Re: Attaching vs. pastebin for big outputs [was: Re: Installation Size Different - bug ?]

2010-12-02 Thread Lisi
On Tuesday 30 November 2010 12:48:12 Camaleón wrote: > ¹ Sorry, my main language is Spanish and sometimes I write faster than my > mind can go (while I already have finished to write down the message, my > brain is still stuck in thinking the appropiate English translation Would that I still spoke

Re: Attaching vs. pastebin for big outputs [was: Re: Installation Size Different - bug ?]

2010-11-30 Thread Camaleón
On Tue, 30 Nov 2010 09:26:45 +, Lisi wrote: > On Monday 01 November 2010 11:26:40 Camaleón wrote: >> if the user does not have Internet access, embedded those inside the >> e-mail is right > > Camaleón, how does said user send emails if he does not have Internet > access? Bad selection of wo

Re: Attaching vs. pastebin for big outputs [was: Re: Installation Size Different - bug ?]

2010-11-30 Thread Lisi
On Monday 01 November 2010 11:26:40 Camaleón wrote: > if the user does not have Internet access, > embedded those inside the e-mail is right Camaleón, how does said user send emails if he does not have Internet access? Lisi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a

Re: Attaching vs. pastebin for big outputs [was: Re: Installation Size Different - bug ?]

2010-11-01 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
In <20101101103001.gd3...@think.homelan>, Andrei Popescu wrote: >On Du, 31 oct 10, 12:15:22, Camaleón wrote: >> Okay... next time instead of attaching the file to a message, better >> uplaod the output to "www.pastebin.com" or similar service :-) > >Personally, I prefer to have the output attached.

Re: Attaching vs. pastebin for big outputs [was: Re: Installation Size Different - bug ?]

2010-11-01 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
In <20101101125817.gm3...@think.homelan>, Andrei Popescu wrote: >On Lu, 01 nov 10, 12:33:17, Camaleón wrote: >> It could be a Pan/Gmane issue: I see text attachments and images as part >> of the e-mail message (embedded) not as separate code. In fact, Pan does >> not even allow sending attachments

Re: Attaching vs. pastebin for big outputs

2010-11-01 Thread Tyler Smith
Klistvud writes: > > Personally, I would urge every submitter to edit their logs/files and > expurge anything irrelevant. Ideally, they should do enough > troubleshooting as to be finally able to only leave one line, the one > which the bug/problem is located in. Thus, the dilemma of whether

Re: Attaching vs. pastebin for big outputs [was: Re: Installation Size Different - bug ?]

2010-11-01 Thread Ron Johnson
On 11/01/2010 07:58 AM, Andrei Popescu wrote: On Lu, 01 nov 10, 12:33:17, Camaleón wrote: It could be a Pan/Gmane issue: I see text attachments and images as part of the e-mail message (embedded) not as separate code. In fact, Pan does not even allow sending attachments :-( Ah, I understand n

Re: Attaching vs. pastebin for big outputs [was: Re: Installation Size Different - bug ?]

2010-11-01 Thread Camaleón
On Mon, 01 Nov 2010 14:58:17 +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote: > On Lu, 01 nov 10, 12:33:17, Camaleón wrote: >> >> It could be a Pan/Gmane issue: I see text attachments and images as >> part of the e-mail message (embedded) not as separate code. In fact, >> Pan does not even allow sending attachments

Re: Attaching vs. pastebin for big outputs [was: Re: Installation Size Different - bug ?]

2010-11-01 Thread Klistvud
Dne, 01. 11. 2010 12:40:06 je Andrei Popescu napisal(a): On Lu, 01 nov 10, 11:26:40, Camaleón wrote: > > It is specified in Debian mailing list "code of conduct": > > http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/index.en.html#codeofconduct > > *** > Avoid sending large attachments. > *** Without any menti

Re: Attaching vs. pastebin for big outputs [was: Re: Installation Size Different - bug ?]

2010-11-01 Thread Andrei Popescu
On Lu, 01 nov 10, 12:33:17, Camaleón wrote: > > It could be a Pan/Gmane issue: I see text attachments and images as part > of the e-mail message (embedded) not as separate code. In fact, Pan does > not even allow sending attachments :-( Ah, I understand now. Does nntp even support attachments?

Re: Attaching vs. pastebin for big outputs [was: Re: Installation Size Different - bug ?]

2010-11-01 Thread Camaleón
On Mon, 01 Nov 2010 14:24:16 +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote: > On Lu, 01 nov 10, 11:56:55, Camaleón wrote: >> >> Yes, what I meant is that many e-mail clients do not allow forcing a >> non- break line and they wrap the bunch of logs into several lines what >> is hard to interpret. > > What I meant:

Re: Attaching vs. pastebin for big outputs [was: Re: Installation Size Different - bug ?]

2010-11-01 Thread Andrei Popescu
On Lu, 01 nov 10, 11:56:55, Camaleón wrote: > > Yes, what I meant is that many e-mail clients do not allow forcing a non- > break line and they wrap the bunch of logs into several lines what is > hard to interpret. What I meant: Wrapping (or otherwise touching) *attachments* on sending e-mail w

Re: Attaching vs. pastebin for big outputs [was: Re: Installation Size Different - bug ?]

2010-11-01 Thread Camaleón
On Mon, 01 Nov 2010 13:40:06 +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote: > On Lu, 01 nov 10, 11:26:40, Camaleón wrote: >> >> It is specified in Debian mailing list "code of conduct": >> >> http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/index.en.html#codeofconduct >> >> *** >> Avoid sending large attachments. >> *** > >

Re: Attaching vs. pastebin for big outputs [was: Re: Installation Size Different - bug ?]

2010-11-01 Thread Andrei Popescu
On Lu, 01 nov 10, 11:26:40, Camaleón wrote: > > It is specified in Debian mailing list "code of conduct": > > http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/index.en.html#codeofconduct > > *** > Avoid sending large attachments. > *** Without any mention of what "large" means :( > > I wonder, what do othe

Re: Attaching vs. pastebin for big outputs [was: Re: Installation Size Different - bug ?]

2010-11-01 Thread Camaleón
On Mon, 01 Nov 2010 12:30:01 +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote: > On Du, 31 oct 10, 12:15:22, Camaleón wrote: >> >> Okay... next time instead of attaching the file to a message, better >> uplaod the output to "www.pastebin.com" or similar service :-) > > Personally, I prefer to have the output attache

Attaching vs. pastebin for big outputs [was: Re: Installation Size Different - bug ?]

2010-11-01 Thread Andrei Popescu
On Du, 31 oct 10, 12:15:22, Camaleón wrote: > > Okay... next time instead of attaching the file to a message, better > uplaod the output to "www.pastebin.com" or similar service :-) Personally, I prefer to have the output attached, because it is very easy for me to grep and quote as needed. And