cyrus authenication problems

2005-12-21 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I had some problems with authenication on my computer after update (I am running testing). Now authenication works fine, but cyrus authenication doesn't work correctly. If I am tring to test: # testsaslauthd -u vadim -p xx 0: OK "Success." but # imtest -u vadim -w xx localhost S: * OK kutsyy.c

Re: PAM Authenication problems

2005-12-21 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
coping these files from /var/backups to /etc/ fixed the problem. Thanks, PS: I still have no idea what happened, and somehow cyrus authenication is brocken. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: PAM Authenication problems

2005-12-20 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
comparing to backup, /etc/shadow change for a few users (I made the change). /etc/passwd did chance, It is empty. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: PAM Authenication problems

2005-12-20 Thread Bill Marcum
On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 04:57:23PM -0800, Vadim wrote: > I updated my box today morning (I am using testing), and I lost my > authenications. Seems like PAm is not using shadow passwords. My > common-password contains only one live (default): > > password requiredpam_unix.so nul

Authenication problems

2005-12-20 Thread Vadim
I updated my box today morning (I am using testing), and I lost myauthenications.  Seems like PAm is not using shadow passwords.  Mycommon-password contains only one live (default):passwordrequiredpam_unix.so nullok obscure min=4 max=8 md5 Are there any other parameters which co

PAM Authenication problems

2005-12-20 Thread Vadim
I updated my box today morning (I am using testing), and I lost myauthenications. Seems like PAm is not using shadow passwords. Mycommon-password contains only one live (default): password required pam_unix.so nullok obscure min=4 max=8 md5Are there any other parameters which could contribute to