Daniel Burrows wrote:
I don't know what the timeline is on that; AFAIK there aren't any 2.6.28
packages anywhere in the archive. In fact,
moe:/tmp/kde-cajun# aptitude install linux-headers-2.6.28-1-all-amd64
linux-headers-2.6.28-1-all-amd64 doesn't seem to exist at all in
Debian. Maybe y
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 06:35:56PM -0600, "M. Lewis" was
heard to say:
>
> How can I resolve this dependency?
>
> Aptitude has given up resolving the dependencies. It appears that
> linux-kbuild-2-6-28 is not available yet:
>
> moe:/tmp/kde-cajun# apt-cache search linux-kbuild
> linux-kbuild-2.
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 16:35, M. Lewis wrote:
>
> How can I resolve this dependency?
>
> Aptitude has given up resolving the dependencies. It appears that
> linux-kbuild-2-6-28 is not available yet:
>
> moe:/tmp/kde-cajun# apt-cache search linux-kbuild
> linux-kbuild-2.6.26 - Kbuild infrastructur
How can I resolve this dependency?
Aptitude has given up resolving the dependencies. It appears that
linux-kbuild-2-6-28 is not available yet:
moe:/tmp/kde-cajun# apt-cache search linux-kbuild
linux-kbuild-2.6.26 - Kbuild infrastructure for Linux 2.6.26
So how am I to resolve the dependencie
Hi, Daniel!
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 09:14:10PM -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 03:00:52PM +, Alan Mackenzie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> was heard to say: > On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 08:54:55PM -0700, Daniel Burrows
> wrote:
> > > > In the real world, nobody I know has got any
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 03:00:52PM +, Alan Mackenzie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
was heard to say: > On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 08:54:55PM -0700, Daniel Burrows
wrote:
> > > In the real world, nobody I know has got any sort of GNU/Linux
> > > installed and working in a few days. Most have tried and giv
On Mon, 23 Jun 2008 16:16:00 + (UTC)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Anyhow, I've got my aptitude working again, and I'm profoundly
> grateful for the help you and others gave me. The essential problem
> was having "stable" instead of "sarge" in my sources.list. Sometime
> or other, I will be upg
On Monday 23 June 2008 11:00:52 am Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> Hi, Daniel!
>
> On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 08:54:55PM -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote:
>
> [ ]
>
> > Just to be a little more clear, you can find out exactly what aptitude
> > thinks by examining the status flags on the left-hand side of the
Hi, Daniel!
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 08:54:55PM -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote:
[ ]
> Just to be a little more clear, you can find out exactly what aptitude
> thinks by examining the status flags on the left-hand side of the
> package list. Normally packages have flags like this:
> pi packag
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 02:44:58PM +, Alan Mackenzie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
was heard to say:
> On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 07:57:45PM -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 07:22:24PM +, Alan Mackenzie <[EMAIL
> > PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
>
> > > #Broken: 12 Will fr
Hi, Eduardo!
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 01:40:55PM -0300, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
> Alan Mackenzie escreveu:
> >My /etc/apt/source.list now looks like this:
> >#
> >#deb ftp://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ stable main contrib
>
Alan Mackenzie escreveu:
Hi, again!
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 10:48:02AM +, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
To know what is going on with your system, we would need to see your
/etc/apt/sources.list and /etc/apt/preferences files.
#/etc/apt/sources.list:
###
Hi, again!
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 10:48:02AM +, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> > To know what is going on with your system, we would need to see your
> > /etc/apt/sources.list and /etc/apt/preferences files.
> #/etc/apt/sources.list:
> #
Hi, Daniel!
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 07:57:45PM -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 07:22:24PM +, Alan Mackenzie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> was heard to say:
> > #Broken: 12 Will free 16.7MB of disk space DL Size: 6215kB
> > . Using the aptitude command `find broken', it
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 10:48:02AM +, Alan Mackenzie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
was heard to say:
> On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 08:47:35PM -0500, Mumia W.. wrote:
> > I suspect that your attempt to upgrade python broke your system. If you
> > are not an expert with Debian, it is best to stick with a sin
Hi again,
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 08:47:35PM -0500, Mumia W.. wrote:
> On 06/19/2008 02:22 PM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> >Hi, debian!
> >My system: Debian Sarge, with little alteration other than a kernel
> >upgrade (to 2.6.8).
> >I currently have aptitude 0.2.15.9 compiled at Apr 7 2005 13:32:48
On 06/19/2008 02:22 PM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
Hi, debian!
My system: Debian Sarge, with little alteration other than a kernel
upgrade (to 2.6.8).
I currently have aptitude 0.2.15.9 compiled at Apr 7 2005 13:32:48. I
am having severe problems with it, and have become totally confused.
I start
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 07:22:24PM +, Alan Mackenzie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
was heard to say:
> #Broken: 12 Will free 16.7MB of disk space DL Size: 6215kB
>
> . Using the aptitude command `find broken', it reports, amongst others,
> vim as being broken, giving as further details:
>
> *
Hi, debian!
My system: Debian Sarge, with little alteration other than a kernel
upgrade (to 2.6.8).
I currently have aptitude 0.2.15.9 compiled at Apr 7 2005 13:32:48. I
am having severe problems with it, and have become totally confused.
I start aptitude. This status message appears at the t
19 matches
Mail list logo
