Re: libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 after apt-get upgrade today from unstable included incorrect symlink?

2002-11-13 Thread Greg Madden
On Wednesday 13 November 2002 04:50 pm, Ravenhall wrote: > Package: libstdc++3 > Version: 1:3.0.4-13 > > After running a dist-upgrade today from unstable, several programs > (including apt-cache, apt-get, and mozilla) would give the following > error when attempting to launch them from a console: >

Re: libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 after apt-get upgrade today from unstable included incorrect symlink?

2002-11-13 Thread Colin Watson
On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 07:50:49PM -0600, Ravenhall wrote: > I want this bug report to get to the correct maintainer, so I am mailing > it to the debian-user mailing list as well as the bug submission email. When you do this, please use the X-Debbugs-Cc: header rather than just mailing both submi

libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 after apt-get upgrade today from unstableincluded incorrect symlink?

2002-11-13 Thread Ravenhall
Package: libstdc++3 Version: 1:3.0.4-13 After running a dist-upgrade today from unstable, several programs (including apt-cache, apt-get, and mozilla) would give the following error when attempting to launch them from a console: error while loading shared libraries: libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3: ca

Re: Apt-get UPgrade today

2000-11-17 Thread dude
i removed xmh, because i say it was conflicintg, duting the install' also remved xlibs which took out a whole bunch of packages Do you know where at-getkeeps a log of all its errors or messages? brw, thanks for your help. On Fri, 17 Nov 2000, John Galt wrote: > > xlibs conflicts with the ve

Re: Apt-get UPgrade today

2000-11-17 Thread John Galt
xlibs conflicts with the version you have ATM (at least it did for me last week when I apparently dealt with the problem). dist-upgrade should've solved it (that WAS the whole point of dist-upgrade at one time). If you know the culprit, just plain install it. My usual process for unstable upgra

Re: Apt-get UPgrade today

2000-11-17 Thread dude
still Didnt help install xlibs which seems to be the root of the problem g On Thu, 16 Nov 2000, John Galt wrote: > > do a dist-upgrade and that should bring down the number of "not > installed"... > > On Thu, 16 Nov 2000, dude wrote: > > > > > > > Hello all. > > > > I've Just > > Upgraded to

Re: Apt-get UPgrade today

2000-11-17 Thread dude
thanks ill give it a try g On Thu, 16 Nov 2000, John Galt wrote: > > do a dist-upgrade and that should bring down the number of "not > installed"... > > On Thu, 16 Nov 2000, dude wrote: > > > > > > > Hello all. > > > > I've Just > > Upgraded today and have noted that exactly 41 packages have not

Re: Apt-get UPgrade today

2000-11-17 Thread John Galt
do a dist-upgrade and that should bring down the number of "not installed"... On Thu, 16 Nov 2000, dude wrote: > > > Hello all. > > I've Just > Upgraded today and have noted that exactly 41 packages have not been fully > installed or removed > > The only error is get is: > > /var/cache/apt/

Apt-get UPgrade today

2000-11-16 Thread dude
Hello all. I've Just Upgraded today and have noted that exactly 41 packages have not been fully installed or removed The only error is get is: /var/cache/apt/archives/xlibs_4.0.1-5_386.deb thanks for the help please CC me a copy of your help directly