On 06/03/2024 08:09, Harald Dunkel wrote:
Hi folks,
the repositories listed on https://www.debian.org/distrib/archive have
been signed using expired keys. Unfortunately this page doesn't deal
with this problem.
Do you think this could be improved?
No, I wouldn't have said so. The packages we
Hi folks,
the repositories listed on https://www.debian.org/distrib/archive have
been signed using expired keys. Unfortunately this page doesn't deal
with this problem.
Do you think this could be improved?
Regards
Harri
On Sun, Dec 17, 2023 at 09:42:19PM -0500, Cindy Sue Causey wrote:
> dpkg-deb: error: failed to read archive
> '/var/cache/apt/archives/dpkg_1.22.1_amd64.deb': Too many levels of
> symbolic links
> dpkg: error: parsing file '/var/lib/dpkg/status' near line 2 package
I ran sudo apt update this morning I received the error message:
>>
>> E: You don't have enough free space in /var/cache/apt/archives/
>>
>> Can I increase the size of the /var partition on the ssd without
>> having to reinstall the system?
>>
>> Thank
On 2023-12-17, Max Nikulin wrote:
> On 16/12/2023 22:46, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
>>
>> I'll add 'sudo apt-get autoclean to' my update bat file.
>
> I have
>
> APT::Keep-Downloaded-Packages "false";
I thought that was the default now for apt. But then he said "sudo apt" in the
OP and "apt-
On 16/12/2023 22:46, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
I'll add 'sudo apt-get autoclean to' my update bat file.
I have
APT::Keep-Downloaded-Packages "false";
in a file inside "/etc/apt/apt.conf.d/". However I use apt-cacher-ng. In
you case this settings may be excessively aggressive.
Charles Curley writes:
> Does anybody read signatures any more?
I certainly don't.
On Sat, 16 Dec 2023 20:30:27 +0100
wrote:
> > I'll add 'sudo apt-get autoclean to' my update bat file.
>
> Bat? 🦇
Yeah, bat file. That's what one uses to smooth the body putty on one's
custom batmobile.
--
Does anybody read signatures any more?
https://charlescurley.com
https://charlescurl
On Sat, Dec 16, 2023 at 10:46:27AM -0500, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
> Many thanks for the replies.
>
> I'll add 'sudo apt-get autoclean to' my update bat file.
Bat? 🦇
Cheers
--
t
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, 16 Dec 2023 10:46:27 -0500
"Stephen P. Molnar" wrote:
> I'll add 'sudo apt-get autoclean to' my update bat file.
Or add it to your crontab.
root@tsalmoth:~# grep clean /etc/cron.d/curley
0 4 18 * * root apt-get -y autoclean
root@tsalmoth:~#
--
Does
x27;t have enough free space in /var/cache/apt/archives/
Can I increase the size of the /var partition on the ssd without
having to reinstall the system?
Thanks in advance.
You can bind mount more space from another partition or create a directory on
another file system and sylmink it to /var/
var etc, and selected the default
sizes of the partitions.
When I ran sudo apt update this morning I received the error message:
E: You don't have enough free space in /var/cache/apt/archives/
Can I increase the size of the /var partition on the ssd without
having to reinstall the system?
Tha
Hello,
On Sat, Dec 16, 2023 at 03:03:38PM +0100, john doe wrote:
> On 12/16/23 14:45, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
> > When I installed the OS I selected the option for separate /var
> > etc, and selected the default sizes of the partitions.
[…]
> > Can I increase the size of the /var partition on t
ation for most
installations.
I make /home/ separate, and the ESP as it must be, but keep the OS itself on one
filesystem.
> When I ran sudo apt update this morning I received the error message:
> E: You don't have enough free space in /var/cache/apt/archives/
> Can I increase the siz
ge:
>
> E: You don't have enough free space in /var/cache/apt/archives/
>
> Can I increase the size of the /var partition on the ssd without
> having to reinstall the system?
>
> Thanks in advance.
Are you doing anything to get rid of unused packages? If not the
ar
x27;t have enough free space in /var/cache/apt/archives/
Can I increase the size of the /var partition on the ssd without having
to reinstall the system?
LVM is one way to avoid this! ;^)
--
John Doe
tion them? Are you using
raw partitions under GPT or DOS partition tables? Are you using LVM?
RAID? Encryption?
> When I ran sudo apt update this morning I received the error message:
>
> E: You don't have enough free space in /var/cache/apt/archives/
>
> Can I increase the size
e/apt/archives/
Can I increase the size of the /var partition on the ssd without having
to reinstall the system?
Thanks in advance.
--
Stephen P. Molnar, Ph.D.
https://insilicochemistry.net
(614)312-7528 (c)
Skype: smolnar1
On 01/24/2019 08:23 AM, David Wright wrote:
On Thu 24 Jan 2019 at 07:25:46 (-0600), Richard Owlett wrote:
On 01/23/2019 08:53 AM, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
Le 23/01/2019 à 15:43, Richard Owlett a écrit :
1. If /var/cache/apt/archives/ has the same or later version
version of a package, will
On Thu 24 Jan 2019 at 07:25:46 (-0600), Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 01/23/2019 08:53 AM, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> > Le 23/01/2019 à 15:43, Richard Owlett a écrit :
> > >
> > > 1. If /var/cache/apt/archives/ has the same or later version
> > > version of
Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 01/23/2019 08:53 AM, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
>> Le 23/01/2019 à 15:43, Richard Owlett a écrit :
>>>
>>> 1. If /var/cache/apt/archives/ has the same or later version version
>>> of a package, will Synaptic and apt-get automatically
On 01/24/2019 07:51 AM, Dan Purgert wrote:
Richard Owlett wrote:
On 01/23/2019 08:53 AM, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
Le 23/01/2019 à 15:43, Richard Owlett a écrit :
1. If /var/cache/apt/archives/ has the same or later version version
of a package, will Synaptic and apt-get automatically use
On 01/23/2019 08:53 AM, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
Le 23/01/2019 à 15:43, Richard Owlett a écrit :
1. If /var/cache/apt/archives/ has the same or later version version
of a package, will Synaptic and apt-get automatically use contents of
/var/cache/apt/archives/ in preference to downloading
On 01/23/2019 08:52 AM, Dan Purgert wrote:
Richard Owlett wrote:
This actually two 'related' questions.
1. If /var/cache/apt/archives/ has the same or later version version of
a package, will Synaptic and apt-get automatically use contents of
/var/cache/apt/archives/ in pre
Richard Owlett wrote:
> This actually two 'related' questions.
>
> 1. If /var/cache/apt/archives/ has the same or later version version of
> a package, will Synaptic and apt-get automatically use contents of
> /var/cache/apt/archives/ in preference to downloading w
Le 23/01/2019 à 15:43, Richard Owlett a écrit :
1. If /var/cache/apt/archives/ has the same or later version version of
a package, will Synaptic and apt-get automatically use contents of
/var/cache/apt/archives/ in preference to downloading whatever is at
location specified by sources.list
This actually two 'related' questions.
1. If /var/cache/apt/archives/ has the same or later version version of
a package, will Synaptic and apt-get automatically use contents of
/var/cache/apt/archives/ in preference to downloading whatever is at
location specified by sources.lis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 12:56:36PM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 03:43:20PM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> >(And while we're painting the shed, I'd go for a /usr/bin/im.d, with a
> >dispatcher script in /usr/bin/im or somet
On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 09:16:41AM +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
Many of these packages (especially old X stuff) “should” migrate to
the command/subcommand way of life.
That might be too much work and result in compatibility problems, but
maybe instead we could move all the X stuff to another p
On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 03:43:20PM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
(And while we're painting the shed, I'd go for a /usr/bin/im.d, with a
dispatcher script in /usr/bin/im or something...)
Software Collections https://www.softwarecollections.org have a pretty
robust way of managing this sort of t
On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 08:56:08AM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 08:52:49AM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > Now "import" is quite another kettle of fish: it's part of the
> > ImageMagick suite (not much to do with X, actually), which has the
> > (questionable) tradition o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 06:06:33PM +0400, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 06/10/17 17:24, Stefan Monnier wrote:
[...]
> We can also add the prefix im- to each executable.
> For instance, the tools coming with the nauty package are prefixed with
Hello,
On 06/10/17 17:24, Stefan Monnier wrote:
>>> Now "import" is quite another kettle of fish: it's part of the
>>> ImageMagick suite (not much to do with X, actually), which has the
>>> (questionable) tradition of calling its things "display", "convert",
>>> "identify", "compare"... or even "c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 09:24:11AM -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> >> Now "import" is quite another kettle of fish: it's part of the
> >> ImageMagick suite (not much to do with X, actually), which has the
> >> (questionable) tradition of calling its thi
>> Now "import" is quite another kettle of fish: it's part of the
>> ImageMagick suite (not much to do with X, actually), which has the
>> (questionable) tradition of calling its things "display", "convert",
>> "identify", "compare"... or even "conjure"). Now ImageMagick is so
>> useful that people
On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 08:52:49AM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> Now "import" is quite another kettle of fish: it's part of the
> ImageMagick suite (not much to do with X, actually), which has the
> (questionable) tradition of calling its things "display", "convert",
> "identify", "compare"... o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 09:16:41AM +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
[...]
> Another one is "import" - should simply NEVER be a program name -
> should be reserved.
>
> man page: import - saves any visible window on an X server and
> outputs it as an im
On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 01:32:47PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Thu, 05 Oct 2017, Kamil Cholewiński wrote:
> > I wrote a short script that calls "apt-file find 'bin/'", filters
> > results to include only stuff from /bin:/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/sbin, and
> > looks for basename clashes. Turns out, i
On Thu, 05 Oct 2017, Kamil Cholewiński wrote:
> I wrote a short script that calls "apt-file find 'bin/'", filters
> results to include only stuff from /bin:/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/sbin, and
> looks for basename clashes. Turns out, in Stretch, there are 97 hits.
> (If you also include /usr/games, 126.)
Hi guys,
I wrote a short script that calls "apt-file find 'bin/'", filters
results to include only stuff from /bin:/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/sbin, and
looks for basename clashes. Turns out, in Stretch, there are 97 hits.
(If you also include /usr/games, 126.)
(Of couse, I'm counting all packages, regar
On Thursday 10 December 2015 17:29:06 David Baron wrote:
> Has this changed in latest-and-greatest from Sid??
>
> I symlink /var/cache/apt off to another drive because the partition the
> install gave me is too small. /var has started filling up again on apt-get.
Seemed to have solved itself.
potentially time to...
autoclean again.
*cough* 4.5GB *cough-cough* =)
Cindy
--
Cindy-Sue Causey
Talking Rock, Pickens County, Georgia, USA
* what's in YOUR archives?! *
Has this changed in latest-and-greatest from Sid??
I symlink /var/cache/apt off to another drive because the partition the
install gave me is too small. /var has started filling up again on apt-get.
On Jo, 27 nov 14, 09:56:37, Scott Ferguson wrote:
> On 27/11/14 01:30, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 11:50 PM, Scott Ferguson
> >> ().
> >
> > Not sure what that's supposed to be a link to,
>
> It's the id of your original post
On Mi, 14 mai 14, 14:23:37, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
>
> Is there a rationale for showing NEWS files, or what they're s'posed
> to contain? I'm not seeing why news files are displayed only, or the
> significance of them, based on the ones I've read.
NEWS.Debian.gz is supposed to contain important u
On 5/14/14, The Wanderer wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On 05/13/2014 01:44 AM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
>
>> I am wondering why, when I do an apt-get dist-upgrade, I get one or
>> two 'changelog' or 'news' type entries out of nearly a gig of
>> updates?
>>
>> I would
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 05/13/2014 01:44 AM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> I am wondering why, when I do an apt-get dist-upgrade, I get one or
> two 'changelog' or 'news' type entries out of nearly a gig of
> updates?
>
> I would expect many many more, or none at all. I do
On 5/6/14, Darac Marjal wrote:
> On Sat, May 03, 2014 at 08:48:38PM +1000, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
>> Despite 800M of sid updates (since my last update), and dozens
>> (probably 100s) of package updates, and I only have TWO, 2 or
>> otherwise known as 1+1, namely (ii) or (II) (that's one less than
On Sat, May 03, 2014 at 08:48:38PM +1000, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> Despite 800M of sid updates (since my last update), and dozens
> (probably 100s) of package updates, and I only have TWO, 2 or
> otherwise known as 1+1, namely (ii) or (II) (that's one less than 3)
> changelog entries to read.
>
>
Despite 800M of sid updates (since my last update), and dozens
(probably 100s) of package updates, and I only have TWO, 2 or
otherwise known as 1+1, namely (ii) or (II) (that's one less than 3)
changelog entries to read.
What am I doing wrong?
BTW: I update off of a local debmirror repo.
TIA
Zen
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 12:16:32PM +0200, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
> Thanks for your replies.
No problem, glad I could help.
> I guess I'll have to submit some reports, for example that the man
> does not says explicitly the order of the arguments. I'll do some
> other tries before t
Le 30.04.2014 00:01, Tom Furie a écrit :
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 05:00:03PM +0100, Tom Furie wrote:
The URI needs to be the last element of the command. You will find
most
of the required files if you mount the iso and pass the mount point
with
--scan, passing the iso file finds 0 files. Usi
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 05:00:03PM +0100, Tom Furie wrote:
> The URI needs to be the last element of the command. You will find most
> of the required files if you mount the iso and pass the mount point with
> --scan, passing the iso file finds 0 files. Using --scan causes jigdo to
> not ask for f
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 04:27:20PM +0200, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I am trying to update some iso images ( I have downloaded ISOs last
> week, but it seems that there were an update since, my images are in
> 7.4 and last debian stable is 7.5 ) through jigdo, and wanted to
Le 29.04.2014 16:27, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org a écrit :
Hello.
I am trying to update some iso images ( I have downloaded ISOs last
week, but it seems that there were an update since, my images are in
7.4 and last debian stable is 7.5 ) through jigdo, and wanted to play
a little with its scr
Hello.
I am trying to update some iso images ( I have downloaded ISOs last
week, but it seems that there were an update since, my images are in 7.4
and last debian stable is 7.5 ) through jigdo, and wanted to play a
little with its scriptable possibilities, since it seems that there is a
--no
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 00:12:43 +0200, Maarten Derickx wrote:
> 2012/4/29 Maarten Derickx
>
>
>> A closer inspection of the logfiles I cared about revealed that there
>> where also related errors. I made a patch with all the changes and
>> posted it at http://pastebin.com/6vALKDYN . What is the pr
2012/4/29 Maarten Derickx
>
> A closer inspection of the logfiles I cared about revealed that there where
> also related errors. I made a patch with all the changes and posted it at
> http://pastebin.com/6vALKDYN . What is the procedure for getting these fixes
> in debian?
>
>
> Thanks,
> Maar
Maarten Derickx wrote:
> A closer inspection of the logfiles I cared about revealed that there
> where also related errors. I made a patch with all the changes and
> posted it at http://pastebin.com/6vALKDYN . What is the procedure for
> getting these fixes in debian?
Report it as a bug. Using 'r
> Look at one of the config files that manages sshd (secure.conf), I think
> there can be a rule pattern definition error there.
>
> Greetings,
>
> --
> Camaleón
Thanks. There where no config files in /etc/ (only a directory
structure). But indeed there was a mistake in the file in
/usr/share/logw
On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 14:39:08 +0200, Maarten Derickx wrote:
(...)
→ About the problem of analyzing from the archive
> The strange thing is that when I do:
>
> logwatch --service sshd --archives
>
> I get only 3 logins 2 from "mderickx" and 1 from "sag
ob to get weekly mails. Now I noticed that not all my
login attemps using sshd where shown in these mails so I tried to start
debugging it.
The strange thing is that when I do:
logwatch --service sshd --archives
I get only 3 logins 2 from "mderickx" and 1 from "sageslave". (s
>
>
> That is true, but oldstable is only archived one year after the relase
> of the current stable. That means you should find lenny sitting just
> beside squeeze on most mirrors. Your sources.list entries from before
> squeeze should still work until February 2012.
>
Ah, great. New learning for
archive.debian.org (archives for oldstables).
That is true, but oldstable is only archived one year after the relase
of the current stable. That means you should find lenny sitting just
beside squeeze on most mirrors. Your sources.list entries from before
squeeze should still work until Februa
This might be a stupid question becuase of my ignorance, in case it is,
please excuse me.
Debian 6.0 Squeeze is stabe and Lenny (last point rel. 5.0.8) is old stable.
As per the posts I have come through so far, says that oldstable are moved
to http://archive.debian.org (archives for oldstables
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 11:33:25 +, Camaleón wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 12:13:36 +0100, Alan Chandler wrote:
>
>> Does anyone know what has happened to the Marc mailing list archives.
>>
>> I go to marc.info (which seems to be what most url's point at) and it
>
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 12:57:26PM +0100, Alan Chandler wrote:
> On 20/07/10 12:26, Paul Cartwright wrote:
> >On Tue July 20 2010, Alan Chandler wrote:
> >>Does anyone know what has happened to the Marc mailing list archives.
> >>
> >>I go to marc.info (which
On 20/07/10 12:26, Paul Cartwright wrote:
On Tue July 20 2010, Alan Chandler wrote:
Does anyone know what has happened to the Marc mailing list archives.
I go to marc.info (which seems to be what most url's point at) and it
appears the domain name is up for sale.
This is Google'
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 12:13:36 +0100, Alan Chandler wrote:
> Does anyone know what has happened to the Marc mailing list archives.
>
> I go to marc.info (which seems to be what most url's point at) and it
> appears the domain name is up for sale.
Ugh :-(
whois marc.info
(...)
L
On Tue July 20 2010, Alan Chandler wrote:
> Does anyone know what has happened to the Marc mailing list archives.
>
> I go to marc.info (which seems to be what most url's point at) and it
> appears the domain name is up for sale.
This is Google's cache of http://marc.info
Does anyone know what has happened to the Marc mailing list archives.
I go to marc.info (which seems to be what most url's point at) and it
appears the domain name is up for sale.
--
Alan Chandler
http://www.chandlerfamily.org.uk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user
Are there other archives to this group for 2009? The link:
http://lists.bofh.it/pipermail/linux-gate/
at:
http://lists.bofh.it/listinfo/linux-gate
only shows [to me at least] 2003,
not what I wanted.
--
CK
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 17:48, Felix Miata wrote:
> On 2009/05/02 09:15 (GMT-0700) David Fox composed:
>
>> Felix Miata wrote:
>
>>> On http://www.dvdboard.de/forum/showthread.php?t=121319 are links to 19 RAR
>>> archives, plus md5, plus a .sfv file that contain
On 2009/05/02 09:15 (GMT-0700) David Fox composed:
> Felix Miata wrote:
>> On http://www.dvdboard.de/forum/showthread.php?t=121319 are links to 19 RAR
>> archives, plus md5, plus a .sfv file that contains a list of the 19 files
>> with what looks like checksums, th
On Sat, May 02, 2009 at 09:18:16AM -0700, Kelly Clowers wrote:
> On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 08:58, Felix Miata wrote:
> > On http://www.dvdboard.de/forum/showthread.php?t=121319 are links to 19 RAR
> > archives, plus md5, plus a .sfv file that contains a list of the 19 files
> >
unrar e *part1.rar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 08:58, Felix Miata wrote:
> On http://www.dvdboard.de/forum/showthread.php?t=121319 are links to 19 RAR
> archives, plus md5, plus a .sfv file that contains a list of the 19 files
> with what looks like checksums, that I downloaded. I am instructed there
> on
On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 8:58 AM, Felix Miata wrote:
> On http://www.dvdboard.de/forum/showthread.php?t=121319 are links to 19 RAR
> archives, plus md5, plus a .sfv file that contains a list of the 19 files
> with what looks like checksums, that I downloaded. I am instructed there
Running
On http://www.dvdboard.de/forum/showthread.php?t=121319 are links to 19 RAR
archives, plus md5, plus a .sfv file that contains a list of the 19 files
with what looks like checksums, that I downloaded. I am instructed there
only in German, which I do not read nor speak, to use Windoz to reconstruct
jeremy bentham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> I can only plead that as a recent emigre from slackware land, I
> became dazzled by Debian's slick package-management system and
> began to expect it to read my mind.
Have you looked at Zenwalk? It's a SW downstream, and its netpkg
rivals apt for dazzle
On Nov 19 s. keeling wrote:
> jeremy bentham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Please, no {advice, orders} to upgrade to etch. Consider this a
> > question about aptitude/sources.list/archives.
That does look kind of trollish. Sorry. Post in haste, repent
at leisure.
> Fin
On Nov 19 you wrote:
> On Mon,17.Nov.08, 19:32:42, jeremy bentham wrote:
> > > > My sources.list
> > > > deb http://archive.debian.org/debian-archive/ sarge main contrib
> > > > non-free
> > > > per the README at the archive site.
> > > That README is wrong, since there is no debian-archive d
On Mon,17.Nov.08, 19:32:42, jeremy bentham wrote:
> > > My sources.list
>
> > > deb http://archive.debian.org/debian-archive/ sarge main contrib non-free
>
> > > per the README at the archive site.
>
> > That README is wrong, since there is no debian-archive directory on
> > archive.debian.org,
jeremy bentham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Please, no {advice, orders} to upgrade to etch. Consider this a
> question about aptitude/sources.list/archives.
Fine. Why would you expect Sarge to work anymore? Just curious.
--
Any technology distinguishable from magic is insuffic
On Nov 18 you wrote:
> On 2008-11-17 23:44 +0100, jeremy bentham wrote:
> > I can't use aptitude anymore.
> > It was working, pre-sarge-archive.
> > Typing aptitude on the command line gives me this:
> > W: Couldn't stat source package list http://archive.debian.org sarge/main
> > Packages (/v
On 2008-11-17 23:44 +0100, jeremy bentham wrote:
> I can't use aptitude anymore.
>
> It was working, pre-sarge-archive.
>
> Typing aptitude on the command line gives me this:
>
> W: Couldn't stat source package list http://archive.debian.org sarge/main
> Packages (/var/lib/apt/lists/archive.debian
der this a
question about aptitude/sources.list/archives.
--
Dave Williams
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2008-07-05 07:49 +0200, gary turner wrote:
(Reading database ... 85648 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking ia32-libs-gtk (from .../ia32-libs-gtk_2.5_amd64.deb) ...
dpkg: error
processing /var/cache/apt/archives/ia32-libs-gtk_2.5_amd64.deb
(--unpack
On 2008-07-05 07:49 +0200, gary turner wrote:
> (Reading database ... 85648 files and directories currently installed.)
> Unpacking ia32-libs-gtk (from .../ia32-libs-gtk_2.5_amd64.deb) ...
> dpkg: error
> processing /var/cache/apt/archives/ia32-libs-gtk_2.5_amd64.deb
> (--unpack
libs-gtk
0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 52 not upgraded.
12 not fully installed or removed.
Need to get 12.2MB of archives.
After this operation, 30.3MB of additional disk space will be used.
Do you want to continue [Y/n]?
Get:1 ftp://ftp.us.debian.org lenny/main ia32-libs-gtk 2
On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 12:11:06AM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> Has anyone seen this issue before (*). I am running a linux debian
> stable (etch).
>
> Thanks
> left on device
> dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe)
> Running postrm hook script /sbin/updat
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 12:41 AM, Mike Bird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue April 8 2008 15:37:25 Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> > What I am reading wrong:
> >
> > $ df
> > Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
> > /dev/mapper/Debian-root
> >
Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 12:32 AM, Damon L. Chesser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Mike Bird wrote:
On Tue April 8 2008 15:11:06 Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
Has anyone seen this issue before (*). I am running a linux debian
stable (etch).
Yes. Wo
On Tue April 8 2008 15:37:25 Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> What I am reading wrong:
>
> $ df
> Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
> /dev/mapper/Debian-root
> 264854255254 0 100% /
>
> everything looks fine, right ?
Damon is right. Y
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 12:32 AM, Damon L. Chesser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mike Bird wrote:
>
> > On Tue April 8 2008 15:11:06 Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> >
> >
> > > Has anyone seen this issue before (*). I am running a linux debian
> > > stable (etch).
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Yes. Wou were lucky
Mike Bird wrote:
On Tue April 8 2008 15:11:06 Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
Has anyone seen this issue before (*). I am running a linux debian
stable (etch).
Yes. Wou were lucky. Sometimes when /boot is full it silently
corrupts the initramfs without any error message. You probably
nee
On Tue April 8 2008 15:11:06 Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> Has anyone seen this issue before (*). I am running a linux debian
> stable (etch).
Yes. Wou were lucky. Sometimes when /boot is full it silently
corrupts the initramfs without any error message. You probably
need to make room in /boot,
-2.6.18-5-486_2.6.18.dfsg.1-13etch6_i386.deb)
...
The directory /lib/modules/2.6.18-5-486 still exists. Continuing as directed.
Done.
Unpacking replacement linux-image-2.6.18-5-486 ...
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/linux-image-2.6.18-5-486_2.6.18.dfsg.1-13etch6_i386.deb
(--unpack
-13etch6_i386.deb)
...
The directory /lib/modules/2.6.18-5-486 still exists. Continuing as directed.
Done.
Unpacking replacement linux-image-2.6.18-5-486 ...
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/linux-image-2.6.18-5-486_2.6.18.dfsg.1-13etch6_i386.deb
(--unpack):
failed in buffer_write(fd
On Monday 18 February 2008 10:43:46 am Russell L. Harris wrote:
> Is there an archiving utility or other reasonably simple approach
> whereby I can process these mail files to (1) considate them into a
> single file or archive and (2) eliminate duplicate messages?
KMail can do both, albeit slowly,
1 - 100 of 453 matches
Mail list logo
