On Fri, Jun 06, 2025 at 07:23:57 +0200, Mgr. Janusz Chmiel wrote:
> Dear developers and users,
> Please, is it still possible to add The I386 architecture by typing as Root
> dpkg --add-architecture I386
> while working with debian-12.11.0?
The architecture's name is "i386" with a lowercase "i".
On Fri, Jun 06, 2025 at 07:23:57AM +0200, Mgr. Janusz Chmiel wrote:
> Dear developers and users,
> Please, is it still possible to add The I386 architecture by typing as Root
> dpkg --add-architecture I386 while working with debian-12.11.0?
> Unfortunately, I have chosen on Debian rep
Dear developers and users,
Please, is it still possible to add The I386 architecture by typing as Root
dpkg --add-architecture I386
while working with debian-12.11.0?
Unfortunately, I have chosen on Debian repository from our country Czech
Republic and I have got warning from apt that this
"Tim Woodall" writes:
> Don't know about systemd-nspawn but I do something like this using
> unshare, binfmt-support and qemu-user-static.
>
> I don't have to do anything at all other than create the file system
> with the emulated architecture and then c
On Wed, 21 Aug 2024, Steve Keller wrote:
Can I run a container for a different CPU architecture using
systemd-nspawn? I can easily install on my amd64 host a Debian
container of the same architecture and run that:
Don't know about systemd-nspawn but I do something like this using
un
"Markus Schönhaber" writes:
> No. systemd-nspawn does indeed simply run a container. You can think of
> that as a chroot on steroids. This means, everything inside the
> container is run using the host kernel. Or to put it the other way
> round: what the host kernel can't execute won't run.
Actua
21.08.24, 16:56 +0200, Steve Keller:
> Can I run a container for a different CPU architecture using
> systemd-nspawn?
No. systemd-nspawn does indeed simply run a container. You can think of
that as a chroot on steroids. This means, everything inside the
container is run using the host kern
Can I run a container for a different CPU architecture using
systemd-nspawn? I can easily install on my amd64 host a Debian
container of the same architecture and run that:
# debootstrap stable deb12-amd64
# systemd-nspawn -D deb12-amd64
and get a shell running in that container. I can
just a comment about this procedure
i shopped around the interweb before jumping in to this
apt purge `dpkg --get-selections |grep :i386 |awk '{print $1}'`
dpkg --remove-architecture i386
this what i settled on
but apt wanted to remove a passel of non-i386 packages that i really
On Mon, 15 Apr 2024, Felix Miata wrote:
> fxkl47BF composed on 2024-04-15 18:23 (UTC):
>
>> i run bullseye amd64
>> i had i386 as a foreign architecture and removed it with no problems
>> i noticed the message
>> warning: while removing libsane1:i386, directory
&g
> In any case, I wouldn't recommend using precompiled code from
> a for-profit company: if they don't distribute the source code, it
> clearly means they're not proud of their code and have something
> to hide.
And of course, the same applies for a non-for-profit company, tho
somehow it seems that
>> ...printer manufacturer(s) only provided Linux drivers for 32bit.
>> The one I'm using that does or did so is Brother. I haven't checked
>> lately to see if it has changed its policy.
> I just got a Brother printer two days ago and everything they provide
> is 32-bit.
In any case, I wouldn't re
- Original Message -
From: "Felix Miata"
> ...printer manufacturer(s) only provided Linux
> drivers for 32bit. The one I'm using that does or did so is Brother. I haven't
> checked lately to see if it has changed its policy.
I just got a Brother printer two days ago and everything they p
fxkl47BF composed on 2024-04-15 18:23 (UTC):
> i run bullseye amd64
> i had i386 as a foreign architecture and removed it with no problems
> i noticed the message
> warning: while removing libsane1:i386, directory
> '/usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/sane' not empty so not remo
i run bullseye amd64
i had i386 as a foreign architecture and removed it with no problems
i noticed the message
warning: while removing libsane1:i386, directory '/usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/sane'
not empty so not removed
/usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/ has
libsane.la libsane.so libsane.so.1
Am 06.11.2023 um 13:51:47 Uhr schrieb జిందం వాఐి:
> > (please tell us the OS
> > you are using).
> * debian bookworm
>
> * not interested with backports
> [ 7.5.6 ] or stable [ 7.4.7 ]
Then you don't need to care about sid, unstable nor experimental, only
about stable/bookworm.
(please tell us the OS
you are using).
* debian bookworm
* not interested with backports
[ 7.5.6 ] or stable [ 7.4.7 ]
--
regards,
జిందం వాఐి [ jindam, vani ]
[matrix]_ @jindam.vani:oikei.net
Am 06.11.2023 um 06:42:41 Uhr schrieb జిందం వాఐి:
> * example_ libreoffice-writer 7.6.3~rc1-2
> is not available for architectures_
> armhf, mips64el, s390x [ 1 ]
> * how to find if libreoffice-writer 7.6.3
> is available for above missing
> architectures
>
> [ 1 ] https://packages.debian.org/exp
* example_ libreoffice-writer 7.6.3~rc1-2
is not available for architectures_
armhf, mips64el, s390x [ 1 ]
* how to find if libreoffice-writer 7.6.3
is available for above missing
architectures
[ 1 ] https://packages.debian.org/experimental/libreoffice-writer
--
regards,
జిందం వాఐి [ jindam, van
On 2023-06-12 06:32 +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 11, 2023 at 09:27:11PM -0400, pa...@quillandmouse.com wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> Nice try. However, this isn't allowed, as it would apparently remove
>> libcrypt1:i386, which is apparently a "system-critical" package. I'm
>> not sure how
On Mon, 12 Jun 2023 06:32:27 +0200
wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 11, 2023 at 09:27:11PM -0400, pa...@quillandmouse.com
> wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > Nice try. However, this isn't allowed, as it would apparently remove
> > libcrypt1:i386, which is apparently a "system-critical" package. I'm
> > not sure how t
On Sun, Jun 11, 2023 at 09:27:11PM -0400, pa...@quillandmouse.com wrote:
[...]
> Nice try. However, this isn't allowed, as it would apparently remove
> libcrypt1:i386, which is apparently a "system-critical" package. I'm
> not sure how this could be system critical, since my original
> installati
On Sun, 11 Jun 2023 00:13:39 -0400
Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 10, 2023 at 10:27 PM wrote:
> >
> > Folks:
> >
> > In order to install steam from the Debian repo, I followed the
> > directions to:
> >
> > dpkg --add-architecture i386
>
On Sat, Jun 10, 2023 at 10:27 PM wrote:
>
> Folks:
>
> In order to install steam from the Debian repo, I followed the
> directions to:
>
> dpkg --add-architecture i386
>
> prior to the installation. Turns out steam wouldn't run my game, so I
> uninst
Folks:
In order to install steam from the Debian repo, I followed the
directions to:
dpkg --add-architecture i386
prior to the installation. Turns out steam wouldn't run my game, so I
uninstalled it. Now I don't need the i386 architecture, so I dutifully
did:
dpkg --remove-architectu
ed in SH-4 architecture
and assembly language. The short of it is, python-greenlet needs a
switch_sh4_linux.h placed in [3].
Is anyone available to help with the bug at [1]?
(The SH-4 software manual is available at [4]. I can help with the
Chroot setup for testing. I have it documented at [5]).
On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 11:27:09PM +0300, ellanios82 wrote:
> On 5/11/21 10:39 PM, Liam O'Toole wrote:
> >On Tue, 11 May, 2021 at 14:30:06 +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> >>As I said, I'm just a lowly user.
> >On the contrary, you are an extremely helpful, courteous and entertaining
> >user. :-)
On 5/11/21 10:39 PM, Liam O'Toole wrote:
On Tue, 11 May, 2021 at 14:30:06 +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
As I said, I'm just a lowly user.
On the contrary, you are an extremely helpful, courteous and entertaining user.
:-)
+1
thank you tomas
.
On Tue, 11 May, 2021 at 14:30:06 +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> As I said, I'm just a lowly user.
On the contrary, you are an extremely helpful, courteous and entertaining user.
:-)
nefit of others who
might have similar questions).
> It is a realy new architecture, I want to know the submission
> process and documents.I know RISC-V has done it ,but I do not know
> how to begain and what can referance.
As I said, I'm just a lowly user. I don't think t
On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 11:28:13AM +0800, zhangjialing wrote:
> We have a new architecture , We have compiled a lot of packages
> . Now the system can work normally .
This sounds exciting :-)
> We want to submit to debian like RISC-V. Please What documents
> (or others) can
We have a new architecture , We have compiled a lot of packages .
Now the system can work normally .
We want to submit to debian like RISC-V. Please What documents (or
others) can we refer to.
Hi.
On Sun, Aug 26, 2018 at 06:24:59PM +0200, Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
> hi,
> get a amd64 deb package (franz, to name it), and converted it to i386,
> using the recommended sequence:
>
>dpkg-deb -x ../paquet_amd64.deb .
>dpkg -e ../paquet_amd64.deb
>in DEBIAN/control, replace
hi,
get a amd64 deb package (franz, to name it), and converted it to i386,
using the recommended sequence:
dpkg-deb -x ../paquet_amd64.deb .
dpkg -e ../paquet_amd64.deb
in DEBIAN/control, replaced amd64 by i386
dpkg-deb -b . ../paquet_i386.deb
but after installing the resulting .de
-b
> > >
> > > But how to rebuild a Debian package for a foreign architecture?
> > > In my case for i386 from an amd64 machine. I've tried
> > >
> > > debuild -i -us -uc -b -a i386
> > >
> > > but the build fails at some point:
that question to someone more knowledgeable.
> >>
> >> I'm much less so, but I've heard people recommending pbuilder for
> >> this (chroot).
> >>
> >> pbuilder --create --architecture i386
> >> pbuilder --build mypackage.dsc
> &
.
>> >
>> >> If I need binutils-i686-linux-gnu, shouldn't dpkg-buildpackage fail
>> >> when checking the build dependencies?
>> >
>> > I'll leave that question to someone more knowledgeable.
>>
>> I'm much less so, but I&#x
dn't dpkg-buildpackage fail
> >> when checking the build dependencies?
> >
> > I'll leave that question to someone more knowledgeable.
>
> I'm much less so, but I've heard people recommending pbuilder for
> this (chroot).
>
> pbuilder --cre
On 2018-01-25 15:30:02 +0100, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 02:56:17PM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > To rebuild a Debian package, one can use:
> >
> > debuild -i -us -uc -b
> >
> > But how to rebuild a Debian package for a foreign arch
encies?
>
> I'll leave that question to someone more knowledgeable.
I'm much less so, but I've heard people recommending pbuilder for this (chroot).
pbuilder --create --architecture i386
pbuilder --build mypackage.dsc
etc...
> Cheers
> - -- tomás
>
>
--
“
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 02:56:17PM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> To rebuild a Debian package, one can use:
>
> debuild -i -us -uc -b
>
> But how to rebuild a Debian package for a foreign architecture?
> In my case for i386 fro
To rebuild a Debian package, one can use:
debuild -i -us -uc -b
But how to rebuild a Debian package for a foreign architecture?
In my case for i386 from an amd64 machine. I've tried
debuild -i -us -uc -b -a i386
but the build fails at some point:
[...]
dh_strip -a
dh_strip: Compatib
boudic...@skimble.plus.com wrote:
>Ansgar Burchardt <"Ansgar Burchardt"@43-1.org> writes:
>>
>> Do you still have any i386 packages installed? I think running
>>
>> dpkg -l "*:i386"
>>
>> should list them (I don't use mu
Sharon Kimble writes:
> I am running a "amd64" version of jessie and in an effort to get
> 'crossover_14.1.11-1.deb' installed, which is 32-bit. To do this I issued the
> command -
>
> ╭────
> │sudo dpkg --add-architecture i386
> ╰
>
&g
Ansgar Burchardt <"Ansgar Burchardt"@43-1.org> writes:
> Sharon Kimble writes:
>> ╭────
>> │sudo dpkg --remove-architecture i386
>> ╰
>>
>> which failed saying -
>>
>> dpkg: error: cannot remove architecture 'i386'
On 01/12/15 08:47, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
Do you still have any i386 packages installed? I think running
dpkg -l "*:i386"
should list them (I don't use multiarch myself, but it works for the
native architecture and "*:all").
I can confirm on my multiarch sy
Sharon Kimble writes:
> ╭
> │sudo dpkg --remove-architecture i386
> ╰
>
> which failed saying -
>
> dpkg: error: cannot remove architecture 'i386' currently in use by the
> database
>
> How then can I remove 'i386' please, or should I
I am running a "amd64" version of jessie and in an effort to get
'crossover_14.1.11-1.deb' installed, which is 32-bit. To do this I issued the
command -
╭────
│sudo dpkg --add-architecture i386
╰
and then -
╭
│dpkg --print-foreign-architectures
╰
then I did a
On Fri, 17 Apr 2015, sppmg wrote:
> I think it is a bug of design.
This is actually not a design bug, but a bug in certain packages which
are not Multi-Arch: foreign which should be.
File the bug against the appropriate package with severity normal.
--
Don Armstrong http://
" to write
down here.
===
Subject: Unmet dependencies on architecture-independent package
Package: apt
Version: 1.0.9.7
In the Debian AMD64 ，If you install ":i386" package , it will not install "all"
package (architecture-independent package) ,
and try to remove this "break
matic set it. ( Maybe in
/etc/alternatives/xinput-zh_TW )
2015-04-10 0:57 GMT+08:00 spp mg :
> Thanks your reply.
>
> I know "architecture-independent means this package contains only files
> which are readable on any arch."
>
> But apt disallow install.
>
> $ apt-cache de
Thanks your reply.
I know "architecture-independent means this package contains only files
which are readable on any arch."
But apt disallow install.
$ apt-cache depends hime:i386
hime:i386
Depends: libc6:i386
Depends: libcairo2:i386
Depends: libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0:i386
Depends:
ll depend "hime-data:i386". But hime-data is architecture
> independent package, there is no ":i386" .
> How can i solve this ?
According to packages.debian.org, hime-qt4-immodule (0.9.10-5) depends
on hime (>= 0.9.10.5), which depends on hime-data.
Note that neither o
* sppmg [2015-04-09 19:57 +0800]:
> Hi all
> I want type Chinese in skype in Debian (testing) amd64, so I need this
> package :
>
> "hime"
> (skype need "hime-qt4-immodule:i386" , I google to get this .)
>
> It's will depend "hime-data:i
Hi all
I want type Chinese in skype in Debian (testing) amd64, so I need this
package :
"hime"
(skype need "hime-qt4-immodule:i386" , I google to get this .)
It's will depend "hime-data:i386". But hime-data is architecture
independent package, there i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 21/02/15 06:49, Michael P. Soulier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Reading
> https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-controlfields.html, it
> says that an architecture of "all" specifies a platform
> independent package, of whi
Hi,
Reading https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-controlfields.html,
it says that an architecture of "all" specifies a platform independent
package, of which I have one. But, if I put that into my apt
conf/distributions, I get complaints.
Error: Distribution wheezy c
really understood
> > why ...
> >
> > http://forum.doozan.com/read.php?2,12096,12096
> >
> > Now, I'm still not sure about the difference between flattened and
> > non-flattened trees, and what they're relative advantages and
> > disadvantages
Hi.
On Sun, 10 Aug 2014 14:25:35 -0400
Jerry Stuckle wrote:
> I don't think the x86 architecture provides ANY hardware enumeration.
> The processor couldn't care less. It's all about ports and interrupts.
Yup. CPU is the ignorant one. Now, BIOS (or UEFI), on the othe
ood
> why ...
>
> http://forum.doozan.com/read.php?2,12096,12096
>
> Now, I'm still not sure about the difference between flattened and
> non-flattened trees, and what they're relative advantages and
> disadvantages are ...
>
One of the reasons for the complic
On 8/10/2014 2:39 AM, Reco wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Sun, 10 Aug 2014 04:40:05 +0300
> Martin T wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> according to wiki, Debian is supported on little-endian ARM
>> architecture. However, then wiki lists some sub-architectures which
>&
On Sun, 10 Aug 2014 18:22:41 +0400
Reco wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Sun, 10 Aug 2014 17:09:58 +0300
> Martin T wrote:
>
> > Reco,
> >
> > thanks for this explanation! Could you please explain this hardware
> > enumeration provided by x86/x86-64 CPU's to kernel bit more? What kind
> > of information
Hi.
On Sun, 10 Aug 2014 17:09:58 +0300
Martin T wrote:
> Reco,
>
> thanks for this explanation! Could you please explain this hardware
> enumeration provided by x86/x86-64 CPU's to kernel bit more? What kind
> of information is provided to kernel in case of x86/x86-64 CPU?
Sure:
1) Obtain an
gt; On Sun, 10 Aug 2014 04:40:05 +0300
> Martin T wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> according to wiki, Debian is supported on little-endian ARM
>> architecture. However, then wiki lists some sub-architectures which
>> are supported. For example iop32x, ixp4xx, kirkwood and ori
Hi.
On Sun, 10 Aug 2014 04:40:05 +0300
Martin T wrote:
> Hi,
>
> according to wiki, Debian is supported on little-endian ARM
> architecture. However, then wiki lists some sub-architectures which
> are supported. For example iop32x, ixp4xx, kirkwood and orion5x. Does
> thi
On 8/9/2014 9:40 PM, Martin T wrote:
> Hi,
>
> according to wiki, Debian is supported on little-endian ARM
> architecture. However, then wiki lists some sub-architectures which
> are supported. For example iop32x, ixp4xx, kirkwood and orion5x. Does
> this mean that Debian ARM po
Hi,
according to wiki, Debian is supported on little-endian ARM
architecture. However, then wiki lists some sub-architectures which
are supported. For example iop32x, ixp4xx, kirkwood and orion5x. Does
this mean that Debian ARM port works on fairly limited number of
sub-architectures? For example
Malte Forkel writes:
> Is there any support for pinning by architecture?
If you're speaking about libraries, you can write something like this:
Package: libgl1-mesa-glx
Pin: release n=wheezy
Pin-priority: 500
Package: libgl1-mesa-dri
Pin: release n=wheezy
Pin-
7;s there !
>
May be I should have tried to explain why I'm asking. I'm experimenting
with multiarch in wheezy and jessie. It seems to me, that e.g. for a
cross-compiling environment it might be desirable to install packages
for the target architecture not from the Debian archives but
Hi,
Is there any support for pinning by architecture? I've only found bug
report #687255 [1].
Thanks,
Malte
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=687255
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". T
On Jo, 18 oct 12, 09:46:19, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
>
> What I really need is a pointer towards a really basic discussion of
> Synaptic an apt.
Debian Reference, also available as package debian-reference.
Kind regards,
Andrei
--
Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers:
http://l
Hi Stephen,
I had the same problem a few month ago. Finally, after look for a lot
of webs, the problem was in our firewall (fortinet). I think you
should look the internet connectivity in your firewall for this
machine. Are you change the server on another place?
Regards,
David
2012/10/18 Stephe
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 09:46:19AM -0400, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
> Debian 6.0.5 (64 bit)/KDE 4.4.5
>
> I have just migrated to Debian and would like to implement Multiarch.
> According to the Debian Wiki it is present in dkpg since 1.16.2.
> However, the version in my installation is 1.15.8.3.
Debian 6.0.5 (64 bit)/KDE 4.4.5
I have just migrated to Debian and would like to implement Multiarch.
According to the Debian Wiki it is present in dkpg since 1.16.2.
However, the version in my installation is 1.15.8.3.
When I try to update the Synaptic Package Manager I get some error
messages t
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 8:21 PM, Brad Rogers wrote:
>
> On Sat, 14 Jul 2012 19:59:56 +0530
> L V Gandhi wrote:
>
> Hello L,
>
> >Thank You!
>
> YW.
>
> >Can amd64 squeeze Grub in MBR boot i386 and win XP?
>
> Yes. You may need to add the package 'os-prober' to make sure all
> installed OS are f
On Sat, 14 Jul 2012 19:59:56 +0530
L V Gandhi wrote:
Hello L,
>Thank You!
YW.
>Can amd64 squeeze Grub in MBR boot i386 and win XP?
Yes. You may need to add the package 'os-prober' to make sure all
installed OS are found.
--
Regards _
/ ) "The blindingly obvious is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 14.07.2012 15:45, L V Gandhi wrote:
> My processor is Intel core 2 duo. Why amd64? Can You explain?
Amd64 is just how the architecture is called. It doesn't matter if you
have AMD or Intel processor.
For more information, see [W
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 6:29 PM, Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Jul 2012 18:15:09 +0530
> L V Gandhi wrote:
>
> Hello L,
>
> >My processor is Intel core 2 duo. Why amd64? Can You explain?
>
> That's what Debian use to describe the x86_64 architecture. i
On Sat, 14 Jul 2012 18:15:09 +0530
L V Gandhi wrote:
Hello L,
>My processor is Intel core 2 duo. Why amd64? Can You explain?
That's what Debian use to describe the x86_64 architecture. ia_64 is
for Itanium processors. Unless I've missed something, your processor
isn't from
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 6:09 PM, Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Jul 2012 17:54:34 +0530
> L V Gandhi wrote:
>
> Hello L,
>
> >Can I install ia64 version as triple booting and boot with grub of ia64
> >version in MBR?
>
> For your processor, you want AMD64, not ia64.
>
> --
> Regards _
>
On Sat, 14 Jul 2012 17:54:34 +0530
L V Gandhi wrote:
Hello L,
>Can I install ia64 version as triple booting and boot with grub of ia64
>version in MBR?
For your processor, you want AMD64, not ia64.
--
Regards _
/ ) "The blindingly obvious is
/ _)radnever i
I have a PC with core2 duo E4500 processor which shows by Intel processor
identification utility as 64 bit architecture. I have Windows XP and Debian
squeeze 32 bit installed with dual boot started by Debian grub.
Can I install ia64 version as triple booting and boot with grub of ia64
version in
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 3:36 AM, Marc Ronell wrote:
>
>
>>>>>> "Jason" == Jason Filippou writes:
>
> Jason> Hello all, I have just completed a fresh installation of
> Jason> debian wheezy, architecture amd64, with KDE included and
> J
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 23:06:01 +0300, Jason Filippou wrote:
> I have just completed a fresh installation of debian wheezy,
> architecture amd64, with KDE included and I've been experiencing
> frequent freezes of the OS. At seemingly random intervals, all my apps
> seem to
Le 24/06/2011 11:13, Andrei POPESCU a écrit :
On Vi, 24 iun 11, 10:12:45, Nacer Adamou Saidou wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to install ubuntu client with pxe + preseed via
apt-cacher-ng apt proxy. But I always have this "Architecture not
supported" error message, stating that "
The s
On Vi, 24 iun 11, 10:12:45, Nacer Adamou Saidou wrote:
> Hi,
> I am trying to install ubuntu client with pxe + preseed via
> apt-cacher-ng apt proxy. But I always have this "Architecture not
> supported" error message, stating that "
> The specified Ubuntu archive m
Hi,
I am trying to install ubuntu client with pxe + preseed via
apt-cacher-ng apt proxy. But I always have this "Architecture not
supported" error message, stating that "
The specified Ubuntu archive mirror does not seem to support your
architecture. Please try a differ
Hello all,
I have just completed a fresh installation of debian wheezy,
architecture amd64, with KDE included and I've been experiencing
frequent freezes of the OS. At seemingly random intervals, all my apps
seem to stop, and the key combinations to kill the X server or reboot
the system
On Sunday 01 August 2010 18:07:44 Jordon Bedwell wrote:
> [SNIP all the childish explanations like I don't know how to work Linux]
Some people don't. For them it might be helpful to have the whole
explanation. Also many people come across the archives at an early stage in
their acquaintance wi
Jordon Bedwell wrote:
> On 8/1/2010 1:23 PM, Joey Hess wrote:
> >Jordon Bedwell wrote:
> >>On 8/1/2010 10:19 AM, Camaleón wrote:
> >>>dpkg-query -W -f='${Package}\t${Architecture}\n'
> >>
> >>You are awesome man, this is exactly what I was
On 8/1/2010 1:23 PM, Joey Hess wrote:
Jordon Bedwell wrote:
On 8/1/2010 10:19 AM, Camaleón wrote:
dpkg-query -W -f='${Package}\t${Architecture}\n'
You are awesome man, this is exactly what I was looking for. Thanks :D
Except the architecture will be "amd64" or &qu
Jordon Bedwell wrote:
> On 8/1/2010 10:19 AM, Camaleón wrote:
> >dpkg-query -W -f='${Package}\t${Architecture}\n'
>
> You are awesome man, this is exactly what I was looking for. Thanks :D
Except the architecture will be "amd64" or "all" for every
On 8/1/2010 10:19 AM, Camaleón wrote:
dpkg-query -W -f='${Package}\t${Architecture}\n'
You are awesome man, this is exactly what I was looking for. Thanks :D
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trou
ns so
does anybody remember how to search for packages by architecture?
Try uninstalling libc6-i386, it will probably pull any 32bit libraries
with it.
Regards,
Andrei
This worked for most of them, thanks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subje
On 8/1/2010 11:45 AM, Bob Proulx wrote:
Debian isn't like CentOS and isn't a "dual" architecture system in the
same way. Instead it is more of a single architecture system but with
the added capability that if the kernel supports it additional
libraries can be in
Jordon Bedwell wrote:
> I can't for the life of me remember how to do it outside of CentOS, but
> we want to remove 32bit libs and simply leave a plain 64bit system,
Debian isn't like CentOS and isn't a "dual" architecture system in the
same way. Instead it i
how to search for packages by architecture?
Try uninstalling libc6-i386, it will probably pull any 32bit libraries
with it.
Regards,
Andrei
--
Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
; remember how to search for packages by architecture?
Remember that "ia32-libs" is a 64 bits compiled package, just provides
the required 32-bit libraries for 32 bits programs.
Well, how about...?
***
dpkg-query -W -f='${Package}\t${Architecture}\n' > /$HOME/Des
I can't for the life of me remember how to do it outside of CentOS, but
we want to remove 32bit libs and simply leave a plain 64bit system, yes
I removed ia32-libs but there are still some remains so does anybody
remember how to search for packages by architecture?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On Vi, 11 iun 10, 11:09:18, Aaron Toponce wrote:
> Other than the kernel, which is compiled for 686 instruction sets, and
> maybe a few core packages that would benefit from targeting the 686
> architecture, Debian compiles the rest of the packages against 386.
AFAIR support for 386 wa
1 - 100 of 185 matches
Mail list logo
