doc/autofs-ldap/README.ldap_master for an example. Regards, Jan signatur

Re: autofs+ldap (without /etc/auto.master)

2007-05-11 Thread Roberto C . Sánchez
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 06:16:08PM +0200, Martin Marcher wrote: > Hello, > > i'm trying to get autofs pull everything from ldap (even auto.master) > > Now the situation is the following having an auto.master as below and > nsswitch.conf with !automount: files" pull

autofs+ldap (without /etc/auto.master)

2007-05-10 Thread Martin Marcher
Hello, i'm trying to get autofs pull everything from ldap (even auto.master) Now the situation is the following having an auto.master as below and nsswitch.conf with !automount: files" pulls the map from ldap (because auto.master says to...), but nsswitch.conf with "automount: l

Re: autofs and /home/home

2007-02-18 Thread Jan C. Nordholz
Hi, > I can't seem to figure out a *very* simple automount configuration > (I've done this before, but it was over two years ago :-( ). > > After much work (and not enough understanding!), I have succeed in > automounting a remote /home directory on a loc

Re: autofs and /home/home

2007-02-18 Thread Mankuthimma
Hi, In your config, /etc/auto.master: /home /etc/auto.misc --timeout 60 This should be fine ... /etc/auto.misc: home-fstype=nfs,hard,intr 1.2.3.4:/home But, this line should be * -fstype=nfs,hard,intr 1.2.3.4:/home/& I

Re: autofs and /home/home

2007-02-18 Thread Michael Pobega
onfig: Debian/etch > > I can't seem to figure out a *very* simple automount configuration > (I've done this before, but it was over two years ago :-( ). > > After much work (and not enough understanding!), I have succeed in > automounting a remote /home directory on a lo

autofs and /home/home

2007-02-18 Thread Kenneth Jacker
Config: Debian/etch I can't seem to figure out a *very* simple automount configuration (I've done this before, but it was over two years ago :-( ). After much work (and not enough understanding!), I have succeed in automounting a remote /home directory on a local client usi

SOLVED: Autofs behaviour: how to show mountable resources in advance

2006-08-28 Thread Joao Carlos de Lima Roscoe
Dieter Roels wrote: Joao Carlos de Lima Roscoe wrote: I have a bunch of autofs mounts in my etch box, whose doesn't show in my filesystem tree until I explicitly use them, with a cd command, for instance (ok, this is the intend autofs behaviour); My Solaris 9 boxes show a diff

Re: Autofs behaviour: how to show mountable resources in advance

2006-08-28 Thread Dieter Roels
Joao Carlos de Lima Roscoe wrote: I have a bunch of autofs mounts in my etch box, whose doesn't show in my filesystem tree until I explicitly use them, with a cd command, for instance (ok, this is the intend autofs behaviour); My Solaris 9 boxes show a different behaviour: autofs resourc

Autofs behaviour: how to show mountable resources in advance

2006-08-28 Thread Joao Carlos de Lima Roscoe
I have a bunch of autofs mounts in my etch box, whose doesn't show in my filesystem tree until I explicitly use them, with a cd command, for instance (ok, this is the intend autofs behaviour); My Solaris 9 boxes show a different behaviour: autofs resources do show in the filesystem tree

Re: autofs only mounting one fs at a time.

2006-07-10 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 08.07.06 08:48, wehn wrote: > Ah, updating to unstable seems to have resolved the- only one device at > a time problems. > > And the multiple partition thing is working now that I found out > "-fstype=auto,sync,rw,uid=1000,gid=100" doesn't play nicely with my 2nd > ext3 partition (1st is vfat

Re: autofs only mounting one fs at a time.

2006-07-07 Thread wehn
ecognized mount option "uid=1000" or missing value EXT3-fs: Unrecognized mount option "gid=100" or missing value This could take some tweaking to get right. wehn wrote: >On 06.07.06 13:41, wehn wrote: >> I set up autofs for automounting with help of: >> http

Re: autofs only mounting one fs at a time.

2006-07-07 Thread wehn
>On 06.07.06 13:41, wehn wrote: >> I set up autofs for automounting with help of: >> http://greenfly.net/tips/autofs.html >> >> But I can only mount the 1st parition of the first device I insert. >>Does anyone know what is wrong? > >the idea of using

Re: autofs only mounting one fs at a time.

2006-07-07 Thread Andrew Sackville-West
On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 02:53:09PM +1000, wehn wrote: > Tony Heal wrote: > >Did you try duplicating the line in auto.removable with a second mount > >point? > > > > Yes. Here's my auto.removable: > > cdrom -fstype=iso9660,ro,sync,nodev,nosuid:/dev/cdrom > floppy -fstype=auto,sync,n

Re: autofs only mounting one fs at a time.

2006-07-06 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 06.07.06 13:41, wehn wrote: > I set up autofs for automounting with help of: > http://greenfly.net/tips/autofs.html > > But I can only mount the 1st parition of the first device I insert. Does > anyone know what is wrong? the idea of using autofs for this purpose :) autofs

Re: autofs only mounting one fs at a time.

2006-07-05 Thread wehn
Tony Heal wrote: Did you try duplicating the line in auto.removable with a second mount point? Yes. Here's my auto.removable: cdrom -fstype=iso9660,ro,sync,nodev,nosuid:/dev/cdrom floppy -fstype=auto,sync,nodev,nosuid :/dev/fd0 sda1 -fstype=auto,sync,rw,uid=1000,

RE: autofs only mounting one fs at a time.

2006-07-05 Thread Tony Heal
: autofs only mounting one fs at a time. I set up autofs for automounting with help of: http://greenfly.net/tips/autofs.html But I can only mount the 1st parition of the first device I insert. Does anyone know what is wrong? If I insert a USB drive, it mounts /dev/sda1 and is accessable from

  1   2   3   4   >